Progress: Procedure completed
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | TRAN |
AYALA SENDER Inés ( S&D)
|
BACH Georges ( PPE),
VAN DALEN Peter ( ECR),
BILBAO BARANDICA Izaskun ( ALDE),
EICKHOUT Bas ( Verts/ALE),
AIUTO Daniela ( EFDD)
|
| Committee Opinion | LIBE |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 091-p1
Legal Basis:
TFEU 091-p1Subjects
Events
The Commission presented a report on the application of Directive (EU) 2015/413 facilitating cross-border exchange of information on road-safety-related traffic offences (CBE Directive).
As a reminder, the CBE Directive aims to ensure a high level of protection for all road users by facilitating the cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences, and thereby facilitating the enforcement of sanctions, where those offences are committed with a vehicle registered in a Member State other than the Member State in which the offence took place.
Possible extension of the CBE Directive’s scope : the Commission considered that the Directive’s scope can be considered adequate as it covers the eight most important road safety related traffic offences. Offences such as speeding, failing to use a seat belt, drink driving and the use of communication devices (distraction) are a major threat to road safety and are often committed by non-resident drivers.
The addition of other offences to the scope of the CBE Directive has been suggested. These include: (i) not keeping a sufficient distance from the vehicle in front ; (ii) dangerous overtaking ; (iii) illegal or dangerous parking . On the other hand, the Commission is not in favour of adding tolling offences and non-payment of municipal charges or taxes to the scope of the Directive.
Impact of the Directive : according to the report, the CBE Directive is an effective tool with a significant potential to improve road safety by making possible identification of non-resident offenders through an electronic information system and by raising citizens’ awareness of traffic rules and the applicability of sanctions in Member States.
According to the external evaluation study, the total number of detected offences covered by the CBE Directive and committed by non-residents/foreign vehicles in the EU is estimated at 10 million for 2014.
The electronic information system which ensures the expeditious, secure and confidential exchange of vehicle registration data is effective since it has had a positive impact on the cross-border enforcement of sanctions: the number of investigated road traffic offences committed by non-residents quadrupled between 2013 and 2015 in the Member States that implemented the Directive.
Possible improvements : in order to improve the impact of the Directive, the report recommended a holistic approach to create a synergy with other instruments , namely those related to mutual assistance and cooperation between Member States in investigating road traffic offences and mutual recognition to financial penalties.
The report suggested in particular:
to better exploit the potential of the electronic information system : in November 2016, 23 out of 28 Member States were connected to the system. Approximately 50 % of detected road traffic offences committed by non-residents were not investigated, in 2015; the possibility to introduce measures which could increase the reliability of automatic control equipment ( for instance harmonised EU-level standards, type approval procedures and periodic checks of automatic checking equipment); strengthening the enforcement of sanctions for investigated road traffic offences which are committed by non-residents: approximately 50% of investigated road traffic offences committed by non-residents are currently not successfully enforced because of the following issues with the enforcement chain not covered by the Directive: (i) Member States’ lack of mutual assistance and cooperation in investigating road traffic offences after exchanging vehicle registration data; (ii) decisions issued by Member States in cases of non-payment of a financial penalty for these offences often do not fall under Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties; working on designing standardised forms to facilitate the procedure for cross-border enforcement of financial penalties under the Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA. Moreover, the number of mutually recognised decisions that fall under the Framework Decision and relate to financial penalties for road traffic offences is very low.
PURPOSE: to facilitate the cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Directive (EU) 2015/413 of the European Parliament and of the Council facilitating cross-border exchange of information on road-safety-related traffic offences.
CONTENT: this Directive aims to ensure a high level of protection for all road users in the Union by facilitating the cross-border exchange of information on road-safety-related traffic offences , and thereby facilitating the enforcement of sanctions, where those offences are committed with a vehicle registered in a Member State other than the Member State in which the offence took place.
This Directive replaces Directive 2011/82/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (adopted on the basis of Article 87(2) Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union), annulled by the Court of Justice of the European Union by its judgment of 6 May 2014.
The main objective of the new Directive, adopted on the basis of Article 91 (1)(c) of the TFEU (Transport), remains identical to the initial Directive, which was to put an end to the anonymity of non-resident drivers and to make sure that their road traffic offences would not go unpunished.
New rules shall also apply to the United Kingdom, Ireland and Denmark.
Procedure for the exchange of information between Member States : for the investigation of the road-safety-related traffic offences, the Member State shall grant other Member States' national contact points, access to the following national Vehicle Registration Data, with the power to conduct automated searches on data relating to vehicles and data relating to owners or holders of the vehicle.
The Member State of the offence shall decide whether or not to initiate follow-up proceedings in relation to the road-safety-related traffic offences.
For the purposes of the exchange of data, each Member State shall designate a national contact point. When sending the information letter to the owner, the holder of the vehicle or to the otherwise identified person suspected of committing the road-safety-related traffic offence, the Member State of the offence shall, in accordance with its law, include any relevant information as regards the offence. The information letter shall be sent in the language of the registration document of the vehicle, if available, or in one of the official languages of the Member State of registration.
Scope : the Directive applies to the following eight road-safety-related traffic offences : (a) speeding; (b) failing to use a seat-belt; (c) failing to stop at a red traffic light; (d) drink-driving; (e) driving while under the influence of drugs; (f) failing to wear a safety helmet; (g) the use of a forbidden lane; (h) illegally using a mobile telephone or any other communication devices while driving.
Data protection : given that data relating to the identification of an offender are personal data, Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data shall apply to the processing activities carried out in application of this Directive.
Information for road users : the Commission shall make available on its website a summary in all official languages of the institutions of the Union of the rules in force in Member States in the field covered by this Directive.
Revision of the Directive : the Commission shall, by 7 November 2016, submit a report on the application of this Directive by the Member States and make legislative proposals if necessary.
In its report, the Commission shall examine the need for common criteria for follow-up procedures by Member States in the event of non-payment of a financial penalty, in accordance with Member States' laws and procedures.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 17.3.2015.
TRANSPOSITION: 6.5.2015. For Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom: 6.5.2017.
DELEGATED ACTS: the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in order to achieve the objective of the exchange of information between Member States through interoperable means.
The power to adopt delegated acts shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years (tacitly extended) from 13 March 2015 . The European Parliament or the Council may raise objections to a delegated act within a period of two months from the date of notification (this may be extended by two months). If the European Parliament or Council express objections, the delegated act will not enter into force.
The European Parliament adopted by 640 votes to 61, with 6 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on facilitating cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences.
Parliament adopted its position at first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure. The amendments adopted in plenary amended the Commission proposal as follows:
Processing and data protection : Parliament stipulated that the provisions of the Prüm Decisions concerning the technical specifications and the availability of automated data exchange set out in the Prüm Decisions should, as far as possible, be included in this Directive.
In the recitals, it is recalled that: (i) Decision 2008/616/JHA specifies the security features for existing software applications and the related technical requirements for the exchange of vehicle registration data (VRD); (ii) the processing of VRD containing personal data is subject to the specific provisions on data protection set out in Decision 2008/615/JHA .
United Kingdom, Ireland and Denmark : an amendment seeks to postpone, until 6 May 2017, the deadline for these three countries to transpose the directive into national law.
Report : the Commission shall, by 7 November 2016 at the latest, report on the application of this Directive.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report by Inés AYALA SENDER (S&D, ES) on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on facilitating cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament position adopted at first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Data protection : Members proposed the addition of a new recital which includes the clarifications made by the Council and the suggestion made by the European Data Protection Supervisor. It aims to clarify the new data protection arrangements that need to be applied in respect of the offences covered by this Directive.
United Kingdom, Ireland and Denmark : an amendment aims to extend by one year (until 6 May 2016 instead of 6 May 2015) the deadline granted to these three Member States in order to transpose the Directive into national legislation.
PURPOSE: to facilitate the cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences.
PROPOSED ACT: Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: improving road safety is a prime objective of the Union's transport policy. An important element of that policy is the consistent enforcement of sanctions for road traffic offences committed in the Union which considerably jeopardise road safety.
However, due to a lack of appropriate procedures and notwithstanding existing possibilities under Council Decision 2008/615/JHA and Council Decision 2008/616/JHA (the 'Prüm Decisions'), sanctions in the form of financial penalties for certain road traffic offences are often not enforced if those offences are committed with a vehicle, which is registered in a Member State other than the Member State where the offence took place.
On 19 March 2008, the Commission adopted a proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council facilitating cross-border enforcement in the field of road safety on the basis of Article 71(1)(c) of the Treaty establishing the European Community (now Article 91 of Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ('TFUE')).
Directive 2011/82/EU was adopted on 25 October 2011. The European Parliament and the Council chose Article 87(2) TFEU on police cooperation as its legal basis.
The Commission fully supported the contents of the adopted Directive but decided to challenge its legal basis before the Court of Justice of the European Union. In its judgement of 6 May 2014, case C-43/12, the Court annulled Directive 2011/82/EU , but maintained its effects until the entry into force of a new Directive on the basis of the transport article of the Treaty within a reasonable period of time.
Following the Commission Communication of 20 July 2010 entitled 'Towards a European road safety area: policy orientations on road safety 2011-2020', the Council invited the Commission to examine the possibilities of harmonising traffic rules at Union level where appropriate and adopting further measures on facilitating cross-border enforcement with regard to road traffic offences, in particular those related to serious traffic accidents.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: given that the proposal does not contain any new elements as compared to the annulled Directive, the impact assessment of the initial Commission proposal remains valid.
CONTENT: the proposed Directive aims to ensure a high level of protection for all road users in the Union by facilitating the cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences and thereby the enforcement of sanctions, where those offences are committed with a vehicle registered in a Member State other than the Member State where the offence took place.
Road safety related traffic offences comprise: speeding; failing to stop at a red traffic light; driving under the influence of drink, drugs; failing to wear a safety helmet; illegally using a mobile telephone or any other communication devices while driving.
The proposal is almost identical to the text of the annulled Directive. The main objective of that Directive was to put an end to the anonymity of non-resident drivers and to make sure that their road traffic offences would not go unpunished. For this reason the Directive provided the Member States with the mutual access to each other's vehicle registration data via an electronic data exchange network . This would allow them to identify drivers when they commit traffic offences abroad, thus ensuring equal treatment of non-resident and resident drivers.
Once the vehicle owner's name and address are known, a letter to the presumed offender may be sent, on the basis of a model established by the Directive. The Member State of offence will have kept their right to decide on the follow up of the traffic offence.
The Commission proposes to introduce minor amendments in order to comply with the Court of Justice case:
Legal basis : the legal basis for the adoption of measures at EU level in the field of road safety is Article 91(1)(c) TFEU. UK, Ireland and Denmark : in recitals 22 and 23 of the annulled Directive, UK, Ireland and Denmark had, in accordance with Protocols no 21 and 22 annexed to the Treaties, the possibility not to take part in adoption of, be bound by or subject to the application of that Directive. However, where those Protocols do not apply since they only apply to Title V of the TFEU, those recitals should be deleted. Data protection : taking account of the new legal basis, the general rules on data protection provided for in Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data should therefore apply. Consequently, the proposal should refer to Directive 95/46/EC, both in general and for the provisions on rectification, erasure, blocking and maximum storage time.
BUDGETARY IMPLICATION: there are no other budgetary implications than those already mentioned in the annulled Directive.
DELEAGTED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Documents
- Follow-up document: COM(2016)0744
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2016)0355
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2016)0356
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2015)173
- Final act published in Official Journal: Directive 2015/413
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 068 13.03.2015, p. 0009
- Draft final act: 00103/2014/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0029/2015
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0001/2015
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2019)007878
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE541.591
- Contribution: COM(2014)0476
- Committee draft report: PE539.855
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES5279/2014
- Contribution: COM(2014)0476
- Debate in Council: 3335
- Contribution: COM(2014)0476
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2014)0476
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES5279/2014
- Committee draft report: PE539.855
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE541.591
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2019)007878
- Draft final act: 00103/2014/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2015)173
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2016)0355
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2016)0356
- Follow-up document: COM(2016)0744 EUR-Lex
- Contribution: COM(2014)0476
- Contribution: COM(2014)0476
- Contribution: COM(2014)0476
Activities
- Inés AYALA SENDER
Plenary Speeches (4)
- 2016/11/22 Cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences (A8-0001/2015 - Inés Ayala Sender) (vote) ES
- 2016/11/22 Cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences (A8-0001/2015 - Inés Ayala Sender) ES
- 2016/11/22 Cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences (debate) ES
- 2016/11/22 Cross-border exchange of information on road safety related traffic offences (debate) ES
- Lucy ANDERSON
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Marie-Christine ARNAUTU
- Nicola CAPUTO
- Isabella DE MONTE
- Bruno GOLLNISCH
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
- Notis MARIAS
- Jill SEYMOUR
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Adina-Ioana VĂLEAN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- Miguel VIEGAS
- Marina ALBIOL GUZMÁN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean ARTHUIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jonathan ARNOTT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivo BELET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hugues BAYET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Steeve BRIOIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gianluca BUONANNO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Soledad CABEZÓN RUIZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Wim van de CAMP
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alain CADEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nessa CHILDERS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Salvatore CICU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alberto CIRIO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Therese COMODINI CACHIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Javier COUSO PERMUY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michel DANTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rachida DATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gérard DEPREZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marielle DE SARNEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jørn DOHRMANN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pablo ECHENIQUE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mireille D'ORNANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios EPITIDEIOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José Inácio FARIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edouard FERRAND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lorenzo FONTANA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elisabetta GARDINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Enrico GASBARRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michela GIUFFRIDA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sylvie GODDYN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nathalie GRIESBECK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Françoise GROSSETÊTE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Enrique GUERRERO SALOM
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sergio GUTIÉRREZ PRIETO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Takis HADJIGEORGIOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Brian HAYES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marian HARKIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Filiz HYUSMENOVA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pablo IGLESIAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Philippe JUVIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Afzal KHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Merja KYLLÖNEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Giovanni LA VIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marine LE PEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paloma LÓPEZ BERMEJO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Svetoslav Hristov MALINOV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Vladimír MAŇKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivana MALETIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Barbara MATERA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- David MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Gesine MEISSNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sophie MONTEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elisabeth MORIN-CHARTIER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alessia Maria MOSCA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Renaud MUSELIER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- József NAGY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Liadh NÍ RIADA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rolandas PAKSAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alojz PETERLE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Florian PHILIPPOT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marijana PETIR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrej PLENKOVIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Salvatore Domenico POGLIESE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franck PROUST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Teresa RODRIGUEZ-RUBIO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Robert ROCHEFORT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Liliana RODRIGUES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claude ROLIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Fernando RUAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Matteo SALVINI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudia SCHMIDT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Olga SEHNALOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Remo SERNAGIOTTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Siôn SIMON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Davor ŠKRLEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Davor Ivo STIER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Catherine STIHLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel SVOBODA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Richard SULÍK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Patricija ŠULIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Kay SWINBURNE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Neoklis SYLIKIOTIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eleftherios SYNADINOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudia ȚAPARDEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel TELIČKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ramon TREMOSA i BALCELLS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ángela VALLINA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sotirios ZARIANOPOULOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Janusz ZEMKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jana ŽITŇANSKÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0001/2015 - Inés Ayala Sender - Résolution législative #
GUE/NGL
NI| Amendments | Dossier |
| 16 |
2014/0218(COD)
2014/11/10
TRAN
16 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 18 (18) In preparing the review of this Directive, the Commission should consult the relevant stakeholders, such as road safety and law enforcement authorities or bodies, victims
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) speeding in excess of 50 km/h;
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point g Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a directive Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point h Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a directive Article 9 Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a directive Article 10 Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland may extend the date referred to in this subparagraph until 6 May 2017.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a directive Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new) By way of derogation from the first subparagraph, the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland may extend the date referred to in this subparagraph one year after the entry into force of this directive.
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 2 (2) However, due to a lack of appropriate procedures and notwithstanding existing possibilities under Council Decision 2008/615/JHA7 and Council Decision 2008/616/JHA8 (the 'Prüm Decisions'), sanctions in the form of financial penalties for certain road traffic offences are often not enforced if those offences are committed with a vehicle, which is registered in a Member State other than the Member State where the offence took place. This Directive aims to ensure that even in such cases, the effectiveness of the investigation of road safety related traffic offences should be ensured in every Member State. __________________ 7 Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross- border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (OJ L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 1). 8 Council Decision 2008/616/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the implementation of Decision 2008/615/JHA on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (OJ L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 12).
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 5 (5) Greater convergence of control measures between Member States should be encouraged
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 7 (7) In order to improve road safety throughout the Union and to ensure equal treatment of drivers, namely resident and non-resident offenders, enforcement should be facilitated irrespective of the Member State of registration of the vehicle. To this end, a system of cross-border exchange of information should be used for certain identified road safety related traffic offences, regardless of their administrative or criminal nature under the law of the Member State concerned, granting the Member State of the offence access to vehicle registration data (VRD) of the Member State of registration. That system of cross border exchange/VRD/It Should also include information on, whether the driver license is valid or not, since there is a growing problem with fake licenses which can be very easily bought over internet.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 10 Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 11 (11) Existing software applications should be the basis for the data exchange under this Directive and should, at the same time, also facilitate the reporting by Member States to the Commission. Such applications should provide for the expeditious, secure and confidential exchange of specific VRD between Member States. Advantage should be taken of the European Vehicle and Driving Licence Information System (Eucaris) software application, which is mandatory for Member States under the Prüm Decisions as regards VRD.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 16 (16) With a view to pursuing a road safety policy aiming for a high level of protection for all road users in the Union and taking into account the widely differing circumstances pertaining within the Union,
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a directive Recital 17 source: 541.591
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
| committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
| docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:5279)(documentyear:2014)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:5279)(documentyear:2014)(documentlanguage:EN) |
| docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE539.855New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-539855_EN.html |
| docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE541.591New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-541591_EN.html |
| docs/6/docs/0 |
|
| docs/7/docs/0 |
|
| events/0 |
|
| events/0 |
|
| events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
| events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
| events/4 |
|
| events/4 |
|
| events/5/docs |
|
| events/7 |
|
| events/7 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| docs/3 |
|
| docs/4 |
|
| docs/5 |
|
| docs/5/body |
EC
|
| events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0001&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0001_EN.html |
| events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0029New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0029_EN.html |
| activities |
|
| commission |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/0 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| committees/1 |
|
| council |
|
| docs |
|
| events |
|
| other |
|
| otherinst |
|
| procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Economic and Social Committee Committee of the Regions
|
| procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
TRAN/8/00877New
|
| procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32015L0413New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32015L0413 |
| procedure/instrument |
Old
DirectiveNew
|
| procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
| procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
| procedure/summary |
|
| activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52014PC0476:EN
|
| activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52014PC0476:EN
|
| activities/6/docs/0 |
|
| activities/6/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Results of vote in Parliament |
| activities/11/docs |
|
| activities/11/text |
|
| links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
| procedure/final/title |
Old
OJ L 068 13.03.2015, p. 0009New
Directive 2015/413 |
| procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L:2015:068:TOCNew
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32015L0413 |
| activities/11 |
|
| procedure/final |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official JournalNew
Procedure completed |
| activities/4/docs |
|
| activities/5 |
|
| activities/6 |
|
| activities/7 |
|
| activities/8 |
|
| activities/9 |
|
| activities/10/date |
Old
2015-02-09T00:00:00New
2015-03-11T00:00:00 |
| activities/10/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
End of procedure in Parliament |
| other/0 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
| activities/4 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
| activities/0/commission/0/Commissioner |
Old
KALLAS SiimNew
BULC Violeta |
| other/0/commissioner |
Old
KALLAS SiimNew
BULC Violeta |
| activities/4/date |
Old
2015-03-10T00:00:00New
2015-02-09T00:00:00 |
| activities/3/committees |
|
| activities/3/date |
Old
2014-12-01T00:00:00New
2014-12-02T00:00:00 |
| activities/3/type |
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading |
| activities/4/date |
Old
2015-01-13T00:00:00New
2015-03-10T00:00:00 |
| activities/3/date |
Old
2014-12-02T00:00:00New
2014-12-01T00:00:00 |
| activities/1/committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
545fc40ad1d1c50406000000New
4f1ac762b819f25efd000084 |
| committees/1/shadows/1/mepref |
Old
545fc40ad1d1c50406000000New
4f1ac762b819f25efd000084 |
| activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
| activities/1 |
|
| activities/2 |
|
| activities/3 |
|
| activities/4 |
|
| committees/1/shadows/1 |
|
| committees/1/shadows/2 |
|
| committees/1/shadows/3 |
|
| committees/1/shadows/5 |
|
| procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
TRAN/8/00877
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
| committees/1/shadows |
|
| committees/1/date |
2014-09-03T00:00:00
|
| committees/1/rapporteur |
|
| procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Economic and Social Committee Committee of the Regions
|
| activities/0/docs/0/url |
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0476
|
| activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52014PC0476:EN
|
| activities |
|
| committees |
|
| links |
|
| other |
|
| procedure |
|