[ParlTrack]

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5

(5) Greater convergence of control measures between Member States should be encouraged ~~and the Commission should examine in this respect the need for developing common standards for automatic checking equipment for road safety controls~~.

2014/11/10
Committee: TRAN

Marie-Christine ARNAUTU

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7

(7) In order to improve road safety throughout the Union and to ensure equal treatment of drivers, namely resident and non-resident offenders, enforcement should be facilitated irrespective of the Member State of registration of the vehicle. To this end, a system of cross- border exchange of information should be used for certain identified road safety related traffic offences, regardless of their administrative or criminal nature under the law of the Member State concerned, granting the Member State of the offence access to vehicle registration data (VRD) of the Member State of registration.deleted

2014/11/10
Committee: TRAN

Marie-Christine ARNAUTU

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10

(10) In the framework of the Prüm Decisions, Member States grant each other the right of access to their VRD in order to improve the exchange of information and to speed up the procedures in force. The provisions concerning the technical specifications and the availability of automated data exchange set out in the Prüm Decisions should, as far as possible, be included in this Directive.deleted

2014/11/10
Committee: TRAN

Marie-Christine ARNAUTU

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11

(11) Existing software applications should be the basis for the data exchange under this Directive and should, at the same time, also facilitate the reporting by Member States to the Commission. Such applications should provide for the expeditious, secure and confidential exchange of specific VRD between Member States. Advantage should be taken of the European Vehicle and Driving Licence Information System (Eucaris) software application, which is mandatory for Member States under the Prüm Decisions as regards VRD. ~~The Commission should report on an assessment of the functioning of the software applications used for the purposes of this Directive.~~

2014/11/10
Committee: TRAN

Marie-Christine ARNAUTU

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16

(16) With a view to pursuing a road safety policy aiming for a high level of protection for all road users in the Union and taking into account the widely differing circumstances pertaining within the Union, Member States should act, without prejudice to ~~more restrictive~~their own policies and laws, in order to ensure greater convergence of road traffic rules and of their enforcement between Member States. In the framework of its report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the application of this Directive, the Commission should examine the need to develop common standards in order to establish comparable methods, practices and minimum standards at Union level taking into account international cooperation and existing agreements in the field of road safety, in particular the Vienna Convention on Road Traffic of 8 November 1968.

2014/11/10
Committee: TRAN

Marie-Christine ARNAUTU

Proposal for a directive
Recital 17

(17) In the framework of its report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the application of this Directive by the Member States, the Commission should examine the need for common criteria for follow-up procedures by the Member States in the event of non-payment of a financial penalty, in accordance with Member States ' laws and procedures. In this report, the Commission should address issues such as the procedures between the competent authorities of the Member States for the transmission of the final decision to impose a sanction and/or financial penalty as well as the recognition and enforcement of the final decision.deleted

2014/11/10
Committee: TRAN

Marie-Christine ARNAUTU

Proposal for a directive
Recital 18

(18) In preparing the review of this Directive, the Commission should consult the relevant stakeholders, such as road safety and law enforcement authorities or bodies, victims ' associations, automobile associations and other non-governmental organisations active in the field of road safety.

2014/11/10
Committee: TRAN

Marie-Christine ARNAUTU

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a

(a) speeding in excess of 50 km/h;

2014/11/10
Committee: TRAN

Marie-Christine ARNAUTU

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g

~~(g) use of a forbidden lane;~~deleted

2014/11/10
Committee: TRAN

Marie-Christine ARNAUTU

Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point h

~~(h) illegally using a mobi~~dele te~~lephone or any other communication devices while driving.~~d

2014/11/10
Committee: TRAN

Marie-Christine ARNAUTU

Proposal for a directive
Article 9

The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 10 concerning the update of Annex I in the light of technical progress to take into account relevant changes to Decisions 2008/615/JHA and 2008/616/JHA or where required by legal acts of the Union directly relevant for the update of Annex I.Article 9 deleted Delegated acts

2014/11/10
Committee: TRAN

Marie-Christine ARNAUTU

Proposal for a directive
Article 10

1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 9 shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from [the date of the publication of this Directive]. The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the five-year period. The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period. 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 9 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect on the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 4. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 9 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.Article 10 deleted Exercise of the delegation

2014/11/10
Committee: TRAN

Activities of Marie-Christine ARNAUTU related to 2014/0218(COD)

Plenary speeches (2)

Amendments (12)

ParlTrack - 2011-2024