BETA

10 Amendments of Jean ARTHUIS related to 2018/0254(COD)

Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital –1 (new)
(-1) Defence is considered to be a clear example of how a greater effectiveness could be achieved by transferring some competences and actions currently performed by the Member States and the corresponding appropriations to the European level; this would result in the demonstration of the European added value and would allow to limit the overall burden of public expenditure in the EU.
2018/10/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Up to 510 % of the financial envelope referred to in paragraph 1 shall be devoted to support disruptive technologies for defence.
2018/10/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. Resources allocated to Member States under shared management may, at their request, be transferred to the Fund. The Commission shall implement those resources directly in accordance with Article [62(1)(a)] of the Financial Regulation. Where possible tThose resources shall be used for the benefit of the Member State concerned.
2018/10/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Proposals shall be systematically screened to identify those actions raising complex or serious ethics issues and submit them to an ethics assessment. Ethics screenings and assessments shall be carried out by the Commission with the support of experts on defence ethics. The Commission shall ensure the transparency of the ethics procedures as much as possible.deleted
2018/10/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. Entities participating in the action shall obtain all approvals or other mandatory documents from the relevant national, local ethics committees or other bodies such as data protection authorities before the start of the relevant activities. Those documents shall be kept on file and provided to the Commission.deleted
2018/10/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. If appropriate, ethics checks shall be carried out by the Commission during the implementation of the action. For serious or complex ethics issues, the checks shall be carried out by the Commission with the support of experts on defence ethics.deleted
2018/10/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. Actions which are not ethically acceptable may be rejected or terminated at any time.deleted
2018/10/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4
4. Unless otherwise provided for in the work programme referred to in Article 27, the action shall be undertaken in a cooperation of at least three legal entities which are established in at least three different Member States and/or associated countries. At least three of these eligible entities established in at least two Member States and/or associated countrwo Member States. These entities shall not, during the whole implementation of the action, be effectively controlled, directly or indirectly, by the same entity, and shall not control each other.
2018/10/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) contribution to reducing the European defence industry's dependence on and increasing its strategic autonomy with regard to technologies or products controlled and/or subject to authorisation by a third country or one of its entities;
2018/10/11
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 32 – paragraph 3
3. At the end of the implementation period but no later than four years after the 31 December 203127, a final evaluation of the Fund implementation shall be carried out by the Commission. The final evaluation report shall include the results of the implementation and to the extent possible given timing the impact of the Fund. The report - building on relevant consultations of Member States and associated countries and key stakeholders - shall notably assess the progress made towards the achievement of objectives set out in Article 3. It shall also analyse cross border participation, including of SMEs and mid-caps in projects implemented under the Fund as well as the integration of SMEs and Mid-caps in the global value chain. The evaluation shall also contain information on the countries of origin of the recipients and, where possible, the distribution of the generated intellectual property rights.
2018/10/11
Committee: BUDG