BETA

9 Amendments of Joëlle MÉLIN related to 2016/2064(INI)

Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recalls that most of the projects financed by the EFSI could have been launched with the support only of the EIB;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Recalls that the methods of financing of projects established by the EFSI are extraordinarily complex and involve too much red tape for them to be readily accessible for SMEs;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Warns the Commission about the development of public-private partnerships, which have the effect of discouraging States from pursuing social welfare policies; observes that there is a danger that the programmed end of the welfare state in the interests of viability will harm the quality of public services and significantly reduce the number of people working in the sector;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses that blackmail to compel reform is resolutely being introduced by means of the Investment Plan, as the release of funds depends on the degree of acceptance of the reforms recommended to Member States under the European Semester;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Recalls that investment primarily benefits businesses which have a good knowledge of the opportunities afforded by the EFSI, as well as particularly benefiting the countries which are the best informed about these measures, so that many Member States in Eastern Europe which need such investment are also those that apply for it least;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Recalls that wealth creation rather than job creation remains the prime motive for all investors, both private and institutional, which effectively penalises regions where growth is poor;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 89 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Recalls that job creation is a variable that is impossible to apprehend at the stage when such a plan is being launched, and does not constitute the Commission’s priority objective;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 91 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Member States to lay down more clear-cut investment priorities and to draw up projects in collaboration with the European Investment Advisory Hub; calls on the Commission to work in closer cooperation with Member States in the European Semester process in order to help them begin as soon as possible to implement the recommendations, in particular by carrying out economic and social reforms, thus removing national barriers to investment.deleted
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 103 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Calls on the Commission to review the principle of austerity which continues to prevail throughout the process of the European Semester; considers that allowing Member States more room for manoeuvre in their budgetary decisions would be the only way of establishing a genuine economic and social recovery policy in Europe;
2016/12/07
Committee: EMPL