9 Amendments of Joëlle MÉLIN related to 2015/2103(INL)
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. takes the view that clear legal relations should be established regarding robots in an effort to determine an impassable border between man and machine, which must always remain a work tool;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b takes the view, moreover, that civil responsibility with regard to work tools already exists in each Member State and is a matter of subsidiarity;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. education must pave the way fortraining at work, both initial and continuing, must pave the way for the current working generation and the next generation to be able to live fully productive lives in a world which will be changed by robotisation and automation;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. strongly calls for this training to maintain the predominance of humans over robots, whatever their level of capability;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. an legislative answer must be found to the question of what provisions might bare necessary in terms of the competitiveness of the labour force if the artificial or genetic development or supplementing of existing human capabilities results in people with extraordinary abilities, thereby altering the meaning of the term 'disability' and if that calls into question the assessment of maximum humand conferring an unassailable advantage on peoplapacity and therefore withs access to such tools and interventionsdverse effect: the ‘disability’;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. points out that, whilstalthough robotics and artificial intelligence promismay provide real advantages in the short and medium term in terms of effectiveness and economy not only for, production, services and trade but also remain areas where human intelligence hitherto meant there were only humans (whose work will be increasingly unnecessary), there is a danger of the number of jobs in the field of robotics not increasing to match the number of jobs which are expected to be lostich are still wholly dependent on human intelligence today;
Amendment 71 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. points out that the amount of work which will be wholly or partially dependent on human intelligence is completely unknown;
Amendment 74 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. considers, therefore, that simply evoking civil legal personality for robots does not provide any framework to secure the place that we want them to have in the future;
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. points out that human intelligence strictly speaking only concerns man and that it would be inappropriate, or even dangerous, to think that, despite the autonomy of certain robots, machines could be humanised;