12 Amendments of Eleonora EVI related to 2016/2908(RSP)
Amendment 17 #
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to ensure that there are adequate human resources and technical expertise in the JRC, including measures to keep relevant experience with vehicle and emissions technology and vehicle testing in the organisation; nothopes that the JRC maycan have additional verification responsibilities for requirements in the context of the proposal for a new market surveillance and type approval regulation;
Amendment 23 #
Paragraph 9
9. Urges the Commission to reviewduce in 2017 the conformity factor with a view to including only the instrumental error margin for RDE tests of NOx emissions, as provided for by the 2nd RDE package;
Amendment 63 #
Paragraph 19
19. Calls for the swift adoption of the proposal for a Regulation on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers (2016/0014(COD)), replacing the current framework directive on type-approval; considers the preservation of the level of ambition of the original Commission proposal, in particular as regards the introduction of EU oversight of the system,introduction of a single EU authority responsible for verifying the conformity of vehicle emissions to be the bare minimum objective to be achieved during the interinstitutional negotiations on the dossier;
Amendment 67 #
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Calls for the creation of a European Agency for Market Surveillance of Road Transport, that would be in charge of market surveillance activities, coordinate the work of national market surveillance authorities, and have the final say in case of disagreements between them; suggests that the Agency should have the power to organise European-wide recall programs and to withdraw type-approval when appropriate; additionally, that the Agency should initiate a test or inspection following a submission of third party test verification results that show evidence of suspicious emission behaviour and that besides market surveillance, it should perform audits on national type approval authorities;
Amendment 92 #
Paragraph 24
24. Points out the need for systematic enforcement of conformity of production and in-use conformity of vehicles by the national authorities responsible, further coordinated and supervised at EU level; urges the Member States to clarify once and for all which authority is in charge of market surveillance in their territory and to notify the Commission accordingly;
Amendment 97 #
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Commission and the co-legislators to consider also introducing testing with PEMS or in-service conformity checks, at least as a screening device, and to introducnd to give a mandate forto the JRC to conduct in-service conformity checks with PEMS in the context of the new type-approval framework;
Amendment 102 #
Paragraph 26
26. Believes that type-approval authorities, market surveillance authorities and technical services should be able to carry out their duties; considers that they should therefore improve their level of competence significantly and continuously, and to that end calls for the establishment of regular, independent audits of their capabilities;
Amendment 124 #
Paragraph 30
30. Urges the Commission to launch infringement procedures against Member States that have not put in place effective market surveillance of the models issued with type approval by their authorities;
Amendment 128 #
Paragraph 31
31. Suggests that the Commission should be empowered to impose effective, proportionate and dissuasive administrative fines and to command remedial and corrective actions where non-compliance of vehicles is established; considers that the possible sanctions should include type-approval withdrawal and the establishment of EU-wide recall programmes;
Amendment 135 #
Paragraph 33
33. Calls on the Member States to apply more vigorous measures in the wake of the emissions cheating scandal; calls on the Member States to apply the available sanctions, where relevant, including mandatory recall programmes and the withdrawal of type-approvals, and to ensure that consumers receive adequate compensation; calls on the Commission to ensure a coordinated approach on recall programmes across the EU;
Amendment 143 #
Paragraph 36 a (new)
Amendment 149 #
Paragraph 36 c (new)
36c. Calls on the Commission to review the existing rules on consumer protection in order to create consistent standards across the Union and the possibility for class action against fraudulent companies; urges the European Commission to review all relevant EU legislation in order to support the establishment of a common compensation scheme and proper rules to compensate European consumers;