BETA

Activities of Gilles LEBRETON related to 2020/2012(INL)

Shadow reports (1)

REPORT with recommendations to the Commission on a framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies
2020/10/08
Committee: JURI
Dossiers: 2020/2012(INL)
Documents: PDF(558 KB) DOC(260 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Ibán GARCÍA DEL BLANCO', 'mepid': 197717}]

Legal basis opinions (0)

Amendments (15)

Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas such questions should be addressed through a comprehensive and future-proof legal framework reflecting the Union’s principles and values as enshrined in the Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights that would bring legal certainty to businesses and citizenall citizens and businesses alike;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas each Member State should establish a national supervisory authoritysystem responsible for ensuring, assessing and monitoring compliance, and for enabling discussion and exchange of points of view in close cooperation with the concerned stakeholders and the civil society;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
L. whereas Parliament continues to call for the establishment of a European Agency to ensure a harmonised approach across the Union and address the new opportunities and challenges, in particular those of a cross-border nature, arising from ongoing technological developments.deleted
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Affirms that possible bias in and discrimination by software, algorithms and data should be addressed by setting rules for the processes through which they are designed and used, as this approach would have the potential to turn software, algorithms and data into a considerable counterbalance to bias and discrimination, and a positive force for social change;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Emphasises that socially responsible artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies should safeguard and promote fundamental values of our society such as democracy, freedom of expression and political pluralism, diverse and independent media and objective and freely available information, health and economic prosperity, equality of opportunity, workers’ and social rights, quality education, cultural and linguistic diversity, gender balance, digital literacy, innovation and creativity;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Notes the added value of having national supervisory authoritiesystems in each Member State responsible for ensuring, assessing and monitoring compliance with ethical principles for the development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Indicates that such authoritienational supervisory systems should liaise not only among themselves but also with the European Commission and other relevant institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union in order to guarantee coherent cross-border action;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls for such authoritienational supervisory systems to be tasked with promoting regular exchanges with civil society and innovation within the Union by providing assistance to concerned stakeholders, in particular small and medium-sized enterprises or start-ups;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Recalls that Parliament’s resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics asked the Commission to consider the designation of a European Agency for Artificial Intelligence;deleted
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Calls on the Commission to follow- up on that request, especially in view of the added-value of having a body at Union level coordinating the mandates and actions of each national supervisory authority as referred to in the previous sub-section;deleted
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Believes that such a body, as well as the certification referred to in the following paragraph, would not only benefit the development of Union industry and innovation in that context but also increase the awareness of our citizens regarding the opportunities and risks inherent to these technologies;deleted
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Suggests that the European Agency for Artificial Intelligence develops common criteriae creation of a European certificate of compliance and an application process relating to the granting of a European certificate of ethical compliance following a request by any developer, deployer or user seeking to certify the positive assessment of compliance carried out by the respective national supervisory authoritysystem;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Points out the added-value of a European Agency as referred to above in this context as well.deleted
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 262 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Concludes, following the above reflections on aspects related to the ethical dimension of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, that the ethical dimension should be framed as a series of principles resulting in a legal framework at Union level supervised by national competent authoritiesystems, coordinated and enhanced by a European Agency for Artificial Intelligenceby the European Commission and duly respected and certified within the internal market;
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI
Amendment 272 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Considers that the requested proposal would have financial implications if a new European Agency for Artificial Intelligence is set up;deleted
2020/05/29
Committee: JURI