6 Amendments of Andor DELI related to 2017/2052(INI)
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the multiannual financial framework (MFF) needs to be agreed quicklyas soon as possible so that decisions can be taken on the future of cohesion policy;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas regional cohesion policy is one of the EU’s core policies, bringing Europe together and, strengthening its economy and helping to make the EU tangible and visible to its citizens through the concrete results it delivers on the ground, and it is therefore key that sufficient funding for cohesion policy is provided for in the MFF, so as to correspond to the challenges which the policy is expected to adequately address;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. States that cohesion policy should remain the EU’s main investment policy, but that more needs to be done to highlight the major role of cohesion policy in achieving the EU’s political objectives and the benefits it brings to citizens; points out that new challenges should not undermine the traditional and long-term objectives of cohesion policy as laid down in the Treaties;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls, therefore, for the MFF to provide for sufficient funds for cohesion policy post-2020, striking a good balance between investments in citizens and investments for citizens and ensuring that the EU’s political goals can be reached keeping in mind the objectives of cohesion policy enshrined in the Treaties; points out that the funding of new challenges cannot be at the expense of traditional EU policies;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that a 5+5 year MFF period might beshould strengthen the long term predictability of EU programmes and should prefserableve the reliability of 7-year programming from the beneficiaries' point of view;
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for the priorities of regional development programmes to be updated in order to take changing conditions into account and to benefit from new technologyreconsidered, but that, traditional priorities deriving from the Treaties should be preserved; also considers that more flexibility is required in the MFF to meet unforeseen challenges;