Activities of Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ related to 2016/2187(DEC)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority for the financial year 2015
Amendments (6)
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Underlines that EIOPA's role is essential in order to ensure financial stability, transparency, better integrated and safer financial markets, as well as a high degree of consumer protection in the Union;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that, while making sure that all assignments are carried out in full, EIOPA should carefully stick to the tasks assigned to it by the Union legislator and should not seek to de facto broaden its mandate beyond those assignments; emphasises, in this respect that, where possible, EIOPA needs to pay particular attention to the principle of proportionalityonly sufficient financial resources would allow EIOPA to fulfil its mandate independently and efficiently; underlines that an expansion of tasks has to be matched by an expansion of resources;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Concludes that EIOPA’s financing arrangement is to be reviewed; calls on the Commission to examine the possibility to modify the current financing arrangement by introducing appropriately and proportionately calibrated fees for market participants, possibly partly replacingensuring that it will not depend in the future on the contributions of nthe National cCompetent aAuthorities in order to enhance its autonomy and supervisory action;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Stresses that, while carrying out its work and in particular when drafting implementing legislation, EIOPA needs to regularly and comprehensively inform the Union legislator about its activities;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Underlines that EIOPA should supervise more and intervene more, when National Financial Supervisory Authorities do not function properly and even create problems to the markets, as for example the Romanian Financial Supervisory Authority did with the Romanian insurance market;