BETA

7 Amendments of Tomáš ZDECHOVSKÝ related to 2018/0218(COD)

Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘The Future of Food and Farming’ of 29 November 2017 sets out the challenges, objectives and orientations for the future Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) after 2020. These objectives include, inter alia, the need for the CAP to be more result-driven, to boost modernisation and sustainability, including the economic, social, environmental and climate sustainability of the agricultural, forestry and rural areas, to mitigate food waste and promote education on healthy eating habits, and to help reducing the Union legislation- related administrative burden for beneficiaries.
2018/11/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) Since the CAP needs to sharpen its responses to the challenges and opportunities as they manifest themselves at Union, international, national, regional, local and farm levels, it is necessary to streamline the governance of the CAP and improve its delivery on the Union objectives and to significantly decrease the administrative burden. In the CAP based on delivery of performance (‘delivery model’), the Union should set the basic policy parameters, such as objectives of the CAP and basic requirements, while Member States shouldall bear greater responsibility as to how they meet the objectives and achieve targets. Enhanced subsidiarity makes it possible to better take into account local conditions and needs, tailoring the support to maximise the contribution to Union objectives.
2018/11/06
Committee: CONT
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘The Future of Food and Farming’ of 29 November 2017 sets out the challenges, objectives and orientations for the future Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) after 2020. These objectives include, inter alia, the need for the CAP to be more result-driven, to boost modernisation and sustainability, including the economic, social, environmental and climate sustainability of the agricultural, forestry and rural areas (including through an increased focus on agri-forestry), to mitigate food waste and promote education on healthy eating habits, and to help reducing the Union legislation- related administrative burden for beneficiaries.
2018/12/12
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) Since the CAP needs to sharpen its responses to the challenges and opportunities as they manifest themselves at Union, international, national, regional, local and farm levels, it is necessary to streamline the governance of the CAP and improve its delivery on the Union objectives and to significantly decrease the administrative burden. In the CAP based on delivery of performance (‘delivery model’), and bearing in mind as a primary focus the objective of providing a sustainable income for producers, the Union should set the basic policy parameters, such as objectives of the CAP and basic requirements, while Member States should bear greater responsibility as to how they meet the objectives and achieve targets. Enhanced subsidiarity makes it possible to better take into account local conditions and needs, tailoring the support to maximise the contribution to Union objectives.
2018/12/12
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) Rules for classifying wine grape varieties by Member States should be modified to include the wine grape varieties Noah, Othello, Isabelle, Jacquez, Clinton and Herbemont, previously excluded. To ensure that wine production in the Union develops a higher resistance to diseases and that it uses vine varieties better adapted to changing climatic conditions, provision should be made allowing Vitis Labrusca varieties and varieties stemming from crosses between Vitis vinifera, Vitis Labrusca and other species of the genus Vitis to be planted for wine production in the Union. No provision should be made, however, for genetically modified varieties.
2018/12/12
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 61
The scheme of authorisations for vine plantings established in this Chapter shall apply from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2030, with a mid-term review to be undertaken by the Commission(aa) Article 61 is replaced by the following: "‘The Commission shall review the scheme of authorisations for vine plantings established in this Chapter in 2023 to evaluate theits operation of the scheme and, if appropriate, make proposals. (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02013R1308-20180101) for improving its effectiveness.’ " Or. en
2018/12/12
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 621 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 28 a (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 226 a (new)
(28a) The following Article is added: Article 226a Performance framework 1. The Commission shall put in place a framework for reporting on, monitoring and evaluating the performance of the crisis management plan during its implementation. 2. The performance framework shall include the following elements: (a) a common set of context, output, results and impact indicators, on which the monitoring and evaluation and the annual performance report shall be based; (b) targets and annual milestones established for the relevant specific objectives, using result indicators; (c) data collection, storage and transmission; (d) annual performance reports on the crisis management plan for each of the outputs affected during the year; (e) measures of the potential for rationalisation in the overall use of the EAGF; 3. The purpose of the performance framework shall be to: (a) assess the impact, effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence and EU added value of the CAP; (b) report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the use of the prerogatives accorded to the Commission in respect of crisis prevention and management; (c) move away from the current rationale for EAGF spending; (d) foster a countercyclical approach in the guidance of agricultural markets and revenues, whereby the regulator of the agricultural sector, i.e. the Commission, makes optimal use of public funding in response to economic cycles, climate- related incidents and geopolitical tensions.
2018/12/12
Committee: AGRI