BETA

1525 Amendments of Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ

Amendment 79 #

2018/2656(RSP)


Recital G
G. whereas corporations are one of the major players in economic globalisation, financial services and international trade and are required to comply with all applicable laws and international treaties in force, and to respect human rights; whereas these business enterprises may at times cause, or contribute to human rights violations, and affect the rights of vulnerable groups such as minorities, indigenous people, women and children or contribute to environmental problems; and whereas they may also have an important role to play in offering positive incentives in terms of promoting human rights, democracy, environmental standards and corporate social responsibility;
2018/06/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 110 #

2018/2656(RSP)


Paragraph 1
1. Notes that globalisation and increasing internationalisation of business activities and supply chains make the role that corporations play in ensuring respect for human rights more important and create a situation in which international norms and rules, rules and cooperation are crucial to avoid human rights violations in third countries;
2018/06/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 115 #

2018/2656(RSP)


Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recalls that the NAP development process, if well designed and adjusted to the local context, can contribute not only to ensuring an efficient implementation of the UNGPs but also to the strengthening of national human rights protection mechanisms;
2018/06/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 117 #

2018/2656(RSP)


Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Reiterates the call for the UNGPs and other international corporate responsibility standards to be consistently raised by EU representatives in human rights dialogues with third countries;
2018/06/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 121 #

2018/2656(RSP)


Paragraph 3
3. Strongly supports the full implementation of the UNGPs within and outside the EU, and calls on the EU and Member States to elaborate and adopt an EU, respectively national action plans for the swift, effective and comprehensive implementation of the said Principles;
2018/06/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 152 #

2018/2656(RSP)


Paragraph 7
7. Warmly welcomes in this context the work initiated in the United Nations through the Intergovernmental Working Group (IGWG) to create a binding UN instrument on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights and considers this to be a necessary step forward in the promotion and protection of human rights;
2018/06/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 159 #

2018/2656(RSP)


Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Recalls the need to adopt a gender- sensitive approach throughout the process and pay special attention to vulnerable groups such as indigenous people and children;
2018/06/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 1 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5
— having regard to the Swiss Confederation’s withdrawal of its application for EU membership in July 2016,deleted
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 2 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 11
— having regard to the EU- Switzerland Agreement on Education, Training and Youth, signed on 15 February 2010,deleted
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 3 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 14
— having regard to the 1972 EU- Switzerland Free Trade Agreement, which has been expandadapted and updated over the years3 , _________________ 33 OJ L 300, 31.12.1972, p. 189. OJ L 300, 31.12.1972, p. 189.
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 4 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 17
— having regard to the negotiations on an EU-Swiss Confederation electricity agreement, which began in November 2007on food safety and on public health,
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 5 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 19
— having regard to its resolutions on Switzerland, in particular of 7 Octo9 September 20105 on EEA-Switzerland: obstacles with regard to the full implementation of the internal market6 , and to the draft motion for a resolution of its Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection on the same topic of 24 April 2018, _________________ 6 OJ C 308 E, 20.10.2011, p.18. OJ C 316, 22.09.2017, p.192.
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 11 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas Switzerland has expressed its wish to leave binding material provisions on State aid for a future market access agreement and have access to the single market for electricity; whereas the Swiss Federal Council has announced a stakeholder consultation on the basis of the text agreed between the negotiators;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 12 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
Da. whereas on 28 September 2018 the Federal Council approved the second Swiss contribution to a number of EU member states of CHF 1.3 billion over ten years and is now awaiting a positive decision of the Federal Assembly;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 13 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D b (new)
Db. whereas Switzerland is member of the European Environment Agency;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 14 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D c (new)
Dc. whereas Switzerland ratified participation in the European satellite navigation programmes Galileo and EGNOS;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 15 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D d (new)
Dd. whereas Switzerland participates in the EU MEDIA programme, which encourages the development of European film industry, vocational training and distribution of European films;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 16 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D e (new)
De. whereas Switzerland’s participation in the EU’s Horizon 2020 research framework programme and its predecessor Framework Programme 7 (FP7) has been valuable to all parties involved due to the high quality of proposals;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 17 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas Switzerland and the EU signed a newn additional protocol to the Taxation and Savings Income Agreement on 27 May 2015, which requires that both parties automatically exchange information (AEI) on the financial accounts of each other’s residents from September 2018; whereas the EU listed Switzerland as ‘non- cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes’ in December 2017;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 18 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas Switzerland cooperates in the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and has participated in the civil and military peace missions of the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP), notably in Ukraine and Mali; whereas the EDA-Switzerland Framework for Cooperation signed in March 2012 enables exchange of information and foresees joint activities in research and technology and armament projects and programmes;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 20 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas Switzerland participates in the Schengen Information System (SIS), the Visa Information System (VIS), Eurodac EU asylum fingerprint database and will participate in the future Entry/Exit System (EES) recording crossing of EU’s external borders and the European Travel information and Authorization System (ETIAS) providing pre-travel security and irregular migration screening of visa-exempt non- EU nationals;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 21 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas based on the Dublin association agreement, Switzerland is associated to parts of the EU asylum acquis; whereas Switzerland has contributed financially and operationally to Frontex since 20109;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 22 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas in 2017, the Swiss population of 8.48 million included 2.13 million foreign nationals, 1.4 million of whom came from Member States of the EU and European Free Trade Association (EFTA); whereas 320 000 EU citizens commute to Switzerland every day,; while 4ereas 750 000 Swiss nationals live abroad, of which 450 000 live in the EU;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 23 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas in 2009, Switzerland agreed to continue the 1999 bilateral EU- Switzerland Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons (AFMP),which confers upon the Swiss and the EU member states’ citizens alike the right to freely choose their place of employment and residence within the national territories of the contracting parties;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 24 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital L
L. whereas Switzerland introduced ‘flanking measures’ in 2002 with the stated aim of protecting Swiss wages, working conditions and social standards, which the EU considers to be disproportionate and discriminating against EU operators;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 26 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M
M. whereas Switzerland wishes to exclude takeover obligthe implementations of the EU’s cCitizenship and coordination of social security systems from the provisions of the institutional framework agreement Directive and EU citizens rights for social welfare benefits and rights of establishment have caused concerns in Switzerland;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 31 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O a (new)
Oa. whereas the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) is based in Geneva;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 32 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O b (new)
Ob. whereas Switzerland hosts 25 major international organizations and conferences as their worldwide headquarters, most of them in Geneva;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 33 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O c (new)
Oc. whereas hundreds of international non-governmental organizations are based in Switzerland providing advice to the UN and other non-governmental organizations;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 34 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital O d (new)
Od. whereas Switzerland plans to hold Federal elections on 20 October 2019;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 37 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b
b) stresses that Switzerland is highly integrated with the EU, is a close-minded partner and shares European regional and global challenges with the EU; welcomes the Swiss statement that it is in its interest, and in the interest of the EU, to renew and consolidate the bilateral approach and to forge an ever- closer relationship;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 40 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point c
c) urges that the EU’s relations with its close partner, Switzerland, be elevated through the timely conclusion ofe conclusion of the bilateral Institutional framework agreement as soon as possible; welcomes the agreement by the negotiationors on the bilateral institutional framework agreement and highlights the potential to further intensify the relations that are already in placefinal text for the agreement; calls on the Swiss Federal Council to take a decision to conclude the agreement, as soon as the consultation of stakeholders has been positively concluded in this respect;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 44 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point d
d) stresses, alongside the Council, that the free movement of persons is a fundamental pillar of EU policy and the internal market, and that its four freedoms are indivisible; expresses regret at the disproportionate one-sided ‘flanking measures’ of Switzerland that have been in force since 20024; and invites Switzerland and the EU to come to a mutually acceptable agreement on the issueto seek a solution which is fully compatible with relevant EU instruments;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 49 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point e
e) underlines the fact that Switzerland should continue making a significant financial contribution in an effort to reduce economic and social disparities in the EU and welcomes the positive results of the contribution in the receiving Member States; recalls that Switzerland draws significant benefits from participating in the Single Market; stresses that future Swiss contribution to EU cohesion is essential and should be stepped up considerably along the practice set by EEA/Norway grants;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 53 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f
f) suggestswelcomes the ongoing intense internal debate on cooperation with EU inside Switzerland; suggests, however, that Switzerland even better tries to explain to its citizens the tangible benefits they reap from having access to the internal market and a closer cooperation with the EU;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 55 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g
g) urges that once concluded, the institutional agreement be submitted without delay to the European Parliament, the Member States, and the Swiss Parliament for approval, and a referendum by the Swiss electorate, in accordance with the Swiss constitution;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 57 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point h
h) notes that Switzerland has welcomed well over a million immigrants from1.4 million EU citizens live in Switzerland; whereas over 450 000 Swiss nationals live in the EU;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 60 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point j
j) acknowledges the contribution thato the close EU-Swiss partnership brings to the bilateral sectoral agreementsthat the bilateral sectorial agreements on Free movement of persons, pensions, MEDIA, environment, statistics, judicial and police cooperation, Schengen area, asylum (Dublin), the CFDP, satellite navigation, research, civil aviation, overland transport, reciprocal market access for agreed goods and services, processed agricultural goods, legal harmonization, mutual recognition, fight against fraud, and taxation and savings bring; urges, however, that it is time to elevate the partnership and take a much more comprehensive and substantial step in bilateral relations by concluding the framework agreement;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 67 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point m
m) acknowledges the Swiss contribution and cooperation in the context of mass migration flows to the Schengen area and in the implementation of the European Agenda on Migration; regrets the decision ofthat Switzerland has not to signed up to the Global Migration Compact and expects it to sign the Compact following the debate in the Swiss Parliament;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 70 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point n
n) suggestcalls ion the context of the flanking measures, that the EU directive on the posting of workers could leave enough room for Switzerland to keepSwitzerland to take over relevant EU directives to maintain its current level of social protection and level of wages, when it comes to the cross-border offering of services;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 72 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point n a (new)
na) welcomes Switzerland joining the Europol joint cybercrime action taskforce (J-CAT) in April 2018, in the fight against international cybercrime threats in a proactive manner;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 74 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point p
p) urges the conclusion of negotiations on SwisSwitzerland to engage in negotiating its participation in the Erasmus+ programme;
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 76 #

2018/2262(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point p a (new)
pa) welcomes progress in the construction of the transalpine rail link (NEAT);
2019/01/10
Committee: AFET
Amendment 1 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
- having regard to the UN Disarmament Agenda (‘Securing our Common Future’)4a, _________________ 4a https://front.un- arm.org/documents/SG+disarmament+ag enda_1.pdf
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 2 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 b (new)
- having regard to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), in particular SDGs 1, 16 and 17, aiming at the promotion of peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development4b, _________________ 4b https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 6 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 12
— having regard to the Council conclusions of 13 November 2017 and, 25 June 2018 and 19 November 2018 on security and defence in the context of the EU Global Strategy,
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 8 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital -A (new)
-A. whereas the EU ambitions to be a global actor for peace, striving for the maintenance of international peace and security and respect for international humanitarian and human rights law;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 11 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the challenging security environment surrounding the EU necessitates the provisions of instruments which enhance the EU’s ability to preserve peace, prevent conflicts and strengthen international security; whereas it is acknowledged that secured and peaceful societies are a pre-requisite for lasting development;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 16 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital 20 b (new)
20b. whereas the EU is the world biggest provider of development and humanitarian aid, strengthening its security and development nexus towards achieving sustainable peace;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 20 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the EU has found it challenging in the past to finance operations with defence implications; whereas Parliament has repeatedly emphasised the need for funding that is more flexible and efficient and expresses solidarity; whereas additional instruments are necessary to ensure that the EU can play its role as a global actor; whereas any such instruments need to be subject to proper parliamentary control;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 24 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas internal and external security are increasingly intertwined; whereas the EU has taken significant steps to increase the cooperation between its Member States in the defence area; whereas the EU has always prided itself on its soft power and will keep doing so; whereas an evolving reality, however, requires the EU not to remain an exclusively ‘civilian power’, but to extend its hard power, since soft and hard power go hand in hand; whereas development in third countries is not possible without security and peace; whereas the military plays a key role in this, especially in countries where civilian authorities are unable to fulfil their tasks in the light of the security situation; whereas the European Peace Facility (EPF or the Facility) will lead to a stronger engagement of the EU towards partner countries and will increase the effectiveness of EU external action, allowing the EU to become in the future a global stability and security provider;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 39 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G a (new)
Ga. whereas operations carried out under the Facility shall comply with the principles and values enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and respect for international humanitarian and Human Rights law; whereas operations which are not defined as ethically acceptable from the point of view of human safety, health and security, freedom, privacy, integrity and dignity, shall be thoroughly assessed and reconsidered;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 42 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas the proposed average annual envelope for the EPF is EUR 1 500 000 000, while the combined spending under the Athena mechanism and the APF has fluctuated between EUR 250 000 000 and EUR 500 000 000 annually; whereas the potential purposes of the additional EUR 1 000 000 000 per year are notshall be adequately specified in the proposal; and shall seek to improve global peace, stability and security;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 44 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas as an off-budget mechanism financed through yearly contributions by Member States, based on a GNI distribution key, the EPF is expected to allow the EU to fund a higher proportion of the common costs (35-45 %) of military missions and operations, as is currently the case with the Athena mechanism; whereas the EPF is also expected to ensure that EU funding is available on a permanent basis, ensuring adequate programming for crisis preparedness and making rapid deployment easier and improving flexibility in case of rapid response; whereas the ambitious inclusion and expansion of the Athena mechanism for the common funding of CSDP missions and operations has been a long-standing demand of Parliament; whereas, however, the proposed Council Decision does not have the same binding character as the internal agreement of the APF, which means that Member States may opt out from funding EPF actions;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 48 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital L
L. whereas all military tasks under the Facility, such as joint disarmament operations, humanitarian and rescue tasks, military advice and assistance tasks, conflict prevention and peacekeeping tasks, tasks of combat forces in crisis management, including peacemaking and post-conflict stabilisation, the fight against terrorism, including by supporting third countries in combating terrorism in their territories, with full respect of human rights, fall within the remit of the CSDP; whereas the exception of Article 41(2) TEU applies to the operating expenditure arising from those military missions only; whereas all other operating expenditure arising from the CSDP, including expenditure arising from any other action referred to in Article 42 TEU, should be charged to the Union budget; whereas the administrative expenditure of the EPF should be charged to the Union budget;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 53 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital N
N. whereas military and civilian missions outside the Union need to be kept separate from each other in order to ensure that the civilian missions are further developed and funded from the Union budget only;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 56 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital P
P. whereas the European Court of Auditors has published a special report on the African Peace and Security Architecture funded via the APF, which is proposed to be included and expanded in the EPF; whereas the Court finds that this support was poorly prioritised and had limited effect, which raises serious questions abereas the recommendations from the ECA shall be duly taken into account the proposed radicallyin view of the ambitious increased funding for the new Facility;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 57 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital P a (new)
Pa. whereas the new Facility shall primary focus on capacity building;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 58 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Q
Q. whereas the Commission did not submit a financial impact assessment regarding the administrative expenditure to accompany its proposal shall be submitted; whereas the administrative expenditure for the EPF has substantial implications for the EU budget; whereas no extra staff should be hired by or delegated to the EPF beyond the staff currently working on the instruments being replaced; whereas the synergies arising from bringing together the current distinct instruments in one administrative structure should facilitate managing the larger geographical scope of the EPF; whereas additional staff should only be recruited if and when the revenue for a mission or measure has been effectively collected from all participating Member States; whereas the time-limited character of the revenue calls for the contracts of staff recruited by the Facility or the secondments to the Facility for a particular mission or measure to have corresponding time limits; whereas no staff should be recruited by or seconded to the Facility from a Member State where it has made a formal declaration under Article 31(1) TEU for a particular mission or measure;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 60 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Q a (new)
Qa. whereas adequate staff should be hired by or delegated to the EPF beyond the staff currently working on the instruments being replaced; whereas the synergies arising from bringing together the current distinct instruments in one administrative structure should facilitate managing the larger geographical scope of the EPF; whereas additional staff should only be recruited if and when the revenue for a mission or measure has been effectively collected from all participating Member States; whereas the time-limited character of the revenue calls for the contracts of staff recruited by the Facility or the secondments to the Facility for a particular mission or measure to have corresponding time limits; whereas no staff should be recruited by or seconded to the Facility from a Member State where it has made a formal declaration under Article 31(1) TEU for a particular mission or measure;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 63 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital R
R. whereas the VP/HR should regularly consult Parliament on all main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP and CSDP and their subsequent evolution; whereas Parliament should be consulted and informed in a timely manner to allow it to present its views and ask questions, to the VP/HR and the Council before decisions are made or decisive action is taken; whereas the VP/HR should consider Parliament’s views and incorporate them into his or her proposals, should reconsider decisions or parts of decisions that Parliament opposes, or withdraw such proposals, notwithstanding the possibility of a Member State advancing the initiative in such a case, and should propose Council decisions relating to the CSDP where invited by Parliament to do so; whereas the Parliament should have a yearly debate with the VP/HR on operations funded by the Facility;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 69 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to includelay down in the decision reference to Parliament’s role as discharge authoritythe powers of Parliament in terms of discharge according to Article 319 TEU, as is currently the case with the European Development Fund (EDF) and therefore for the APF, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the financial regulations applicable to the EDF, with a view to preserving the consistency of the EU’s external action in line with Article 18 (TEU);
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 71 #

2018/2237(INI)

(c) to provide Parliament with access to all information, including original documents, regarding the EPF annual budget, amending budgets, transfers, action programmes (including during the preparatory phase), implementation of assistance measures (including ad hoc measures), agreements with implementing actors, and reports on the implementation of revenue and expenditure, as well as the annual accounts, the financial statement, the evaluation report and the annual report by the Court of Auditors;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 87 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 5
- to add a new subparagraph at the end of Article 26 as follows: ‘All civilian aspects, assets or missions under the CFSP and in particular under the CSDP, or parts thereof, shall be exclusively funded from the Union budget.’;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 92 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 8
- to amend Article 7 as follows: ‘Any Member State, the High Representative or the High Representative with the support of the Commission may submit proposals for Union actions under Title V TEU to be financed by the Facility. The High Representative shall inform the European Parliament immediatelyn a timely manner any such proposal.’;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 98 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 10
- to add a new point 2a to Article 11: ‘2a. The facility shall have a liaison officer to the European Parliament. The liaison officer shall appear before the relevant parliamentary body before taking up his or her post, and subsequentlHead of the FPI shall have annual exchange of views with the relevant parliamentary body in order to provide regular briefings. on the Facility’;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 99 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 10 a (new)
- to amend Article 12.1 as follows: ‘A Facility Committee (hereafter “ the Committee”) composed of one representative of each participating Member State is established. Representatives of the European External Action Service (EEAS) and of the Commission shall be invited to attend the meetings of the Committee without taking part in its votes. Representatives of the European Defence Agency (EDA) may be invited to attend Committee meetings for items under discussion that relate to the EDA’s area of activity, without taking part in or being present at its votes. Representatives of the European Parliament may be invited to attend the Committee meetings without taking part in or being present at its votes.’; ;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 101 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 10 b (new)
- to amend paragraph 4 of Article 12 as follows: ‘The Committee shall approve the annual accounts and close them’;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 102 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 10 c (new)
- to amend paragraph 1 of Article 13 as follows: ‘The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, after informing the Committee, and after an exchange of views with the European Parliament relevant body, shall appoint an administrator for a period of three years.’;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 103 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 10 d (new)
- to amend paragraph 7 of Article 13 as follows: ‘The administrator shall coordinate work on financial questions relating to operations, assistance measures and other operational actions. He or she shall be the contact point with national administrations and, as appropriate, with the European Parliament and international organisations on these matters.’;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 104 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 11
- to add a new point 8a. to Article 13 as follows: ‘8a. The administrator shall be involved in briefinghave yearly exchange of views with the European Parliament relevant body.’;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 107 #

2018/2237(INI)

- to add a new point 8a. to Article 16 as follows: ‘8a. The operation commanders shall be involved in briefing the European Parliamenthave exchange of views with the European Parliament relevant body in a timely manner.’;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 108 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 12 a (new)
- to amend Article 34.1 as follows: ‘The administrator shall propose to the Committee the appointment of an internal auditor of the Facility, and at least one deputy internal auditor, for a period of four years, renewable up to a total period not exceeding 8 years. Internal auditors must have the necessary professional qualifications and offer sufficient guarantees of security, objectivity and independence. The internal auditor may not be either the authorising officer or accounting officer; he or she may not take part in the preparation of financial statements.’;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 111 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 12 b (new)
- to add a new paragraph 7a. to Article 47 as follows: ‘7a. Sale or transfer to the host country or a third party shall be in full compliance with the EU Common Position 944/2008/CFSP.’;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 112 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 12 c (new)
- to add a new paragraph 7b. to Article 47 as follows: ‘7b. Sale or transfer to the host country or a third party shall have been subject to adequate end-use checks and risk management evaluation.’;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 113 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 12 d (new)
- to amend paragraph 1 of Article 49 as follows: ‘Action Programmes shall be approved by the Council on a proposal from the High Representative. The European Parliament shall be informed of the approved Action Programmes once adopted by the Council.’;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 118 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 13 a (new)
- to amend paragraph 3 of Article 50 as follows: ‘Where a request falls outside the existing Action Programmes, the Council may approve an ad hoc assistance measure on a proposal from the High Representative. The European Parliament shall be informed of the approved ad hoc assistance measures once adopted by the Council;’
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 120 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 13 b (new)
- to add a new point fa) to Article 52, paragraph 2 as follows: ‘fa) A detailed list of equipment funded under the Facility shall be made available;’
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 122 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point f – indent 14
- to amend point a1 of Article 54 as follows: ‘Any implementing actor entrusted with the implementation of expenditure financed through the Facility shall respect the principles of sound financial management and transparency and, shall have due regard forundertaken the necessary risk assessments and end-use checks, and shall ensure EU fundamental values and, international law, notably concerning human rights.’;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 132 #

2018/2237(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point e
(e) to ensure, in line with Article 18 TEU, the complementary with existing EU funds, programmes and instruments, the consistency of the EPF with all other aspects of the EU’s external action, notably as regards the Capacity Building for Security and Development initiative (CBSD), which should in all cases be implemented in the framework of the wider security sector reform programme;
2019/01/17
Committee: AFET
Amendment 2 #

2018/2204(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges that, in the opinion of the Court of Auditors (the 'Court’), the European Securities and Markets Authority’s (the ‘Authority’) transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year 2017 are legal and regular in all material aspects; calls on the Authority to ensure a proper follow-up and implementation of the Court’s recommendations;
2018/12/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 10 #

2018/2204(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. considers that, while carrying out its work and in particular when drafting implementing legislation, ESMA needs to regularly and comprehensively inform the Union legislator about its activities; stresses that it is essential for the Authority, in view of the nature of its assignments, to exhibit transparency, not only to the European Parliament and the Council, but to the Union citizens as well;
2018/12/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 17 #

2018/2204(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Draws attention to the fact that the Authority’s budget is financed partly27% from European Union funds and partly42% through direct contributions from the Member States’ supervisory authorities and supervised entities 29% from fees received from supervised entities (Credit Rating Agencies and Trade Repositories) and 2% from others sources, and that this mixed financing arrangements may pose a threat to its independence and supervisory tasks; highlights that the Authority’s revenue will decrease as a result of the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the Union, and stresses the need to find adequate arrangements for its funding.
2018/12/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 2 #

2018/2203(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges that, in the opinion of the Court of Auditors (the 'Court’), the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority’s (the ‘Authority’) transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year 2017 are legal and regular in all material aspects;
2018/12/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 4 #

2018/2203(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Underlines the central role of the Authority in contributing to a high quality common regulatory and supervisory standards and practices, to the consistent application of legally binding Union acts, to stimulate and facilitate the delegation of tasks and responsibilities among competent authorities, to monitor and access market developments within the scope of its competence and to foster the protection of policy holders, pension scheme members and beneficiaries.
2018/12/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 5 #

2018/2203(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Emphasises the need of a closer supervision in certain Member States with the view of addressing vulnerabilities in the insurance markets of those Member States and protecting consumers from unfair practices of multinational insurance companies, such as selling in some parts of Europe, namely in Central- Eastern Europe, insurance products of lower quality than in other MS.
2018/12/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 9 #

2018/2203(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that, while making sure that all assignments are carried out in full and within deadline, the Authority should carefully adhere to the tasks and the mandate assigned to it by the European Parliament and the Council; calls on the Authority to ensure a proper follow-up and implementation of the Court’s recommendations;
2018/12/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 15 #

2018/2203(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Considers that, while carrying out its work and in particular when drafting implementing legislation, EIOPA needs to regularly and comprehensively inform the Union legislator about its activities; stresses that it is essential for the Authority, in view of the nature of its assignments, to exhibit transparency not only to the European Parliament and the Council, but to the Union citizens as well;
2018/12/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 21 #

2018/2203(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Draws attention to the fact that the Authority’s budget is financed partly40% from European Union funds and partly60% through direct contributions from the Member States’ supervisory authorities and that this mixed financing arrangements may pose a threat to its independence and supervisory tasks; highlights that the Authority’s revenue will decrease as a result of the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the Union, and stresses the need to find adequate arrangements for its funding. , as only sufficient financial resources would allow the Authority to fulfil its mandate consistently, independently and efficiently, with a view to making the financial markets more secure and protecting European consumers more effectively;
2018/12/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 3 #

2018/2202(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Acknowledges that, in the opinion of the Court of Auditors (the 'Court’), the European Banking Authority’s (the ‘Authority’) transactions underlying the annual accounts for the year 2017 are legal and regular in all material aspects;
2018/12/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 5 #

2018/2202(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Underlines the central role of the Authority in ensuring better oversight of the Union financial system to ensure financial stability, the necessary transparency, a better integrated and safer financial markets, as well as a high degree of consumer protection in the Union, in particular by coordinating an enhanced supervision over national supervisory authorities
2018/12/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 12 #

2018/2202(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. considers that, while carrying out its work and in particular when drafting implementing legislation, EBA needs to regularly and comprehensively inform the Union legislator about its activities; stresses that it is essential for the Authority, in view of the nature of its assignments, to exhibit transparency, not only to the European Parliament and the Council, but to the Union citizens as well; expects the Authority to publish the minutes of meetings of the Board of Supervisors and of the Stakeholder Groups more swiftly.
2018/12/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 18 #

2018/2202(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the need to allocate more resources to anti-money laundering tasks to fulfil the Authority’s oversight functions and inquiries into national institutions; urges the Authority to ensure that competent authorities and credit and financial institutions apply the European Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) legislation effectively and consistently; asks the Authority to develop common guidance in exchange with ESMA and EIOPA on how to integrate AML/CFT risks in prudential supervision;
2018/12/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 22 #

2018/2202(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasizes that the Authority’s budget is financed partly40% from European Union funds and partly60% through direct contributions from the Member States’ supervisory authorities and that this mixed financing arrangements may pose a threat to its independence and supervisory tasks; highlights that the Authority’s revenue will decrease as a result of the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the Union, and stresses the need to find adequate arrangements for its funding., that would allow the Authority to fulfil its mandate consistently, independently and efficiently;.
2018/12/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 25 #

2018/2202(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Highlights that the Authority will leave the United Kingdom in 2019, and draws attention to its budgetary implications; notes that its accounts and notes have been drawn up using the information available at the time of signing the accounts and draws the attention to its budgetary implications; mentions that on 20 November2017, the General Affairs Council of the European Union agreed to move the seat of the Authority to Paris, France and acknowledges that removal is planned for the beginning of 2019 and the Authority’s accounts include provisions for related costs amounting to 6,7 million euros and disclose 11,2 million euros remaining future contractual payments as scheduled for the Office in London.
2018/12/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 28 #

2018/2202(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Notes that, the Court observed some weaknesses in public procurement, mostly relating to services that lack of adequate balance between price and quality aspects; highlights that such procedures indicate that the Authority puts an over-emphasis on quality criteria and do not allow the identification of the most economically advantageous solutions, which should show a fair balance between quality and price.
2018/12/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 89 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Highlights that close to 40 % of MNEs’ profits are shifted to tax havens globally each year25 ; _________________with some European Union countries appearing to be the prime losers of profit shifting, because 35% of shifted profits come from EU countries, followed by developing countries (30%)1a; deplores that Ireland is the number one shifting destination, followed by Singapore, the Netherlands, Caribbean tax havens and Switzerland1b; deplores furthermore that about 80% of the profits shifted within the EU are shifted to the EU tax havens, primarily Ireland, Luxembourg and the Netherlands1c; [3] _________________ 1a Tørsløv, Wier and Zucman ‘The missing profits of nations’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 24701, 2018. 1b Tørsløv, Wier and Zucman ‘The missing profits of nations’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 24701, 2018. 1c Tørsløv, Wier and Zucman ‘Themissing profits of nations’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 24701, 2018. 25 Tørsløv, Wier and Zucman ‘The missing profits of nations’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 24701, 2018.
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 170 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16 a. Stresses that between 1985 and 2018, the global average statutory corporate tax rate has fallen from 49% to 24%1a ; notes that nominal corporate tax rates have decreased by 46% since 2000 at EU level –from an average of 32% in 2000 to 21,9% in 20181b; is concerned about a growing race to the bottom on nominal corporate tax rates at both international and EU levels; regrets that international tax reform such as G20/OECD led BEPS project did not touch upon this unfair tax competition; calls for a second set of international tax reforms aiming at tackling tax competition among countries and ensuring a fair allocation of taxing rights; underlines it is necessary to give a greater role to the UN Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters in the next reform of international tax rules; _________________ 1a Tørsløv, Wier and Zucman ‘Themissing profits of nations’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 24701, 2018. 1b Taxation trend in the EU, Table 3:Top statutory corporate income tax rates (including surcharges), 1995- 2018,European Commission 2018
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 214 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes the provisions on Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) included in ATAD I to ensure that profits made by related companies parked in low or no-tax countries are effectively taxed; acknowledges that they prevent the absence or diversity of national CFC rules within the Union from distorting the functioning of the internal market beyond situations of wholly artificial arrangements as called for repeatedly by Parliament; deplores the coexistence of two approaches to implement CFC rules in ATAD I and calls on Member States to implement only the simpler and most efficient CFC rules as in ATAD I Article 7(2)(a); asks the European Commission to make a legislative proposal reinforcing CFC rules, including a criteria on an actual corporate tax paid on profits lower than 18%;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 218 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Welcomes the general anti-abuse rule for the purposes of calculating corporate tax liability included in ATAD I, allowing Member States to ignore arrangements that are not genuine and having regard to all relevant facts and circumstances aimed at obtaining a tax advantage; reiterates its repeated call for the adoption of a general and common anti- abuse rule, namely in existing legislation and in particular in the parent-subsidiary directive, the merger directive and the interest and royalties directive; calls on Member States to consider a general anti- abuse rule including a minimum effective tax rate of 18%;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 244 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
28. Recognises that the new flow of information to tax authorities following the adoption of ATAD I and DAC4 creates the need for adequate resources to ensure the most efficient use of such information and to effectively reduce the current tax gap; calls on all Member States to evaluate if the tools of the authorities are sufficient and adequate to use this information; points out the importance of combining different sets of information in order to identify patterns which indicate suspicious activity and can thereby help to discover financial crimes, tax evasion or tax avoidance;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 271 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32 a (new)
32 a. Calls on the Council, assisted by the European Commission, to define a comprehensive and exhaustive list of potential harmful tax practices within the EU, to be updated every year; demands that criteria aiming at identifying harmful tax practices include, notably, schemes allowing for a large deduction of corporate income tax without benefiting the real local economy;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 284 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
33. Welcomes the re-launch of the CCCTB project in a two-step approach, with the Commission’s adoption of interconnected proposals on CCTB and CCCTB; calls on the Council to swiftly adopt them,stresses that once implemented fully, the CCCTB will make it possible to attribute income to where the value is created and will eliminate loopholes between national tax systems, in particular transfer pricing; calls on the Council to swiftly adopt and implement the two proposals side by side taking into consideration Parliament’s opinion that already includes the concept of virtual permanent establishment that would close the remaining loopholes allowing tax avoidance to take place and level the playing field in light of digitalisation;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 300 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Notes that the phenomenon of digitalisation has created a new situation in the market, whereby digital and digitalised companies are able to take advantage of local markets without having a physical, and therefore taxable, presence in that market, creating a non-level playing field and putting traditional companies at a disadvantage; notes that digital businesses models in the EU face a lower effective average tax burden than traditional business models31 ; deplores that digital businesses pay almost no taxes in some Member States despite their significant digital presence and large revenues in those Member States; reminds that, when it comes to the digitalisation of the whole economy, the location of the value creation should take into account the input from users as well as information collected on consumers' behaviour online; _________________ 31 As evidenced in the impact assessment of 21 March 2018 accompanying the digital tax package (SWD(2018)0081), according to which on average, digitalised businesses face an effective tax rate of only 9.5 %, compared to 23.2 % for traditional business models.
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 339 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36 b (new)
36b. Calls on Member States to ensure that the ‘Digital Services Tax’ remains a temporary measure by including a ‘sunset clause’ to the proposal for a Council Directive on the common system of a digital services tax on revenues resulting from the provision of certain digital services and by speeding up the discussion on a Significant Digital Presence1a ; _________________ 1a Proposal for a Council Directive laying down rules relating to the corporate taxation of a significant digital presence COM(2018) 147 final
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 407 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45 a (new)
45a. Calls on the Commission and the Council to create a mandatory standardised public European Business Register in order to gain up-to-date and trustworthy information on companies and to achieve transparency via cross- border access to comparable and reliable information of companies in the EU;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 425 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49 a (new)
49a. Deplores the fact that companies can make agreements with governments to pay almost no tax in a given country despite conducting substantial activity; points in this light to a tax ruling between the Dutch tax revenue authority and Royal Dutch Shell plc that seems to be in violation of Dutch tax law on the sole ground that the head office would be located in the Netherlands after the unification of the two former parent companies, which results in an exemption from Dutch dividend withholding tax, while at the same time recent investigations seem to show that the company pays no profit tax in The Netherlands either; reiterates its call on the Commission to investigate this case of potential illegal state aid;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 444 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 52
52. Notes that there is no single definition of letterbox companieHighlights that companies create cross-border operations and corporate constructions including artificial arrangements in order to avoid or circumvent national tax law; stresses that company mobility should not lead to forum shopping; notes that there is no single definition of letterbox companies; reiterates its call for a clear definition; stresses that the requirement of genuine economic activity in the destination Member States can prevent the creation of a letterbox company through a cross- border operation, as proposed in the draft report for the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive (EU) 2017/1132 as regards cross-border conversions, mergers and divisions;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 519 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 65 a (new)
65a. Welcomes that a VAT Mini One Stop Shop (MOSS) on telecommunications, broadcasting and electronic services was introduced in 2015 as a voluntary system for registration, declaration and payment of VAT; welcomes the extension of the MOSS to other supplies of goods and services to final consumers as of 1 January 2021;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 555 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 75
75. Points, however, to the need for better cooperation between the administrative, judicial and law- enforcement authorities within the EU, as highlighted by experts during the hearing held on 28 June 2018 and in a study commissioned by the TAX3 Committee; calls on the EPPO, OLAF, Eurofisc, Europol and Eurojust to closely cooperate with a view to coordinating their efforts against VAT fraud and to identifying and adapting to new fraudulent practices;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 708 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 102
102. Calls on the Commission to table a legislative proposal to ensure the automatic exchange of information between the relevant authorities, including tax and customs authorities, on beneficial ownership and relevant transactions for taxation purposes taking place in free ports, customs warehouses or SEZs;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 747 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 110 a (new)
110 a. Welcomes the Action Plan adopted by the Council on the 4th of December 2018, including several non-legislative measures to better tackle money laundering and terrorist financing in the EU; requests the Commission to regularly update the Parliament on the progress of the implementation of the Action Plan;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 748 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 110 b (new)
110 b. Is concerned by the absence of concrete procedures to assess and review the probity of members of the governing council of the European Central Bank, in particular when they are formally accused of criminal activity; calls for mechanisms to monitor and review the conduct and propriety of the members of the governing council of the European Central Bank and to protect them in case of abuse of power by the authority that has the appointment power;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 759 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 112 a (new)
112 a. Notes the positive results of the UK law establishing the Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO) in tracking proceeds of criminal activities; highlights that a UWO is a court order that requires a person who is reasonably suspected of involvement in, or of being connected to a person involved in, serious crime to explain the nature and extent of their interest in particular property, and to explain how the property was obtained, where there are reasonable grounds to suspect that the respondent’s known lawfully obtained income would be insufficient to allow the respondent to obtain the property; calls on the Commission to assess the feasibility of proposing a similar measure through EU legislation and report back to Parliament;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 762 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 112 b (new)
112 b. Welcomes the decision in some Member States to ban the issuing of bearer shares and to convert the current ones into nominal securities; reiterates its call on the Commission to propose EU- wide legislation to the same effect;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 763 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 112 c (new)
112 c. Stresses the urgent need to create a more efficient system for communication and information exchange among judicial authorities within the EU, replacing the traditional instruments of mutual legal assistance in criminal matters, which provide lengthy and burdensome procedures harming investigations of money laundering and other serious crimes; reiterates its call on the Commission to assess the need for legislative action in this field;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 764 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 112 d (new)
112 d. Calls on the Commission to assess and report to Parliament about the role and particular risks presented by legal arrangements such as Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), Special Purpose Entities (SPEs) and Non Charitable Purpose Trusts (NCPTs) in money laundering, particularly in the UK, and Crown Dependencies and Overseas territories;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 806 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 121 a (new)
121 a. Notes that the recent scandals affecting banks in Malta, Latvia, Estonia, the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark reveal the failure of supervision by national anti-money laundering authorities; highlights, at the same time, that ESAs have limited abilities to take a more substantial role in the anti-money laundering field due to tight resources coupled with a lack of appropriate powers;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 825 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 125 a (new)
125 a. Notes the concerns expressed by the EBA with regards to the implementation of the Directive 2013/36/EU on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms1a; welcomes the suggestions made by the EBA to tackle the deficiencies caused by the current Union legal framework; _________________ 1a https://www.eba.europa.eu/documents/101 80/2101654/Letter+to+Tiina+Astola+on+t he+request+to+investigate+a+possible+B UL+under+Article+17+of+Regulation+% 28EU%29%20No+10932010+- +24092018.pdf
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 827 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5.2
Cooperation between financial intelligence units (FIUs) and law enforcement
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 833 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 126 a (new)
126 a. Highlights that the fight against money laundering and tax evasion also requires good cooperation between FIUs and customs authorities;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 858 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 129 a (new)
129 a. Notes the Commission’s assessment of the framework for FIUs’ cooperation with third countries and obstacles and opportunities to enhance cooperation between FIUs in the Union including the possibility of establishing an EU level coordination and support mechanism; recalls that according to the AMLD5 this assessment should be ready by 1 June 2019; asks the Commission to consider this opportunity to make a legislative proposal for a EU Financial Intelligence Unit, creating a hub for joint investigative work and coordination, with its own remit of autonomy and investigatory competences on cross border financial criminality, and an early warning mechanism;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 863 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 129 b (new)
129 b. Calls on the Commission to draw up a report assessing the necessity of uniformisation or harmonisation of the organisational status conferred to FIUs in Member States, to ensure better cooperation and exchange of information, without interfering with their independence;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 864 #

2018/2121(INI)

129 c. Calls on the Commission to propose legislation for the creation of a European Financial Police within the framework of Europol, with its own autonomous investigatory competence, based on the European legal framework to tackle cross-border tax fraud, money laundering, financing of terrorism and predicate offences;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 870 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 131 a (new)
131 a. Takes note of the repeated calls from obliged entities, namely financial institutions, for proper channels of enhanced dialogue, communication and exchange of information between private bodies and public authorities, on one hand, and among obliged entities themselves, on the other, to provide less fragmented information to FIUs; calls on the Commission to draw up guidelines in accordance with the AMLD5, for Member States to implement at national level in this regard, namely using the mechanisms provided in the General Data Protection Regulation for secure and lawful exchange of data;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 881 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 133 a (new)
133 a. Calls on Member States to ensure that registers of beneficial owners contain verification mechanisms to ensure the accuracy of the data; calls on the Commission to make assessment of verification mechanisms and reliability of the data in its reviews;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 920 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 140 a (new)
140 a. Urges the Commission to lead on creating a global framework regulating virtual currencies which takes into consideration the risks of these new technologies; recalls the dangers posed to consumers by Initial Coin Offerings (ICO’s) and urges the Commission to enact a proposal for their regulation as financial operations; notes in particular that cryptocurrencies' opacity can be used to facilitate money laundering and tax evasion; calls on the Commission to draft legislative proposals to ban certain anonymity measures on specific cryptocurrencies, on a case-by-case basis;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 949 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 148
148. Recognises the effort made by some third countries to act decisively against BEPS; stresses, however, that such reforms should remain in line with existing WTO rules; considers the information gathered during the committee visit to Washington DC about the US tax reforms and their possible impact on international cooperation to be of particular importance; finds that some of the provisions of the US Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 would be incompatible with existing WTO rules according to some experts regrets certain provisions of the US tax reform seek, unilaterally and without any reciprocity, to revitalise transnational benefits attributable to US territory (presuming that these are generated, at least 50%, in US territory); welcomes the fact that the Commission is currently in the process of assessing the potential regulatory and commercial implications of, in particular, the BEAT, GILTI and FDII78 provisions of the new US tax reform; asks the Commission to inform Parliament of the results of the assessment; _________________ 78 Respectively ‘Base Erosion and Anti- Abuse Tax’ (BEAT), ‘Global Intangible Low Tax Income’ (GILTI) and ‘Foreign- Derived Intangible Income’ (FDII).
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 1000 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 154 c (new)
154 c. Notes that developing countries might not possess the resources to implement newly agreed international or European tax standards and /or might have more urgent tax gap issues to tackle to ensure they generate sufficient revenues to provide for essential public services; subsequently calls on the Council to exclude counter measures such as cuts in development aid;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 1005 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 154 g (new)
154 g. Notes the current negotiations between the EU and Switzerland towards a Framework Agreement; stresses its view that the EU should renegotiate its trade, economic and other relevant bilateral agreements with Switzerland to bring them into line with EU anti-tax fraud policy and anti-money laundering legislation, so as to eliminate serious flaws in the Swiss supervisory system which enable a policy of internal banking secrecy to continue, as well as the creation of offshore structures worldwide, tax fraud and tax evasion not constituting a criminal offence, weak supervision, the inadequate self-regulation of obliged entities, and aggressive prosecution and harassment of whistle-blowers;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 1021 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 158
158. Reiterates its call for the EU to have a leading role in the global fight against tax evasion, aggressive tax planning and money laundering, in particular through Commission initiatives in all related international forums; calls on the EU as a member of the G20 to aim for that forum to undertake a strong action against tax competition;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 1041 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 160 a (new)
160 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to push for a second set of international tax reform gathering all countries interested on an equal footing and aiming at tackling the growing corporate tax race to the bottom and the allocation of taxing rights;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 1097 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 170 b (new)
170 b. Notes that some tax treaties allow the development of potential harmful tax schemes, such as the ‘SingleMalt’ 1awhich directs profits to countries with which Ireland has a double taxation agreement but that do not have any corporation tax; asks the European Commission to investigate such schemes and assess if they constitute an abuse of tax treaties; _________________ 1a Christian Aid, ‘Impossible’ structures: tax outcomes overlooked by the 2015 tax Spillover analysis, Part Two, 2017 https://www.christianaid.ie/sites/default/fil es/2018-02/impossible-structures-tax- report.pdf
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 1102 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 171 a (new)
171 a. Asks Member States to renegotiate their bilateral tax treaties with third countries with the aim of introducing anti-abuse clauses, preventing ‘treaty shopping’ and a race to the bottom among developing countries;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 1103 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 171 b (new)
171 b. Reiterates its call on the European Union and its Member States to ensure that, when negotiating tax and investment treaties with developing countries, income or profits resulting from cross-border activities be taxed in the source country, where value is extracted or created; stresses, in this regard, that the UN Model Tax Convention ensures a fairer distribution of taxing rights between source and residence countries; stresses than when negotiating tax treaties, the European Union and its Member States should comply with the principle of policy coherence for development established in Article 208 TFEU;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 1132 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 177
177. Welcomes the broad definition of both ‘intermediary’ and ‘reportable cross- border arrangement’ in the recently adopted DAC683 ; _________________ 83stresses that the relevant information in relation to potentially aggressive tax planning arrangements should also be accessible to the general public; _________________ 83 OJ L 139, 5.6.2018, p. 1. OJ L 139, 5.6.2018, p. 1.
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 1149 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 178 a (new)
178 a. Calls for a rotation of auditors every 7 years to prevent conflicts of interests and the limitation of the provision of non-audit services to a minimum;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 1152 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 178 b (new)
178 b. Reiterates that intermediaries play a crucial role in facilitating money laundering and the financing of terrorism and should beheld accountable for these actions;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 1158 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 179 a (new)
179 a. Points out that professional secrecy cannot be used for the purposes of protection, the covering up of illegal practices or violating the spirit of the law; urges that the client/attorney privilege principle should not impede adequate STRs or the reporting of other potentially illegal activities without prejudice to the rights guaranteed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the general principles of criminal law; calls on the Commission to issue guidance on the interpretation and application of the legal privilege principle for professionals and to introduce a clear demarcation line between traditional judicial advice and lawyers acting as financial operators, in line with case-law of European courts;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 1159 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 179 b (new)
179 b. Calls on the Commission to assess the possibilities of blacklisting financial and non-financial intermediaries based in the EU which operate branches in countries blacklisted as non-cooperative jurisdictions or which are listed as high risk third countries by the Commission; Suggests further that intermediaries should be restricted from operating in the single market if convicted of financial crimes or of facilitating tax evasion;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 1167 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 180 a (new)
180 a. Calls for a general EU fund to be set up to give appropriate financial support to whistle-blowers whose livelihood is put at risk as a result of disclosures of criminal activity or facts with clear public interest;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 1174 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 181 a (new)
181 a. Is concerned by the impact of non- disclosure agreements in employment contracts and dismissal agreements, particularly in the financial sector; calls on the Commission to assess the possibility of proposing legislation banning abusive non-disclosure agreements and declared void agreements which limit the employee’s ability and right to report unlawful activity;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 1207 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 188 a (new)
188 a. Highlights that trade unions should have a greater role in the negotiation of whistleblowing policies and channels in the workplace; calls on Member States to allow, in national law, for whistle-blowers to report wrongdoing to a union representative if they feel they cannot report it internally;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 1224 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 194 a (new)
194 a. Notes that no EU Member States were included on the EU list of non- cooperative jurisdictions as EU Member States were not assessed; welcomes the declaration from the Chair of the Code of Conduct Group indicating that Member States could be assessed in the future1a; demands that such assessment is conducted without any further delay; _________________ 1a “The fact of screening the EU Member States with the same criteria is exactly what is under discussion in the context of the revision of the mandate of the Code Group that currently the Austrian Presidency of the Council is taking forward.” Exchange of views with Fabrizia Lapecorella, Chair of the Code of Conduct Group on Business Taxation, European Parliament, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/cmsdata/1 55396/TAX3%20Verbatim%2010%20Oct ober%202018_OR.pdfOct 2018
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 1233 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 199 a (new)
199 a. Reiterates its call for the creation of an EU Tax Policy Coherence and Coordination Centre (EUTPCCC) within the structure of the Commission1a,which would ensure effective and expeditious cooperation between Member States’ and facilitate early warning in cases like the Cum Ex scandal; urges Member States to support this call and for the Commission to present a legislative proposal for such a mechanism; _________________ 1a European Parliament resolution of 6 July 2016 on tax rulings and other measures similar in nature or effect (2016/2038(INI))
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 1280 #

2018/2121(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 207
207. Takes the view that the work of the TAXE, TAX2, PANA and TAX3 committees should be continued, in the forthcoming parliamentary term, in a permanent structure within Parliament such as a subcommittee to the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON), including Members from a diverse range of committees; considers that the Commissioner for Taxation, the Chair of the CoC Group and the Finance minister holding the rotating EU presidency should appear at least twice a year before the heretofore mentioned permanent structure;
2018/12/20
Committee: TAX3
Amendment 2 #

2018/2107(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission’s Mid- Term Evaluation of the EU’s Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP); welcomes the fact that the new regulation has seen an increase in exports from beneficiaries of the Everything But Arms (EBA) and GSP+ arrangements, which is an important stepcontribution towards poverty eradication; notes that the focus on fewer beneficiaries under the 2012 regulation should further contribute to this aim;
2018/12/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 4 #

2018/2107(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Emphasize that EU’s trade policy must be built on the principles of EU external policy (effectiveness, transparency and values); whereas Article 208 of the TFEU establishes the principle of policy coherence for development and sets the eradication of poverty as the main objective;
2018/12/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 8 #

2018/2107(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Underlines that the GSP+ is a key to the EU trade policy instrument which provides better market access and is accompanied by astringent monitoring mechanism to promote human and labour rights, environmental protection and good governance in vulnerable developing countries;
2018/12/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 10 #

2018/2107(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes with satisWelcomes the faction that the preference utilisation rate for EBA beneficiaries is high, meaning the potential benefit for the world’s poorest countries is also high; stresses; recalls that market- access alone is not enough to reduce poverty and inequalities; stresses therefore that EBA should be complemented with development aid as well as trade-related assistance and capacity-building if it is to become more usefuleffective; notes in particular that greater effort is needed to tackle issues such as land grabbing and environmental degradation in the context of EBA;
2018/12/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 17 #

2018/2107(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the fact that GSP has contributed to social development and human rights, in particular employment of women, implementation of good governance practices and ratification of core ILO conventions; urges the Commission to intensity dialogue with partner countries on these issues in order to ensure continuous progress; stresses the importance of continued engagement and monitoring, together with thegreater participation of civil society in these processes;
2018/12/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 20 #

2018/2107(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Expects the GSP mid-term review to encourage more the EU’s trade partners to adopt higher social, labour and environmental standards, which could be achieved through incentives such as additional tariff preferences for sustainably produced products;
2018/12/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 21 #

2018/2107(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Recalls that GSP is an incentive- based regime which must be used consistently in order to effective; regrets that investigations into alleged non- compliance with the requirements on human rights and labour standards have not been launched in a coherent or timely manner; urges the Commission to take more decisive and swift action into alleged violations of human or labour rights under the requirements of the GSP regime; calls for the establishment of a mechanism that can be invoked by individuals or groups who have been negatively affected by the implementation of the GSP regime;
2018/12/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 23 #

2018/2107(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for greater support to be given to GSP+ beneficiary countries to reverse the trend of decreasing product diversification; Is of the opinion that the more intensified GSP+ monitoring system, alongside the findings of UN and ILO monitoring bodies and information provided by third parties, has contributed to the fact that all GSP+ beneficiaries are making progress in implementing the 27 conventions; notes however that greater transparency in GSP+ monitoring is needed;
2018/12/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 28 #

2018/2107(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for greater participation in the monitoring process from Member State embassiescivil society and development agencies.
2018/12/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 95 #

2018/2098(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Praises the work done by the EU’s Special Representative for Human Rights (EUSR), Stavros Lambrinidis, in increasing the effectiveness, cohesion and visibility of human rights in EU foreign policy and recalls its request for his mandate to be made permanent; welcomes the recent approach on the EU’s Good Human Rights Stories initiative, which focuses on the best practices employed by various countries to counter attacks on the universality of human rights;
2018/09/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 222 #

2018/2098(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Considers that the support the EU provides for electoral processes and democracy around the world – its electoral missions and subsequent follow-up, its electoral assistance and, in particular, the active role played by Parliament in this regard – is of the utmost importance; stresses the importance of electoral observation in the context of peaceful democratic transitions, of strengthening the rule of law, of political pluralism and increasing the participation of women in electoral processes, and of transparency and respect for human rights; recalls that involving civil society organisations in the implementation of the election missions' recommendations is essential for their adoption at local level;
2018/09/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 237 #

2018/2098(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes the EU’s signature of the 22. Istanbul Convention and stresses the need to prevent and combat by all means violence against women, including domestic violence; supports, in this connection, the joint EU- UN Spotlight Initiative; urges countries to step up their legislation in order to tackle, at the earliest possible stage, gender-based violence, female genital mutilation and sexual violence, while promoting gender equality; condemns the frequent violation of women’s sexual and reproductive rights; emphasises that proper, affordable healthcare and universal respect for and access to sexual and reproductive rights and education should be guaranteed for all women;
2018/09/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 242 #

2018/2098(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22 a. Recalls the release in August 2017 of the first annual implementation report for the year 2016 of the Gender Action Plan II 2016-2020 (GAP II), which notes a number of positive trends in transforming the lives of girls and women through ensuring girls' and women's physical and psychological integrity, promoting the economic and social rights and strengthening girls' and women's voice and participation; underlines however that one year on from the adoption of GAP II it is too early to deliver a full assessment of its impact; emphasises the need to ensure coherence and complementarity among all existing EU external instruments and policies with respect to gender mainstreaming;
2018/09/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 260 #

2018/2098(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Notes with appreciation the adoption of the revised EU Guidelines for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of the Child and highlights the need of ensuring that all children are reached, including the most marginalised and those in vulnerable situations; underlines the fact that children are often exposed to specific abuses, such as child marriage, genital mutilation and child labour, especially in humanitarian crises and armed conflicts, and therefore require enhanced protection; stresses the need to step up the EU’s engagement when it comes to addressing the protection of children, including unaccompanied minors, and to devote particular attention to education and psycho-social support;
2018/09/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 304 #

2018/2098(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Denounces and explicitly rejects trafficking in human beings; underlines the fact that trafficking in human beings is a modern kind of slavery, and a serious crime which constitutes one of the worst forms of human rights violations; emphasises, in this respect,reiterates that human trafficking constitutes a regional and global problem which cannot always be addressed exclusively at national level; emphasises the importance of a consistent approach to the internal and external dimensions of the EU’s policies for combating trafficking in human beings; calls for the EU and the Member States to increase cooperation with third countries in order to investigate all stages of trafficking in human beings;
2018/09/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 314 #

2018/2098(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Encourages all countries, including the Member States, and the EU to engage in the negotiations to adopt a legally binding international human rights instrument for transnational corporations and other companies with respect to human rights, through active participation in the UN-established open-ended intergovernmental working group; welcomes the adoption of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) and calls for their universal application; recognises the major importance of the UN Global Compact and the National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights; encouragesmphasises the importance of supporting states’ efforts to develop their National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights by creating a database of best practices and case studies, particularly on access to remedy; calls on companies to exercise due diligence; calls on all countries to swiftly implement the UNGPs and guarantee that businesses in their jurisdictions abide by human rights and social labour standards; encourages all countries to tackle companies which use raw materials or other commodities originating from conflict zones; reiterates its call to include the rules of corporate liability for human rights violations into trade and investment agreements; emphasises that the victims of business- related human rights abuses should be guaranteed appropriate and effective access to remedies;
2018/09/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 325 #

2018/2098(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Considers GSP+ trade schemes to be one of the main EU trade policy instruments for promoting human rights, sustainable development, good governance and environmental standards with third countries; calls on the Commission to review and better monitor GSP+ schemes in order to ensure that human rights standards are upheld by beneficiary countries;
2018/09/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 339 #

2018/2098(INI)

29. Strongly condemns all forms of discrimination, including that carried out on the grounds of race, gender, sexual orientation, disability or any other status; is alarmed by the many manifestations of racism, xenophobia and other forms of intolerance and a lack of political representation for the most vulnerable groups, such as ethnic, linguistic and religious minorities, people with disabilities, the LGBTI community, women and children; calls for the EU to enhance its efforts to eradicate, without distinction, all forms of discrimination and to promote awareness, a culture of tolerance and inclusion, and special protection for the most vulnerable groups by means of human rights and political dialogues, the work of EU delegations and public diplomacy; stresses the importance of developing education strategies in schools in order to raise awareness among children and provide them with the tools they need to identify all forms of discrimination; calls on all countries to ensure that their respective institutions provide effective legal protection within their jurisdictions;
2018/09/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 2 #

2018/2084(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that trade liberalisation is notcan play a positive, per s role, in terms of reducing poverty and inequalities, and that it can even have negative effects on sustainable development if it is not properly regulated; underlines, in this context,in advancing sustainable development if it is accompanied by appropriate policies and institutions that maximise and distribute better the benefits of trade and economic growth; reiterates the importance of promoting policy reforms in the multilateral trading system which support development-related objectives; underlines the potential of the WTO as an efficient rules-based multilateral negotiating forum which provides a platform for open discussion on global trade-related issues; insists that the EU should continue to promote the democratisation of the WTO;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 21 #

2018/2084(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for a trade agenda based on fair trade for the benefit of all, which puts development and social, environmental and human rights at the centre of the process and has a special focus on the needs of low-income developing countries and least-developed countries; highlights in this regard the need of promoting comprehensive, binding and enforceable provisions on social, labour and environmental standards in trade agreements;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 28 #

2018/2084(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Underlines the importance for WTO members who are developing countries to decide on their own pace and sequencing of trade liberalisation according to their level of development;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 29 #

2018/2084(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Welcomes the entry into force of the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement on 22 February 2017 and notes that this agreement should bring significant benefits in particular to developing countries; recalls the importance of providing targeted and sustainable technical, financial and capacity building assistance to support the developing country Members, in particular least- developed countries, to implement the agreement and to adjust to the reform process;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 32 #

2018/2084(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Regrets that the WTO 11th Ministerial Conference did not secure progress on issues of key importance to developing countries; welcomes however enhanced preferential treatment previously secured at the WTO for LDCs including preferential Rules of Origin and treatment for service providers and emphasises the need to undertake capacity building measures that would allow suppliers from LDCs to benefit from the LDC Services Waiver;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 62 #

2018/2084(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the EU to continue to make the case for increasing the importance of the parliamentary dimension of the WTO; calls on WTO members to ensure democratic legitimacy and transparency by strengthening the parliamentary dimension of the WTO; stresses, in this connection, the need to ensure that parliamentarians have better access to trade negotiations and are involved in the formulation and implementation of WTO decisions and that trade policies are properly scrutinised in the interests of their citizens.
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 2 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 19 a (new)
– having regard to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol (A/RES/61/106),
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 17 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas humanitarian innovation must be consistent with the humanitarian principles (humanity, impartiality, neutrality, and independence) and the dignity principle;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 19 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K b (new)
Kb. whereas humanitarian innovation must be conducted with the aim of promoting the rights, dignity and capabilities of the recipient population, and it should be possible for all members of a crisis-affected community to benefit from innovation without discriminatory barriers to use;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 21 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K c (new)
Kc. whereas under no circumstances should humanitarian digitalisation and innovation lead to intentional harm;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 22 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K d (new)
Kd. whereas risk analysis and mitigation must be used to prevent unintentional harm, including those relating to privacy and data security and impacts on local economies;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 23 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K e (new)
Ke. whereas experimentation, piloting and trials must be undertaken in conformity with internationally recognised ethical standards;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 24 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K f (new)
Kf. whereas the work started at the World Humanitarian Summit for the creation of a global network aimed at addressing critical gaps in capacity and relationships must continue in order to generate a more supportive and enabling environment for innovation efforts that help comply with the humanitarian objectives;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 36 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the imperative that any digital trade strategy must be fully in line with the principle of Policy Coherence for Development (PCD); underlines that access to internet connectivity and digital payment methods are pivotal to enabling digital trade, sustainable development and inclusive growth; notes in this regard the potential of the Trade Facilitation Agreement to supporting digital initiatives in developing countries to facilitate cross- border trade;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 39 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls for the development of an action plan in technical innovation for humanitarian assistance to ensure compliance with the legal and ethical principles laid down in documents such as the New European Consensus on Development - 'Our world, our dignity, our future' and ‘Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development’;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 40 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Underlines that all aspects of humanitarian innovation should be subject to evaluation and monitoring, including an assessment of primary and secondary impacts of the innovation process; notes that ethical review and risk analysis should be undertaken prior embarking on humanitarian innovation and digitalisation projects, and should incorporate external or third party experts where appropriate;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 41 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Calls for the implementation in EU external action of the principles embodied in The Digital Single Market for Europe (DSM) strategy through the support to EU partners’ regulatory frameworks;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 47 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls for digitalisation to be incorporated into the national strategies for development of EU Member States;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 51 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for a more concerted and holistic cross-sectoral effort from the international community, including non- state actors such as representatives of civil society, the third sector, private companies and academia, to ensure that the shift towards a more digital economy leaves no one behind;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 54 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls for the improvement of political articulation between the EU, the EU Member States and other relevant actors, with a view to enhancing their coordination, complementary and the creation of synergies;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 69 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Deplores the persistent digital divides across gender, geography, age, and income, ethnicity, and health condition or disability, among other factors of discrimination, within each country; insists, therefore, that international development cooperation should use digital technologies for greater inclusion of disadvantaged groups;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 76 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls for increased efforts to address the challenges of digital exclusion through education and training on essential digital skills and initiatives to facilitate the use of ICTs; stresses the importance of e- learning and distant learning to reach remote areas and people of all ages;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 81 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls for the introduction of digital literacy in school curricula at all levels of education, from primary school to university, in developing countries, with a view to the acquisition of the skills needed to improve access to information;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 106 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Recalls that MSMEs in developing countries make up the majority of businesses and employ the majority of manufacturing and service sector workers; reiterates that facilitating cross-border e- commerce will have a direct impact on improving livelihoods, fostering higher living standards and boosting economic development; reaffirms the contribution that such endeavours could make to gender equality, since a great number of these companies are owned and run by women; stresses the need to reduce legal, administrative and social barriers to women’s entrepreneurship;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 117 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Points out that ICT tools can be used for information dissemination during both natural and technological disasters and emergencies, as well as in fragile and conflict affected contexts; highlights that digital technologies can enable low-income communities and other vulnerable communities to have access to quality basic services such as health, education, water and electricity, as well as to humanitarian relief and other public and private services;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 119 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Underlines that technological innovation in humanitarian assistance is a priority, most especially in the context of forced displacements, for contributing to sustainable solutions that bring stability and dignity to people’s lives and may facilitate the humanitarian development nexus; welcomes global initiatives to facilitate humanitarian innovation, such as the Global Alliance for Humanitarian Innovation (GAHI), the Humanitarian Innovation Fund (HIF) and UN Global Pulse, and calls for the EU to promote open data and strongly support the global communities of software developers and designers who are building practical open technology with a view to solving international development and humanitarian problems;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 125 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Stresses that e-government applications contribute to making public services faster and cheaper to access, improve consistency and citizen satisfaction, facilitate the articulation and activities of civil society, and increase transparency, thus contributing significantly to promoting democratisation and fighting corruption; stresses the vital role of technology and digitalisation for effective fiscal policy and administration, enabling an effective increase in domestic resource mobilisation; insists that it is imperative to create secure digital identities, as this could help determine the numbers of those in need of certain basic services;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 132 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Acknowledges the central role of digital technology in access to health services and in training for health workers andmanagement of health services, emergency response to epidemics, dissemination of public health campaigns, public access to health services and in training for health workers, support and promotion of basic research, and development of health and e-health information services; calls, therefore, on policymakers to introduce the appropriate policy and regulatory frameworks to scale up e-health projects; asks the Commission to provide the necessary financial resources in this regard;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 136 #

2018/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Highlights the importance of digital technologies in the fight against climate change, the improvement of the environment, and the development of renewable energies and agroecology; underlines the need to reduce the ecological impact linked to digitalisation;
2018/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 7 #

2018/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas education prevents the transmission of poverty between generations;
2018/09/04
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 8 #

2018/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas education plays a pivotal role in achieving gender equality and women’s empowerment;
2018/09/04
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 58 #

2018/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Underlines the importance of supporting countries affected by fragility and conflict to strengthen the resilience of their education systems during and after a crisis in order for children to be able to continue with their education;
2018/09/04
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 88 #

2018/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Reiterates the importance of reinforcing policies and measures promoting education for girls and recalls that girls and young women are particularly vulnerable and that special focus is needed to guarantee their access to all levels of education;
2018/09/04
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 102 #

2018/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Reiterates that only an enabling environment makes quality education possible, including nutritional aspects, health and safety, and access to electricity and water, water and adequate sanitation, in order to enable pupils to genuinely benefit from school and to increase completion rates, especially in primary education;
2018/09/04
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 108 #

2018/2081(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Considers it vital to improve coordination of donors in local groups for education in order to avoid duplication and even conflict of aid efforts; calls on Member States to make more systematic use of joint programming and delegation; recalls that development aid must not be subordinated to a strategy designed to wield influence;
2018/09/04
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 3 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the SDGs 2030, in particular Goal 3 on health, Goal 4 on education, Goal 5 on gender equality and Goal 13 on climate action require appropriate Union assistance and must be reflected in the budget for 2019, while focusing on long-term efforts to eradicate poverty, as stipulated in Article 208 TFEU;
2018/07/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 12 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that the Union and its Member States must honour their collective commitment, confirmed in 2015, to raise their ODA to 0,7 % of their GNI by 2030; calls on the Commission and the Member States to present binding timelines for progressive increases towards this level; calls the Member States to exclude the in donor costs out of the ODA calculation; reiterates the commitment made by the Commission to dedicate at least 20% of its total ODA to human development and social inclusion; calls for an increased allocation of its 2019 ODA to health, education and social protection, in order to reach its commitment by the end of the current MFF; stresses in particular the need to promote and protect sexual and reproductive health and rights, thereby countering the Global Gag Rule which was reinstated by the United States government;
2018/07/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 24 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Given the dramatic situation in the field of humanitarian aid, insists to mobilise more funds from the emergency aid reservehat the current global humanitarian needs are reflected with a significant funding increase for humanitarian aid budget lines; reiterates that education plays a key role in preventing man-made humanitarian crises by avoiding conflicts and welcomes that already a significant amount of humanitarian aid is spent on education in emergencies; calls, however, for a steady increase of this share and for more support to the Erasmus+ DCI budget line;
2018/07/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 29 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes the exhaustion of margins and flexibility mechanisms within the Union budget and in the Union’s external action, which are often used to mobilise additional funds to respond unforeseen needs, including humanitarian crises; in relation to this, opposes the Commission’s proposal for the funding of the second tranche of the Facility for Refugees in Turkey (FRT) that has not left sufficient margins under the Heading IV and MFF special instruments for unforeseen humanitarian crisis, due to the unfulfilled commitment by the Members States to contribute with EUR 2 billion by means of bilateral to the FRT; is concerned by the continued mobilisation of the European Development Fund (EDF) reserve to top- up contributions to the Union Trust Fund for Africa, most recently by EUR 500 million; stresses that this transfer of founds not only diverts money away from the EDF objectives of eradicating poverty and promoting sustainable development and towards migration management, but also severely limits the possibility to mobilise additional funds for future humanitarian crises in the ACP region in the coming years; calls again on Member States to increase their contributions to the FRT and the EU Trust Fund for Africa, for which pledged contributions currently amount to EUR 3 billion (before the additional EUR 500 million) from the Union budget and European Development Fund, and only EUR 430 million from EU Member States and other donors;
2018/07/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 32 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Recalls the importance to support expenditure directly linked to the achievement of the objectives of the humanitarian aid policy, inter alia, expenditure on technical and administrative assistance;
2018/07/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 33 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Emphasises the importance of maintaining payment appropriations in the humanitarian aid chapter at least on the same level as commitment appropriations, in order to avoid severe and constant lack of funds for payments, complicated urgent interventions and led to the accumulation of unpaid bills, with negative effects also on implementing partners;
2018/07/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 38 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 f (new)
4f. Reiterates the importance of focusing on main humanitarian crises, including forgotten humanitarian crises; calls to guarantee humanitarian funding for the following crises: Yemen (22 million people in need of humanitarian aid), Syria crisis including neighbouring countries (more than 13 million people in need of humanitarian assistance inside Syria), as well as for forgotten humanitarian crises such as Sahel (1,6 million children at risk of suffering from severe acute malnutrition and 6.8 million people food insecure) and DRC (13 million people in need and more than 2 million children suffering from severe acute malnutrition);
2018/07/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 39 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 g (new)
4g. Highlights the need to guarantee humanitarian and development aid for the Sahel; stresses that chronic poverty, climate change, intensification of conflicts and a nearly lean season this year have resulted in 6.8 million people in need of humanitarian aid in a region with structural fragilities restricting access to basic social services; therefore calls to increase humanitarian and development funding for the region to cover both life- saving interventions and longer term efforts to tackle the root causes of vulnerability to food and nutrition insecurity and to strengthen basic social services;
2018/07/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 40 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 h (new)
4h. Stresses that the need to implement the humanitarian/development nexus should be reflected in the budget 2019, in focusing on key sectors such as nutrition; calls therefore on the Commission, and in particular ECHO and DEVCO to close the humanitarian and development gap by dedicating both humanitarian and longer term funding to nutrition in the budget 2019, hence enabling children with severe acute malnutrition to access the treatment in all contexts, emergency and development alike;
2018/07/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 45 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls that the effects of climate change have a tangible impact on several aspects of human life and are increasingly being felt in the development countries; calls for an increased allocation in climate action, which better reflects the strong commitment to and increased engagement in climate diplomacy in order to tackle climate change; stresses, that the allocation shall come from other funds than development funding.
2018/07/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 49 #

2018/2046(BUD)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Underscores the importance of pilot projects and preparatory actions; asks for continued support for on-going and new pilot projects and preparatory actions;
2018/07/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 3 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
- having regard to Directive (EU) 2017/541 of the European Parliament and the Council of 15 March 2017 on combating terrorism and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA and amending Council Decision 2005/671/JHA,
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 5 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 b (new)
- having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 5 October 2017 on prison systems and conditions (2015/2062(INI)),
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 6 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 c (new)
- having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 3 May 2018 on media pluralism and media freedom in the European Union (2017/2209(INI)),
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 7 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 d (new)
- having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 1 March 2018 on the situation of fundamental rights in the EU in 2016 (2017/2125(INI)),
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 8 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 e (new)
- having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 30 May 2018 on the implementation of Directive 2012/29/EU establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime(2016/2328(INI)),
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 9 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 f (new)
- having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 25 November 2015 on the prevention of radicalisation and recruitment of European citizens by terrorist organisations (2015/2063(INI)),
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 10 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 g (new)
- having regard to the Opinion of the European Committee of the Regions – Combatting radicalisation and violent extremism: prevention mechanisms at local and regional level,
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 11 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 h (new)
- having regard to the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism,
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 12 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 i (new)
- having regard to the Council of Europe handbook for prison and probation services regarding radicalisation and violent extremism,
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 13 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 j (new)
- having regard to the European Court of Auditors Special report Tackling radicalisation that leads to terrorism: the Commission addressed the needs of Member States, but with some shortfalls in coordination and evaluation,
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 14 #
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 15 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital -A (new)
-A. whereas counter-terrorism measures and the protection of freedoms are not conflicting goals, but complementary and mutually reinforcing;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 16 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital -A a (new)
-A a. whereas the Union is founded on the values of human dignity, freedom, equality and solidarity, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, as well as on the principles of democracy and the rule of law; whereas acts of terrorism constitute one of the most serious violations of these universal values and principles;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 17 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital -A b (new)
-A b. whereas the EU should do the utmost possible to guarantee the wellbeing of its citizens who are endangered by terrorists; whereas Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights enshrines both the right to liberty and the right to security, which complement each other; so that wherever measures are taken to combat terrorism, the right to liberty must be safeguarded in all cases; whereas Article 10 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights ensures the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 18 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital -A c (new)
-A c whereas the Charter of Fundamental Rights prohibits discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, ethnic or social origin, genetic features, language, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, membership of a national minority, property, birth, disability, age or sexual orientation; and recognises the right of people with disabilities to benefit from measures to ensure their independence, social and occupational integration, and participation in the life of the community; whereas the rights of persons with disabilities in the EU are also protected by the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 22 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the security of one Member State is the security of all in the Union; whereas in the last two years the EU and the Member States have made progress in countering the threats posed by terrorism which require a holistic approach, articulating internal and external security and national and European coordination;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 30 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the national security and intelligence agencies of EU Member States and of some third countries cooperate very effectively through the Counter Terrorism Group (CTG), an informal body outside the EU, and on a bilateral and multilateral basis; whereas the EU has an established complex of structures dealing wholly or in part with terrorism, notably through Europol’s European Counter Terrorism Centre (ECTC)through EU Intelligence and Situation Centre (INTCEN), as the gateway for strategic intelligence from the intelligence and security services to the EU, and Europol’s European Counter Terrorism Centre (ECTC), as the central hub for law enforcement information exchange and cooperation in the field of counter terrorism at the EU level;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 38 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas the diverse landscape of regional, national, EU and international actors in the field of terrorism with overlappingspecific competences and insufficiently delineateddifferent mandates, the multitude of formal and informal fora for cooperation and exchange of information, as well as the division of competences between the different regional and national agencies, between law enforcement services and intelligence services and between the EU and the Member States, give rise to difficulties with regard to the coordinationrequire consistent efforts in order to provide efficiency and coherence of the response to the terrorist threat;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 50 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas the Commissioner for Security Union is a valued actor in joining up the Commission's policy development, implementation, monitoring and evaluation; whereas the establishment of the position of Commissioner for Security Union signals the EU's commitment to encouragingsupport cooperation between Member States on issues of EU internal security while fully respecting the status of these matters as national competencies as laid down in the Treaties;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 81 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas in recent years the EU Member States have suffered major terrorist attacks, perpetrated or inspired by jihadist groups such as Daesh, Hezbollah or Al-Qaeda; whereas far right, far left and ethno- nationalist separatist extremism are also matters of concern;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 97 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
K a. whereas the cross-border aspects of the terrorist threat call for a coordinated EU approach by offering cooperation and assistance in the form of capacity-building in third-countries;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 111 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M
M. whereas Daesh and Al-Qaeda arim to be financially self-reliant and whereas illicit trade in goods, firearms, oil, drugs, cigarettes and cultural objects, among other items, as well as trafficking in human beings, slavery, child exploitation, racketeering and extortion, have become means for terrorist groups to obtain funding; whereas the possible links between organised crime and terrorist groups could constitutes a growing noteworthy security threat; whereas these sources could enable the continued funding of future criminal activities by Al-Qaeda, as well as by Daesh following its territorial collapse in Syria and Iraq;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 158 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital S
S. whereas the flow of illegal migrants and refugees poses challenges to the integration process, which have already been exploited by extremists and could be further exploited in the future;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 196 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital X
X. whereas experts highlight the positive experience offered by a multi- agency approach, focusing on creating infrastructures that ensure the provision of early-stage support to those vulnerable to radicalisation and their families from different authorities and organisations across multiple levels and emphasising the supportive role of the police, thus strengthening the relationship;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 199 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital Y b (new)
Y b. whereas the promotion of social inclusion and active promotion of democratic values contribute to mitigate the risk of radicalisation through practical measures to address violent extremist ideologies, poverty, discrimination and marginalisation, including the prevention of early school leaving and school exclusion, enhancing equality, social cohesion and encouraging active citizenship;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 225 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AC
AC. whereas there is a prevalence of Wahhabi and Salafist literature available in certain bookshops and online in Europe, leaving little moderate alternative interpretation available to Muslim communities;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 254 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AG a (new)
AG a. whereas several recent investigations have shown that the internet and namely social media can play a role as a driver of radicalisation leading to violent extremism as well as a tool for xenophobic groups to disseminate hate speech and illicit content especially among young people;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 259 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AH a (new)
AH a. whereas combating radicalisation and violent extremism requires close and coordinated collaboration between all concerned actors, at all levels of governance (local, regional and national) as well as with civil society and the private sector;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 268 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AI
AI. whereas although majorsome progress has been made with regard to removal of online terrorist content, there is a need to scale up the companies' engagement; whereas the removals are often not complete nor timely or permanent, removing the content from one website but leaving it on another belonging to the same company; whereas effective and comprehensive and transparent reporting by companies has to be improved;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 284 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AJ
AJ. whereas, in response to larger companies removing more content and doing so at a greater pace, Daesh is increasingly using new and/or smaller platforms which are less suited to fast removal of terrorist material; whereas this diversification to smaller platforms makes additional technical support and the sharing of best practices essential to enable, for example, the introduction of platform-agnostic automated tools, such as the database of hashes which can identify online terrorist content with a high degree of accuracy;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 289 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AK
AK. whereas prisons have become hothouses of extremism, incubatmagnify and accelerate the threat of radicalisation of offenders, incubating and enabling terroristsm; whereas many of those serving prison sentences will soon be released back into their communities and there are few resources to monitor their activities; whereas prison conditions can play a significant role in heightening or lessening risks of radicalisationwith particular reintegration needs and high risk of re- offending; whereas there are few resources to monitor their activities and achieve re- entry into society; whereas prison regimes and risk management can play a significant role to mitigate these threats;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 308 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AL
AL. whereas retention of data is an essential part of the investigative process; whereas police and judicialthe national competent authorities usually rely heavily on communications data to successfully proceed with their casework; whereas in order for interoperability of information systems to reach its full potential, harmonised data retention regimes across the EU are vital; whereas the necessity of an appropriate data retention regime when it comes to the fight against terrorism was consistently raised during the work of the TERR Committee;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 317 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AM
AM. whereas the use of encryption by terrorists to protect their communications or stored data represents a considerable challenge for law enforcement,the national competent authorities denying access to essential intelligence and evidence; whereas encryption becomes particularly critical when even the responsible online service providers are unwilling or unable to decrypt the communication;
2018/09/18
Committee: TERR
Amendment 357 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AY
AY. whereas a variety of factors can lead to difficulties in cooperation between the different national, regional and local services within the Member States, such as: overlapping competences and insufficiently delineated mandates; hesitancy to share information as this might result in loss of responsibility or loss of important information flows; legal obstacles when it comes to sharing information between different servicauthorities or the possibility of using intelligence in court cases; servicauthorities being obliged to compete with each other for resources; and technical barriers to information exchange;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 367 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital AZ
AZ. whereas adjusting thethe different legal standards applying to information exchange between intelligence and, respectively, the law enforcement authorities isare one of the main challenges that need to be addressed, especially, since intelligence often concerns information on people who are not yet suspects in criminal investigations but belong to terrorist networks or are returning FTFs;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 372 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital BA
BA. whereas a possible solution could also be offered by the creation of counter- terrorism centres or units within the national territory; whereas such centres allow representatives of the different servicnational competent authorities to communicate with each other on a regular basis and discuss how best to cooperate and exchange information; whereas this helps build trust between the servicnational competent authorities and fosters a better understanding of their respective working methods and challenges;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 379 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital BB
BB. whereas security services tend to cooperate and exchange information bilaterally or multilaterally - notably through the Counter Terrorism Group (CTG) and with the EU bodies via EU INTCEN, by sharing strategic intelligence; whereas it is necessary to find a practical solution to fill the existing gaps between the parallel tracks of the law enforcement community and the intelligence community, as well as between Europol's ECTC and the CTG, in order to allow a more systematic interaction between both communities and an enhanced operationalmore efficient cooperation, while still keeping them separate;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 393 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital BD
BD. whereas efficient and systematic cooperation between the Member States and the EU aAgencies, according to their legal mandates, as well as among the agencies in the counter-terrorism field is imperative, especially cooperation between Europol and Eurojust in order to effectively support the efforts to detect, prevent, and investigate and prosecute the perpetrators of a terrorist attack;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 402 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital BG
BG. whereas several EU instruments such as Decision 2005/671/JHA, the CT Directive and the Europol regulation require Member States to share information on terrorism with the relevant agencies; whereas increased information sharing with Europol and Eurojust on a regular basis and in a timely and systematic manner, including contextual information, according to their legal mandates, facilitates their work in detecting links between cases and providing an overview of challenges and best practice related to investigations, prosecutions and convictions for terrorist offences;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 479 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital BV
BV. whereas social media fundraising, non-profit organisations and small wire transfers arecould be used as funding methods for Daesh and other terrorist organisations; whereas micro lending platforms are used to facilitate all three of these typologies;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 497 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital CA
CA. whereas cyber-attacks on electronic services or through interconnected systems are a key compontent of hybrid threatsial tool for cyber terrorism;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 498 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital CB
CB. whereas the Commission Comprehensive Assessment of EU Security Policy and the evaluation study of Directive 2008/114/EC in need of revision and updating indicate that: the threat to critical infrastructures is likely to continue to rise, that there is a need to enhance preparation and response capabilities and to revise Directive 2008/114/EC, and that there is an interest in targeting transport infrastructures; whereas a better framework is needed to improve rail security and to address the issue of protection of public areas of transport infrastructures, such as airports and railway stations and also energy production facilities, with particular attention to nuclear power plants;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 505 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital CE
CE. whereas the private sector should be involved in the protection and insurance of critical infrastructure and soft targets;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 511 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital CG
CG. whereas the Commission, in its communication on the new Multiannual Financial Framework, proposes to significantly increase EU funding for security and defence, including EU internal security;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 530 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital CR
CR. whereas the potential crime-terror nexus could also facilitates the access of terrorists to firearms;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 536 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital CT
CT. whereas the key regions in the EU’s 's neighbourhood, and more specifically the Balkans, the Caucasus and North Africa, are facing important challenges such as those relating to foreign fighters and returnees management, as well as to home- grown radical cells;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 575 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital DA
DA. whereas deaththe aftermath of terrorist attacks destroys families and leaves a legacy of irrevocable sadness, and many of the injured survivors of terrorist attacks suffer disfiguring and life- changing loss of senses and limbs and their plight impacts heavily on close family and community, while too often once the media spotlight has passed, the long-term needs of the victims are neglected;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 593 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital DE a (new)
DE a. whereas businesses, including SMEs, can also suffer damage from terrorism such as property damage and business interruption;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 597 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital DF
DF. whereas the Union is founded on the values of human dignity, freedom, equality and solidarity, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, as well as on the principles of democracy and the rule of law; whereas acts of terrorism constitute the most serious violation of these universal values and principles;deleted
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 604 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital DG
DG. whereas the EU should do the utmost possible to guarantee the physical and psychological integrity of its citizens who are endangered by terrorists; whereas Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights enshrines both the right to liberty and the right to security, which complement each other;deleted
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 610 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital DH
DH. whereas the Charter of Fundamental Rights prohibits discrimination on the ground of disability and recognises the right of people with disabilities to benefit from measures to ensure their independence, social and occupational integration, and participation in the life of the community; whereas the rights of persons with disabilities in the EU are also protected by the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities;deleted
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 634 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Reiterates that while Member States remain first in line to respond to and prevent threats, a clear need exists to fully recognisrther clarify and consolidate the Security Union's role in supporting them, providing common solutions and adding value;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 641 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that, at this stage, the EU and the Member States should improve cooperation through existing European agencies and Member States’ security' competent authorities and justice institutions;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 670 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission to work with the Member States towards more transparency and a common understanding of threat levels; calls on the Member States to swiftly transmit to the appropriate EU bodies information on the change of the threat level and the rationale behind it;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 682 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Member States to monitor all identified foreign terrorist fighters; calls for an effective and appropriate follow-up of the threat posed by returnees, and for this purpose invites Member States to share contextual information about returnees via Europol; calls on the Commission to assist Member States in the establishment of aligned classification systems in order to distinguish between high, medium and low-risk returnees;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 746 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls for the creation of an EU ‘Centre of Excellence for Preventing Radicalisation (CoE PR)’, to be embedded in the Commission with adequate financial and human resources; believes its tasks should include coordination, including of funding, and facilitation of cooperation among Member States, policymakers, practitioners (by involving former RAN and ESCN structures), technologists, experts and researchers in the area of preventing and countering radicalisation, exchange of best practices, lighthouse projects and training, also by partnering with key strategic third countries; considers that this centre should also establish methodologies to evaluate and measure the effectiveness of programmes and projects;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 876 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
25. Calls on the Member States to establish binding procedures for schools for tackling the challenge of radicalised pupils, and to offer training for teachers with regard to this; stresses the need for involvement of law enforcement and justice bodcompetent authorities in the process of addressing radicalisation;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 889 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Underlines the need to achieve automatic, fast and full removal of terrorist content and the need to achieve prevention of upload or streaming of terrorist content; requests the Commission to present a legislative proposal obliging companies to remove terrorist content fully within one hour from upload and to introduce clear and transparent reporting obligations on the incidence of terrorist content and removal rates, as well as sanctions for non-compliance;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 911 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Calls for the creation of an online European platform that citizens can use in order to flag terrorist and extremist content online, increasing companies’ capabilities to respond to flagged content;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 939 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
29. Calls on Member States to ensure secure, safe and orderlyjust prison conditions and to create specific procedures for radicalised inmates, in order to prevent radicalisation of others, as well as to ensure targeted monitoring and targeted disengagement measures, and to train prison staff accordingly;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 975 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Urges Member States to ensure that they havefind the adequate means for ensuring the necessary technical equipment (for example mobile devices allowing the police to check the biometrics of a person during on-the-spot checks), software, security systems and qualified staff to make full use of the existing information systems and cooperation mechanisms;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 989 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
34. Urges Member States to adopt the approach of 'information sharing by default' when it comes to sharing CT- related information, among national competent authorities thus exchanging such information as a rule, and refraining from such exchange only in specific cases where circumstances require that it be withheld;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1032 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
42. Calls on Member States to ensure access to VIS for law enforcement authorities involved in CT operationtheir CT competent authorities and for a simplified procedure for such access;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1048 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
45. Calls on the Member States to interconnect their PIUs in order to facilitate the exchange of PNR, data and calls on the Commission to propose technological solutions to make the exchange of PNR data less time-consuming and demanding in terms of human resources by automating the processing of requests from one PIU to another; encourages, therefore, projects such as the ISF project led by the Netherlands to develop PIU.net based upon the established FIU.net; asks the Commission, together with Europol, to support the development of joint targeting rules and risk assessments to be applied by the Member States, in order to enable Europol to searchsearches into the national PNR data with central algorithms;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1084 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 53
53. Calls on the Member States that have not yet done so to create national counter-terrorism 'fusion centres'/coordination units, as well as coordinated databases, in order to centralisein order to facilitate the search, identification and exchange of terrorism-related information and intelligence from all relevant national stakeholders;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1101 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 55
55. Recommends that Member States provide guidance or a legal framework in national law as to when it is permissible to exchange information between services, and believes that aligning national standards on this issue iwith other MS' competent authorities and EU agencies as a precondition for an EU-wide solution to the issue of when such information can be used and shared;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1109 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 56
56. Calls on the Member States to examinesupport the examination of the possibility of better coordination and cooperation between intelligence and law enforcement services at EU level, e.g. by increasingly sending intelligence experts in addition to law enforcement staff to the meetings of the Counter-Terrorism Joint Liaison Team (CTJLT) at Europol, which could serve as a blueprint for further cooperation between law enforcement and intelligence; calls on the Commission to support the CTJLT, including special funding;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1118 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 57
57. Calls on Member States and European stakeholders to continue existing operational capabilities and enhance maximum effective cooperation in the fields of counter-terrorism and EU internal security;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1125 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 58
58. Calls on Member States to further support the sharing of intelligence through EU INTCEN and calls for Europol to become a veritable hub for law enforcement information exchange and cooperation in the field of counter- terrorism in the EU, if necessary with a stronger mandate;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1279 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 88
88. Calls for the mandate of EUNAVFOR MED Operation Sophia to be extended and its territorial scope enlarged with a view to better responding to changing migration patterns such as ghost landings from Tunisia, and for the fight against terrorism to be specifically includedassessing the possibility to include the fight against terrorism in its mandate;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1323 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 97
97. Calls on the Commission to develop, together with Member States and international partners, ways of better monitoring financial flows and identifying users of virtual currencies, electronic wallets and prepaid cards, crowdfunding platforms and online and mobile payment systems in relevant investigations;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1344 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 99 a (new)
99 a. Calls on Member States to ensure that cryptocurrency companies fully apply Anti-Money Laundering regulations when users convert cryptocurrencies to real currency;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1347 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 99 b (new)
99 b. Stresses the importance of enhancing interaction and exchange of information between investigative authorities and the private sector, namely obliged entities under the EU AML/CFT Directive, to overcome the shortcomings of segregated and incomplete information submitted by suspicious transaction reports; calls on the Commission and Member States to develop dedicated fora for sharing financial information, including on use of virtual currency, including the private sector, under safe channels and EU data protection standards; notes the important role that Europol could play in this regard;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1348 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 99 c (new)
99 c. Calls on the Commission to examine the EU regulation virtual currency platforms, and namely exchanges between different virtual currencies, since some Member States have already spearheaded national systems to become global hubs for virtual currency platforms; calls on the Commission to form an expert working group to explore next steps in the EU- wide regulation of virtual currencies; calls on the Commission and Member States to act as global advocates for a coherent and coordinated international regulatory framework around virtual currencies;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1349 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 99 d (new)
99 d. Calls on Commission and Member States to mandate and support formal, strategic and sustained operational law enforcement training to enhance capacity in Member States for investigating illicit activity involving virtual currencies; stresses that these efforts should ensure a standard level of law enforcement competency across the EU, so that certain Member States do not fall behind; emphasises the importance of conducting the EU-wide risk assessments of virtual currency activities and of coordinating investigative initiatives to use findings from those assessments to develop strategies for regulatory and law enforcement approaches over the short, medium and long-term;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1350 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 99 e (new)
99 e. Calls on Member States to encourage cryptocurrency companies to use analysis tools to assess potential criminal activity associated with the destination and recipient addresses;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1351 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 99 f (new)
99 f. Encourages the Commission to carry out an in-depth assessment to evaluate whether features designed to make cryptocurrency users untraceable should be banned;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1352 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 100
100. Calls on the Member States which have not yet done so to establish national CIP programmes addressing the issues identified by the Commission, especially in relation to the potential vulnerabilities of critical infrastructures, in its 2006 communication on a European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection which should be revised and updated;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1361 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 106
106. Calls for Directive 2008/114 to be revised, in order to: provide similar rules and procedures for ‘operators of essential services’ as in the NIS Directive; ensure that designation of ECIs be done on the basis of an analysis of the systems supporting vital and cross-border services, rather than a sector-by-sector approach, taking due account of the importance of cybersecurity; allow the Commission to designate assets of pan-European services as ECIs; take due account of existing interdependencies; create an obligation to report incidents, conduct stress tests, provide appropriate training at the designated contact points and establish quality requirements as regards business and operational continuity plans in the case of an incident or attack;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1364 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 107
107. Recommends that the private sector be involved when devising programmes for the protection of critical infrastructure and soft targets, and highlights the need to develop public-private dialogues to this effect and to develop national and local resilience;
2018/09/12
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1445 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 126
126. Calls on the Commission to establish an EU Coordination Centre for victims of terrorism (CCVT), which should provide timely and adequate crisis support in cases of mass attacks in one or several Member States; considers that the role of the CCVT would be to ensure the provision of expertise at EU level by promoting exchange of knowledge and best practices; stresses however the need to extend support and protection measures to indirect victims, like victim’s relatives, eyewitnesses and first responders;
2018/09/13
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1472 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 132
132. Calls on the Member States to ensure that the assistance provided to victims of terrorism also encompasses measures such as first aid, psychological support, protection from secondary victimisation, effective access to justice, cash advances to help cover immediate expenses, certified childcare and home support, tax relief schemes or other forms of social benefits and help with transport;
2018/09/13
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1517 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 139
139. Calls on the Member States to ensure that the necessary data protection safeguards are in place, including appropriate technical and organisational measures to protect the security and confidentiality of personal data; urges the Member States to provide clear rules as to who can access and who consults which data in the systems, to maintain records of consultation and disclosure, and to provide for rights of access, rectification, erasure and restriction, as well as rights to compensation and judicial redress;
2018/09/13
Committee: TERR
Amendment 1519 #

2018/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 139 a (new)
139 a. Encourages the Commission to regularly submit reports to the European Parliament and to the Council, assessing the added value of the anti-terrorism legislation; asks that such reports shall also focus on fundamental rights and freedoms, including on non- discrimination, on the rule of law, and on the level of protection and assistance provided to victims of terrorism;
2018/09/13
Committee: TERR
Amendment 6 #

2018/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls the New European Consensus on Development in which the EU and its Member States reaffirm their commitment to Policy Coherence for Development (PCD) across all policies and all areas covered by the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development;
2018/04/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 10 #

2018/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls the EU’s and its Member States’ commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and underlines that coherence of the CAP with the SDGs is crucial; recalls in particular SDG 2 and its associated targets, which aim at ending hunger and malnutrition by 2030,notably by increasing productivity of small-holders and achieving sustainable and climate resilient agriculture and food systems;
2018/04/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 20 #

2018/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for another chapter in the CAP post-2020 legislation regarding its responsibility in development policy issues and stresses on the need to systematically measure the CAP’s impact on developing countries;
2018/04/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 34 #

2018/2037(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Urges the Member States to put an end to the goal of an ever more intensified European agriculture and to cease overproduction in the livestock sector through the obligatory introduction of an area-based livestock farming system; consequently urges them to reduce, and ultimately to put an end to, their imports of protein crops from third countries such as Argentina and Brazil, since increased soybean production has led to negative social and environmental impacts, such as biodiversity loss, forced displacement of small farmers and indigenous people, loss of employment and higher level of food insecurity;
2018/04/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 62 #

2018/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. SRecalls the need to improve the contribution of finance to sustainable and inclusive growth and to accelerate the shift to a low-carbon and resource efficient economy; stresses the potential of a faster green transition as an opportunity for orienting capital markets towards long- term, innovative and efficient investments; notes that environmental, social and governance (ESG) benefits and risks are not reflected in prices and that this provides a market advantage to unsustainable and short-termist geared finance; stresses that a political and regulatory framework to govern sustainable finance is overdue;
2018/03/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 77 #

2018/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Underlines that the financial sector has a critical role to play in the process of accelerating the transition towards a low-carbon, more resource- efficient and sustainable economy;
2018/03/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 82 #

2018/2007(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the financial sector as a whole and its core function of allocating capital to benefit society should be governed by the values of equity and sustainability; taking into account environmental, social and governance considerations; emphasises in that respect the instrumental role of economic, fiscal and monetary policy in fostering sustainable finance by facilitating capital allocation, by re-orienting investments towards more sustainable technologies and businesses, to decarbonised and resource- efficient economic activities which are able to reduce the current need for future resources and thereby capable of meeting EU sustainability goals; insists that a substantial price for greenhouse gas emissions is a key component of a functioning and efficient environmental and social market economy;
2018/03/02
Committee: ECON
Amendment 3 #

2018/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that ODA alone is not sufficient to meet development needs and that the private sector plays an essential role in the realisation of inclusive and sustainable development and the implementation of the 2030 Agendait is necessary to ensure that trade becomes an effective vehicle to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); calls on the EU to increase its financial commitment to Aid for Trade initiatives that are essential for developing countries, in particular Least Developed Countries (LDCs);
2018/06/28
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 7 #

2018/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that when acting in development, the private sector should abide by shared principles and common values, and that development objectives and effeConsiders that the private sector should meet its responsibility in contributing to the realization of the 2030 Agenda; stresses that development objectives and effectiveness principles should prevail and recalls the obligations that the private sector is required to fulfill under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises in terms of transparency and respect of human rights; calls on the Commission to draw up a legislative proposal on binding due diligence obligations for supply chains and to engage in constructive ness should prevailgotiations on the UN binding instrument on business & human rights;
2018/06/28
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 12 #

2018/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the EU to ensure that its activities with developing countries, both in the field of development and trade, promoteare based on a fair and balanced framework among equal partners and are aimed at the promotion and respect of human rights;
2018/06/28
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 21 #

2018/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines that trade is not an end in itself, but that an inclusive, rules-based, free and fair trade policy if aligned with the SDGs can contribute to poverty eradication; recalls, reducing inequalities and creation of decent jobs; recalls the need to strengthen the principle of policy coherence for development, requiring that the objectives of development cooperation be taken into account in policies that are likely to affect developing countries; calls on the EU to systematically evaluate the impact of its trade and fiscal policies on developing countries;
2018/06/28
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 33 #

2018/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Reiterates the importance of the multilateral rules-based order as the most effective way to achieve an inclusive global trading system; emphasises the importance of comprehensive provisions on social, labour and environmental standards in trade agreements; and welcomes the Commission’s commitment to include abinding and enforceable chapters on Trade and Sustainable Development in all trade agreement; calls for accompanying measures, including financial support, to be implemented in trade agreements concluded with developing countries in order to support their efforts in respecting and implementing internationally agreed social and environmental standards; reiterates its call for more transparency in the trade in natural resources;
2018/06/28
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 39 #

2018/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Recalls that Africa is still marginalized in the global context, calls on the EU to support its ambitions of creating a genuine intra-African market and avoid taking steps which might hinder these ambitions; underlines in this regard the need to maximise the development and the positive impact of migration and mobility;
2018/06/28
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 42 #

2018/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Calls on the EU to take into account the different level of development and capabilities of developing countries and to support African countries in strengthening its productive and transformation capacities in order to become less dependent on raw materials and simple processed products, enhancing their competitiveness and participation in global markets, and to help create quality jobs particularly strengthening the role of women in the formal and informal economy; stresses the need for any trade agreement with developing countries to provide for sufficiently asymmetrical liberalisation schedules, protection for infant industries, development-supportive rules of origin and effective safeguard clauses;
2018/06/28
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 45 #

2018/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses that Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) are an important instrum, if accompanied by appropriate structural measures and duly monitored, have the potential to be an important tool to promote regional integration and the inclusion of the African continent into promote sustainable development through trade, if accompanied by appropriate structural measureworld trade; stresses the importance of engagement with partner countries to create ownership at government and civil society levels, and strongly condemns the use of coercion as an instrument to secure approval for EPAs;
2018/06/28
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 50 #

2018/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Deplores the facts that, each year, a sum exceeding total annual ODA is drained out of Africa in the form of illicit financial flows; reiterates its call to create effective tools to combat tax dodging globally and to enhance cooperation on tax matters with developing countries, including domestic resource mobilisation; recalls the need to establish a UN intergovernmental body to engage on an equal footing with developing countries in the reform of global tax rules;
2018/06/28
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 56 #

2018/2005(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Calls for transparency in trade agreements and for the full involvement of civil societies of the partner countries concerned in the negotiations and implementations of future trade agreements, including the inclusion of structured and well-financed civil society monitoring process;
2018/06/28
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 1 #

2018/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 2 a (new)
– having regard to the Treaties on the Functioning of the EU and the Treaty of Lisbon Art. 208,
2018/05/22
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 6 #

2018/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 28 a (new)
– having regard to the most recent Planetary Boundaries report,
2018/05/22
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 49 #

2018/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas SDG goal 15 explicitly mentions the need for good forestry management, while forests can play a role helping achieve many of the other SDGs;
2018/05/22
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 50 #

2018/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H b (new)
Hb. whereas a European Commission study in 2013 found that EU27 was the largest global net importer of embodied deforestation(between 1990 and 2008), concluding that during that time 9 million hectares of tropical forest had been cleared to provide products such as beef, soya and palm oil to the European market;
2018/05/22
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 81 #

2018/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Acknowledges that forest crime, such as illegal logging, has been estimated to represent a value of 50-152 billion USD globally in 2016, up from 30- 100 billion in 2014 and ranks number one in revenues among environmental crimes. Notes that illegal logging plays a substantial role in financing organized crime and thus significantly impoverishes governments, nations and local communities owing to uncollected revenues 2a. _________________ 2a UNEP, 2017: The Rise of Environmental Crime report
2018/05/22
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 128 #

2018/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Stresses that recognition of tenure rights of peoples e.g. via constitution are not necessarily applied in practice and therefore calls for tenure rights to be respected and that their recognition be a necessary component of the EU’s screening process for the purpose of Voluntary Partnership Agreements (VPA) and for individual cases of EU development funding; 11a _________________ 11aFor example a recent case (WaTER project financed by DG DEVCO) of violation of tenure rights of Kenyan indigenous peoples Ogiekand Sengwer despite the recognition of their rights to land in the Kenyan Constitution, particularly Article 63(2)(d)) and in the 2016 Community Land Act
2018/05/22
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 142 #

2018/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point e a (new)
(ea) expand the scope of the EU Timber Regulation to cover all products that are or may be made of wood, and that contain or may contain wood;
2018/05/22
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 156 #

2018/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Notes that it is well established and uncontested that the conversion of tropical forest to agriculture, plantations and other land uses causes a significant loss of species, and particularly of forest- specialist species;
2018/05/22
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 160 #

2018/2003(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 c (new)
16c. Recalls that sustainable development can only be successful if supply chains are made to be sustainable, and through the use of good management of the lived environment;
2018/05/22
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 3 #

2018/0291(NLE)

Draft legislative resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Declines to giveGives its consent to the proposal for a Council decision;
2018/10/19
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 1 #

2018/0272M(NLE)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Strongly supports the FLEGT process with Vietnam since about 45% of Vietnam's land area is forested, and the country has a key role in processing in the timber sector in Southeast Asia; welcomes Vietnam’s commitment to this process and the progress made so far, including the Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA);
2018/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 6 #

2018/0272M(NLE)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Draws attention to the crucial importance of full stakeholder involvement and of the major role that civil society must be able to play; encoplay as a fully-fledged actor including the implementation and monitoring of the Agreement; urages the Vietnamese Government to further develop the working methods in relation toto ensure transparency and the timely sharing of documents;
2018/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 11 #

2018/0272M(NLE)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Recalls that the implementation of the Agreement must complement EU commitments to environmental protection and ensure coherence with commitments to prevent mass deforestation.
2018/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 14 #

2018/0272M(NLE)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to continue its FLEGT-related support to Vietnam and to ensure the integrity of the FLEGT process, in particular through the stamping outeradication of illegal timber and the full involvement of civil society in the preparation of measures and monitoring of results; recalls that in order to ensure effective monitoring the Agreement, and its impact on development, the Commission should continue to regularly report-back to Parliament on the implementation.
2018/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 4 #

2018/0249(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Citation 1
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 77(2) and 79(2)(d) and 80 thereof
2018/11/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 6 #

2018/0249(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) Pursuant to Article 80 TFEU, these policies and their implementation should be governed by the principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, including its financial implications, between theall Member States of the European Union.
2018/11/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 10 #

2018/0249(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) Financial support from the Union budget is indispensable to the implementation of European integrated border management to support Member States to achieve the objectives of the program, which are largely in their responsibility ,in managing the crossing of the external borders efficiently and in addressing migratory challenges and potential future threats at those borders, thereby contributing to addressing serious crime with a cross-border dimension while acting in full respect of fundamental rights.
2018/11/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 13 #

2018/0249(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) To promote the implementation of the European integrated border management defined by its components in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1624: border control, search and rescue during border surveillance, risk analysis, cooperation between Member States (supported and coordinated by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency), inter-agency cooperation (including the regular exchange of information), cooperation with third countries, technical and operational measures within the Schengen area related to border control and designed to address illegal immigration and to counter cross- border crime better, use of state-of-the-art technology, quality control and solidarity mechanisms, and to ensure that it becomes an operational reality, Member States should be provided with real, adequate and substantial Union financial support in line with their own needs.
2018/11/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 15 #

2018/0249(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11
(11) As customs authorities of the Member States have been taking up an increasing number of responsibilities which often extend to the field of security and take place at the external border, ensuring uniformity in carrying out border control and customs control at the external borders needs to be addressed by providing real, adequate and substantial Union financial support to the Member States. This will not only strengthen customs controls but also facilitate legitimate trade, contributing to a secure and efficient customs union.
2018/11/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 17 #

2018/0249(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) The instrument should be implemented in full compliance with the rights and principles enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and with the Union’s international obligations as regards fundamental rights and the principle of non-refoulement.
2018/11/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 92 #

2018/0249(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 13
13. Training in the field of border management carried out with the support of this instrument shall be based on the relevant harmonised and quality-assured European education and common training standards for border and coast guarding as well as for fundamental and human rights respect and protection.
2018/11/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 117 #

2018/0249(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) any action concerning third countries, the respect of fundamental and human rights, the complementarity between the actions supported by the instrument and support provided by other Union Funds, in particular those in or in relation to third countries;
2018/11/16
Committee: AFET
Amendment 26 #

2018/0248(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) The Fund should comply with the UN Agenda 2030 and the commitments at the international level in relation to migration and asylum, notably the Global Compact on Refugees and the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration.
2018/11/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 54 #

2018/0248(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20
(20) An efficient return policy is an integral part of the comprehensive migration approach the Union and its Member States pursue. The Fund should support and encourage efforts by the Member States with a view to the effective implementation and further development of common standards on return, in particular as set out in Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council15 , and of an integrated and coordinated approach to return management. For sustainable return policies, tThe Fund should equally support related measures in third countries, such as the reintegration of returnees to facilitate and guarantee safe and dignified return and readmission as well as sustainable reintegration. _________________ 15 Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ L 348, 24.12.2008, p. 98).
2018/11/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 75 #

2018/0248(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) Measures in and in relation to third countries supported through the Fund should complement other actions outside the Union supported through the Union’s external financing instruments. In particular, in implementing such actions,taken under the Fund in relation with Third countries should be fully coherence should be sought with the principles and general objectives of the Union’s external action and foreign policy in respect of the country or region in question and the Union international commitments. In relation to the external dimension, the Fund should target support to enhance cooperation with third countries and to reinforce key aspects of migration management in areas of interest to the Union's migration policyCooperation with Third countries should not be intended to support actions that are directly oriented towards development and should not undermine the principle of policy coherence for development, as set out in Article 208 of the TFEU.
2018/11/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 104 #

2018/0248(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission and the Member States shall ensure that actions in relation with third countries are taken in coherence with other actions implemented through Union instruments, respect the principle of policy coherence for development and focus on non- development-oriented measures.
2018/11/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 127 #

2018/0248(COD)

8. Whenever a Member State decides to implement projects with or in a third country with the support of the Fund, the Member State concerned shall consultrequest the approval of the Commission prior to the start of the project.
2018/11/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 138 #

2018/0248(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) heavy migratory pressure in third countries, including where persons in need of protection may be stranded due to political developments or conflicts, notably where it might have an impact on migration flows towards the EU.
2018/11/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 96 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 18
(18) The Union and the OCTs recognise the special importance of education and vocational training as a lever for the OCTs’ sustainable development, especially on territories where the population’s general level of education is rather low.
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 98 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 20
(20) Trade and trade-related cooperation between the Union and the OCTs should contribute to the objective of sustainable economic development, social development and environmental protection along with the lines of the Sustainable Development Goals.
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 99 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 21
(21) This Decision should provide for more flexible rules of origin, including new possibilities of cumulation of origin. Cumulation should be possible not only with OCTs and Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) countries, but under certain conditions also for products originating in countries with which the Union is applying a free trade agreement as well as for products entering the Union duty-free and quota-free under the Union’s General System of Preferences, also subject to conditions. These conditions are necessary for a trade union more robust and capable to prevent trade circumvention and ensure the proper functioning of the cumulation arrangements.
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 100 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 25
(25) Cooperation in the area of financial services between the Union and OCTs should tackle tax fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance in order to contribute to building a safer, sounder, more transparent financial system that is essential to enhance global financial stability and to underpin sustainable growth. Efforts in that area should focus on convergence with internationally agreed standards and approximation of OCTs' legislation with Union acquis on financial services. Adequate attention should be paid to strengthening administrative capacity of OCTs' authorities, including in the area of supervision.
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 103 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 4
4. The general objective of this Decision is to promote the economic and social development of the OCTs and to establish close economic relations between them and the Union as a whole. The association shall pursue this general objective by the enhancing the OCTs’ competitiveness, improving social standards, strengthening the OCTs’ resilience, reducing their economic and environmental vulnerability and the promoting of cooperation between them and other partners.
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 104 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 3 – paragraph 6
6. In pursuing those objectives, the association shall respect the fundamental principles of liberty, democracy, gender equality, human rights and fundamental freedoms, the rule of law, good governance and sustainable development, all of which are common to the OCTs and the Member States to which they are linked.
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 106 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(a a) the promotion of a high quality social model;
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 107 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. To this end, the Union and the OCTs may exchange information and best practices or establish any other form of close cooperation and coordination with other partners in the context of the OCTs’ participation in regional and international organisations, where appropriate by means of international agreements, in order to contribute to the smooth integration of the OCTs to their respective geographical environments.
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 108 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new)
(b a) OCT organisations, such as the Overseas Countries and Territories Association (OCTA);
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 109 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 13 – paragraph 5
5. The dialogue with Greenland shall, in particular, strengthen the Union's strategy in each region concerned and provide the basis for broad cooperation and dialogue in areas concerning, inter alia, energy, climate change and environment, disaster risk reduction, biodiversity, sustainable management of natural resources, including raw materials and fish stocks, maritime transport, research and innovation, as well as the Arctic dimension of those issuessocial issues, good governance in the tax area and the fight against organised crime.
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 113 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) an OCTs-EU forum for dialogue (the ‘OCT-EU Forum’), shall meet annually to bring together OCTs' authorities, representatives of the Member States and the Commission. Members of the European Parliament, representatives of the EIB, and representatives of the outermost regions and neighbouring ACP and non-ACP States shall, where appropriate, be associated with the OCTs- EU Forum;
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 114 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the promotion of sustainable resource use and resource efficiency, and encouragement to the decoupling of economic growth from environmental degradationtowards the achievement of a low carbon economy based on just transition strategies; and;
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 115 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(e a) addressing issues linked to land degradation, including rising sea-levels and soil contamination,
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 116 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 17 – paragraph 1
In the context of the association, cooperation in the field of sustainable forest management may concern the promotion of the conservation and sustainable management of forests, including their role in the conservation of the environment from erosion and desertification control, afforestation and management of timber exports and fighting illegal logging.
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 117 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) conciliation of economic and social activities such as fisheries and aquaculture, tourism, maritime transports and sustainable agriculture with the potential of marine and coastal zones in terms of renewable energy, raw materials, whilst taking into account impacts of climate change and human activities.
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 118 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) the development and strengthening of human rights, social end environmental protection;
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 119 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) contributing to partners countries' efforts to pursue their commitments on climate change in line with the Paris Agreement on Climate Change and the Sustainable Development Goals;
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 120 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the support to the OCTs in defining and implementing education and vocational training policies. and
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 121 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
(b a) the support of the participation and access of the OCTs to the Erasmus+ program, by fostering and increasing the mobility of its potential beneficiaries, from and to, the OCTs;
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 122 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 38 – title
38 Performing, fine and digital arts
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 123 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 38 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
In the context of the association, cooperation in the field of performing fine and digital arts may concern:
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 124 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 42 a (new)
Article 42 a Negotiation of trade agreements with third countries Where a trade negotiation with third countries cause or threaten to cause serious injuries to sensitive sectors of OCTs, the Commission shall carry out an impact assessment, taking into consideration the cumulative impact of trade agreements on OCTs economies. When completed, the Commission shall forward the results of this assessment to the European Parliament, the Council and the governmental and local authorities of the OCTs before the conclusion of the international agreements in question.
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 125 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 53 – paragraph 2
2. Trade-related cooperation shall aim to support the ultimate objectives of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and, the implementation of the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals. It may also extend to cooperation on other trade related multilateral environmental agreements, such as the Convention on Trade in Endangered Species.
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 126 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 57 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
(d a) Urges for the inclusion of sustainable development chapters (TSD) in the trade agreements between the Union and the OCTs , with binding and enforceable provisions and sanctions- based mechanisms.
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 127 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 70 – paragraph 1
The Union and the OCTs shall make their best endeavours to ensure that internationally agreed standards for regulation and supervision in the financial services sector and for the fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance are implemented and applied in their territory. Such internationally agreed standards are, inter alia, the Basel Committee’s ‘Core Principle for Effective Banking Supervision’, the International Association of Insurance Supervisors’ ‘Insurance Core Principles’, the International Organisation of Securities Commissions’ ‘Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation’, the OECD’s ‘Agreement on exchange of information on tax matters’, the G20 ‘Statement on Transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes’, the Financial Stability Board’s ‘Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions.
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 128 #

2018/0244(CNS)

Proposal for a decision
Article 75 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) be implemented with due regard to the OCTs respective demographic, geographical, social and cultural characteristics, as well as their specific potential;
2018/11/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 399 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The general objective of the Programme "Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument" (the ‘Instrument’) should be to promote sustainable development, contribute to the eradication of poverty, fight inequality in all its forms uphold and promote the Union’s values and interests worldwide in order to pursue the objectives and principles of the Union’s external action, as laid down in Article 3(5), Articles 8 and 21 of the Treaty on European Union.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 406 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) In accordance with Article 8 of the Treaty on European Union, the Union shall develop a special relationship with neighbouring countries, aiming to eliminate inequalities, the gender equality gap and to establish an area of prosperity and good neighbourliness, founded on the values of the Union and characterised by close and peaceful relations based on cooperation. This Regulation should contribute to such objective.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 408 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) The primary objective of Union’s development cooperation policy, as laid down in Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union is the reduction and, in the long term, the eradication of poverty and should complement and reinforce the Members States' development cooperation policies . The Union’s development cooperation policy also contributes to the objectives of the Union’s external action, in particular to foster the sustainable economic, social and environmental development of developing countries, with the primary aim of eradicating poverty, as set out in Article 21(2)(d) of the Treaty on European Union.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 439 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) In line with the international commitments of the Union on development effectiveness as adopted in Busan in 2011 and renewed at the Nairobi High Level Forum in 2016 and recalled in the Consensus, the Union’s development cooperation should apply the development effectiveness principles, namely ownership of development priorities by developing countries, a focus on results, alignment, harmonisation, inclusive development partnerships as well as transparency and accountability.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 451 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 a (new)
(13a) Children and youth are essential agents of change and contributors to the realisation of Agenda 2030, as recognised in the European Consensus on Development and Art. 3 of the Treaty on European Union. The Union's external action under this regulation will give particular attention to their rights and empowerment and will contribute to the realisation of their potential as key agents of change by investing in human development and social inclusion.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 457 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 b (new)
(13b) In line with existing commitments in EU Gender Action Plan II, at least 85% of ODA-funded programmes should have gender equality as a principal or significant objective. In addition, 20% of all Official Development Assistance under this regulation should have gender equality as a principal objective. These commitments will be reflected through specific objectives under all pillars of the instrument.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 460 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13 c (new)
(13c) Under this regulation, we will give particular attention to the rights and empowerment of children and youth, in particular girls and young women, and will contribute to the realisation of their potential as key agents of change by investing in human development and social inclusion.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 511 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) Reflecting the importance of tackling climate change, protecting the environment and fight nature loss, in line with the Union commitments to implement the Paris Agreement, the Convention on Biological Diversity and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, this Regulation should contribute to mainstream climate and environmental action in the Union policies and to the achievement of an overall target of 250 % of the Union budget expenditures supporting climate and environment objectives. Actions under this Regulation are expected to contribute 250% of its overall financial envelope to climate objectiveand environment related objectives and support actions with clear and identifiable co-benefits across sectors. Relevant actions will be identified during the implementation of this Regulation, and the overall contribution from this Regulation should be part of relevant evaluations and review processes. As a general principle, all Union action and expenditure should be consistent with the objectives of the Paris Agreement and not contribute to environmental degradation. Special emphasis should be put on support for adaptation to climate change in poor, highly vulnerable countries. Financing of climate action through this regulation will contribute to the honouring of the developed countries’ commitment to mobilise USD 100 billion per year from 2020 to address the needs of developing countries.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 530 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30
(30) This Regulation should enable the Union to respond to challenges, needs and opportunities related to migration, in complementarity with Union migration policy. To contribute to that end, and without prejudice to unforeseen circumstances, 10% of its financial envelope is expected to be dedicated to addressing the root causes of irregular migration and forced displacement and to supporting migration management, to contribute to helping host communities provide concrete support for displaced persons, notably the provision of access to basic services and livelihoods opportunities and to supporting strengthened engagement to facilitate safe, orderly, regular and responsible migration and the implementation of planned and well-managed migration policies and governance including the protection of refugees and migrants' rights within the objectives of this Regulation.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 535 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 30 a (new)
(30a) Capacity building in support of development and security for development should be used in exceptional cases only, where the objectives of the Regulation cannot be met by other development cooperation activities. Giving support to security sector actors in third countries, excluding the military, in a conflict prevention, crisis management or stabilisation context is essential to ensure appropriate conditions for poverty eradication and development. Good governance, effective democratic control and civilian oversight of the security system, as well as compliance with human rights and the rule of law principles are essential attributes of a well-functioning State in any context, and should be promoted through a wider security sector reform support to third countries.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 590 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) to pursue the eradication of poverty, especially in Least Developed Countries (LDCs);
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 721 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 6
6. Programmes and actions under this Regulation shall mainstream conflict prevention and peace-building, climate change, environmental protection and, gender equality and women’s empowerment, and shall address interlinkages between Sustainable Development Goals, to promote integrated actions that can create co-benefits and meet multiple objectives in a coherent way. These programmes and actions shall be based on an analysis of risks and vulnerabilities, integrate a resilience approach and be conflict sensitive. They shall be guided by the principle of leaving no one behind.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 728 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. The Commission shall ensure that actions adopted under this Regulation in relation to security, stability and peace, in particular with regard to capacity building of security actors in support of development and security for development, fight against terrorism and organised crime, and cyber-security, are applied in accordance with international law, including international human rights and humanitarian law. The Commission shall carefully monitor and report on the application of such actions pursuant to Article 31 in order to ensure compliance with human rights obligations. For such actions, the Commission shall pursue a conflict sensitive approach, including conflict analysis, in addition to the provisions on risk management under Article 8(8)b. The Commission shall adopt a delegated act in accordance with Article 34 supplementing this Regulation by establishing an operational framework to ensure that human rights are taken into consideration in the design and application of the measures referred to in this Article, in particular as regards the prevention of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and respect for due process, including the presumption of innocence, the right to a fair trial and rights of defence.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 738 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. In accordance with Article 41(2) of the Treaty on European Union, Union funding under this Regulation shall not be used to finance the procurement of arms or ammunition, or operations having military or defence implications. Any equipment supplied under this Regulation shall be subject to strict transfer controls as set out in the EU Common Position on Arms Exports.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 743 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Assistance pursuant to this Article may cover in particulashall be conflict sensitive and may cover in particular actions providing support and training to civil society actors, including women, men, girls and boys from diverse segments of society, to develop their capacity to monitor the actions of military forces. It may also cover the provision of capacity building programmes in support of development and security for development, including training, mentoring and advice, as well as the provision of equipment, infrastructure improvements and services directly related to that assistance.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 757 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) where a consensus exists between the partner country concerned and the Union that militarsecurity actors are key for preserving, establishing or re-establishing the conditions essential for sustainable development and that those security actors are not implicated in human rights violations or pose a threat to the functioning of state institutions, including in crises and fragile or destabilised contexts and situations.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 765 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point a
(a) recurrent military expenditure;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 773 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 7
7. The Commission shall establish appropriateundertake rigorous and systematic ex ante conflict analysis which fully integrates gender analysis, risk assessment, monitoring and evaluation procedures for measures pursuant to this Article.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 776 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 a (new)
Article 9 a Scope of the thematic programmes 1. Thematic programmes shall cover the following areas of intervention: (a) Human Rights, Fundamental Freedoms and Democracy: - protecting and promoting human rights and human rights defenders in countries and urgency situations where human rights and fundamental freedoms are most at risk, including through addressing urgent protection needs of human rights defenders in a flexible and comprehensive manner. - upholding human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, contributing to forging societies in which participation, non-discrimination, equality, social justice and accountability prevails. - consolidating and supporting democracy addressing all aspects of democratic governance, and supporting credible, inclusive and transparent electoral processes, in particular by means of EU Election Observation Missions (EU EOMs). - promoting effective multilateralism and strategic partnerships contributing to reinforcing capacities of international, regional and national frameworks and empowering local actors in promoting and protecting human rights, democracy and the rule of law. - fostering new cross-regional synergies and networking among local civil societies and between civil society and other relevant human rights bodies and mechanisms so as to maximise the sharing of best practices on human rights and democracy, and create positive dynamics. (b) Civil Society Organisations and Local Authorities: - supporting inclusive, participatory, empowered and independent civil society in partner countries; - promoting dialogue with and between civil society organisations; - supporting capacity building of local authorities and mobilising their expertise to promote a territorial approach to development; - increasing awareness, knowledge and engagement of Union citizens about objectives specified in Article 3 of this Regulation; - supporting civil society to participate in public policy advocacy and dialogue with governments and international institutions; - supporting civil society to sensitize consumers and citizens and raise their awareness about environmental friendly and fair trade production and consumption, to encourage them to adopt more sustainable behaviour; (c) Stability and Peace - assistance for conflict prevention, peace- building and crisis preparedness; - assistance in addressing global and trans-regional threats and emerging threats; (d) global challenges - health, - education, - women, - children and youth, - migration and forced displacement, - decent work, social protection and inequality, - culture, - ensuring a healthy environment and tackling climate change, - sustainable energy, - sustainable and inclusive growth, decent jobs and private sector engagement, - food and nutrition, - access to safe water, sanitation and hygiene - promoting inclusive societies, good economic governance, and transparent public finance management. (e) Foreign Policy Needs and Priorities: - providing support for the Union's bilateral, regional and inter-regional cooperation strategies, promoting policy dialogue and developing collective approaches and responses to challenges of global concern; - providing support for Union trade policy; - contributing to the implementation of the international dimension of internal Union policies and promoting the widespread understanding and visibility of the Union and of its role on the world scene; 2. Further details of the areas of cooperation referred to in paragraph 3 are set out in Annex III.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 784 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. CAll cooperation and interventions under this Regulation shall be programmed, except for rapid response actions referred to in Article 4 (4) shall be conflict- and gender sensitive.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 851 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) to address new needs or emerging challenges, such as those at the Union’s or its neighbours’ borders linked to crisis and post-crisis situations or migratory pressure;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 868 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) commitment to and progress in building deep and sustainable peace and democracy;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 882 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
1. Indicatively 10 % of the financial envelope set out in Article 4(2)(a) to supplement the country financial allocations referred to in Article 12 shall be allocated to partner countries listed in Annex I in order to implement the performance-based approach. The performance-based allocations shall be decided on the basis of their progress towards democracy, human rights, rule of law, cooperation on migration, economic governance and reforms. The progress of partner countries shall be assessed annually.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 920 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Appropriate environmental screening, including for climate change and biodiversity impacts, shall be undertaken at the level of actions, in accordance with the applicable legislative acts of the Union, including Directive 2011/92/EU82 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 85/337/EEC83 , comprising, where applicable, an environmental impact assessment for environmentally sensitive actions, in particular for major new infrastructure; where exceptional assistance measures concern conflict related crises and threats to peace, conflict analysis and risk assessments shall be conducted in order to ensure positive impact and effectiveness of that assistance. _________________ 82 Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (codification) (OJ L 26 28.1.2012. p.1). 83 Council Directive of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ L 175, 05.07.1985. p. 0040 – 0048).
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 921 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Appropriate environmental screening, including for climate change and biodiversity impacts, shall be undertaken at the level of actions, in accordance with the applicable legislative acts of the Union, including Directive 2011/92/EU82 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 85/337/EEC83 , comprising, where applicable, an environmental impact assessment for environmentally sensitive actions, in particular for major new infrastructure. as well as a human rights due diligence and an assessment of externalities (beyond the environmental but also social and economic aspect). _________________ 82 Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (codification) (OJ L 26 28.1.2012. p.1). 83 Council Directive of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ L 175, 05.07.1985. p. 0040 – 0048).
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 927 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 7 – point c
(c) contributions to the necessary costs of setting up and administering a public- private partnership;, including support of broad participation by setting up independent 3rd party CSO body to assess and monitor PPP set-ups.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 941 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Budget support as referred to in point (c) of paragraph 1, including through sector reform performance contracts, shall be based on country ownership, mutual accountability and shared commitments to universal values, democracy, human rights, the rule of law, and aims at strengthening partnerships between the Union and partner countries. It shall include reinforced policy dialogue, capacity development, and improved governance, complementing partners' efforts to collect more and spend better in order to support sustainable and inclusive economic growth and decent jobs and poverty eradication.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 959 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 12
12. Under the Democracy and Human Rights programme, Civil Society Organisations, Peace-building, Conflict Prevention and Stability, Global Challenges thematic programmes as well as for rapid response actions, any entity not covered under the definition of legal entity in Article 2(6) shall be eligible when this is necessary to pursue the areas of intervention of this programme.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 988 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 a (new)
Article 26 a Objectives for the EFSD+ 1. The EFSD+ operations eligible for support through the External Action Guarantee shall contribute to the following priority areas: (a) providing finance and support to private and cooperative sector development to contribute to sustainable development and, where appropriate, the European Neighbourhood Policy and the objectives set out in Article 3 of the of Regulation EU.../... [IPA III]; (b) addressing bottlenecks to private investments; (c) leveraging private sector financing, with a particular focus on micro, small and medium-sized enterprises; (d) strengthening socio-economic sectors and areas and related public and private infrastructure and sustainable connectivity and sustainable production, with the objective of promoting an inclusive and sustainable socio-economic development that respects human rights and the environment; (e) contributing to climate action and environmental protection and management; (f) contributing, by promoting sustainable development, to addressing specific root causes of migration, including irregular migration, and contribute to safe, orderly and regular migration and mobility. 2. The External Action Guarantee shall not be used to privatize or undermine the provision of essential public services, which remains a government responsibility.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 1039 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. The Commission shall submit an annual report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the financing and investment operations covered by the External Action Guarantee, and the functioning of the EFSD+, its management and its effective contribution to its objectives.That report shall be made public and be accompanied by an opinion of the Court of Auditors.It shall include the following elements: (a) an assessment of the results contributing to the purpose and objectives of the EFSD+ as set out in Article 26(1); (b) an assessment of current financing and investment operations and covered by the External Action Guarantee at sector, country and regional levels and their compliance with this Regulation, including the risk measures and their impact on the financial and economic stability of the partners; (c) an assessment of the additionality and added value, the mobilisation of private sector resources, the estimated and actual outputs and the outcomes and impact of the financing and investment operations covered by the External Action Guarantee on an aggregated basis, including the impact on decent job creation and ability to provide a living wage, the eradication of poverty and the reduction of inequality, are addressed;that assessment shall include a gender analysis of the operations covered based on evidence and data broken down by gender, where possible, and an analysis of the type of private sector supported including cooperatives and social enterprises; (d) an assessment of the compliance with the requirements concerning the use of the External Action Guarantee and of the achievement of key performance indicators established for each proposal submitted; (e) an assessment of the leverage effect achieved by the operations covered by the External Action Guarantee; (f) the financial amount transferred to beneficiaries and an assessment of financing and investment operations by each eligible counterpart on an aggregated basis; (g) an assessment of the additionality and added value of financing and investment operations of the eligible counterparts, and of the aggregate risk associated with those operations; (h) detailed information on calls on the External Action Guarantee, losses, returns, amounts recovered and any other payments received, as well as overall risk exposure; (i) the financial reports on financing and investment operations of the eligible counterparts covered by this Regulation, audited by an independent external auditor; (j) an assessment of the synergies and complementarity between operations covered by the External Action Guarantee and the second and third pillars of the EIP based on relevant existing reports, with particular regard to progress made on good governance, including in the fight against corruption and illicit financial flows, respect for human rights, the rule of law and gender-responsive policies, as well as the boosting of local entrepreneurship and local financial markets; (k) an assessment of the compliance of External Action Guarantee operations with the internationally agreed development effectiveness principles; (l) an assessment of the remuneration of the guarantees and of the application of the provisions related to excluded activities and non-cooperative jurisdictions.
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 1082 #

2018/0243(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II – part A – point 1 – point j
(j) Increasing transparency and accountability of public institutions, strengthening public procurement, including the development of sustainable criteria (environmental, social and economic) and targets and public finance management, developing eGovernment and strengthening service delivery;
2018/12/17
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 92 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – paragraph 8
In the implementation of Horizon Europe, particular attention will be paid to ensuring a balanced and broad approach to research and innovation, which is not only limited to the development of new products processes and services on the basis of scientific and technological knowledge and breakthroughs, but also incorporates the use of existing technologies in novel applications and continuous improvement and non-technological and social innovation. A systemic, cross-disciplinary, cross-sectoral and cross-policy approach to research innovation will ensure that challenges can be tackled while also giving rise to new competitive businesses and industries, fostering competition, stimulating private investments and preserving the level playing field in the internal market. In line with Union commitments to the reduction and eradication of poverty, particular attention will be paid to innovation for the benefit of international development and humanitarian assistance.
2018/10/25
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 101 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – paragraph 18
The Commission will systematically identify and record the results of the research and innovation activities under the Programme and transfer or disseminate these results and knowledge produced in a non-discriminatory fashion to industry and enterprises of all sizes, public administrations, academia, civil society organisations and policy-makers within and outside the EU, in order to maximise the European added value of the Programme.
2018/10/25
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 105 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – paragraph 19
Greater impact will be obtained through aligning actions with other nations and regions of the world within an international cooperation effort of unprecedented scale. Based on mutual benefit, partners from across the world will be invited to join EU efforts as an integral part of initiatives in support of EU action for poverty- eradication, sustainability, reinforced research and innovation excellence, and competitiveness.
2018/10/25
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 109 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – paragraph 20
International joint action, particularly focused on addressing market failures, will ensure effective tackling of global societal challenges and neglected areas of research, achieving the Sustainable Development Goals, access to the world’s best talents, expertise and resources, and enhanced supply and demand of innovative solutions.
2018/10/25
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 119 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 1 – point 1.1 – paragraph 3
Health research and innovation research and innovation have played a significant part in this achievement but also in improving productivity and quality in the health and care industry. However, the EU continues to face novel, newly emerging or persisting challenges that are threatening its citizens and public health, the sustainability of its health care and social protection systems, as well as the competitiveness of its health and care industry. Major health challenges in the EU include: the lack of effective health promotion and disease prevention; the rise of non-communicable diseases; the spread of antimicrobial drug resistance and the emergence of infectious epidemics; increased environmental pollution; the persistence of health inequalities among and within countries affecting disproportionally people that are disadvantaged or in vulnerable stages of life; the detection, understanding, control, prevention and mitigation of health risks in a rapidly changing social, urban and natural environment; the increasing costs for European health care systems and the progressive introduction of personalised medicine approaches and digitalisation in health and care; and the increasing pressure on the European health and care industry to remain competitive in and by developing health innovation vis-a-vis new and emerging global players. Globally, deaths from preventable diseases remain unacceptably high, particularly for children. Access to essential medicines remains out of reach for many in the developing world, due to prohibitively high costs, or because insufficient investment has been made into tackling neglected diseases. Health research under Horizon Europe must be driven by the principles of the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health to increase research into neglected diseases, ensure global access to essential medicines, recognise the right to healthcare as a human right, and stimulate new funding mechanisms to encourage greater collaborative efforts to tackle global health challenges in Europe and the developing world.
2018/10/25
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 146 #

2018/0225(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Annex I – part II – point 2 – point 2.2 – point 2.2.4 – paragraph 2 – indent 2
– The capacities of society to increase resilience and better manage and reduce disaster risk, including through nature-based solutions, by enhancing prevention, preparedness and response to existing and new risks
2018/10/25
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 60 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) To deliver scientific, economic and societal impact in pursuit of this general objective, the Union should invest in research and innovation through Horizon Europe - a Framework Programme for Research and Innovation 2021-2027 (the ‘Programme’) to support the creation and diffusion of high-quality knowledge and technologies within and outside the EU, to strengthen the impact of research and innovation in developing, supporting and implementing Union policies, to support the uptake of innovative solutions in industry and society to address global challenges, meet the Sustainable Development Goals and promote industrial competitiveness; to foster all forms of innovation, including breakthrough innovation, and strengthen market deployment of innovative solutions; and optimise the delivery of such investment for increased impact within a strengthened European Research Area.
2018/10/25
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 87 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25
(25) The Programme should promote and integrate cooperation with third countries and international organisations and initiatives based on common interest, mutual benefit and global commitments to implement the UN SDGs. International cooperation should aim to strengthen the Union's research and innovation excellence, attractiveness and economic and industrial competitiveness, to tackle global challenges, as embodied in the UN SDGs, and to support the Union's external policies, notably the reduction and long- term eradication of poverty. An approach of general opening for international participation and targeted international cooperation actions should be followed, including through appropriate eligibility for funding of entities established in low to middle income countries. At the same time, association of third countries to the Programme should be promoted.
2018/10/25
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 93 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 40
(40) In line with the objectives of international cooperation as set out in Articles 180 and 186 TFEU, the participation of legal entities established in third countries and of international organisations should be promoted. In support of the participation of entities established in third countries, training and information activities shall be provided to the national contact points (NCPs) and to all relevant stakeholders from research organisations to private sector, civil society, as well as local and national authorities. The implementation of the Programme should be in conformity with the measures adopted in accordance with Articles 75 and 215 TFEU and should be in compliance with international law. For actions related to Union strategic assets, interests, autonomy or security, the participation to specific actions of the Programme may be limited to entities established in Member States only, or to entities established in specified associated or other third countries in addition to Member States.
2018/10/25
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 99 #

2018/0224(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The Programme’s general objective is to deliver scientific, economic and societal impact from the Union’s investments in research and innovation so as to strengthen the scientific and technological bases of the Union and foster its competitiveness, including in its industry, deliver on the Union strategic priorities, and contribute to tackling global challenges, including measures to help achieve the Sustainable Development Goals inside and outside the Union.
2018/10/25
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 27 #

2018/0217(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled 'The Future of Food and Farming' of 29 November 2017 concludes that the Common Agricultural Policy (hereinafter ‘CAP’) should continue to step up its response to future challenges and, opportunities, by boosting employment, growth and investment and to adjust farmers' position in the value chain by boosting employment, growth and investments to facilitate business development in rural areas, promoting social inclusion, reduce development gaps between areas, fighting and adapting to climate change, technological change and bringing research and innovation out of the laboratories and onto fields and markets. The CAP should furthermore address citizens' concerns regarding sustainable agriculture production., food security an to foster sustainable development and efficient management of natural resources such as water, soil and air
2018/12/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 32 #

2018/0217(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
(1 a) Moreover to upgrade the response of EU agriculture to societal demands on food and health, including safe, nutritious and sustainable food, as well as animal welfare to provide to the protection of biodiversity and preserve habitats and landscapes.
2018/12/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 34 #

2018/0217(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) The CAP's compliance-driven delivery model should be adjusted to ensure a greater focus on results and performance. Accordingly the Union should set the basic policy objectives, types of intervention and basic Union requirements while greater responsibility and accountability for meeting those objectives should be borne by the Member States. As a consequence, there is a need to ensure greater subsidiarity in order to take better account of the local conditions and needs. Accordingly, under the new delivery model, Member States should be responsible for tailoring their CAP interventions in line with their specific needs and basic Union requirements in order to maximize their contribution to Union CAP objectives and to establish and design the compliance and control framework for beneficiaries.
2018/12/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 36 #

2018/0217(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) The CAP encompasses various interventions and measures, many of which are covered by the CAP Strategic Plans referred to in Title III of Regulation (EU) …/… of the European Parliament and of the Council10 [the CAP Strategic Plan Regulation]. Others still follow the traditional compliance logic. It is important to provide financing for all interventions and measures in order to contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the CAP such as ensuring a viable support farm income and resilience across the EU territory to enhance food security, increase competitiveness,improve farmers' position, contribute to climate change ,foster sustainable development ,promote employment, growth, social inclusion and local development in rural areas. Those interventions and measures have certain elements in common, therefore their financing should be dealt with in the same set of provisions. However, where necessary those provisions should allow for different treatment. Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council11 governed two European agricultural Funds, namely the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (‘EAGF’) and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (‘EAFRD’) (hereinafter the "Funds"). Those Funds should be maintained in this Regulation. In view of the scope of the reform, it is appropriate to replace Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013. _________________ 10 Regulation (EU) …/… of the European Parliament and of the Council of […][…] (OJ L […], […], p. […]). 11 Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 549).
2018/12/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 49 #

2018/0217(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) Competent national authorities should make the CAP payments provided for by Union law to the beneficiaries in full in order to a lead towards a more sustainable agriculture, to support farmers' income and viability and to ensure that agriculture plays its full role in relation to the general objectives of the Union.
2018/12/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 53 #

2018/0217(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47
(47) The existing main elements of the integrated system and, in particular, the provisions concerning a system for identifying agricultural parcels, a geo- spatial and an animal-based application system, a system for identifying and registering payment entitlements, a system for recording the identity of beneficiaries and a control and penalties system should be maintained. Member States should continue to use data or information products provided by the Copernicus programme, in addition to information technologies such as GALILEO and EGNOS in order to ensure that comprehensive and comparable data is available throughout the Union for the purposes of monitoring agri-environment- climate policy and for the purposes of boosting the use of full, free and open data and information captured by Copernicus Sentinels satellites and services. Moreover satellite technology will significantly reduce the number of field inspections, removing the climate of fear, and will contribute in reducing the costs of administering controls and checks. To this end, the integrated system should include also an area monitoring system.
2018/12/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 75 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled ‘The Future of Food and Farming’ of 29 November 2017 sets out the challenges, objectives and orientations for the future Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) after 2020. These objectives include, inter alia, the need for the CAP to be more result-driven, to boost modernisation and sustainability, reducing development gaps between different areas including the economic, social, environmental and climate sustainability of the agricultural, forestry and rural areas, and to help reducing the Union legislation- related administrative burden for beneficiaries.
2018/12/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 82 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) In view of further improving the performance of the CAP, income support should be targeted to genuine farmers. In order to ensure a common approach at Union level for such a targeting of support, a framework definition for ‘genuine farmer’ displaying the essentialcommon elements should be set out. On the basis of this framework, Member States should define in their CAP Strategic Plans which farmers are not considered genuine farmers based on conditions such as income tests, labour inputs on the farm, company object and inclusion in registers. It should also not result in precluding support to pluri-active farmers, who are actively farming but who are also engaged in non-agricultural activities outside their farm, as their multiple activities often strengthen the socio-economic fabric of rural areas and help to preserve the model of family farming that already exists in UE.
2018/12/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 84 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) In order to ensure consistency between the direct payments types of interventions and rural development types of interventions when addressing the objective of generational renewal, a framework definition for ‘young farmer’ with the essential elements should be set out at Union levelcommon elements and practicing a credible agricultural activity should be set out at Union level for a balanced and fair rural economy.
2018/12/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 88 #

2018/0216(COD)

(12) A smarter, modernised and more sustainable CAP needs to embrace research and innovation, in order to serve the multi- functionality of Union agriculture, forestry and food systems, reduce poverty, technological changes, investing in technological development and digitalisation, as well as improving the access to impartial, sound, relevant and new knowledge; The existing gender gaps, including digital gender gap, a gender- perspective must be incorporated and Member States should develop sub- programmes in the Strategic Plan for supporting women farmers to utilise financial instruments and to upgrade their knowledge and skills.
2018/12/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 95 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 – introductory part
(16) Bolstering environmental care and climate action and contributing to the achievement of Union environmental- and climate-related objectives is a very high priority in the future of Union agriculture and forestry. The architecture of the CAP should therefore reflect greater ambition and must be speeded up to meet with respect to these objectives and by making farming a strong pylon in the battle against climate change . By virtue of the delivery model, action taken to tackle environmental degradation and climate change should be result-driven and Article 11 TFEU should, for this purpose, be considered as an obligation of result.
2018/12/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 99 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
(17) The CAP should keep ensuring food security, which should be understood as meaning access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food at all times. Moreover, it should help improving the response of Union agriculture to new societal demands on food and health, including sustainable agricultural production, healthier nutrition, food waste and animal welfare. The CAP should continue to promote production with specific and valuable characteristics, while at the same time helping farmers to proactively adjust their production according to market signals and consumers’ demands also thought access to land at reasonable prices, encourage young farmers to setup in business and by promoting short supply chains and local purchasing.
2018/12/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 106 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 24
(24) Member States should set farm advisory services for the purpose of improving the sustainable management and overall performance of agricultural holdings and rural businesses, covering economic, environmental and social dimensions, and to identify the necessary improvements as regards all measures at farm level provided for in the CAP Strategic Plans. These farm advisory services should help farmers and other beneficiaries of CAP support to become more aware of the relationship between farm management and land management on the one hand, and certain standards, requirements and information, including environmental and climate ones, on the other hand. The list of the latter includes standards applying to or necessary for farmers and other CAP beneficiaries and set in the CAP Strategic Plan, as well as those stemming from the legislation on water, on the sustainable use of pesticides, as well as the initiatives to combat antimicrobial resistance and the management of risks, and to promote the sustainable management of nutrients. In order to enhance the quality and effectiveness of the advice, Member States should integrate advisors within the Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems (AKIS), in order to be able to deliver up-to-date technological and scientific information developed by research and innovation.
2018/12/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 109 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 31
(31) The CAP should ensure that Member States increase the environmental delivery by respecting local needs and farmers' actual circumstances. Member States should under direct payments in the CAP Strategic Plan set up Eco-schemes voluntary for farmers, which should be fully coordinated with the other relevant interventions. They should be defined by the Member States as a payment granted either for incentivising and remunerating the provision of public goods by agricultural practices beneficial to the environment and climate or as a compensation for the introduction of these practices. In both cases they should aim at enhancing the environmental and climate performance of the CAP and should consequently be conceived to go beyond the mandatory requirements already prescribed by the system of conditionality. Member States may decide to set up eco- schemes forto promote production models that are beneficial for the environment and to promote all kind of agricultural practices such as, among other measures, the enhanced management of permanent pastures and landscape features, and organic farming. These schemes may also include ‘entry-level schemes’ which may be a condition for taking up more ambitious rural development commitments.
2018/12/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 112 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) Member States should be allowed to use part of their financial ceiling available for direct payments for coupled income support in order to improve competitiveness, sustainability, and/or quality in certain sectors and productions that are particularly important for social, economic or environmental reasons and undergo certain difficulties and where other tools are not sufficient enough or don´t exist, Member States should be free to identify the sectors that should benefit from this. Furthermore, Member States should also be allowed to use an additional part of their financial ceiling available for direct payments to grant coupled income support specifically for the support of protein crop production in order to reduce the Union's deficit in this regard.
2018/12/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 113 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32 a (new)
(32a) Taking into account the on-going development of digitalisation in agricultural sector, Member States may develop sub-programme to upgrade digital skills in rural areas and may take further measures to minimize the digital gender gap by facilitating women’s access to life- long learning, vocational and professional training in rural areas.
2018/12/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 130 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 80
(80) Farmers are increasingly facing risks of income volatility, partly because of market exposure and catastrophic or systemic risks , partly because of extreme weather events and frequent sanitary and phytosanitary crises affecting the Union livestock and agronomic assets. To develop strategies and to alleviate the effects of income volatility by encouraging farmers to make savings in good years to cope with bad years, national tax measures whereby the income tax base applied to farmers is calculated on the basis of a multiannual period should be exempted from the application of the State aid rules.
2018/12/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 133 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) to foster a long-lasting, smart, resilient, sustainable and diversified agricultural sector ensuring food security;
2018/12/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 137 #

2018/0216(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h
(h) promote employment, growth, gender equality, social inclusion and local development in rural areas, including bio- economy and sustainable forestry;
2018/12/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 1 #

2018/0166R(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Recalls TFEU art 208 in which the Union policy in the field of development cooperation shall be conducted within the framework of the principles and objectives of the Union's external action, which primary objective is the reduction and, in the long term, the eradication of poverty; stresses that the Union's development cooperation policy and that of the Member States complement and reinforce each other; recalls article 21(2) TEU sets out that the development cooperation policy contributes to the objectives of EU external action; Calls for full respect of the TFEU and the TUE legal commitments and for a development oriented external instrument in the next MFF 2021-2027;
2018/09/17
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 5 #

2018/0166R(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the proposal for a Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument (NDICI) reflects a new approach to foreign and development policy; recalls thatunderlines that poverty eradication, sustainable human and economic development, good governance and peace and security are essential for achieving the goal of eradicating povertytackling inequality, injustice and exclusion, good governance and peace and security must be the EU´s external financial instruments primary objectives in the next MFF, as well as achieving its Sustainable Development Goals commitments honouring the TFUE art.208.2;
2018/09/17
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 13 #

2018/0166R(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Underlines that the next MFF must ensure that the external instruments are policy driven, serving the most effective way possible to the pursuit of the objectives of the relevant policies, as laid down in the Treaty ; recalls that EU domestic interest should not drive its neighbourhood, development, humanitarian and international cooperation agenda; underlines its opposition to the instrumentalisation of aid;
2018/09/17
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 18 #

2018/0166R(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the new financing needs resulting from the deterioration of security conditions in the European Union's neighbourhood and the increase in migration flows to the Union are reflected in the mobilisation of new funds; notes that thmust be supported by Member States and Union's freseh new challenges must be added to existing sustainable development goalsfunds in the next MFF;
2018/09/17
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 22 #

2018/0166R(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Recalls that country aid allocations within the EUs international cooperation programs should complemented foreign policy, while ensuring that development funding is used only for development related objectives and purposes and not to cover expenses related to the achievement of different objectives, such as border control or anti-migration policies;
2018/09/17
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 23 #

2018/0166R(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Notes that the design of the cooperation instrument should leave sufficient flexibility for tailoring programmes to the specific needs of third countries; reiterates that a substantial share of EU aid should be allocated to Least Developed Countries, as primary target of ODA; stresses that ensuring efficiency, effectiveness, visibility and policy coherence for development in the implementation; ensuring the participation of CSOs and implementing the rights-based approach to development cooperation, as well as introducing a benchmarking of 20% of funds for basic social services, are key development features to be maintained and improve in the next MFF cycle;
2018/09/17
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 24 #

2018/0166R(APP)

2c. Stresses that gender equality and women’s and girls’ rights and empowerment must be a significant objective, across all programmes, geographic and thematic; considers that the EU budget should be gender-and conflict-sensitive;
2018/09/17
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 27 #

2018/0166R(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that the NDICI appears to not substantially contain thcore elements for a more pragmatic implementation of the Union's development cooperation policy and reiterates its position that a single instrument for this policy is necessary and will allow for better cooperation with partner countries and stakeholders; notes with concern the lack of explicit reference in the objectives to eradication of poverty , sustainable development, the Sustainable Development Goals and combating inequality; underlines that these priorities must be reflected explicitly in the objectives of the proposed instrument;
2018/09/17
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 36 #

2018/0166R(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Draws attention to the European Union's international commitments to increase its official development assistance to 0.7% of GNI and to contribute at least0.2% of GNI towards Least Developed Countries by 2030 and to provide new and additional funding for climate action in developing countries; asserts that these commitments must be properly reflected in MFF 2021-2027;
2018/09/17
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 49 #

2018/0166R(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Acknowledges the significant efforts made by the EC to increase the allocation given to humanitarian aid budget line in the next MFF. However, notes that this increase does not respond yet to the level of needs, which have more than doubled since 2011;
2018/09/17
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 52 #

2018/0166R(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Welcomes the extension scope and allocation increase of the Emergency Aid Reserve to respond also to internal crises. Reminds that priority should be guarantee to sudden onset humanitarian crises outside the EU;
2018/09/17
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 53 #

2018/0166R(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Stresses the need to seize the opportunity y of the next MFF to financially support Linking Relief , Rehabilitation and Development operations; underlines that implementing the humanitarian-development nexus requires ensuring complementarity of development and humanitarian activities, and a culture shift from the EU as a donor, towards more operational flexibility and risk taking to support LRRD, people and their communities resilience, early recovery and reconstruction; call for more multi-year planning and funding in EU humanitarian activities, and the systematic introduction of crisis modifiers in EU development activities in order enable EU´s partners to effectively contribute to the nexus implementation;
2018/09/17
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 54 #

2018/0166R(APP)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5d. Underlines that the MFF 2021- 2027 must preserve and improve the EP oversight and scrutiny over the use of funds, with a clear mechanism and decision making process for the disbursement of unallocated funds, ensuring the EP impact in the programming and implementation phase of the external financial instruments; reiterates that any proposal for increased flexibility must be balanced by an improvement of transparency and accountability;
2018/09/17
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 42 #

2017/2594(RSP)


Paragraph 5
5. Highlights that building resilience in partner countries is a long-term process and that this therefore needs to be integrated into development programmes; stresses that the new Joint Communication should recognise this and support the promotion of resilience as essential element of the sustainable development strategies of partner countries, particularly in fragile states; notes that these strategies need to be context-specific and in line with the principles of effective development including countrylocal ownership and shared accountability to European citizens and those from partner countries; underlines in this regard the important monitoring and scrutiny role of the European Parliament and of national parliaments;
2017/03/29
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 43 #

2017/2594(RSP)


Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Stresses the importance of providing technical assistance to LDCs and fragile states in particular on sustainable land management, conservation of the ecosystems and water supply, being these, fundamental issues in order to achieve benefits for both the environment and the people who depend on it;
2017/03/29
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 66 #

2017/2594(RSP)


Paragraph 10
10. Underlines that the concept of resilience in the external action of the EU should maintain a global geographic scope; notes that fostering resilience should be an objective of the promotion of sustainable development in partner countries and not be limited to geographic areas facing security crises with an immediate impact on the EU; promoting resilience should in any case prioritise and pay particular attention to LDCs and fragile states;
2017/03/29
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 3 #

2017/2586(RSP)


Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the clear recognition by the new Consensus that the primary objective of EU development policy is the reduction and, in the long term, the eradication of poverty in line with the Article 208 of the TFEU; reiterates that this should be done fully in line with the principles of effective development cooperation: ownership of development priorities by developing countries, focus on results, inclusive partnerships and transparency and accountability; underlines the need to prioritize action on fragile states and global public goods, including climate change.
2017/04/26
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 4 #

2017/2586(RSP)


Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Strongly welcomes the objective to pursue an end to hunger, universal health coverage, universal access to quality education and training, adequate and sustainable social protection and decent work for all, within a healthy environment;
2017/04/26
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 5 #

2017/2586(RSP)


Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Welcomes the commitment to implement a rights-based approach to development cooperation and the promotion of the protection and fulfilment of women's and girls' rights;
2017/04/26
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 13 #

2017/2280(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the EU’s external financing instruments (EFIs) are a complex set of tools for the EU to support and enhance its action on the international scene, and that their complexity is coordinated by the Common Implementing Rules Regulation, which ensures a smooth and complementaryharmonised approach to the implementation of all instruments;
2018/01/24
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 53 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that the effects of climate change have a tangible impact on several aspects of human life, on peace and security as well as on business models and trade relations, and that these effects are increasingly being felt in the lives of EU citizens, as well as challenging the international community; underlines the increasing urgency of climate action and that addressing climate change requires a joint effort at international level,; urges the Commission and EU Member States to continuously facilitate the multilateral discourse as it constitutes a collective responsibility towards the entire planet, for the current and future generations; notes that the fight against climate change is necessary for the protection of Human Rights;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 66 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Reaffirms the EU’s commitment to the Paris Agreement and to the UN Agenda 2030, including the SDGs, and stresses the need to implement the Paris Agreement, in particular its objectives of mitigation, adaptation and redirecting finance flows, among others, and the SDGs both in the EU and globally to develop a more sustainable economy and society; reaffirms the need for an ambitious EU climate policy and its readiness to improve the existing EU National Determined Contribution (NDC) for 2030 as well the necessity of developing a long-term strategy for 2050 in a timely manner;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 70 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Strongly welcomes the European Council’s demand towards the Commission to present by the first quarter of 2019 the proposal for a Strategy for long-term EU greenhouse gas emissions reduction in accordance with the Paris Agreement, laid down in the Council Conclusions from 23 March 2018;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 71 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Urges the Commission to develop an ambitious proposal for a new EU long- term mid-century low-emission strategy that lays down concrete greenhouse gas emission reduction targets for 2050 for all sectors and a clear path how to reach these targets, and how to enhance removals by sinks in pursuit of the temperature goals and the Paris Agreement, so as to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions within the EU by 2050, and go into negative emissions soon thereafter; calls for this strategy to represent a fair distribution of efforts between sectors, to be consistent with a fair EU-share of the remaining global carbon budget, to include a mechanism to incorporate the results of the five yearly global stocktake, to build on national plans, to take into account the findings of the upcoming IPCC Special Report, the recommendations and positions by the European Parliament, as well as the views of non-state actors like local and regional authorities, the civil society and private sector;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 73 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. Underlines the importance of an ambitious EU climate policy in order for the EU to act as a credible and reliable partner vis-à-vis third states and calls on the Commission and the Member States to take an active and constructive role during the 2018 Talanoa Dialogue and COP24 as 2018 will be a crucial year for the implementation of the Paris Agreement; urges the Commission and the Member States to raise the ambition of the EU’s NDC before 2020 taking into account the outcome of the Talanoa Dialogue; believes that the stocktaking mechanisms every five years should inform the possible raising of ambition of EU climate commitments; calls on the EU to show commitment beyond its NDC through substantial contributions of finances and capacities like technology and knowledge, by seeking and announcing alliances and cooperation on climate finance instruments, phasing out fossil fuel subsidies and shifting to an economy that is less harmful to the climate; stresses that a strong internal climate policy will help the EU to advocate for strong mitigation commitments of other countries and to find partners at the UNFCCC Conference of Parties;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 74 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 d (new)
2d. Welcomes the Commission’s Action Plan on sustainable finance, adopted on 8th March 2018, and the recommendations put forward by the High Level Expert Group On Sustainable Finance; believes that the financial system needs to contribute to the targets of the Paris Agreement as well as the SDGs; considers it necessary that investments and financial products are in line with climate policy and that they support the development towards a sustainable economy; is convinced that a true reform of the EU financial system to contribute to climate mitigation and incentivising investments in clean technologies and sustainable solutions will be a role model for other countries and help them to implement similar systems; underlines that a transformation towards a financial system in line with the Paris Agreement and the SDGs will reduce risks on the global financial system stemming from stranded fossil fuel assets;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 81 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the US President’s announcement of the country’s withdrawal from the Paris Agreement gives the EU the opportunity and reinforces its obligation to assume a leading role in climate action and to step up its climate diplomacy efforts and to form a strong alliance of countries and actors that will continue to support and contribute to the objectives of limiting global warming to well below 2°C while pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 86 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that mitigating climate change and moving towards a low- emission economy will contribute to enhanced peace and human security both within and outside of the EU as climate change often exacerbates existing instabilities and conflicts as well as deepening existing or creating new inequalities, even leading to increased - mainly internal - migration flows due to the scarcity of resources and lack of economic opportunities, a fragile governance structure, insufficient supply of water and food as well as a deterioration in living conditions;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 96 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Reiterates that consequent and rapid climate action contributes essentially to the prevention of social, economic, but also security risks, the prevention of conflicts and instabilities and ultimately to the prevention of major political, social and economic costs;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 106 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Underlines that due to melting polar caps and rising sea levels people living on the coast line or on small island states are in particular danger; urges the Commission and the Member States to protect and preserve these living spaces through facilitating ambitious climate change mitigation goals as well as multilateral coastal protection measures;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 108 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Notes that the EU and its Member States are the largest provider of public climate finance; urges the Commission and the Member States to scale up their financial contributions to the collective goal to jointly mobilise USD 100 billion per year by 2020 through to 2025 for mitigation and adaptation purposes and to actively support the mobilisation of international climate finance through public sources by other countries as well as private sources; welcomes the announcements made at the ONE Planet Summit on 12 December 2017 that put an important focus on the need for financial support and the role of new instruments to trigger sustainable investments; recognises the Commission’s announcement of its new Action Plan for the Planet in this regard;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 120 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Urges the Commission and the Member States to raise international awareness for climate change through coordinated communication strategies and activities to increase public and political support; calls to especially create an international understanding of the interconnection of climate change and social injustice, migration, famine and poverty and that global climate action can largely contribute to the solution of these issues;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 127 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Commits itself to formulate an own position and recommendations for a new EU long-term mid-century strategy that shall be taken into account by the Commission and the Council before submitting the strategy to the UNFCCC;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 131 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Commits itself to making better use of its international role and its membership of international parliamentary networks, to stepping up its climate activities within its work in its delegations as well as through delegation visits, especially of ENVI and AFET Committees, and during European and international interparliamentary meetings as well as in dialogue platforms with national parliaments and subnational actors/non-state actors and civil society; encourages the inclusion of members of the AFET Committee into the parliamentary delegations to the annual COP; intends to set off an exchange on NDC implementation and to address EU’s financial contributions and efforts in projects in the respective countries to trigger an exchange on successes and shortcomings of existing cooperation;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 144 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Urges the Commission to provide, in the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), for a bigger budget line dedicated to supporting climate change activities in existing programmes and future calls that reflects the increased importance and urgency of climate action and that translates into a higher target for climate related spending than the current 20% target, meaning at least a 30% target, in order to enable further climate diplomacy actions; calls for a better use of other EU funds to ensure resource efficiency, optimised outcomes and enhanced impact of EU actions and initiatives;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 155 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Underlines that the EU must be an active player in international organisations and forums (such as the UN, UNFCCC, the High-level Political Forum on Sustainable Development (HPFL), NATO, the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) and the G7 and G20) and closely cooperate with regional organisations (such as the African Union (AU), the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and MERCOSUR) to foster global partnerships and ensure the implementation of the Paris Agreement and the SDGs, while defending, strengthening, and further developing multilateral cooperation regimes; notes that climate can be an entry point for diplomatic relations with partners with whom other agenda items are highly contested, thereby offering an opportunity to enhance stability and peace;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 161 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the EU to mediate between disagreeing parties and facilitate consensus in order to ensure an effective and successful summitry, thereby injecting strong political momentum into the global discourse on climate action; calls on the EU and the Member States to stronger place climate action on the agenda of G20 summits and meetings as well as on the agenda of bilateral meetings of G20 members; calls on the Member States to enhance their engagement in the framework of the Organization for Security and Co- operation in Europe (OSCE) in line with the targets of the Paris Agreement;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 172 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls on the Commission to integrate the climate change dimension into international trade and investment agreements and to make compliance with the provisions of the Paris Agreement a condition for future trade agreements; calls on the Commission to streamline financial instruments and programmes to ensure coherence and increase the effectiveness of EU climate action; recommends the development and systematic inclusion of a fundamental climate change clause in international agreements with partners who have signed the Paris Agreement, supporting thereby the European and international decarbonisation process;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 187 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Supports sustained and active EU engagement within the High Ambition Coalition (HAC) and with its member countries to give visibility to their determination to achieve meaningful implementation of the Paris Agreement, the conclusion of its rule book in 2018 and a successful Talanoa Dialogue at COP24 that is aimed at motivating further States to join in with these efforts and to establish a group of climate leaders in the next few years that are ready to ramp up their climate targets in line with the Paris Agreement goals, in order to establish shared leadership;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 190 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Highlights the responsibility incumbent on the EU and other developedaffluent countries to show greater solidarity towards the vulnerable states and developing countries, many of them in the Global South, that are most affected by the impact of climate change and to ensure continuous support to help them recover from damage related to climate change, to improve adaptation measures and resilience through financial support and by means of capacity building; notes that vulnerable states are crucial partners for pushing for ambitious climate action internationally, due to the existential threat posed to them by climate change; calls on the Member States to support the efforts of developingless affluent countries to decrease dependence on fossil fuels and increase access to affordable renewable energy as well as to become low-carbon societies, especially by cooperating within NDC partnerships; highlights the opportunities offered by the EU External Investment Plan in stimulating climate-smart investments and supporting sustainable development;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 204 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Recommends that the EU deepens its strategic cooperation on state- and non- state levels through zero-carbon development dialogues and partnerships with emerging economies and other countries which have a major impact on global warming, but which are also decisive in terms of global climate action; notes against this backdrop that climate can be an entry point for diplomatic relations with partners with whom other agenda items are highly contested, thereby offering an opportunity to enhance stability and peace; calls on the EU to create dedicated panels to debate climate and sustainability policies during high-level ministerial meetings; calls on the EU to build up and support partnerships for carbon markets and other carbon pricing instruments beyond Europe;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 215 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Calls on the EU to be at the forefront of developing international and regional partnerships on carbon markets as set out by Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and by using its understanding in setting up, adjusting and operating the EU Emission Trading System (ETS) and its experience in linking the ETS with the Swiss carbon market; calls on the Commission and Member States to promote the development of carbon pricing mechanisms in third states and regions and to foster international cooperation with the aim to make them compatible to a large extent in the medium-term and to create an international carbon market in the long- term; emphasizes, in this regard, the successful cooperation of the past years between the EU and China enabling the launch of the nationwide emission trading system in China in December 2017 and urges the EU to continuously support China’s carbon trading ambition and enhance the future cooperation;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 233 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Considers it important that the EU keep up its efforts to re-engage the US in multilateral cooperation andwithout jeopardizing the Paris Agreement’s level of ambition; points out that the Brexit negotiations and the future relationship with the UK must reflect the need for continued cooperation on climate diplomacy;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 240 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the EU to further intensify its relations with local and regional authorities in third countries to enhance thematic cooperation between cities and regions both within and outside of the EUNotes that regions and cities play an increasingly important role for a sustainable development as they are affected by climate change directly, as their growth has direct impact on the climate and as they are becoming more active in the mitigation of and adaptation to climate change, sometimes in the light of opposing policies of their national governments; therefore, calls on the EU to further intensify its relations with local and regional authorities in third countries to enhance thematic cooperation between cities and regions both within and outside of the EU to develop adaptation and resilience initiatives and emission reduction plans in key sectors such as energy, industry, technology, agriculture and transport in both urban and rural areas, e.g. through twinning programmes, through the International Urban Cooperation programme, through support of platforms like the Covenant of Mayors and by building new fora for exchanging best practice; calls on the EU and the Member States to support efforts by regional and local actors to introduce regionally and locally determined contributions (similar to NDCs) where climate ambition can be increased through this process; notes the role EU delegations in third countries can play in this regard;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 245 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Notes that increasing urbanisation visible in many parts of the world aggravates existing challenges caused by climate change due to a higher demand for resources like energy, land and water and contributes to further deterioration of environmental problems in many conurbations in and outside the EU, like air pollution and increased volumes of waste; notes that further consequences of climate change, like extreme weather events, droughts and land degradation are often felt in rural areas particularly; believes that local and regional authorities need to receive special attention and support to address these challenges, to establish better resilience and to contribute to mitigation efforts by developing new energy supply as well as transport concepts;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 247 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Believes that the increased importance and influence of elected local and regional authorities and this form of bottom-up government should be better reflected within the UNFCCC regulatory and structural framework and its processes including the Talanoa Dialogue and the five yearly Global Stocktake by recognising their role in a formalised manner; believes that the EU should support the possibility for cities and regions to submit local and regional determined contributions that could help to increase ambition towards full implementation of the Paris Agreement;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 249 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the EU and its Member States to strengthen their ties with civil societyand support for civil society around the globe as agents for climate action, and to form alliances and build up synergies with the scientific community, non-governmental organisations, and non- traditional actors and the private sector; encourages the EU and its Member States to engage with the private sector, to enhance cooperation on how to reap the opportunities from the transition towards a zero-carbon economy, to develop export strategies for climate technologies for countries globally and to encourage technology transfer to and capacity- building in third countries;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 256 #

2017/2272(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Underlines the importance of scientific research for climate political decision making; notes that transboundary scientific exchange is a fundamental component of international cooperation; urges the Commission and the Member States to continuously support scientific organisations that work on climate risk assessment and that aim on estimating the implications of climate change and that offer possible adaption measures for political authorities; urges the EU to use their own research capacities in order to contribute to global climate action;
2018/04/25
Committee: AFETENVI
Amendment 7 #

2017/2266(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Points outIs aware that IUU fishing is a major economic and environmental problem worldwide, in both marine and freshwater fisheries, threatening the sustainability of fish stocks and food security, and the biodiversity of the world’s oceans; stresses that IUU fishing also undermines fisheries management efforts and constitutes unfair competition for fishers, in particular from artisanal fleets, and others who operate in accordance with the law, with serious social and economic, economic and environmental repercussions; notes that high levels of IUU fishing tend to be more frequent in countries with weak governance;
2018/01/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 11 #

2017/2266(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises that developing countries are particularly vulnerable to IUU fishing due to their limited capacity for control and surveillance of their waters, which further destabilises the management of their fisheries; highlights that IUU fishing deprives developing countries of revenue and food, particularly when these activities take place in the same fishing grounds where small-scale local fishers operate;
2018/01/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 24 #

2017/2266(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Is convinced that the fight against IUU fishing requires a multilateral approach and greatly depends on a coherent response at international level, including from flag states, coastal states, port states and market states; takes the view that this response should be based on the uniform application of international law and regulations on IUU fishing and on an extensive and accurate exchange of information; calls on the international community to take similar measures to those adopted by the EU to close markets to IUU-caught fish.;
2018/01/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 53 #

2017/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that in their first years of implementation, the DCI and the EDF have enabled the EU to respond to new crises and needs thanks to the broad nature of the instruments’ objectives; notes, however, that a multiplication of crises and the emergence of new political priorities have put financial pressure on the DCI, the EDF and the HAI, have stretched these instruments to their limits and have required the setting-up of new ad hoc mechanisms such as trust funds; recalls the recently adopted European Fund for Sustainable Development, which has been created to provide further leverage capacity;
2018/03/01
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 73 #

2017/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Is satisfied with the simplification, harmonisation and broader implementation modalities introduced in Regulation 236/2014 on common rules for the implementation of the EFIs, which has brought about more effectiveness in the DCI; notes, however, that the implementation procedures, some of them originating from the Financial Regulation, are still perceived as lengthy and burdensome; stresses that the DCI Regulation does not provide details on a monitoring and evaluation system for measuring the instrument's performance;
2018/03/01
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 86 #

2017/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Underlines that more efforts have to be taken in order to ensure greater coherence between geographic and thematic programmes;
2018/03/01
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 87 #

2017/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Notes that the EDF has played an important role in addressing poverty eradication and the attainment of the SDGs; notes, however, that evidence of progress is weaker at regional level and that the EDF has not consistently established solid synergies and coherence across its national, regional and intra-ACP cooperation programmes;
2018/03/01
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 147 #

2017/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
27. Is of the view that in a context of multiple crises and uncertainty the EFIs need to have sufficient flexibility to be able to adjust swiftly to changing priorities and unforeseen events, and to deliver rapidly on the ground; recommends, to this end, a smart use of the EFIs reserve or the unused funds, more flexibility in the multiannual programming, an appropriate combination of funding modalities and greater simplification at implementation level; also, points out that the balance between long-term commitments to uphold reforms in partner countries and short-term actions should be reviewed;
2018/03/01
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 167 #

2017/2256(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 3 a (new)
Enlargement of the Schengen Area 1. Recalls that Romania and Bulgaria’s readiness for joining the Schengen Area was announced on several occasions by the President of the European Commission, and it has also been stated by the European Parliament in its resolution of 8 June 2011, by the Council in its conclusions of 9 and 10 June 2011 and 25 and 26 October 2012, and in the 3rd, 4th, 5th,6th, 7th and 8th bi-annual reports on the functioning of the Schengen Area; 2. Notes that in the European Council of 1 and 2 March 2012, the Heads of State and Government reiterated that all legal conditions had been met for the decision on Romania’s and Bulgaria’s accession to the Schengen Area to be taken, and asked the Justice and Home Affairs Council to adopt its decision in September 2012. However, no decision has been taken until this moment, with postponements on many occasions; 3. We remind that Romania and Bulgaria have successfully fulfilled already in 2011 all relevant criteria and prerequisites, as set by the Schengen evaluation procedures; we believe that additional criteria cannot be imposed on the two Member States; 4. Urges the Council to take the decision concerning the accession of Romania and Bulgaria to the Schengen Area, in line with the Schengen acquis.
2018/03/14
Committee: LIBE
Amendment 94 #

2017/2226(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights, however, the persistent structural problem of insufficient growth of potential output and productivity, flanked by too low a level of investments and wages, leading to persistent social inequalities; underlines the importance of socially-balanced structural reforms in order to achieve social justice, diminish income inequalities and foster convergence towards better outcomes;
2018/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 120 #

2017/2226(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the importance of a responsible wage increase at European level in order to boost private consumption as the main support for growth; points out the need to focus on the interaction between monetary, fiscal and incomes (including wage and profit development) policies rather than only fiscal issues;
2018/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 160 #

2017/2226(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls the importance of public investment for accelerating the pace of reforms and for boosting and leveraging investment in the EU; considers that the policy mix proposed in the AGS 2018 should be further developed to remedy the current decrease in public investment in the EU; highlights that this decrease also affects local and regional authorities, threatening their ability to deliver quality public services;
2018/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 183 #

2017/2226(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. URecalls the Commission’s efforts to reinforce the role and visibility of social indicators encompassed in the European Semester and calls, when formulating country-specific recommendations and the euro-area recommendation, to take into consideration the existing scoreboard of key employment and social indicators; underlines that the European Semester and the Country-Specific Recommendations should achieve the objectives set out in the Pillar of Social Rights;
2018/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 206 #

2017/2226(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Insists on the need to develop within the European semester a comprehensive and an ambitious strategy to support investment that enhances environmental sustainability; calls on the Commission, in this respect, to demonstrate how its statement that ‘the SDGs are now fully integrated in the Semester’ (Commission communication of 22 May 2017, COM(2017)0500) is reflected in Annual Growth Survey 2018 and will be reflected in the subsequent Semester process;
2018/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 217 #

2017/2226(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Welcomes the fact that the AGS 2018 acknowledges the need for efficient and fair tax systems to ensure sustainable finance and reverse the current fall in capital income taxation; recalls that fair and growth-friendly tax systems can diminish inequalities and poverty and boost employment; supports the Commission’s initiatives to achieve increased transparency, a reformed VAT system and a common consolidated corporate tax base;
2018/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 257 #

2017/2226(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Recalls that the role of the Member States is to guarantee equal opportunity and access to quality education and training; underlines that this requires to invest in both initial and continuing education and training and to upgrade vocational training and strengthen work- based learning, including through quality apprenticeships;
2018/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 302 #

2017/2226(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Underlines that a fiscal capacity – on top of existing capacities, and not through redeployments that would undermine the vital role currently played by structural funds and cohesion policy – represents a necessary tool for increasing incentives for convergence and to counter asymmetric or symmetric economic shocks; stresses that the fiscal capacity should be complementary and additional to other existing instruments of the EU budget;
2018/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 310 #

2017/2226(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Is concerned that gaps and discrimination on the labour market remain high throughout the European Union, contributing to differences in remuneration, retirement, participation in decision- making and wealth between men and women and considers that more efforts have to be made in order to improve the participation of women in the labour market, to eliminate gender pay gaps and to promote a better work-life balance for men and women; stresses the importance of preserving high standards in relation to the quality of the proposed employment;
2018/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 367 #

2017/2226(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Underlines that any further step towards a deepening of the EMU must go hand in hand with stronger democratic ownership, legitimacy, accountability and controls; insists that, to this end, the role of the European Parliament and national parliaments must be strengthened; asks to include trade unions in the negotiation process at both national and European level; urges the launch of the long-awaited negotiation of an interinstitutional agreement (IIA) on the Semester;
2018/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 17 #

2017/2206(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Deplores the allegations that ODA projects have negatively affected the rights of indigenous peoples; regrets that the REDD+ programme has failed to secure tenure rights for local forest communities; urges the EU to support the inclusion of human rights obligations in all domestic and international mitigation and adaptation instruments; calls on the EU Delegations to reinforce the dialogue with indigenous peoples on the ground further in order to identify and prevent human rights violations;
2018/03/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 36 #

2017/2206(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Underlines that particular attention should be given to empowering indigenous women, in particular by strengthening their equal access to productive resources and agricultural inputs;
2018/03/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 19 #

2017/2086(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses the need to make climate financethe financing of both adaptation to climate change and mitigation of its effects gender-responsive; encourages the private sector and other climate finance mechanisms at national and global level to engage in gender mainstreaming during all phases of the project cycle, namely design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation;
2017/10/20
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 32 #

2017/2086(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need to address the gender-differentiated investment risks to sustainable agriculture; calls for the EU to help developing countries reform laws and eliminate practices that restrict women’s ownership of and access to productive resources, advisory or financial services;
2017/10/20
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 53 #

2017/2086(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Recalls the climate change impact on the energy sector and highlights that, within the latter, women and men have different gender-defined roles; emphasizes the need to incorporate gender mainstreaming into energy policies and programmes to improve its effectiveness and efficiency;
2017/10/20
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 48 #

2017/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes this new communication, which aims to impart fresh impetus to the Africa-EU partnership in order to broaden and intensify it, gearing it to prosperity and stability on the two continents, in accordance with the commitments given in subscribing to the SDGs, the new European consensus for development, which serves as guideline for European development policy, the EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy and Agenda 2063;
2017/09/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 115 #

2017/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Underlines the need for a stronger political partnership with shared responsibilities between the EU and Africa, that will give greater African ownership on programs and goals based on shared values and interest;
2017/09/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 170 #

2017/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Underlines within the EU/African partnership the necessity to create decent jobs and ensure decent payment and to link investment to it; calls to comply with ILO standards, including those related to a safe and healthy working environment; stresses the importance to respect and strengthen the role of social partners amongst others in involving them in monitoring, consultation processes, policy making and implementation notably of social, trade and economic policies and to support the organisation and carrying into effect of social dialogue and collective bargaining;
2017/09/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 179 #

2017/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 b (new)
18b. Recognises the fundamental role of small-scale producers to attain food security; calls for support to notably small-holder farmers and pastoralists through building up and investing in infrastructure that facilitates the regional food supply and diversity of food production and that are in line with the Principles for Responsible Investment in Agriculture and Food Systems of the CFS, in granting them access to land and water, in preserving healthy water and soil ecosystems and respecting non- documented traditional use thereof, in guaranteeing access to open source seeds in great variety that also contribute to biodiversity, in facilitating participatory land use planning and rangeland management of small-scale producers, and in supporting the establishment of cooperatives;
2017/09/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 194 #

2017/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Recognises that the increasing population in Africa is both a challenge and an opportunity for the continent and therefore calls on the EU to be committed in promoting appropriate public policies and investments in health, education, and sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) to ensure young people are equipped to make informed decisions about their SRH, without which social, economic and environmental resilience cannot be reached;
2017/09/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 207 #

2017/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Calls on the EU to support Africa to build the capacity of its administrative structure by opening channels for more young Africans participation in the Erasmus+ programme: mobility of staff and students and academic cooperation by providing trainings for teachers in a few key disciplines in order to improve students' skills and education quality and relevance;
2017/09/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 212 #

2017/2083(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Considers it important to support African countries in establishing effective health systems; in this context, the importance of investing in science, technology and innovation (STI) to tackle the still huge burden of poverty-related and neglected diseases (PRNDs) that disproportionately affect the most marginalised African populations, and thereby addressing the critical need to achieve the SDGs;
2017/09/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 6 #

2017/2070(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates the importance of the multilateral system as the most effective way to achieve an inclusive global trading system; which works in the interest of developing countries; regrets in this regard the failure of the WTO 11th Ministerial Conference to make progress on issues of key importance to developing countries; welcomes however enhanced preferential treatment previously secured at the WTO for LDCs including preferential Rules of Origin and treatment for service providers; further welcomes the extension of the WTO waiver for pharmaceutical products for LDCs until 2033; calls on the Commission, in this regard, to ensure that trade provisions do not hinder access to medicine, and TRIPS+ provisions such as data exclusivity are not included in trade agreements with developing countries;
2018/01/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 14 #

2017/2070(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises the importance of comprehensive provisions on social, labour and environmental standards in trade agreements; urges the Commission to include a sanctions-based, binding and enforceable chapter on Trade and Sustainable Development in all trade agreements; insists strong provisions to tackle tax evasion and avoidance are included in EU FTAs and preferential trade regimes;
2018/01/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 18 #

2017/2070(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the conclusion of the Regulation on Conflict Minerals1 and calls for its speedy implementation including the accompanying measures; encourages the Commission to introduce greater transparency and accountability in global supply chains, including binding due diligence obligations for supply chains in the garment sector; _________________ 1 Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 laying down supply chain due diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas, OJ L 130, 19.5.2017, p. 1.
2018/01/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 32 #

2017/2070(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that EU trade and development policy must contribute towards regional integration and the incorporation of developing countries into global value chains; calls on the Commission to continue to support the development of the Continental Free Trade Area in Africa through political and technical assistance;
2018/01/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 35 #

2017/2070(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Notes the progress on the conclusion and implementation of Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) and calls on the Commission to advance dialogue in a spirit of genuine partnership; calls in order to address outstanding issues; recalls EPAs are asymmetrical agreements with equal importance given to development and trade aspects; calls in this regard for the timely implementation of accompanying measures including the disbursement of EDF resources;
2018/01/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 41 #

2017/2070(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses the importance of robust monitoring mechanisms in trade agreements with developing countries, including; recalls that monitoring and enforcement of sustainable development provisions require sustained and comprehensive engagement with civil society organisations including local partners; welcomes the fact that EU monitoring missions are being sent to all GSP+ countries and urges the Commission to carry out a critical assessment of progress reports in order to evaluate the ability of trade preferences to deliver development outcomes;
2018/01/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 13 #

2017/2055(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Notes that intensified activities in coastal and marine waters increasingly require the implementation of Maritime Spatial Planning; calls on the Commission to work towards international guidelines on Maritime Spatial Planning and help expand Marine Protected Areas worldwide with funding under Horizon 2020 and LIFE programmes;
2017/05/08
Committee: PECH
Amendment 40 #

2017/2055(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Commends the EU's international leadership in achieving concrete progress in the fight against illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUU) and its strong commitment in implementing effective measures against IUU fishing; recalls the EU's efforts to reinforce its international actions against IUU fishing at bilateral, regional and multilateral level, including by continuing bilateral dialogues with third partners, using vessel tracking instruments and securing greater role for key international agencies such as Interpol; calls on the Member States' authorities to actively support the Commission's work in establishing an electronic tool for management of catch certificates;
2017/05/08
Committee: PECH
Amendment 62 #

2017/2055(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Looks forward to the Commission's proposals on coordinating EU research and observation activities with international partners, and exploring ways to improve research quality inter alia through extending the existing EU research and observation tools and activities, including the European Marine Observation and Data Network (EMODnet) in order to put in place a shared database, the European Earth Observation Programme (Copernicus), the European Global Ocean Observing System (EuroGOOS) and the Joint Programming Initiative 'Healthy and Productive Seas and Oceans' (JPI Oceans), all with the aim of creating an international marine and maritime data network;
2017/05/08
Committee: PECH
Amendment 6 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that the EU’s commitment to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) worldwide must guide the preparation of the next multiannual financial framework (MFF) and that the EU’s support for such implementation , focusing on long-term objectives such as eradication of poverty, tackling inequality and exclusion, promoting developing countries must increasemocratic governance and human rights, and enhancing sustainable and inclusive development;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 14 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Recalls that EU Development Cooperation has as its primary objective the eradication of poverty as enshrined in article 208 TFEU; calls for the next MFF to maintain the integrity of development and humanitarian aid, which should support the capacity and interests of developing countries in line with internationally agreed development effectiveness principles;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 22 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines, in this context, the need to focus on the health, food, education, water and sanitation, energy, industry, innovation and infrastructure and governance SDGincrease the level of resources allocated to development cooperation in order to implement Agenda 2030 in an integrated and holistic way; emphasises the need to fulfil EU commitments to allocate 20% of its ODA to social inclusion and human development with a focus on education and health; recalls EU commitment to gender mainstreaming in the next MFF and the need to invest in powerful enablers to sustainable human development such as sexual and reproductive health and rights;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 30 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines, in this context, the need to focus on the health, security, food, education, employment, water and sanitation, energy, industry, innovation and infrastructure and governance SDGs;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 48 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Points to the crucial role of official development assistance (ODA) in least developed countries and fragile states; notes its potential to facilitate the mobilisation of financing for development from other sources, private and public, domestic and international; supports the EU’s new efforts at stimulating private investment through blending grants and loans and providing guarantees, also in countries where the needs are great, but and recalls EU commitment under the Addis Ababa Action Agenda to reach 0,20% of ODA/GNI to least developed countries, abiding by the prisks are high; notes that important funding needs will arise as a resultnciple of leaving no one behind;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 64 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the next MFF also to reflect the unprecedented needs for humanitarian aid, caused by natural and man-made disasters driven, inter alia, by climate change and human insecurity, conflicts and forced displacement; calls in particular for maintaining a separate instrument for humanitarian aid with its own legal basis, budget and long term funding strategy, as well as a substantial humanitarian aid reserve;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 67 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for the next MFF also to reflect the unprecedented needs for humanitarian aid, caused by natural and man-made disasters driven, inter alia, by climate change and to consider earmarking more resources to the civil protection instrument and equip their use with more flexibility;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 69 #

2017/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that the next MFF should enable the Union to provide solutions and emerge strengthened from the crises of the decade: the economic and financial downturn, the phenomenon of migration and refugees, climate change and natural disasters, terrorism and instability, persistent poverty, increasing inequality, to name but a few; underlines that these global, cross-border challenges with domestic implications reveal the interdependency of our economies and societies, and point to the need for joint actions; stresses in this context the obligation to align the EU’s budgetary framework with the Sustainable Development Goals which provide a global roadmap for more sustainable, equitable and prosperous societies within planetary boundaries; recalls that all EU member states and the European Commission itself had signed up the SDG Declaration in November 2015
2018/02/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 76 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Points out the need to reinforce the essential role of the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights in promoting European values worldwide and consolidating human rights and democracy in EU external action;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 80 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Calls for the next MFF to adequately resource the EEAS and EU Delegations, in order to allow them to meet their objectives and obligations in the field of development cooperation and humanitarian aid;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 81 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 c (new)
4c. Calls for the next MFF to be consistent with the objectives of the Paris Agreement, underlines the need of scaling up financing for climate action in developing countries, supporting climate mitigation and adaptation and the protection of biodiversity; calls for effective mainstreaming of climate change and environment issues in EU external financing instruments;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 83 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that losses of fUnderlines that the United Kingdom’s contribution amoundts forto 15 % of the EU’s development cooperation caused by Brexit must be compensated for; supports the integration of the European Development Fund (EDF) into the EU budget in the context of an overall increase the total of EU-managed ODA; aid budget, calls for a review of existing tools and instruments that can allow for a future UK collaboration in EU development policy; emphasises that eventual losses of funds for EU development cooperation caused by Brexit must be compensated for;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 87 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Emphasises that losses of funds for EU development cooperation caused by Brexit must be compensated for; supports the integration of the European Development Fund (EDF) into the EU budget in the context of an overall increase the total of EU-managed ODA; is encouraged by the advantages that budgetisation may bring such as stronger democratic legitimacy of the EDF together with increased efficiency and effectiveness of EU development aid;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 91 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Reiterates its position that the European Development Fund (EDF) should be integrated into the Union budget; stresses, however, that such integration should be conditional to a geographical allocation of funds based on countries’ needs and an ambitious upward revision of the ceilings to avoid a reduction of the current EDF resources;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 96 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Draws attention to the ODA commitments entered into by thCalls for the next MFF to enforce EU’s and itsthe Member States international commitments, including that of increasing their ODA to 0.7 % of GNI by 2030 in a timely manner; recalls that EU-managed ODA contributes towards the honouring of Member States’ commitments and can significantly increase the development effectiveness of ODA expenditure, including through reduced fragmentation and the facilitation of an incentive-based approach with partner countries.;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 100 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Draws attention to the ODA commitments entered into by the EU and its Member States, including that of increasing their ODA to 0.7 % of GNI by 2030 and points out that the next MFF should take this into account; recalls that EU-managed ODA contributes towards the honouring of Member States’ commitments and can significantly increase the development effectiveness of ODA expenditure, including through reduced fragmentation and the facilitation of an incentive-based approach with partner countries.
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 105 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Believes that a genuine simplification of EU external financing instruments could enhance coherence and facilitate democratic control and scrutiny; stresses however that such simplification should respect European Parliament’s right of scrutiny and development effectiveness principles, and that EU development funding should retain its fundamental objective of poverty eradication, focusing in particular on LDCs and fragile contexts;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 109 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Recalls that the EU budget dedicated to EU external action has constantly been fully mobilised and reinforced, exhausting all available margins to tackle the multiplication of humanitarian and other emergencies around Europe; underlines the need for flexibility to allow funding to be deployed more rapidly in reaction to unforeseen developments and crises; stresses however that greater flexibility should not come at the expense of aid effectiveness principles and aid predictability, in detriment of those instruments designed to serve long- term development goals, or short-cutting parliamentary scrutiny and consultations with partner countries and civil society;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 112 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Believes that the promotion of peace, security and justice in developing countries is crucial and recognises the need for security-related expenditure to deliver on SDG 16;reiterates that the creation of a specific and separate instrument in support of capacity building for security and development should avoid the securitization of development instruments and funding;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 116 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 e (new)
6e. Strongly believes that Trust Funds benefitting of development funds, such as the EU Emergency Trust Fund for Africa, should serve genuine long-term development objectives and respond to partner countries’ development needs; considers that the mobilisation of the EU budget to respond to the migration challenge should be accompanied by a common policy on this field and that actions taken in this area should not come at the expense of EU's development policies;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 117 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 f (new)
6f. Notes that development assistance can play an important role in the area of migration in tackling the causes of forced displacement and enhancing the benefits of migration and mobility for development; considers however that ODA should not be used to cover in-donor refugee costs, the externalisation of migration policies outside EU borders or the costs of returns and readmission to countries of origin; rejects the idea of conditionality of aid based on border control, management of migratory flows or readmission agreements as the basis of partnership and cooperation with third countries;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 118 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 g (new)
6g. Notes the potential role of ODA to facilitate the mobilisation of financing for development from other sources, private and public, domestic and international; supports the EU’s effort at stimulating private investment through blending grants and loans and providing guarantees; stresses, however, that private sector engagement shall abide by strong transparency and accountability standards, bringing in measurable and additional development impact with solid social, environmental and human rights safeguards in place;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 118 #

2017/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Union to assume its role in twohree emerging policy areas with internal and external dimensions, which have appeared in the course of the current MFF: on the one hand, by develop– by developing and funding a comprehensive asylum, migration and integration policy and addressing the root causes of migration and displacement in third countries and on the other hand, by providing security to European citizens and promoting stability abroad, notably by pooling research efforts and capabilities in the area of defence; on the other hand, promoting stability and safeguarding human rights abroad notably by building capacity in conflict prevention and mediation; – by promoting stability and safeguarding human rights abroad notably by building capacity in conflict prevention and mediation, and development of the adequate infrastructures and logistic capacities which guarantee the needed mobility – by pooling research efforts and capabilities in the area of defence, stresses that actions taken in this areas should not come at the expense of EU’s development policies, preventing diversion of ODA from its main objective of poverty eradication
2018/02/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 119 #

2017/2052(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 h (new)
6h. Reiterates its unequivocal call for continued and increased EU support and funding for CSOs as development actors in their own right, and for their full and free involvement in political dialogue as well as in programming and implementation across EU cooperation instruments;
2017/12/11
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 284 #

2017/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 54
54. Considers also that, when a certain share of off-budget operations is deemed necessary to achieve certain specific objectives, for example through the use of financial instruments or trust funds, these should be kept at a limited level and duration, be fully transparent, and backed by strong decision- making and accountability provisions;
2018/02/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 348 #

2017/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 69
69. Calls, therefore, for a substantial increase in the overall budget earmarked for the FP9 programme in the next MFF that should be set at a level of at least EUR 120 billion; considers this level to be appropriate for securing Europe’s global competitiveness, scientific and industrial leadership, for responding to societal challenges, and for helping to achieve the EU’s climate goals and the Sustainable Development Goals;
2018/02/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 613 #

2017/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 88 b (new)
88b. Recalls that the EU budget dedicated to EU external action has been constantly mobilised and reinforced, exhausting all available margins to tackle the multiplication of humanitarian and other emergencies around Europe; underlines the need for more flexible procedure to allow funding to be deployed more rapidly in reaction to unforeseen developments and crises; stresses however that greater flexibility should not come at the expense of aid effectiveness and aid predictability, or short-cutting parliamentary scrutiny and consultations with partner countries and civil society;
2018/02/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 618 #

2017/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 89
89. Emphasises that substantial additional funding is necessary for the Union to play its role in the framework of its global strategy and of its neighbourhood, development and enlargement policies; draws attention to the commitment by the EU and its Member States to the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and to increase their official development assistance (ODA) to 0.7 % of GDP by 2030; expects the next MFF to reflect the unprecedented needs of neighbourhood countries struggling with conflicts and the consequences of the challenges presented by migration and refugees, as well as the needs for humanitarian aid as a result of natural and manmade disasters;
2018/02/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 621 #

2017/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 89 b (new)
89b. Recalls that EU Development Cooperation has as its primary objective the eradication of poverty as enshrined in article 208TFEU; calls for the next MFF to maintain the integrity of dedicated instruments for development and humanitarian aid in order to serve the interests of developing countries in line with internationally agreed development effectiveness principles; recalls EU commitments to allocate 20% of its ODA to social inclusion and human development, including sexual and reproductive health and rights, to reach 0,20 % of ODA to Least Developed Countries, to gender mainstreaming and to ensure that Policy Coherence for Development is respected throughout all EU policies;
2018/02/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 622 #

2017/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 89 c (new)
89c. Calls for the next MFF to reflect the unprecedented needs for humanitarian aid, caused by natural and man-made disasters driven, inter alia, by climate change, through an increased allocation; underlines that humanitarian aid must be delivered according to the humanitarian principles enshrined in the Treaty and the European Consensus, and in a predictable, timely and flexible manner; calls for a separate instrument and an own budget line for humanitarian aid; draws the attention to the need to avoid any gap between commitment and payment appropriations for humanitarian aid;
2018/02/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 624 #

2017/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 90
90. Is ready to consider a streamlined architecture of the external financing instruments, as long as the Commission and the High Representative clearly demonstrate the expected advantages of such changes such as enhanced coherence and democratic scrutiny, and provided that the specificities autonomy and objectives of the underlying Union policies, in particular EU Development Cooperation and Humanitarian aid are respected; notes that such architecture should include a budgetised EDF, a more transparent incorporation of trust funds and facilities guided by the key principles of democratic ownership and development effectiveness, as well as a possible continuation of the External Investment Plan based on its evaluation demonstrating its development additionality and human rights, social and environmental impact; could consider, as part of an overall increase in the external financing instruments, a larger unallocated reserve aimed at increasing in-built flexibility, but stresses that this should not be achieved at the expense of long-term geographic and thematic priorities; in addition, considers that the streamlined architecture calls for proper check and balances and transparency, including an enhanced strategic policy input and scrutiny of implementation by the EP.
2018/02/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 627 #

2017/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 90 a (new)
90a. Notes that development assistance can play an important role in the area of migration tackling the causes of forced displacement and enhancing the benefits of migration and mobility for development; considers, however, that ODA should not be used to cover in-donor refugee costs, the externalisation of migration policies outside EU borders or the costs of returns and readmission to countries of origin; rejects the idea of conditionality of aid based on border control, management of migratory flows or readmission agreements as the basis of cooperation with third countries;
2018/02/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 634 #

2017/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 90 b (new)
90b. Notes the potential role of ODA to facilitate the mobilisation of financing for development from other sources, private and public, domestic and international; supports the EU’s effort at stimulating private investment through blending grants and loans and providing guarantees; stresses, however, that private sector engagement shall abide by strong transparency and accountability standards, bringing in measurable and additional development impact with solid social, environmental and human rights safeguards in place;
2018/02/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 635 #

2017/2052(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 90 c (new)
90c. Reiterates its unequivocal call for continued and increased EU support and funding for CSOs as development actors in their own right, and for their full and free involvement in political dialogue as well as in programming and implementation across EU cooperation instruments;[
2018/02/01
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 35 #

2017/2043(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Commends the role of the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) in bridging the investment gap across the EU and supports its extension until 2020; underlines its position in the on-going legislative negotiations that no further cuts should be incurred on existing EU programmes in order to finance this extension; points to persistent differences in the eligibility criteria, regulations, timeframe for reporting and the application of state aid rules, which hinder combined usage of EFSI and ESI Fund and hopes the revision of the Financial Regulation will be performed in a timely manner so as to simplify the combination of financing and avoid competition and overlaps;
2017/06/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 159 #

2017/2043(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal to fund the continuation of the Youth Employment Initiative and notes the proposed mobilisation of EUR 233.3 million from the global margin for commitments; calls on the Commission and the Member States to follow the indications of the recent report of the European Court of Auditors (ECA) in order to carry out an impact assessment specifying expected costs and benefits; recalls that any increase in the dedicated allocation for YEI should be matched with the corresponding amounts from the European Social Fund (ESF);
2017/06/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 219 #

2017/2043(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 45
45. Notes the overall increase in draft budget 2018 for decentralised agencies by +3.1 % (not taking into account assigned revenues) and +146 posts but highlights wide differences between ‘cruising speed’ agencies (-11.2 %) and ‘new tasks’ agencies (+10.5%); assumes that these figures properly reflect the fact that since 2013 most agencies have completed or even exceeded the 5 % staff cuts (some are to complete them in 2018), while staff increases in the same period were confined to agencies dealing with migration and security (+183 posts), financial supervisory agencies (+28 posts) and some agencies entrusted with new tasks (ERA, EASA, GSA) (+18 posts); notes with concern that staff cuts are also applied regardless of increases in some agencies' core tasks, in particular when these are financed by applicant's fees; reiterates its call, as expressed in the 2015 discharge report, to safeguard and where necessary provide additional resources to ensure the proper functioning of the agencies, including the Agencies Network’s Permanent Secretariat (now called Shared Support Office);
2017/06/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 225 #

2017/2043(BUD)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46 a (new)
46 a. Notes EU agencies currently located in the UK will be facing an additional workload and budgetary needs in 2018 as a consequence of the decision of the UK to withdraw from the Union; calls on the Commission to make available additional staff and budget resources in 2018, to ensure that these agencies can both continue to carry out their tasks effectively and launch all required activities in preparation of their relocation in 2019 including significant IT and infrastructure investments; proposes in addition that the agencies, in the spirit of sound financial management, be authorised to maintain a budgetary reserve to respond to unforeseen costs and unfavourable exchange rate fluctuations that may be incurred in 2018 or beyond;
2017/06/21
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 1 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 1 a (new)
– having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and to the UN human rights conventions and the optional protocols thereto,
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 2 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
– having regard to the UN Security Council Resolutions 1325, 1820, 1888, 1889, 1960, 2106, 2122 and 2242 on Women Peace and Security,
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 3 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 b (new)
– having regard to the European Parliament resolution from the 16th of March 2017 on the EU Priorities for the UN Human Rights Council session in 2017,
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 4 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 c (new)
– having regard to the EU Annual Report on human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union´s policy on the matter 2015,
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 5 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 d (new)
– having regard to its resolution of 28 April 2016 on attacks on hospitals and schools as violations of international humanitarian law,
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 14 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 a (new)
– having regard to the revised EU Guidelines on the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of the Child - Leave No Child Behind, adopted 6 March 2017,
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 32 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the EU and its Member States were instrumental in shaping the global UN 2030 Agenda, EU remains committed to be a front-runner in mobilizing all means of implementation and a strong follow-up and review mechanism to ensure progress and accountability; that this is reflected in the EU external action and other policies across EU financial instruments;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 40 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the EU’s security environment is increasingly unstable and volatile owing to a large number of longstanding or newly emerging challenges, including violent conflicts, terrorism, organised crime, unprecedented waves of migrationmigratory pressures and climate change, which are impossible to address at national level and require regional and global responses;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 44 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1 a (new)
to support the strengthening of the coherence, synergies and complementarities of the UN peacebuilding architecture and of UN Security Council Resolutions on Women, Peace and Security; to support the implementation of the UN Security Council's resolution 2242 on women, peace and security, which makes women the central component in all efforts to address global challenges, including rising violent extremism, climate change, migration, sustainable development, peace and security;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 45 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1 b (new)
stresses the importance of women's equal and full participation as active agents and the incorporation of a gender analysis in all areas concerning prevention and resolution of conflicts, notably peacekeeping operations, humanitarian operations, post-conflict reconstruction and reconciliation processes in line with landmark UNSC resolutions 1325, 1820, 1888, 1889, 1960, 2106, 2122 and 2242 on women, peace and security; calls for the development of indicators to measure progress on the participation of women in peace and security building;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 46 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 1 c (new)
to remind of the impact of sexual violence in conflict on the maintenance of peace and security and recalls that sexual violence such as rape is used as a tactic of war and constitutes a war crime, in this context to ensure that safe medical attendance to female war rape victims are provided in line with the Commission's review of its humanitarian aid policy;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 57 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph b
(b) to push for stronger multilateral commitments to find sustainable political solutions to current conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa, particularly in Syria, Yemen and Libya; to continue to support UN special envoys' work, actions and initiatives aimed at solving these conflicts; to call for continued humanitarian, financial and political assistance from the international community in order to address the humanitarian situation and to work towards the immediate cessation of violence; of International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law, including the direct targeting of civil infrastructure and civilian populations; to support efforts deployed by the UN to find a sustainable resolution to the conflict in Syria and to continue to back the EU's role in the humanitarian field and the EU's regional initiative; to call on all States Parties to the UN Refugee Convention to recognize the Syrian community's right to safety and protection and the obligation of State Parties to offer sanctuary; to support the UN peace plan initiative in Yemen and to tackle the ongoing humanitarian crisis as a matter of urgency; to call for stronger support for the UN-backed government in Libya;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 72 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph c
(c) to call for a stronger empowerment of Iraqi institutions and for the need to work towards a more inclusive society and the reintegration of all the ethnic and religious minorities that have been displaced; while engaging the most vulnerable people (i.e. children, youth, women, people with disabilities) at all levels of decision-making;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 85 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph h
(h) to further encourage the UN's efforts to bring about peace in Afghanistan and to overcome the fragile security environment in the country; to strengthen support for local actors by empowering the most vulnerable (especially children, youth, women) to act as agents of change and create the spaces to engage them in all phases of humanitarian and peacebuilding work;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 90 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph i
(i) to strongly condemn the actions of the North Korean leadership that threaten peace and security in the Korean peninsula and beyond; to draw up and implement a strongresilient response, supported by a broad and sufficiently robust international consensus, in order to deter the North Korean regime from further developing hostile nuclear capabilities and carrying out extra- territorial assassinations, attacks and kidnappings;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 96 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph j
(j) to significantly increase Member State support for UN peacekeeping and peacebuilding operations, in particular by contributing personnel and equipment, and to enhance the EU's role as a facilitator in this respect; to ensure better visibility for this support and contribution; to further develop procedures for the use of EU Common Security and Defence Policy in support of UN operations; to support the UNSC reform of its use of veto power when evidence of war crimes and crimes against humanity occur;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 109 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph k
(k) to continue to support the efforts to further operationalise R2P and to support the UN in continuing to play a critical role in assisting countries in the implementation of R2P and the role of women in peace- building;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 113 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph k a (new)
(ka) to promote a broad definition of the human security concept and the Responsibility to Protect principle, bringing it more closely together with human rights, gender equality and human development;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 121 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph m
(m) to support the UN in making counter-terrorism a key element of its prevention agenda in line with the EU's engagement in preventive measures to combat terrorism and counter violent extremism; to strengthen joint EU-UN efforts in combating the root causes of terrorism, particularly by supporting resilient societies in countering hybrid threats and developing research and capacity-building in cyber defence; to rely on the existing peacebuilding initiatives set up by local partnersactors (including young peacebuilders in line with the UN Security Council Resolution 2250) to devise, implement, and develop approaches to counter radicalisation and terrorist recruitment;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 130 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph n a (new)
(na) to recall that the promotion and protection for human rights and respect for the rule of law are key elements in counter-terrorism policies;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 140 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph r
(r) to work towards more effective action against the diversion of and illicit trade in weapons and ammunitions, including small arms and light weapons, in particular by developing a weapons tracking system; to request the UN Members to actively take steps towards global disarmament;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 141 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph r a (new)
(ra) to pay special attention to the technological progress in the field of weaponisation of robotics and in particular, on the armed robots and drones and their conformity with the international law; to establish legal framework on drones and armed robots in line with the existing international humanitarian law to prevent this technology to be misused on illegal activities by state and non-state actors;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 147 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph s
(s) to call for a strengthening of the global response to migrationory pressures, by building on the successful UN General Assembly High-Level Meeting to Address Large Movements of Refugees and Migrants of 19 September 2016 and addressing the challenges and security concerns that arise, such as illegalrregular migration and human trafficking;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 158 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph t a (new)
(ta) to call on all countries to adopt a human rights-based approach to migration, which safeguards the rights of migrants and refugees in migration policies and management, paying particular attention to the situation of marginalised and disadvantaged groups of migrants and refugees, such as women and children; to call on all states to address gender-related violence against women and girls, and stresses the importance of designing migration policy from a gender perspective in order to respond to their particular needs;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 160 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph u
(u) to demand that greater efforts be made to prevent irregular migration and to fight people smuggling and human trafficking, in particular by introducing safe and legal routes for migrants and refugees and by combating criminal networks through timely and effective exchange of relevant intelligence; to improve methods to identify and protect victims and to reinforce cooperation with third countries with a view to tracking, seizing and recovering the proceeds of criminal activities in this sector; to insist at UN level on the importance of the ratification and full implementation of the UN Convention against Transnational Organised Crime and the Protocols thereto against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air and to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 164 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph u a (new)
(ua) to requests the EU to refrain from the externalisation of the refugee crisis management and to remain coherent with our internal and external policies in order to maintain our credibility;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 169 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph v a (new)
(va) to promote, strengthen and mainstream activities supporting equality between women and men; to support measures strengthening leadership and participation of women at all levels of decision-making; to call on states to secure equal representation for women in public institutions and public life, including special attention to the inclusion of minority women;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 174 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph v e (new)
(ve) supports the EU's efforts to promote children's rights, in particular by contributing to ensuring children's access to water, sanitation, healthcare and education, by ensuring the rehabilitation and reintegration of children enlisted in armed groups, by eliminating child labour, torture, child witchcraft, trafficking, child marriage and sexual exploitation, and by assisting children in armed conflicts and ensuring their access to education in conflict zones and refugee camps;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 175 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5 a (new)
reiterates that indigenous peoples today are among the most disadvantaged and vulnerable groups of people in the world; calls on the international community to recognize and dedicate the means necessary for the special measures required to protect the rights of indigenous peoples and maintain their distinct cultures and way of life; to recognise and protect the exceptional vulnerable situation indigenous human rights defenders have due to climate change and exploitation of their lands;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 176 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph v f (new)
(vf) to call for the UN member states, including the EU Member States, to implement the recommendations of the UN Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 177 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 5 b (new)
reiterates that the Roma people are among the most discriminated against minorities in the world and that the discrimination is getting worse in several countries; reminds that the Roma issue is a global issue as they live on all continents; calls on the UN to install a special rapporteur on Roma issues to raise awareness and to safeguard that the UN programs will also reach the Roma;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 180 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph w
(w) to continue to advocate freedom of religion or belief; to call for greater efforts to protect the rights of religious and other minorities; to call for greater protection of religious minorities against persecution and violence; to call for the repeal of laws criminalising blasphemy or apostasy, which serve as a pretext for the persecution of religious minorities and non-believers; to support the work of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief; to actively work for UN recognition of the genocide of religious, ethnic and other minorities committed by ISIL/Daesh, and for referral to the International Criminal Court (ICC) of cases of suspected crimes against humanity, war crimes and genocide;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 188 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph y
(y) to strengthen the role of the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the international criminal justice system in order to promote accountability and to end impunity; to ensure its independence and provide the Court with strong diplomatic, political and financial support, including in the UN; to encourage dialogue and cooperation between the ICC, the UN, the UNSC and the UN´s agencies;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 192 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph z
(z) to maintain strong engagement in promoting an end to the death penalty worldwide; torecalls the EU's position on zero tolerance for the death penalty and reiterates its long-standing opposition to the death penalty, torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment in all cases and under all circumstances; underlines the importance of the EU continueing to advocate zero tolerance for the death penalty; to call for a moratorium on the use of the death penalty and to further work towards its universal abolition; ance the moratorium on the death penalty and emphasises once again that the abolition of the death penalty contributes to the enhancement of human dignity;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 200 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph aa
(aa) to underline the leading role of the EU in the process that led to the adoption of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (Agenda 2030) and its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by the General Assembly in September 2015; to take concrete steps to ensure the efficient implementation of Agenda 2030 and the 17 SDGs as important instruments for prevention and development; as well as a priority for all external and internal action, especially when it comes to development cooperation financing; to recognize the significant role civil society organizations plays to successfully implement Agenda 2030 and to achieve the SDGs; to recognize the instrumental role and impact of the SDG's for international peace and security;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 208 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph aa a (new)
(aaa) To increase EU's leading role in leaving no-one behind while ensuring the most vulnerable, especially children, young people, women, people with disabilities, are consulted and engaged in the implementation and monitoring of Agenda 2030; to emphasise the role local actors play in ensuring resilient and peaceful communities as well as a long- term sustaining peace and development;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 214 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph aa b (new)
(aab) to urge the EU to seek for cross- national initiatives in promotion and protection of women´s rights; calls for the full implementation of Beijing Platform for Action and the ICPD Programme of Action;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 223 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph ab – subparagraph 1 (new)
to participate actively in the debate on the term 'climate refugee', including its recognition of a legal definition in international law or in any legally binding international agreements;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 226 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 7 a (new)
Business and human rights
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 227 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Subheading 7 b (new)
to further support the work of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on improving accountability and access to remedy for victims of business- related human rights abuse in order to contribute to a fair and more effective system of domestic law remedies, in particular in cases of gross human rights abuses in the business sector; to call on all governments to fulfil their duties in securing respect for human rights, access to justice for victims who face both practical and legal challenges to access remedies at national and international levels, with regard to human rights violations linked to business;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 240 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph ad
(ad) to support actively a comprehensive reform of the United Nations Security Council on the basis of a broad consensus in order to better reflect the new world reality and to re-launch the question of the necessity for the EU single seat; to promote the revitalisation of the work of the General Assembly, and improved coordination and coherence of the action of all UN institutions, which should enhance the efficiency, effectiveness, legitimacy, transparency, accountability, capacity and representativeness of the system;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 243 #

2017/2041(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph ad – subparagraph 1 (new)
reminds of the importance of gender and human rights mainstreaming in all UN activates; calls for the dedication of sufficient means to make the UN an example for gender and human rights mainstreamed organisation;
2017/04/06
Committee: AFET
Amendment 8 #

2017/2036(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that development policy based on law, respect for democratic values and individual rights, freedom of expression and good governance is one of the pillars of the EU’s external action, and this should be clearly reflected in the application of the agreement;
2017/04/26
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 22 #

2017/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that Parliament emphasised that progress in the negotiation of the EPCA must be linked to progress of political reform, democracy, the rule of law and real progress on respect for human rights, where implementation of the Venice Commission recommendations could play a beneficial role;
2017/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 56 #

2017/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Expects that the EPCA will promote a strengthened rule of law and a more diverse political landscape, a better functioning, independent and impartial judiciary, increased transparency and accountability of the government, improvement in labour laws in line with ILO requirements and the sustainable development of environment, taking into consideration the water resource management;
2017/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 59 #

2017/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Supports Kazakhstan in its efforts to save the Aral Sea in the framework of the action programme of the International Fund for Saving the Aral Sea;
2017/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 87 #

2017/2035(INI)

22. Is concerned that some of the provisions of the recently reformed Criminal Code and the Criminal Procedural Code restrict the freedom of expression; encourages Kazakhstan to revisit those in particular with regard to the criminalisation of defamation and corruption of the judiciary, which also need to tackle the right to a fair trial and defence rights;
2017/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 103 #

2017/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30
30. Regrets that Kazakhstan has so far refused an independent international investigation into the Zhanaozen events of 2011 despite calls by the UNHCR, regarding their causes and their repercussion, despite calls by the UNHCR; and urges for the release of the persons convicted on political grounds on the basis of the vague “inciting social discord” criminal charge;
2017/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 104 #

2017/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 30 a (new)
30a. Regrets that Kazakhstan is not a party nor a signatory state and calls to sign and accede to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court;
2017/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 111 #

2017/2035(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
32. Notes with concern that adoption of recent anti-terrorism laws, including a bill proposing withdrawal of citizenship for terrorist suspects could lead to the suppression of peaceful and legitimate political opposition; urges the Kazakh authorities to avoid abusing this legislation with the aim of restricting freedom of speech, the independence of the judiciary or banning opposition activity and the activity of independent candidates; also urges that citizens’ electoral rights to be respected;
2017/09/05
Committee: AFET
Amendment 19 #

2017/2028(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas corruption appears to be a complex phenomenon which can be defined as the abuse of entrusted power for individual or collective, direct or indirect personal gain, and which poses a serious threat to social, political and economic stability and security by undermining the institutions and values of democracy, ethics and justice;
2017/05/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 54 #

2017/2028(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the economic consequences of corruption are extremely negative, especially in terms of its impact on increasing poverty and inequality among the population, the quality of public services, mistrust in public institutions, access to infrastructures, economic opportunities and loss of investment;
2017/05/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 26 #

2017/2027(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Stresses the need to step up efforts to combat corruption and impunity, to ensure the separation of powers and equal access to an impartial judicial system, to address institutional weaknesses, to enhance social cohesion and to strengthen administration;
2017/03/29
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 34 #

2017/2027(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. BRecalls that one of the main challenges in LAC countries is the high level of youth violence and social conflicts; believes public policies opening up opportunities for the nearly 30 million young people not in employment, education or training to be fundamental;
2017/03/29
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 53 #

2017/2027(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Stresses that economic growth and trade alone are not sufficient to reduce poverty and inequality; calls for policies that contribute to achieving diversified, sustainable and inclusive growth, with a strong emphasis on social issues; recalls the necessity to respect the rights of vulnerable indigenous populations of LAC countries whose needs shall be taken into consideration when negotiating EU- LAC agreements;
2017/03/29
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 63 #

2017/2027(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for development programmes in LAC to guarantee women’s fundamental freedoms and ensure their access to job opportunities;
2017/03/29
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 28 #

2017/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the original Gender Action Plan I (2010- 2015) brought some progress, it also contained a number of gaps : narrow scope, a missing gender responsive budgeting, a weak understanding of the gender equality framework by the EU delegations, a lack of commitment among the EU leadership and a lack of institutional architecture and incentives to motivate and adequately support staff;
2017/11/16
Committee: DEVEFEMM
Amendment 55 #

2017/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the GAP II provides a comprehensive agenda that spans across the entire EU foreign policy agenda and welcomes in this regard the choice of fourthree thematic pillars, including theand an horizontal one on shifting the Commission services’ and the EEAS institutional culture;
2017/11/16
Committee: DEVEFEMM
Amendment 72 #

2017/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the expansion of the gender action plan to all EU external services and to the member states and notes the important progress in shifting EU institutional culture at headquarters and delegation levels; reiterates however the need for strengthened leadership and for continued improvements in coherence and coordination among EU institutions and member states while using the existing structures and budget;
2017/11/16
Committee: DEVEFEMM
Amendment 75 #

2017/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Welcomes the compulsory requirement introduced by GAP II for all EU actors to submit an annual reporting on the progress delivered in at least one thematic area and on shifting institutional culture, which is key to strengthening effectiveness of EU initiatives and their impact on gender equality and key to improving accountability of EU initiatives to EU institutions and citizens, and finally to beneficiaries;
2017/11/16
Committee: DEVEFEMM
Amendment 76 #

2017/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the fact that the Commission services and EEAS as well as 81% of EU delegations and 22 member states submitted gender reports for 2016; while there might be justified circumstances for delegations not reporting, the European Parliament expects to see continued progress year on year towards all reports by EU delegations and member states being submitted; recalls that full compliance in GAP reporting and implementation will be key in attaining the GAP II target to mainstream gender actions across 85% of all new initiatives by 2020;
2017/11/16
Committee: DEVEFEMM
Amendment 125 #

2017/2012(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Notes that the link between trade and gender is not sufficiently addressed in the GAP II; recalls in this respect that negotiation of trade agreements could be used as an effective tool for advancing equality between women and men and calls for all EU trade agreements to include references to women’s rights and gender equality; recalls the need to monitor the impact of trade agreements on women’s empowerment and gender equality during their implementation;
2017/11/16
Committee: DEVEFEMM
Amendment 2 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A
A. whereas the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development has a transformational potential and sets out universal, ambitious, comprehensive, indivisible and interlinked goals requiring immediate action with a view to full and effective implementation;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 4 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas the EU has not yet established a comprehensive strategy to implement Agenda 2030 and taken up a general coordination role for the actions taken at the national level; whereas an effective implementation strategy, monitoring and review mechanism are essential to achieve the SDGs;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 8 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A b (new)
A b. whereas the financing of the SDGs poses an enormous challenge which demands a strong and global partnership and the use of all forms of financing (domestic, international, public, private and innovative sources) and non- financial means; whereas private financing can complement, but not substitute public funding;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 10 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A c (new)
A c. whereas effective mobilisation of domestic resources is an indispensable factor in achieving the objectives of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, and developing countries are particularly affected by corporate tax evasion and tax avoidance;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 12 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A d (new)
A d. whereas international trade can be a powerful driver of development and economic growth and a large part of EU imports comes from developing countries, whereas the Agenda 2030 acknowledges trade as means of implementation to achieve the SDGs;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 13 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A e (new)
A e. whereas Member States and EU policies have both intended and unintended effects on developing countries, and the SDGs constitute a unique opportunity to achieve more coherence and fairer policies towards developing countries;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 14 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital A f (new)
A f. whereas Agenda 2030 emphasises the role of migration as potential driver of development, and art. 208 of TFEU establishes that eradication of poverty is the primary objective of EU development policies;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 15 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to draw up an ambitious overarching strategy bringing together existing initiatives, setting new priorities based on identified gapsinformed by a broad gap analysis of existing policies and their implementation, as well as synergies and incoherencies between them, and providing guidance for both the EU institutions and the Member States in their implementation, monitoring and review of the 2030 Agenda, ensuring that both EU internal and external policies are in line with the agenda;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 16 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to draw up an ambitious overarching strategy bringing together existing initiatives, identifying areas where further action or implementation is needed, setting new priorities based on identified gaps and providing guidance for both the EU institutions and the Member States in their implementation, monitoring and review of the 2030 Agenda, ensuring that both EU internal and external policies are in line with the agenda;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 21 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to define a clear and detailed EU-wide Sustainable Development Goal (SGD)2030 Agenda implementation plan with specific targets, deadlines, and methodology for coordination between the EU and its Member States, underpinned by a transparent and robust monitoring, accountability and review framework with the close involvement of Parliamentthe European Parliament and civil society, on the basis of a comprehensive set of quantitative and qualitative indicators covering social, economic and environmental factors;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 24 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to define a clear, concrete, ambitious and detailed EU-wide Sustainable Development Goal (SGD) implementation plan with specific targets, deadlines, and methodology for coordination between the EU and its Member States, underpinned by a transparent and robust monitoring, accountability and review framework with the close involvement of Parliament, on the basis of a comprehensive set of indicators covering social, economic and environmental factors;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 27 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Recalls the importance of the underlining principle of the Agenda 2030 of 'leaving no one behind', asks the Commission and the Member States to take strong action in addressing inequalities within and between countries and to promote research and data disaggregation in their policies to ensure inclusiveness and prioritisation of the most vulnerable and marginalised;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 29 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the next Multiannual Financial Frameworks (MFFs) should be designed in a way that enables the implementation of the EU’s strategy and SDGthe 2030 Agenda implementation plan and ensures a substantial EU contribution to the implementation of the 2030 Agenda worldwide, mainstreaming sustainable development priorities throughout the EU budget;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 32 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines the importance of Official Development Assistance (ODA) as a key instrument for eradicating poverty; calls on the EU and its Member States to recomminfirm their commitment without delay to the 0.7 % of the gross national income target and to submit a timeline for gradually increasing ODA in order to reach this target; recalls the EU commitment to allocate at least 20% of its ODA to human development in the period until 2020 and calls on the Commission to reconfirm this commitment; calls to protect ODA from diversion by retaining its fundamental objective of poverty eradication, focusing in particular on LDCs and fragile contexts;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 46 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to reaffirm their commitment to Policy Coherence for Development (PCD) as an important contribution towards achieving broader Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development (PCSD) in its actions for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda and; stresses the need to enhance mechanisms for PCD and PCSD within all EU institutions and policy-making and to ensure that the principle is respected adequately in regular ex ante impact assessments and by introducing adequate mechanisms for accountability, mitigation and redress;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 56 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Believes that supporting peace, security and justice in developing countries is crucial; emphasises that the funding for security-related expenditure, which does not constitute ODA, must come from other instruments than the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) or the European Development Fund (EDF) or any other mechanisms that benefit from these instruments;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 57 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Calls for EU action to be coordinated also with external partners bilaterally and at global level, especially to achieve further progress in developing countries;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 58 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Takes note of the role of the private sector in implementing the 2030 Agenda, in particular its responsibility for transitioning towards sustainable consumption and production patterns in Europe and globally; calls on the Commission to establish binding obligations for corporate accountability and transparency to ensure that the private sector adheres to clear environmental, social and human rights standards, and that its contribution is fully in line with the 2030 Agenda;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 65 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that ensuring tax justice, and transparency, fighting tax dodging, eradicating tax havens and increasing Domestic Resources Mobilisation is crucial for financing the 2030 Agenda; reiterates its call to investigate the spill over impact on developing countries of all national and EU tax policies and to uphold the principle of Policy Coherence of Development when legislating in this field;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 66 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses that ensuring tax justice, transparency and increasing Domestic Resources Mobilisation is crucial for financing the 2030 Agenda; supports increased efforts and funding for targeted education programmes and public campaigns, such as a European Year for Sustainable Development, to increase public awareness and action for the SDGs;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 74 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Underlines the importance of fair and properly regulated trade for the implementation of the 2030 Agenda, and urges the EU to frame its trade policy strategy in line with the SDGand urges the EU to frame its trade policy strategy in line with the 2030 Agenda in order to promote regional integration, high social and environmental standards, sustainable consumption and production patterns, contributing to sustainable growth and combating poverty and global inequalities;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 78 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Calls on the Commission to promote sustainable global value chains with the introduction of due diligence systems for companies with regard their full supply chain, encouraging businesses to invest more responsibly and stimulating more effective implementation of sustainability chapters in free trade agreements, including anticorruption, transparency, anti-tax avoidance and responsible business conduct;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 79 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to re-adjust their approach to migration with a view to developing a migration policy in line with the SDG 10 and a positive, evidence-based narrative on migrants and asylum-seekers; reiterates its concerns that the new policies and financial instruments to address the root causes of migration may be implemented to the detriment of development objectives, and asks for a stronger scrutiny role of the European Parliament in this regard to ensure that the new funding tools are compatible with EU legal basis, principles and commitments, especially with the 2030 Agenda;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 85 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Strongly rejects the idea of conditionality of aid based on border control, management of migratory flows or readmission agreements as the basis of partnership and development cooperation with third countries; calls on the EEAS and the Member States to ensure that cooperation with partner countries on migration is human rights compliant;
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 88 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal to establish an EU Multi- Stakeholder Platform, and with a role in the follow-up and exchange of best practices on SDG implementation across sectors, allowing a real engagement of stakeholders in the planning and monitoring of the implementation of the SDGs; stresses the need to include civil society as an active partner in the entire planning, implementation, monitoring and review process.
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 89 #

2017/2009(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal to establish an EU Multi- Stakeholder Platform, and stresses the need to include civil society as an active partner in the entire planning, implementation, monitoring and review process; invites the Commission and the Member States to invest in raising awareness on sustainable development among citizens.
2017/05/08
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 317 #

2017/0230(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 32
(32) To ensure a high level of convergence in the area of supervision and approval of internal modeland to remedy potential inconsistencies, EIOPA should be able to iassue opinions to remedy potential inconsistencieess and, where necessary, review the decisions made by the competent authorities in the area of supervision and approval of internal models and assist competent authorities in reaching agreement related to the approval of internal models. Competent authorities should take theirIn cases where EIOPA deems that a decisions in conformity with these opinions, or alternatively explain why there are notthe area of supervision and approval of internal models should be amended or withdrawn, competent authorities should conforming to the opinionfinal provisions laid down by the Authority.
2018/09/11
Committee: ECON
Amendment 352 #

2017/0230(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a c (new)
Regulation (EU) 1093/2010
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point f
(f) enhancing customer protection. ac) In paragraph 5, point (f) is replaced by the following: "(f) enhancing the protection of customers and other users of financial services." (This amendment also applies throughout Articles 2 and 3.) Or. en (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/ET/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32010R1093&qid=1532334130461&from=EN)
2018/09/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 354 #

2017/0230(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a d (new)
Regulation (EU) 1093/2010
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point fa (new)
(ad) In paragraph 5, the following point (fa) is added: "(fa) ensuring supervisory convergence of conduct of business across the internal market."; (This amendment also applies throughout Articles 2 and 3.)
2018/09/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 355 #

2017/0230(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a e (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point fb (new)
(ae) In paragraph 5, subparagraph 1, the following point (fb) is added: “(fb) contributing, in all areas of its work, to preventing the use of the financial system for money laundering or terrorist financing purposes." (This amendment also applies throughout Articles 2 and 3.)
2018/09/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 378 #

2017/0230(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a – point iii
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) to organise and conduct reviews of competent authorities and, in that context, to issue guidelines and recommendations and to identify best practic, with the support/contribution of national competent authorities, of competent authorities and, in that context, to issue recommendations addressed to those competent authorities and to identify best practices and, in that context, to issue guidelines, with a view to strengthening consistency in supervisory outcomes; (This amendment also applies throughout Articles 2 and 3.)
2018/09/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 464 #

2017/0230(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 b (new)
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
(https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02010R1093-20160112(8b) In Article 18, in paragraph 1, subparagraph 1a is inserted: In case of adverse developments which may seriously jeopardise the protection of consumers and other users of financial services, competent authorities, including dispute resolution institutions, of the country where a product or service is marketed shall be competent to act, as a safeguard clause, to prevent and solve any detriment caused by financial institutions established in another Member State and providing services across border. These competent authorities shall immediately inform the Authority that will examine the situation within 6 months pursuant to Article 9(5). (This amendment also applies throughout Articles 2 and 3.) Or. en
2018/09/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 466 #

2017/0230(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 – point a
Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
In cases specified in the Union acts referred to in Article 1(2) as well as in all cases of disagreement between two or more national competent authorities concerning the application of those acts and without prejudice to the powers laid down in Article 17, the Authority may assist the competent authorities in reaching an agreement in accordance with the procedure set out in paragraphs 2 to 4 in either of the following circumstances: (This amendment also applies throughout Articles 2 and 3.)
2018/09/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 595 #

2017/0230(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 17 – point -a a (new)
Regulation (EU) 1093/2010
Article 33 – paragraph 1
(-a a) paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: "1. Without prejudice to the respective competences of the Member States and the Union institutions, the Authority may develop contacts and enter into administrative arrangements with regulatory, supervisory and resolution authorities, international organisations and the administrations of third countries. Those arrangements shall not create legal obligations in respect of the Union and its Member States nor shall they prevent Member States and their competent authorities from concluding bilateral or multilateral arrangements with those third countries. (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02010R1093-20160112)By way of derogation from this paragraph, where a third country is included in the list of jurisdictions which are considered to have national anti- money laundering policies and policies countering the financing of terrorism regimes with strategic deficiencies that pose significant threats to the financial system of the Union, as referred to in a delegated act in force adopted by the Commission pursuant to Directive (EU) 2018/843 of the European Parliament and of the Council, the Authority shall not conclude administrative arrangements with regulatory, supervisory and resolution authorities of that third country. " (This amendment also applies throughout Articles 2 and 3.) Or. en
2018/09/14
Committee: ECON
Amendment 905 #

2017/0230(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010
Article 21 a – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) Iassue opinions toess and, where necessary review, the decisions made by the supervisory authorities concerned oin the application to use or change an internal model. To this end, EIOPA may request all the information necessary from the supervisory authorities concerned; andrea of supervision and approval of internal models. To this end, the Authority shall: (i) follow a risk-based approach, taking into account level playing field aspects and closely examining cross- border cases; (ii) have access to all the information necessary, notably all data and material concerning the model application; (iii) participate in all relevant meetings and on-site inspections; The Authority may involve staff from the supervisory authorities concerned in order to ensure the relevant skills and experience for its assessment. Following their assessment by the Authority, the decisions made by the supervisory authorities concerned may be amended or withdrawn by the Executive Board in accordance with Article 45a. The supervisory authorities concerned shall conform to the final provisions as laid down by the Authority.
2018/09/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 907 #

2017/0230(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11
Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010
Article 21 a – paragraph 2
2. In the circumstances set out under Article 231(6a) of Directive 2009/138/EC, undertakings may request EIOPAthe Authority to assist the competent authorities in reaching an agreement in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 19.
2018/09/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 212 #

2017/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) The proposal will empower consumers to make full use of the internal market by enabling them to transfer their pension rights abroad and offering them a greater choice of providers, including in other EU countries.
2018/04/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 233 #

2017/0143(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) The portability of personal pension products is a concern for people moving to another EU country while trying to maintain the same product and provider. PEPP providers should have access to the whole Union market with one single product authorisation issued by the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (“EIOPA”), on the basis of a single set of rules.
2018/04/30
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1 #

2016/2903(RSP)


Citation 2
— having regard to Directive 2009/128/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides2 , and in particular Article 124 thereof; _________________ 2 OJ L 309, 24.11.2009, p.71.
2016/12/15
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 29 #

2016/2903(RSP)


Recital D
D. whereas biological low-risk pesticides may constitute a viable alternative to conventional plant protection products, both for conventional and for organic farmers, and contribute to a more sustainable agriculture, especially if it is based on the implementation of good agronomic practices; whereas some biological pesticides possess new modes of action, which is beneficial with a view to evolving resistance to conventional pesticides and limits the impact on non- target organisms; whereas biological low- risk pesticides should be the preferred option for non-professional users and home gardening;
2016/12/15
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 55 #

2016/2903(RSP)


Recital K
K. whereas Article 12 of Directive 2009/128/EC provides that the use of low- risk plant protection products shall be prioritised in specific areas, such as areas used by the general public and protected areas; whereas some Member States have, for a long time now, prohibited the use of pesticides in these specific areas;
2016/12/15
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 113 #

2016/2903(RSP)


Paragraph 9
9. Stresses the need to revise Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 in order to foster the development, authorisation and placing on the EU market of biological low-risk pesticides; is concerned that the current authorisation process for placing plant protection products on the market is sub-optimal for biological low-risk pesticides; points out that the current registration process for low-risk basic substances sometimes, in practice, acts as a kind of patent, making it difficult to use a product based on the same substance which is not registered in another Member State;
2016/12/15
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 15 #

2016/2325(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Believes pre-existing bilateral relationships between European countries and the United States should be utilised where appropriate in order to strengthen shared security and defence interests, and to enhance vital capabilities to detect, deter, and respond to, emerging threats in space and to deal with security situations such as disaster response, border and maritime surveillance, arms control and terrorist attacks;
2017/04/25
Committee: AFET
Amendment 19 #

2016/2325(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Urges enhanced cooperation between the European Space Agency, NATO, the United States, and countries such as India, in order to improve space policy, including in areas of infrastructure resilience, launch capabilities and security; cooperation would enable Europe's space sector to respond to the changing landscape global competition, in terms of changing markets, actors and technologies;
2017/04/25
Committee: AFET
Amendment 27 #

2016/2325(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Recognises the increasing synergies between the civil and defence aspects of developing space technology, and encourages the development of dual-use systems consistent with the space security objectives of EU Member States; notes, furthermore, that some Member States already operate dual-use satellite systems supporting civil as well as government/military operations; encourages cooperation with EEAS, EDA, EUSatCen and Member States to explore duals-use synergies in space programmes.
2017/04/25
Committee: AFET
Amendment 13 #

2016/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 16 a (new)
- having regard to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights,
2017/06/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 20 #

2016/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas civil society represents the third sector of society, along with governments and businessethe public and private sectors; whereas it comprises non-governmental and non- profit organisations that have a presence in public life, expressing the interests and values of their members or others, based on ethical, cultural, political, scientific, religious or philanthropic considerations;
2017/06/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 37 #

2016/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas the EU is the largest donor to local civil society organisations in developing countries and has been a leading actor in the protection of civil society actors and human rights defenders through the use and implementation of a range of instruments and policies, including the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR), the European Endowment for Democracy, the DCI thematic programme for Civil Society Organisations and Local Authorities (CSOs-LAs), the Civil Society Roadmaps implemented in 105 countries and country strategy papers;
2017/06/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 42 #

2016/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas an increasing number of governments in developing countries are clamping down in legal or administrative terms on civil society organisations, including by imposing restrictive laws, limits on funding, strict licensing procedures and punitive taxes;
2017/06/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 49 #

2016/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas civil society’s ability to act relies on the exercise of three fundamental freedoms, namelyincluding the right to freedom of association, freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of expression;
2017/06/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 57 #

2016/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Believes that a genuinely independent, pluralistic and vibrant civil society is pivotal to a country’s development and stability, to ensuring democracytic consolidation and respect for human rights, and to building inclusive societies; further recalls that civil society is a key actor in achieving the SDGs;
2017/06/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 61 #

2016/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Emphasises the central role played by civil society in developing countries in promoting transparency, accountability and good governance, in particular in the fight against corruption, and its potential implicationsdirect impact on country’s economic and human development;
2017/06/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 66 #

2016/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Is deeply concerned that the closing down of civil society space in developing countries is being carried out inand in particular at the increasingly subtcomplex and sophisticated waycomprehensive means, which are harder to tackle and range from legislation, administrative, reporting and banking requirements, to the criminalisation and stigmatisation of CSO representatives, defamation, administrative harassment, online repression, censorship, arbitrary detention, torture and assassination;
2017/06/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 89 #

2016/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the EU to continue to work towards greater autonomy of the civic space not only by tackling thethrough EU development and human rights policies, but by integrating all other EU internal and external policies, including justice, home affairs, trade and security policies, in accordance with the principle of policy coherence for development;
2017/06/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 101 #

2016/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines that tackling shrinking civil society space requires a unified and consistent approach in the EU’s relationship with developing countries, and calls for the EU and Member States to proactively address the root causes of shrinking civil society space, in particular by mainstreaming the promotion of civil society organisations and their participation in bilateral and multilateral cooperation at all stages, including in political dialogues at the highest level, taking into account their different sizes, capacities and expertise;
2017/06/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 103 #

2016/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. ENotes the importance of the EU and Members States working with CSOs, the private sector, opposition political parties, governments and local authorities to maintain an open environment for civil society; encourages the EU to become an active facilitator and to promote institutional mechanisms for reinforced dialogues and partnerships amongin developing countries governments, CSOs, local authorities and the private sector on an enabling civil society environment; calls on the Commission to strengthen the role of civil society actors in trade agreement institutions including Domestic Advisory Groups and EPA Consultative Committees;
2017/06/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 110 #

2016/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Recalls equally that the private sector is a key partner in achieving the SDGs, and has an important role to play in fostering civic space; responsibilities in fostering civic space including Corporate Social Responsibility reporting, transparency in supply chain due diligence and full recognition and engagement with trade unions;
2017/06/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 123 #

2016/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Recalls the importance of regional cooperation to strengthen enabling environments for civil society; encourages developing countries to promote dialogue and best practice of protection of and engagement with civil society;
2017/06/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 125 #

2016/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the EU to strengthen its support for the full participation of minorities including indigenous people and other vulnerable groups in cultural, social, economic and political processes;
2017/06/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 131 #

2016/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Underlines the critical role played by women in social progress; calls on the EU to insist on the need for supporting the creation of a safe and enabling environment for women’s CSOs and women’s rights defenders, particularlyCSOs defending and promoting women’s rights, and in conflict- affected regions;
2017/06/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 153 #

2016/2324(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. Calls on the EU to take steps to maximise engagement with and support the CSOs through its funding modalities and mechanisms beyond those which currently have on-going contracts;
2017/06/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 81 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the respect for fundamental freedoms shown at the elections of 11 December 2016; urges all political parties to accept its results in the interest of domestic stability and underlines their responsibility to ensure that there is no backsliding into political crisis; calls for a swift formation of a new, stable and accountable government in order to make use of the mandate to carry on with necessary reforms; considers cross- party cooperationand inter-ethnic cooperation, as well as a strong reformist consensus, to be essential for addressing pressing domestic and EU- related challenges;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 254 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Is extremely concerned about the significant shortcomings in the field of the environment, in particular in the area of air and water pollution; calls for a comprehensive policy and strategy on climate action to be developed that is in line with the EU 2030 framework;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 275 #

2016/2310(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Commends the country for constructive cooperation in addressing the migration crisis; recommends further actions to ensure capacities to combat human trafficking and migrant smuggling; recommends the European Council to open negotiations with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in order to allow deployments of the European Boarder and Coast Guard and make the Agency fully operational as soon as possible;
2017/02/09
Committee: AFET
Amendment 36 #

2016/2309(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the continued steady progress in the accession negotiations, noting that so far 26 chapters have been opened for negotiations and 2 chapters have been provisionally closed; encourages Montenegro to work on meeting all benchmarks and to continue focusing on the fundamentals of the accession process; recalls that it is essential to deliver concrete results with a strong implementation record; believes that a credible enlargement process is necessary to generate transformation and to consolidate stability in all of South-East Europe;
2017/02/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 61 #

2016/2309(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the attempts by Russia to influence developments in Montenegro; is concerned about the serious incidents that occurred on 16 October 2016, and calls on the Vice-President of the European Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (VP/HR), and on the Commission, to follow closely ongoing investigations by the competent authorities; encourages the Prime Minister to enter a dialogue with the opposition and to clarify remaining open questions; considers it important that relevant services of the Member States share information pertaining to these incidents among themselves and with the VP/HR and the Commission;
2017/02/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 97 #

2016/2309(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. NotWelcomes the adoption of an action plan for fighting money laundering and terrorism financing, and the signing of the Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe’s Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism; stresses the need to continue to develop the track record in organised crime cases, especially as regards trafficking in human beings and money laundering, to ensure stronger inter-agency cooperation and to further intensify regional and international cooperation in the fight against organised crime;
2017/02/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 105 #

2016/2309(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Welcomes the new strategy to combat violent extremism in 2016-2018, which complements the national strategy for preventing and combating terrorism, money laundering and the financing of terrorism; notes the setting up of a new intelligence unit tasked with identifying and monitoring potential members of violent extremist groups; considers it importantfundamental to identify people in the early stages of radicalisation in order to prevent them from being recruited by violent extremist groups;
2017/02/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 114 #

2016/2309(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. While acknowledging CSOs’ involvement in the accession preparations, calls on the competent authorities to further improve CSOs’ access to EU-related information and to ensure that consultations with CSOs are held in a meaningful way, where possible; is deeply concerned that smear campaigns and intimidation attempts have continued against certain CSO activists; calls on the authorities to investigate and clarify the cause of these attempts and to strengthen efforts in order to protect CSO activists;
2017/02/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 2 #

2016/2306(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the European Semester debate is of particular importance in view of the need to find a new development model for structural reforms and selective investments, investing in strategic areas; stresses that the European Semester is one of the means of mainstreaming and integrating environmental concerns into other relevant policies, in line with the approach defined by Article 11 TFEU; reiterates, therefore, that the environmental dimension should play a full role, together with the economic and social dimensions, in the European Semester process to ensure that Member States return to higher growth levels while continuing their path towards the development of sustainable societies;
2016/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 12 #

2016/2306(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission to use the European Semester as an instrument to fulfil EU commitments emanating from the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, and in particular to include in the process policies and effective measures addressing climate change, sustainable production and consumption, food security and biodiversity;
2016/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 13 #

2016/2306(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that ensuring sustainable growth, climate protection and job creation in the EU means using our resources in a smarter and more sustainable way and reducing dependence on imports of raw materials; considers that the focus should be on waste prevention, greater recycling and re-use of products; stresses that if the reform of waste legislation and the action plan on the circular economy are to advance the transition of the European economy into a circular model, it is essential to integrate recommendations to this effect into the European Semester process to boost competitiveness, create jobs and generate sustainable growth; notes that it is estimated that the circular economy could provide EU companies with savings of about EUR 600 billion per year; reiterates therefore its call for the principles of the circular economy to be incorporated into the European Semester;
2016/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 21 #

2016/2306(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the efficient use of resources, reducing foreign energy dependence and the induction of production patterns and more sustainable consumption patterns involves promoting entrepreneurship and job creation and effectively implementing international targets and objectives and diversifying revenue sources, in a context of fiscal responsibility and economic competitiveness; considers that the European Semester should also incorporate reporting on renewable energy, energy efficiency and interconnectivity on the basis of targets set at EU level;
2016/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 39 #

2016/2306(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that effective investment in health is an essential condition for economic prosperity and growth promotion, producing results in terms of productivity, labour supply, human capital and public spending.; stresses the importance of the sustainability of the healthcare sector, which plays an important role in the overall economy as it accounts for 8 % of the total European workforce and 10 % of GDP in the EU, and of being able to provide equal access to healthcare services for all citizens, as health is an essential factor for stability, sustainability and further development of Member States and their economies;
2016/12/16
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 34 #

2016/2301(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. recalls the 2030 SDG agenda and calls on the Commission to transparently communicate the reference to each SDG concerned in the reporting; calls on the Commission and the Member States to use trade to promote sustainable development and good governance according to the principles of policy coherence for development;
2017/03/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 35 #

2016/2301(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. underlines the importance of inclusive and sustainable approaches as agreed in the 2030 Agenda on Sustainable Development, notably those on sustainable production, sustainable consumption and decent work;
2017/03/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 40 #

2016/2301(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. encourages the Commission and Member States to include specific measures in Free Trade Agreements with developing countries in order to support their social and environmental standards; calls on the Commission to introduce tariff preferences for proven sustainably- produced goods in the forthcoming reform of the GSP / GSP+ rules;
2017/03/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 43 #

2016/2301(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Warmly welcomes the drafting of a binding UN Treaty on Business and Human Rights and reiterates its calls for the Member States and the EU itself to promote and participate in this process; calls on the Commission to introduce a legislative proposal on binding due diligence obligations for supply chains aligned with the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and several sector-specific OECD guidelines and set up comprehensive labelling measures in order to guarantee enhanced consumer information on the content and origin of the final products sold in the EU market throughout their supply chain;
2017/03/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 48 #

2016/2301(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. encourages the International Labour Organization, enterprises and other stakeholders to work towards a binding legal convention, regulating Global Value Chains, which will include adequate remedy mechanisms for workers when their rights are violated, establish legal accountability for the actions of the corporations and their subcontractors, and include mandatory due-diligence and transparency obligations;
2017/03/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 19 #

2016/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
B a. whereas it is both economically and environmentally necessary to preserve raw materials and limit the production of waste;
2017/03/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 60 #

2016/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the Commission’s Ecodesign Work Plan 2016-2019; welcomes especially the inclusion of product durability and recyclability as a possible environmental standard of its own;
2017/03/08
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 1 #

2016/2241(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to the UN General Assembly Resolution 'Towards the establishment of a multilateral legal framework for sovereign debt restructurings' of 9 September 2014,
2018/01/31
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 3 #

2016/2241(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital –A (new)
-A. whereas addressing the sovereign debt problems of developing countries is an important element in international cooperation and can contribute to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in developing countries;
2018/01/31
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 14 #

2016/2241(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the composition of developing country debt has evolved in line with the growing importance of private creditors and trading conditions and increased exposure to financial market volatility, which has an impact on the sustainability of debt; whereas, while debt denominated in the national currency effectively eliminates exchange-rate risks, such an option may prove to be unfavourable or untenable where backed by insufficient domestic capital reserves;
2018/01/31
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 20 #

2016/2241(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas, while the UNCTAD principles for responsible sovereign lending and borrowing and the G20 operational guidelines for sustainable financing are undeniably useful for the formulation of regulatory framework provisions, priority must be given to ending irresponsible practices through the introduction of suitable and binding deterrents and penalties;
2018/01/31
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 23 #

2016/2241(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas the debt sustainability analysis should not focus solely on economic considerations, such as the prospects for future economic growth of the debtor State and its ability to service its debts, but must take into consideration the impact of the debt burden on the country’s capacity to respect all human rights;
2018/01/31
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 26 #

2016/2241(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas odious debts contracted by regimes parties to facilitate corrupt practices or transactions known by creditors to be illicit are resulting in a substantial burden for the poorer classeseople, particularly those who are most vulnerable;
2018/01/31
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 51 #

2016/2241(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that borrowing is an important way of supporting investment, which is vital in order to achieve sustainable development, including the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs);
2018/01/31
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 58 #

2016/2241(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Is concerned at the substantial increase in both private and public debt in many developing countries and the harmful effect thereof on their ability to finance investment expenditure for health, education, the economy and, infrastructure and combating climate change;
2018/01/31
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 59 #

2016/2241(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that structural adjustment plans that were developed in the 1990s for over-indebted countries have seriously compromised the development of basic social services and undermined the ability of those countries’ ability to assume their essential responsibilities they have as sovereign nations, in combating insecurity and terrorism for example to maintain security;
2018/01/31
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 60 #

2016/2241(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses that debt relief measures must not be liable to impede the provision of basic services and impair respect for all human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights, and development in the recipient State;
2018/01/31
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 70 #

2016/2241(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the EU and its Member States to actively combat tax havens, tax avoidance and illicit financial flows, which merely increase the debt burden of developing countries, to cooperate with developing countries to combat aggressive tax avoidance, and to seek ways to help developing countries withstand pressures to engage in tax competition, which would damage the mobilisation of domestic revenue for development;
2018/01/31
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 73 #

2016/2241(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls for legislation to be drawn up to prevent the repayment of loans to creditors that have been complicit in granting loans to manifestly corrupt governments;
2018/01/31
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 74 #

2016/2241(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Advocates the drafting of a code of conduct on credit management that is binding on institutional, political and private stakeholders;
2018/01/31
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 97 #

2016/2241(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to draw up, in the form of a white paper, a genuine strategy designed to save developing countries from excessive debt by adopting a multilateral approach, specifying the rights, duties and responsibilities of all concerned and considering the institutional provisions best suited to to ensuring an equitable and sustainable approach to the problem of debt;
2018/01/31
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 98 #

2016/2241(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Endorses the principles set out by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development for responsible credit policy, which highlight in particular the shared responsibility of creditors and borrowers (UNCTAD Principles on Promoting Responsible Sovereign Lending and Borrowing), as well as the need for parliamentary control, which is an essential component of public funding operations, and calls on the European Union to support the implementation of the UNCTAD Principles; stresses the importance of introducing monitoring and accountability mechanisms in order to ensure full compliance with the principles adopted;
2018/01/31
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 112 #

2016/2241(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point a
(a) create a permanent crisis management mechanism for the developing countries, which can be activated promptly and over the long term;
2018/01/31
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 115 #

2016/2241(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point b
(b) allow the establishment of a multilateral legal framework for the orderly and predictable restructuring of sovereign debt in order to prevent it becoming unsustainable and to achieve greater predictability for investors;
2018/01/31
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 117 #

2016/2241(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 – point b a (new)
(ba) Underlines that, in order to ensure sustainability, sovereign debt restructuring negotiations should be completed without delay and efficiently and should lead to a stabilisation of the debtor State’s debt, while safeguarding its sustainable development;
2018/01/31
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 48 #

2016/2238(INI)

G. whereas the outsourcing of military activities, formerly an integral part of the activities of armed forces, is taking place, among other things, to provide services in a more cost-efficient manner, but also to compensate for a shortfall in capabilities in shrinking armed forces in the context of an increasing number of multilateral missions abroad; whereas PSCs can also , provide capabilities that are entirely lacking in national armed forces, often at short notice; whereas PSCs could also be used for reasons of political convenience to avoid limitations on the use of troops; whereas the use of PSCs as a foreign policy tool raises a number of concerns;
2017/03/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 56 #

2016/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas PSCs have been involved in incidents resulting in loss of life; whereas thisviolations of human rights and in loss of life; whereas the opacity in their behaviour and their lack of transparency has had repercussions on the efforts of the international community in the countries in question and has revealed considerable gaps in accountability structures, such as, among others, the creation of numerous layers of subsidiaries or subcontracts in diverse countries;
2017/03/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 62 #

2016/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas, due to the lack of specific international regulation of PSCs and PMCs, the non-homogenous national legislations and self-regulation adopted by some PSCs provide a weak deterrent to prevent abuses and has a major impact on how PSCs operate in multilateral interventions and conflict regions;
2017/03/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 69 #

2016/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas, for states to benefit from the advantages offered by PSCs, and to ensure that they can be held accountable, a legal framework should be put in placewith binding regulatory and monitoring mechanisms should be put in place at the international level to facilitate their use; whereas PSCs are part of an industry, which is highly transnational in nature and is intertwined with governmental and intergovernmental actors and as such requires a global approach to regulation;
2017/03/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 75 #

2016/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas there is a lack of agreed definitions of PSCs, PMCs and of their services; whereas, as suggested by the definition included in the draft convention prepared by the UN Working Group on Mercenaries, a PSC can be defined as a corporate entity which provides on a compensatory basis military and/or security services by physical persons and/or legal entities; whereas military services in this context can be defined as specialised services related to military actions including strategic planning, intelligence, investigation, land, sea or air reconnaissance, flight operations of any type, manned or unmanned, satellite surveillance and intelligence, any kind of knowledge transfer with military applications, material and technical support to armed forces and other related activities; whereas security services can be defined as armed guarding or protection of buildings, installations, property and people, any kind of knowledge transfer with security and policing applications, development and implementation of informational security measures and other related activities;
2017/03/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 79 #

2016/2238(INI)

M. whereas the EU and 23 Member States have joined the Montreux document and whereas the EU is a Member of the Working Group on the International Code of Conduct Association; whereas the EU contributes in the context of the Human Rights Council to the possible development of an international regulatory framework; whereas the EU plays a critical role in promoting national and regional control over the provision and export of various military and security services;
2017/03/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 122 #

2016/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Underlines that the cost-effective principle of PSCs employment offers mainly benefits in the short-term, especially if a number of socioeconomic variables are not taken into consideration, and should therefore not become the main criteria when dealing with security issues; recalls that accountability and oversight mechanisms are crucial in order to ensure that the legitimacy and potential benefits of PMSCs are fully obtained;
2017/03/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 137 #

2016/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Underlines that the employment of PSCs in third countries leads primarily to aspects of social and moral trust, both in relation with the beneficiaries (employers) and with those whom they have to interact with, i.e. the population and authorities of the third countries;
2017/03/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 139 #

2016/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises, however, that, particularly in conflict-prone environments, employing a PSC for certain duties can have negative side effects for the EU, especially for its legitimacy, by accidentally associating it with armed actors in a conflict area, with negative repercussions in the case of armed incidents, or by possibly compromising Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration (DDR) and Security Sector Reform (SSR) efforts through the inadvertent strengthening of local actors; notes in particular the risks posed by uncontrolled sub-contracting;
2017/03/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 165 #

2016/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Draws attention on the fact that PSCs, besides offering security services, are conducting intelligence activities, as well, that, due to their potentially implications, require efficient regulation and control;
2017/03/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 177 #

2016/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Recommends that the European Commission draw up a Green Paper with the objective of involving all stakeholders from the public and private security sectors in a broad consultation and discussion of processes to identify opportunities for direct collaboration more efficiently and to establish a basic set of rules of engagement and good practices; recommends the creation of sector-specific EU quality standards; recommends, therefore, a clarification of the definition of PSCs before setting up an effective regulation of their activities, as the lack of it can create legislative loopholes;
2017/03/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 195 #

2016/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 – indent 4 a (new)
– ensure reporting of eventual private military and security companies' irregularities and illegalities;
2017/03/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 206 #

2016/2238(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Notes, however, that the evaluation of the performance of PSCs is hampered by the lack of consistent reporting about their use by both EU institutions and Member States' governments; encourages Member States and EU institutions to provide this information more consistently to allow for a proper assessment of the use of PSCs by their respective budgetary authorities; recommends non-state actors should be actively engaged in the necessary evaluation processes that are crucial for the regulation and oversight of this industry;
2017/03/20
Committee: AFET
Amendment 13 #

2016/2230(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Takes the view that the EU-Cook Islands FPA should effectively promote sustainable fisheries in the Cook Islands waters through adequate EU sectoral support, and pursue two equally important goals: 1) to provide fishing opportunities to EU vessels in the Cook Islands fishing zone, on the basis of the best available scientific advice and respecting the conservation and management measures of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) within the limits of the available surplus; and 2) to promote cooperation between the European Union and the Cook Islands with a view to a sustainable fisheries policy and sound exploitation of fisheries resources in the Cook Islands fishing zone, and to contribute to the sustainable development of the Cook Islands fishing sector, through economic, financial, technical and scientific cooperation while respecting that country’s sovereign options regarding this development;
2016/12/12
Committee: PECH
Amendment 23 #

2016/2230(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Takes the view that the EU-Cook Islands FPA and the relevant protocol should allow bilateral cooperation on the fight against illegal fishing to be strengthened and provide the Cook Islands with the means to finance surveillance programmes, and believes that measures to prevent IUU fishing in the exclusive economic zone of the Cook Islands should be reinforced, including by improved monitoring, control and surveillance through the use of the satellite-based vessel monitoring system, logbooks, inspectors and the implementation of decisions by regional fisheries organisations;
2016/12/12
Committee: PECH
Amendment 9 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Reminds the Commission of its Communication "Addressing the challenges of deforestation and forest degradation to tackle climate change and biodiversity loss" emphasising a holistic approach to tropical deforestation, taking into account of all deforestation drivers, including palm oil production; reminds the Commission of its objective in the UNFCCC negotiations to halt global forest cover loss by 2030 at the latest and to reduce gross tropical deforestation by at least 50% by 2020 compared to current levels;
2017/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 21 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas palm oil is increasingly being used in processed food, with some 50 % of packaged goods now containing palm oil, and as a biofuel;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 23 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that the EU is a major importer of products resulting from illegal deforestation; calls for the immediate termination of EU subsidies for biofuels produced from food crops and for a phase- out of such fuels; stresses the inadequacy of voluntary certification schemes, such as the Round Table on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), in addressing land grabs and human rights violations; calls for binding regulations on agricultural commodity importers’ supply chains; Expresses its deep concerns that multiple investigations reveal widepsread abuse of basic human rights at a time of establishment and running of palm oil plantations in many countries, including forced evictions, armed violence, child labour, debt bondage or discrimination of indigenous communities;
2017/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 35 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Notes that palm oil can be cultivated responsibly and can make a real contribution to the economic development of a country, offering viable economic opportunities to farmers, provided that no deforestation occurs, that no plantations are established on peat lands, that plantations are managed using modern agroecological techniques to minimise adverse environmental and social outcomes and that land rights, the rights of indigenous communities as well as human rights and workers' rights are respected;
2017/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 38 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas precious tropical ecosystems, which cover a mere 7% of the Earth’s surface, are under increasing pressure from deforestation and the establishment of palm oil plantations, which are resulting in, for example, massive forest fires, the drying up of rivers, soil erosion, loss of groundwater, loss of biodiversity, pollution of waterways and destruction of rare natural habitats, and even causing ecosystems to stop providing basic ecosystem services, which is having a major impact on the global climate;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 39 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Notes that latest research proves that agroforestry polycropping applied to palm oil plantations can offer combined benefits in terms of biodiveristy, productivity and positive social outcomes;
2017/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 44 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Calls on the Commission to support the development of new binding regulations for deforestation-free and conflict-free palm oil, backed by appropriate and mandatory due diligence framework and traceability mechanisms throughout the supply chain. These would be imposed on supply chain operators for forest-risk and conflict-risk palm oil commodities and should be aligned with globally adopted best standards and practices.
2017/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 67 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Calls on the Commission to require all palm oil imports arriving in the EU to be certified according to the established sustainability criteria;
2017/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 68 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. calls on the European Commission to completely phase out the use of biofuels made from food crops after 2020 by making these ineligible to meet all EU 2030 climate and energy targets, in particular of biodiesel that has created an unsustainable demand for palm oil;
2017/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 96 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls on the Commission, the Member States, and the industry to support the High Carbon Stock (HCS) approach, which makes it possible to determine areas suitable for planting with oil palms, that is to say, degraded lands of little value in terms of carbon storage and their natural environment, thereby promoting sustainable palm oil that can be produced without converting forests or interfering with ecosystems with a high conservation value;
2016/11/21
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 111 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission to include a ‘no deforestation’ guarantee in trade agreements with palm oil-producing countries;
2016/11/21
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 119 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for companies that cultivate palm oil to useadopt the High Carbon Stock (HCS) approach, when developing their plantationsich makes it possible to determine areas suitable for plantation with oil palms, which is to say degraded lands of little carbon storage or natural value, thereby promoting sustainable palm oil production without converting forests or interfering with ecosystems of high conservation value; draws attention to the need to create a comprehensive land- use plan that will take into account the land used by local communities for the cultivation of food, peatlands and high conservation value (HCV) land, and will respect the right of communities to use the land on the basis of ‘free prior and informed consent’ (FPIC);
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 158 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the non-profit sector, to launch information campaigns and to provide consumers with comprehensive information on the consequences of the reckless cultivation of palm oil; calls on the Commission to ensure that information confirming that a product is not linked to deforestation is provided to consumerinform consumers on the sustainability of products by means of a special indication to be affixed ton the product;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 168 #

2016/2222(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Calls on the Commission to draw up an action plan to combat deforestation and trade in agricultural commodities, in particular palm oil, obtained by that means;
2016/11/21
Committee: AGRI
Amendment 196 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission to strengthen environmental measures in its trade agreements with a view to preventing palm oil-related deforestation, including, in particular, an anti-deforestation guarantee in trade agreements with palm oil producing countries;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 211 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to establish a regulatory framework of strong and enforceable measures to guarantee that none of those forming part of the supply chain, including EU financial institutions and the investments and loans they provide, are involved in deforestation;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 224 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to develop technologies and, strategies and a plan of action to reduce the impact of European consumption on deforestation in third countries;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 236 #

2016/2222(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. calls for the clear and transparent labelling of palm oil in processed goods;
2016/12/07
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 6 #

2016/2220(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises the connections between statelessness and social and economic vulnerability; urges governments in developing countries to prevent denial, loss or deprivation of nationality on discriminatory grounds, to adopt equitable nationality laws and to implement accessible, affordable and non- discriminatory nationality documentation procedures;
2016/12/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 11 #

2016/2220(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Invites the European Commission to launch exchanges of good practices among Member States, encourages the active coordination of national statelessness contact points, and welcomes the IBelong Campaign;
2016/12/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 12 #

2016/2220(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4 b. Invites Member States to grant protection status to stateless migrants and facilitate their naturalization;
2016/12/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 25 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Strongly believes that the private sector has a role in ensuring respect of human rights when taking activity in a country and believes that this role can be maximised by the conclusion of more public-private partnerships;
2016/10/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 43 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Warns against the increase of populism and extremism that legitimise breaches of human rights as well as the constitutional abuse of some elected officials to remain in power;
2016/10/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 58 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Insists that all international agreements negotiated by the EU must include binding and non-negotiable human rights clauses and regrets that the Economic Partnership Agreements negotiated until now fail to meet this standard; notably insists that the future agreement between the ACP and the EU must reinforce the existing dialogue on human rights and enable a system of sanction when failure to respect human rights is demonstrated;
2016/10/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 63 #

2016/2219(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Welcomes the creation of new EU instruments to address the root causes of migration but urges for human rights to be at the centre of the programmes that are financed by these instruments; recalls that human rights of migrants must be fully respected in origin, transit and destination countries;
2016/10/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 140 #

2016/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points to the importance of a viable, dynamic rural context in which there is demographic diversity; points also to the importance of creating the opportunities necessary to support young women;
2016/11/21
Committee: AGRIFEMM
Amendment 163 #

2016/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to help set up an accurate database on the economic and social situation of women and their involvement in business in rural areas and to use available data more effectively in order to better tailor policy measures;
2016/11/21
Committee: AGRIFEMM
Amendment 238 #

2016/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls for support for women's business and other initiatives, in particular through the promotion of female ownership, businesswomen's networks and easier access to financing for businesswomen in rural areas, including self-employed women, for women in part-time low-paid jobs and for younger women, with a view to placing them in a stronger position on the market;
2016/11/21
Committee: AGRIFEMM
Amendment 280 #

2016/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Notes that, in rural as well as urban areas, it is essential to improve the quality and accessibility of infrastructures, facilities and services meeting daily needs, so as to facilitate work-life balance and preserve rural communities; notes that this would necessitate the inclusion of rural childcare infrastructures (such as ' agroasilo' kindergarten and other pre- school facilities), healthcare services, educational (including lifelong learning) facilities, care homes for elderly and dependent people, sickness and maternity replacement services and local outlets for everyday items and cultural services; calls, therefore, for the provision of such services under the CAP, thereby offering women fresh prospects and opportunities for paid employment and greatly helping to reconcile family and working life;
2016/11/21
Committee: AGRIFEMM
Amendment 296 #

2016/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Calls on the Commission to recognize the importance of extending its digital agenda to rural areas, ensuring that no citizens, especially women, are excluded or isolated and that the digital opportunities are available to all;
2016/11/21
Committee: AGRIFEMM
Amendment 298 #

2016/2204(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Urges the Member States to use the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund to remedy the lack of good transport infrastructure in rural areas and implement policies to actively improve access to transport for all, given that transport problems continue to constitute a factor of social exclusion and inequality, primarily for women;
2016/11/21
Committee: AGRIFEMM
Amendment 1 #

2016/2188(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Underlines that ESMA's role is essential in order to ensure financial stability, transparency, better integrated and safer financial markets, as well as a high degree of consumer protection in the Union;
2017/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 6 #

2016/2188(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that, while ensuring that all assignments are carried out in full, ESMA should carefully adhere to the tasks assigned to it by the Union legislator and should not seek to de facto broaden its mandate beyond those assignments; emphasises, in this respect, that, where possible, ESMA needs to pay particular attention to the principle of proportionalityonly sufficient financial resources would allow ESMA to fulfil its mandate independently and efficiently; underlines that an expansion of tasks has to be matched by an expansion of resources;
2017/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 11 #

2016/2188(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the initiative reducing the 2015 budget through two subsequent budget amendments, thereby using Union funds rationally; believes that ESMA’s budget still has rationalisation potential; stresses, therefore, that any potential increases in ESMA’s means should be accompanied by adequate rationalisation measures;deleted
2017/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 21 #

2016/2188(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Concludes that ESMA’s financing arrangement is to be reviewed; calls on the Commission to examine the possibility of modifying the current financing arrangement by introducing additional appropriately and proportionately calibrated fees for market participants, possibly replacing in partensuring that it will not depend in the future on the contributions of nthe National cCompetent aAuthorities in order to enhance its autonomy and supervisory action;
2017/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 26 #

2016/2188(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Stresses that, while carrying out its work and in particular when drafting implementing legislation, ESMA needs to regularly and comprehensively inform the Union legislator about its activities;
2017/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1 #

2016/2187(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Underlines that EIOPA's role is essential in order to ensure financial stability, transparency, better integrated and safer financial markets, as well as a high degree of consumer protection in the Union;
2017/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 5 #

2016/2187(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that, while making sure that all assignments are carried out in full, EIOPA should carefully stick to the tasks assigned to it by the Union legislator and should not seek to de facto broaden its mandate beyond those assignments; emphasises, in this respect that, where possible, EIOPA needs to pay particular attention to the principle of proportionalityonly sufficient financial resources would allow EIOPA to fulfil its mandate independently and efficiently; underlines that an expansion of tasks has to be matched by an expansion of resources;
2017/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 16 #

2016/2187(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that the EIOPA budget still has rationalisation potential; stresses, therefore, that any potential increases in EIOPA's means should be accompanied by adequate rationalisation measures;deleted
2017/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 21 #

2016/2187(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Concludes that EIOPA’s financing arrangement is to be reviewed; calls on the Commission to examine the possibility to modify the current financing arrangement by introducing appropriately and proportionately calibrated fees for market participants, possibly partly replacingensuring that it will not depend in the future on the contributions of nthe National cCompetent aAuthorities in order to enhance its autonomy and supervisory action;
2017/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 25 #

2016/2187(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Stresses that, while carrying out its work and in particular when drafting implementing legislation, EIOPA needs to regularly and comprehensively inform the Union legislator about its activities;
2017/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 27 #

2016/2187(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Underlines that EIOPA should supervise more and intervene more, when National Financial Supervisory Authorities do not function properly and even create problems to the markets, as for example the Romanian Financial Supervisory Authority did with the Romanian insurance market;
2017/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1 #

2016/2186(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Underlines that EBA's role is essential in order to ensure financial stability, transparency, better integrated and safer financial markets, as well as a high degree of consumer protection in the Union;
2017/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 8 #

2016/2186(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that the initial budget cuts should not have been implemented by postponing the publication of standardonly sufficient financial resources would allow EBA to fulfil its mand guidelines or by cutting attendance in BCBS working groups, but bate independently eanding financing of non-core related activities; stresses, therefore, that any potential increases in EBA's means must be accompanied by adequate rationalisation meas efficiently; underlines that an expansion of tasks has to be matched by an expansion of resources;
2017/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 22 #

2016/2186(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Concludes that EBA’s financing arrangement is to be reviewed; calls on the Commission to examine the possibility of modifying the current financing arrangement by introducing appropriately and proportionately calibrated fees for market participants, possibly partly replacingensuring that it will not depend in the future on the contributions of the National Competent Authorities in order to enhance its autonomy and supervisory action;
2017/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 25 #

2016/2186(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Stresses that, while carrying out its work and in particular when drafting implementing legislation, EBA needs to regularly and comprehensively inform the Union legislator about its activities;
2017/01/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 15 #

2016/2182(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Recognises that the Agency's declarations of interest are transparent, and calls on it to constantly review its internal procedures and to further improve its policies to guarantee independence and transparency in all its fields of activity as regards both outside staff and temporary staff;
2016/12/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 16 #

2016/2182(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Notes the discussion platform between the Agency and nongovernmental organisations, as a useful forum for discussing the main issues of interest to civil society;
2016/12/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 5 #

2016/2175(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Notes that with regard to its procurement procedures, the Centre has put specific focus on ensuring consistency in all tender documents; emphasises that the Centre’s revised Committee on Procurement, Contracts and Grants is providing an additional quality control mechanism; calls on the Centre in particular to carry out careful checks on conflicts of interest in relation to tenders, procurement, recruitment and contracts in order to strengthen transparency;
2016/12/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 8 #

2016/2175(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Asks the Centre to apply strictly the measures pertaining to discretion and exclusion in public procurement, with proper background checks being carried out in every instance, and to apply the exclusion criteria so as to debar companies in the event of any conflict of interest, this being essential to protect the financial interests of the Union;
2016/12/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 4 #

2016/2166(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls for the Agency to implement Article 16 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union by publishing information about senior officials who have left the service and a list of conflicts of interest on an annual basis;
2016/12/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 5 #

2016/2166(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Encourages the Agency further to raise awareness of the conflict-of-interest policy among its staff, alongside ongoing awareness-raising activities and the inclusion of integrity and transparency as an obligatory item to be discussed during recruitment procedures and performance reviews;
2016/12/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 5 #

2016/2151(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Is satisfied with the overall implementation of the LIFE+ operational budget, which amounted to 99,95 % in 2015 for commitment appropriations and 98,93% for payment appropriations; stresses that LIFE+ has helped to increase public awareness and participation in legislation and the implementation of EU environment policy, in addition to improving governance in this sector; notes that in 2015 EUR 225,9 million were committed for action grants, EUR 40 million were used for financial instruments managed by the European Investment Bank and EUR 59,2 million were used for measures intended to support the Commission's role of initiating and monitoring policy and legislation development; notes that EUR 10,2 million were used for administrative support to LIFE and for support to the Executive Agency for Small and Medium- sized Enterprises (EASME);
2016/12/14
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 3 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 b (new)
- having regard to the programmes funded by the UN Trust Fund to End Violence against Women focused on addressing harassment and violence against women in the garment industry6b _________________ 6bhttp://www.unwomen.org/en/trust- funds/un-trust-fund-to-end-violence- against-women
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 4 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
- having regard to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child6a _________________ 6a https://www.unicef.org/crc/
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 7 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 18 a (new)
- having regard to its resolution of 14 December 2016 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of a Protocol to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement establishing a partnership between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Uzbekistan, of the other part, amending the Agreement in order to extend the provisions of the Agreement to bilateral trade in textiles, taking account of the expiry of the bilateral textiles Agreement18a , _________________ 18a Texts adopted, P8_TA(2016)0490.
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 10 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 c (new)
- having regard to the ILO Programme on Improving working conditions in the Ready-Made garment sector in Bangladesh6c _________________ 6c http://www.ilo.org/dhaka/Whatwedo/Proje cts/safer-garment-industry-in- bangladesh/lang--en/index.htm
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 11 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 20 d (new)
- having regard to the Bangladesh Sustainability Compact20d _________________ 20d http://www.ilo.org/global/docs/WCMS_40 8025/lang--en/index.htm
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 13 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 20 c (new)
- having regard to the Bangladesh Accord20c _________________ 20c http://bangladeshaccord.org/
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 16 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
- having regard to the EU's GSP+ scheme9a , _________________ 9a http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015 /august/tradoc_153732.pdf
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 17 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 b (new)
- having regard to the Public Procurement Directive of 26 February 20149b _________________ 9bhttp://eur- lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/24/oj
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 19 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 20 a (new)
- having regard to the German Partnership for Sustainable Textiles20a , _________________ 20a https://www.textilbuendnis.com/en/
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 20 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 20 b (new)
- having regard to the Dutch Agreement of the Sustainable Garment and Textile20b , _________________ 20b https://www.ser.nl/en/publications/publica tions/2016/agreement-sustainable- garment-textile.aspx
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 27 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
A a. whereas victims of the three most deadly incidents in the garment sectors (Rana Plaza, Tazreen and Ali Enterprises) have or are in the process to receive compensation for the loss of income; whereas this is in line with ILO Convention 121 and is the result of unprecedented cooperation between brand, trade unions, civil society, governments and the ILO; whereas given the widespread violation of key human rights, actual remedy remains rare;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 28 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
A b. whereas victims of human rights abuses involving European companies face multiple obstacles to access judicial remedies; including procedural obstacles on admissibility and disclosure of evidence, often prohibitive litigation costs, absence of clear liability standards for corporate involvement in human rights abuses, and lack of clarity on the application of EU rules of private international law in transnational civil litigation;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 29 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas Article 207 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) requiredemands the EU's policies, including trade,trade policy to be baseduilt on the principles and objectives of the EU’s external actionEU's external policies and objectives a, concretely those of development cooperation stated in Article 208 TFEU; whereas Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) reaffirms that the EU's external actions will be guided by the principles of democracy, the rule of law, the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for human dignity, the principles of equality and solidarity, and compliance with the UN Charter and international law;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 42 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas most human rights violations in the garment sector are labour- rights related and include the denial of workers fundamental right to join or form a union of their choosing and bargain collectively in good faith; whereas this has led to widespread labour rights violations ranging from poverty wages, child labour, forced labour, arbitrary dismissals, wage theft, unsafe workplaces, violence against women and sexual harassment, to precarious work conditions;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 48 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas initiatives led by the private sector on a voluntary basis, such as codes of conduct, labels, self-assessments and social audits, have to be further enhanced and have not proven to be at all effectiveenough over the last 20 years in terms of increasing workers’ rights, consumer awareness and environmental safety in the garment supply chain;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 51 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
E a. whereas multistakeholder initiatives like the German Partnership for Sustainable Textiles or the Dutch Agreement on Sustainable Garment and Textile are bringing stakeholders like the industry, the trade unions, the government and the NGOs at one table; whereas the standards elaborated by the initiatives also reach out to environmental issues; whereas those initiatives have not yet entered the implementation phase, so concrete results are still outstanding; whereas such national initiatives are necessary due to a lack of an EU legislative initiative; whereas there is still a majority of Member States that don't have any initiative;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 53 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
E b. whereas the trend of the garment industry is still going towards fast fashion, which poses an enormous threat and pressure on garment workers in the producing countries;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 54 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E c (new)
E c. whereas the German Ministry for Development Cooperation has set the goal, that by 2020 Germany will import 50% of its textiles only according to ecological and social criteria;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 59 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the specific characteristics of the garment sector value chains, such as geographically dispersed stages of the production process, low prices,different types of garment workers, low prices, high volumes short lead times, subcontracting and short-term buyer-supplier relationships are conducive to reducing visibility, traceability, and transparency over an enterprise's supply chain and to increasing the risks of human rights and labour abuses and of environmental damage; whereas transparency and traceability are is a prerequisites for a company's accountability and responsible consumption; whereas the consumer has the right to know where a piece of clothing was produced, and in which social and environmental conditions;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 61 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas the specific characteristics of the garment sector value chains, such as geographically dispersed stages of the production process, low prices, short lead times, subcontracting and short-term buyer-supplier relationships are conducive to reducing visibility and transparency over an enterprise’s supply chain and to increasing the risks of human rights and labour abuses and of environmental damage already in the raw-material production; whereas transparency is a prerequisite for a company’s accountability and responsible consumption; whereas the consumer has the right to know where a piece of clothing was produced, and in which social and environmental conditions;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 64 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas women's rights are a constitutive part of human rights; whereas gender equality falls within the scope of the chapters of trade agreements on sTrade and Sustainable dDevelopment (TSD); whereas the specific impact of trade and investment agreements affects women and men differently owing to structural gender inequalities, and whereas sustainable and inclusive development, growth and trade agreements must include human rights, including from a gender perspective;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 66 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
H a. whereas in December 2016 many trade union activists have been arrested in Bangladesh followed by a protest for a living wage and better working conditions, whereas several hundreds of garment workers have been fired following the protests; whereas the right of association is still not respected in the producing countries;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 78 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J
J. whereas the garment sector is the sector which has the most sustainability initiatives in progress; whereas few existing initiatives reach the scale needed and need further actions to make a significant impact;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 81 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K
K. whereas in October 2015 the Commission released its new trade strategy 'Trade for All', in which it sets out its aim to use trade agreements and preference programmes as levers to promote around the world, sustainable development, human rights, fair and ethical trade and improve the responsibility of the supply chains as a means of strengthening sustainable development, human rights and good governance in third countries;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 84 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
K a. whereas the clothing and textile sector in Europe provides for 1.7 million workplaces and generates an output of EUR 166 million; whereas the EU imports about the world's total clothing production; whereas the manufacturing countries are mostly emerging economies;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 87 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K b (new)
K b. whereas the garment industry in Eastern Europe, for example Poland, the Czech republic, Slovakia and Croatia, does not comply with ILO standards like a living wage or decent working conditions;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 89 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that EU trade and investment policies are interlinked with social protection, gender equality, tax avoidance, SMEs, development, human rights and environmental policies; reiterates its call on the Commission and the Member States to guarantee policy coherence for development on business and human rights at all levels, in particular in relation to the Union's trade and investment policy;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 101 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Acknowledges the increasing attention given to promoting gooddecent working conditions through global supply chains following the Rana Plaza factory collapse, the introduction of the draft French law on mandatory due diligence, the UK anti- slavery bill, the Dutch Agreement on Sustainable Textile and Garment, the German Partnership for Sustainable Textiles, and the statement made by President Juncker at the G7 Summit in favour of 'urgent action' to improve responsibility in global supply chains; acknowledges the Commission's commitment towards responsible management of supply chains, including in the garment sector, as outlined in the Communication entitled 'Trade for All'; welcomes the green card initiative in which eight Member States have called for a duty of care by EU-based companies towards individuals and communities whose human rights and local environment are affected by the companies' activities;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 102 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Supports the Commission's examination of a possible EU-wide initiative on the garment sector; notes, in addition, that the current multiplication of existing initiatives could result in an unpredictable environment for companies; believes that the proposal should address human rights related issues, promote the traceability and the transparency of value chains, enhance conscious consumption, focus on labour rights and gender equality;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 103 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Believes that the EU consumers have the right to be informed on conformity of garment industry products with sustainability and respect for human rights and environment; believes that EU legislative effort and initiative to this regard on garments should be made visible in the final product;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 108 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the Commission to present a legislative proposal on binding due diligence obligations for supply chains in the garment sector as soon as possible, aligned with the new OECD guidelines and internationally agreed standards on human rights and social and environmental standards; this proposal should focus on the core problems garment workers facon due diligence in the garment and foot- wear sector, the OECD guidelines for multinational companies, that are importing into the European Union, the ILO resolution on decent work in supply chains and internationally agreed standards on human rights and social and environmental standards; emphasises, that the new OECD guidelines should be the leading principle in the legislative proposal; stresses, that this legislative proposal should include core standards like (occupational health and safety, a living wage, freedom of association, and freedom of collective bargaining, prevention of sexual harassment and violence) and shouldt the workplace, eliminating forced and child labour; calls on the commission to further address the following matters: key criteria for sustainable production, transparency and traceability, including collection and transparent of data and tools for consumer information, due diligence checks and auditing, access to remedy;, gender equality, supply-chain due diligence reporting; awareness raising; notes, however, with concern that a lot more needs to be done and urges the Commission to take further actions which have a direct impact on workers’ lives in the European Union; encourages the Commission to acknowledge other national legislative proposals and initiatives with the same goal as the legislation, once they have been audited and have met the requirements of the European legislation;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 114 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Calls the Commission to introduce tariff preferences for proven sustainably produced textiles in the forthcoming reform of the GSP / GSP + rules; notes, that the goods would have to undergo a certification on their voluntary basis with regard to their sustainable production method, and corresponding proofs should be submitted during the import into the EU; encourages the Commission to support the efforts of the private sector to bring sustainability into the textile value chain in this way; urges the Commission to recognise established sustainability criteria and minimum requirements for the detection and certification systems on the basis of international conventions, such as the core labor standards of the International Labor Organization or the protection of biodiversity; calls on the Commission to promote the production of Fair Trade products through this instrument of tariff preferences;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 122 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Reiterates its call on the Commission to extend corporate social responsibility and binding due diligence initiatives beyond existing frameworks for the garment sector so as to ensure that the EU and its trading partners and operators live up to the obligation to respect both human rights and the highest social and environmental standards; urges the Commission to pay attention on remuneration and the working conditions in the garment sector in the Eastern Member States of the EU; urges the Eastern Member States to implement the ILO standards in the garment sector;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 140 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Urges the Commission to deliver on its objective to foster improvements in the ready-made garment sector, including through a strong gender focus; calls on the Commission to make gender equality a central focus of its flagship legislative initiative; calls for gender aspect to be mainstreamed in the EU garment initiative; therefore believes that the proposal should promote women empowerment, non-discrimination, gender equality and address the issue of harassments in workplaces as already envisaged by European and international commitments;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 141 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to promote actively the use of ecological and sustainably managed raw materials like cotton and to promote enthusiastically the re-use and recycling of garments and textiles within the European Union through specific provisions in its flagship legislative initiative;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 143 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Urges the commission to invest in Research and Development (R&D) aiming at building a sustainable alternative sourcing of raw materials for the EU garment sector and the recycling process within the European Union; calls on the Commission to put in place additional resources in institutions in order to follow up on the flagship initiative;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 154 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Calls on the Commission to put in place specific measures for small and medium-sized European enterprises to have access to toolsfinancial and policy tools with particular regard to their capacity to deliver on traceability and transparency, to invest in the sustainability and fairness of their supply chains by, inter-alia, supporting match- making business platforms to connect them with fair trade and ethical fashion importers and suppliers in the EU and in its partner countries;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 161 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Believes that it is crucial to ensure increased access to information on the conduct of enterprises; considers it fundamental to introduce a mandatory reporting system and due diligence for EU companies that outsource their production to third countriesgarment products entering the EU market ; believes that responsibility should extend throughout the entire supply chain, including sub- contractors in the formal and informal economy, and commends existing efforts to this effect; believes, however, that the EU is best placed to develop a common framework through legislation on mandatory transnational due diligence and supply chain transparency and traceability;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 166 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses the need for collecting and publishing comprehensive data on corporate sustainability performance; in this context, the elaboration of common definitions and standards for the collection, comparison and assessment of statistical data notably on imports, and welcomes the holistic approach of the Higg Index in measuring enterprises’ environmental, social and labour impacts;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 172 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12 a. Calls on the Commission to develop a wide variety of monitoring systems in the EU garment sector using Key performance indicators – encompassing data collection using surveys, audits and data analysis techniques that can effectively measure performance and address their impacts on development, labour rights and human rights in the entire garment supply chain;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 173 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 b (new)
12 b. Urges the Commission to export the model of the Bangladesh Sustainability Compact into other producing countries like India or Pakistan;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 176 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to present a comprehensive strategy on how development, aid for trade and public procurement policies can support a fairer and more sustainable garment supply chain, by promoting best practices and giving incentives to private sector actors that invest in the sustainability and fairness of their supply chains, from the fibre farmer to the final consumer; urges the Commission and the European Institutions to be a role model when it comes to public procurement of textile used in the institutions; calls on the Commission to create guidance for local authorities on social criteria in purchasing textiles following the 2014 Directive on Public Procurement and motivate them accordingly; encourages the Commission to propose a plan so that the majority of public procurement of garments in the EU by 2030 comes from sustainable sources;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 181 #

2016/2140(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13 a. encourages the Commission to use the legislation to further implement and promote the SDGs;
2017/02/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 43 #

2016/2139(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital M a (new)
Ma. whereas South-South cooperation continued to grow despite the slowing down of the emerging economies and dropping commodity prices;
2016/10/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 60 #

2016/2139(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that the GPEDC ought to play a leading role in ensuring progress on SDG 17, namely on monitoring and accountability, quality and capacity aspects of finance for development, tax and debt sustainability, mobilising the private sector and its responsibility for sustainable development, policy coherence, multi- stakeholder partnerships, south-south and triangular cooperation;
2016/10/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 73 #

2016/2139(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Underlines that a monitoring framework anchored on the principles of horizontal development cooperation, i.e. solidarity, mutuality, respect for sovereignty, human rights, inclusiveness, non-conditionality, is crucial towards enhanced accountability and impact of SSDC, particularly in the country level;
2016/10/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 76 #

2016/2139(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 b (new)
9b. Urges the EU to honour its longstanding commitments on development effectiveness by supporting sustained global efforts to monitor the implementation of the Busan principles and commitments;
2016/10/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 84 #

2016/2139(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Stresses the importance to promote equal partnerships and shared responsibility for development results, including support for implementation of the Istanbul Principles and other voluntary mechanisms;
2016/10/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 93 #

2016/2139(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Underlines the importance to enable CSOs to exercise their roles as independent development actors, with a particular focus on an enabling environment, consistent with agreed international rights, that maximizes the contributions of CSOs to development;
2016/10/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 96 #

2016/2139(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14 a (new)
14a. Urges the Commission to submit reports on EU´s and Member States´ effort and action plans to comprehensively implement the Busan principles on regular basis, at least every 24 months;
2016/10/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 113 #

2016/2139(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Underlines the significance of SDG 16 for development effectiveness overall, and warns that development aid cannot effectively fulfil its purpose where there is a lack of respect for human rights and the rule of law, sufficientinternationally-recognized social, environmental and labour standards and safeguards for the integrity of public institutions and office-holders, and transparency and accountability;
2016/10/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 115 #

2016/2139(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Notes the increasing role of private sector in development cooperation and asks business sector actors to commit to development effectiveness commitments, become increasingly transparent and responsive to all sectors of society, including workers, legislators, regulators, consumers and shareholders, and adhere to existing international human rights commitments such as ILO labour standards, UN Principles on Business and Human rights and the OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises; furthermore asks the private sector to align their efforts to national development plans and with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and to set up reporting and accountability systems on environmental, economic and social impacts of their efforts, in particular on the generation of full and productive employment and decent work for all;
2016/10/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 10 #

2016/2100(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
– having regard to Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17.06.2014 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU,
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 11 #

2016/2100(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 b (new)
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20.1.2004 on the control of company amalgamations,
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 12 #

2016/2100(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 c (new)
– having regard to the White Paper 'Towards more effective EU merger control' of 9.7.2014,
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 13 #

2016/2100(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 d (new)
– having regard to the European Commission's E-000344/2016, E- 002666/2016 and E-002112/2016 answers to written parliamentary questions,
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 92 #

2016/2100(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Emphasises that corruption in public procurement has serious market distorting effects on European competitiveness; reiterates that public procurement is one of the government activities most vulnerable to corruption; highlights that in certain Member States, EU funded procurement carries higher corruption risks than nationally funded procurement; reminds that tailor-made tender invitations are widely used to limit market competition; calls on the Commission to continue its effort to prevent the misuse of EU funds and stimulate accountability in public procurement; urges the establishment of the European Public Prosecutors' Office with the necessary rights in order to better investigate alleged crimes against EU money;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 94 #

2016/2100(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Recognises the actions of the Commission against international companies distorting fair competition on the European Single Market; reminds that unfair competition is still one of the main challenges identified by European SMEs; highlights that illegal tax benefits granted by Member State governments to multinational companies generate a highly anti-competitive environment and further degrade the capacity of SMEs for job creation; calls on the Member States to forthwith cease such activities and asks the Commission to actively support the improvement of SMEs' access to markets, the reduction of administrative burdens on SMEs and the promotion of entrepreneurship and skills within the EU;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 98 #

2016/2100(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3d. Calls on the Member States and the EU institutions to prioritise the strengthening of the post-Brexit Single Market by ensuring full compliance with European competition laws and by further increasing cooperation between Member States on tax issues;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 100 #

2016/2100(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 e (new)
3e. Stresses the need for single market rules to be enforced also at the Member States level and for infringements to be dealt to tackle fragmentation of the single market;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 147 #

2016/2100(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Welcomes the Commission's commitment towards a European digital single market and its proposal on geo- blocking and other forms of discrimination based on customers' nationality and place of residence; notes that the proposal only covers online purchases of goods and services therefore calls on the Commission to also address the geo-blocking of audiovisual services;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 152 #

2016/2100(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Underlines that collaborative economy platforms have brought into play the idea of challenging existing incumbent, dominant players to create a more competitive environment for consumers and businesses alike;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 153 #

2016/2100(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Highlights, the increasing presence of new digitally enabled businesses, in particular internet and mobile phone applications, alongside existing operators has opened up new channels for consumers to find, compare, and select goods and services across the single market. This results in an empowered consumer who seeks to make informed choices based on their personal needs and goals;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 168 #

2016/2100(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. There is clearly a need for further deregulation of the taxi and private hire vehicle market in Europe. The present rigid regulation of the number of taxis and private hire vehicles results in poor competition, detrimental to consumers and businesses alike. Therefore the present system should be reformed as quickly as possible across Europe;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 171 #

2016/2100(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. For decades, national authorities have conferred special rights to taxi operators by granting them exclusive rights, resulting in artificial and unnecessary barriers to competition in the provision of services. Conversely, Member State measures have prevented other sector participants, such as Private Hire Vehicle (PHV) drivers, from operating under equivalent conditions as taxi operators. They have created a dramatic imbalance between supply and demand as evidenced by the difficulties that consumers often face when trying to find an available taxi or PHV. These entry barriers have a negative economical and societal impacts as consumers are facing reduced choice and availability of taxis and PHVs, higher prices, lower quality of service, and longer waiting periods;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 343 #

2016/2100(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 c (new)
20c. Calls on the Commission to propose changes in the Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 to ensure the same protection for air travellers on flights from third country, regardless the fact that the carrier is EU or non-EU carrier;
2016/10/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 1 #

2016/2099(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Welcomes the EIB's development mandates in the ACP region when operating Under its External Lending Mandate; underlines that the focus of EIB's activities should be to have a positive impact on the achievements of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs);
2016/10/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 2 #

2016/2099(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph -1 a (new)
-1a. Stresses that the EIB should continue to pay strong attention to the Human Rights impacts of its operations and to reinforce its due diligence at project level in this regard; calls on the EIB to act in strict compliance with the EU treaty obligations, including Article 21 TEU on principles of EU external action, and to ensure its policies and operations are in line with the EU Strategic Framework and Action Plan for Human Rights and the European Charter of Fundamental Rights;
2016/10/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 10 #

2016/2099(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Highlights the need for the EIB to ensure that, together with its clients, sound public consultations take place at project level, including via the application of the principle of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC); urges the EIB to consider extending the FPIC to all affected communities in land and natural resource-based investments;
2016/10/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 11 #

2016/2099(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Welcomes the adoption of the EIB External Lending Mandate Climate Strategy in December 2015 and the commitment to increase the share of climate-related projects to 35% of its investments in developing countries by 2020; calls on the EIB to ensure this is supported by robust eligibility criteria for climate action and that climate considerations are also mainstreamed into all EIB operations outside of Europe;
2016/10/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 21 #

2016/2099(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Welcomes the fact that the European Commission's 2016 External Strategy for Effective Taxation reminds that European legislation prohibits EU funds from being invested in entities in third countries which do not comply with international tax transparency standards and asks the EIB to transpose good governance requirements in their contracts with all selected financial intermediaries; supports the Commission's claim that the EIB needs to go further than the current transparency requirements to ensure fair tax competition; calls therefore on the EIB to establish a responsible taxation policy in 2017, starting from the review of its policy on non-cooperative jurisdictions (NCJ policy) in cooperation with the European Commission;
2016/10/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 22 #

2016/2099(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Stresses the need for increased visibility of the bank's involvement in project financing to various projects stakeholders, in particular outside the European Union, which is crucial for local citizens to be aware of their right to appeal and lodge complaints at the Complaints Mechanism Office and the European Ombudsman;
2016/10/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 31 #

2016/2099(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Stresses the need for the Resilience Initiative of the EIB to reach a high level of transparency in its operation and to focus on high quality projects with enhanced development impact and genuine additionality.
2016/10/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 5 #

2016/2096(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes with concern that gender discrimination and inequalities occur in health and social care research in developing countries, thereby affecting the development of appropriate and targeted treatments; recalls that women's different biological and physiological make-up requires proper information about the effect of drugs on their bodies;
2016/09/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 12 #

2016/2096(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on governments of developing countries to mainstream gender in mental health policy, and to develop policies and programmes that address both the specific needs of women for mental health treatment and the social origins of psychological distress; notes with concern that, especially in Least Developed Countries, the exclusion of women from biomedical research is often caused by lack of information and awareness campaign, their fulfilment of their role as mothers and caregivers and their lack of decision-making freedom in their household; strongly believes that better balance in gender roles and obligations, income security, access to education, the development of social safety nets and poverty reduction would further redress gender disparities in mental health;
2016/09/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 17 #

2016/2096(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the European Commission to address the root causes of the failure to include and retain adequate numbers of women in clinical trials and to yield meaningful information about treatment and burden of disease, and to allocate resources for more research, prevention, treatment and support services for women;
2016/09/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 29 #

2016/2096(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes with concern that the increase in offshoring medicine testing to Africa may result in serious ethical violations; points out that not having access to affordable healthcare or health insurance, as well as access to affordable medicine, gives vulnerable people, particularly women, no other choice than to participate in clinical trials in order to receive medical treatment;
2016/09/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 11 #

2016/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B
B. whereas wildlife protection can, however, have a considerable price for local communities, as some species are dangerous to humans or can destroy plantations and other property or kill livestock; whereas confronting armed poachers can be utterly risky;
2016/07/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 16 #

2016/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B a (new)
Ba. recognises the intrinsic value of biological diversity and its various contributions to sustainable development and human well-being as enriched in Goal 15 of Agenda 2030;
2016/07/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 18 #

2016/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Recital B b (new)
Bb. is concerned about the increasing scale of poaching and illegal trade in wildlife and wildlife products and its adverse economic, social and environmental impacts; believes that the fight against poaching requires a EU coordinated response and assistance to countries with limited capacity to protect wildlife; considers the EU can play an extended role in protecting and maintaining wildlife reserves projects in developing countries;
2016/07/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 48 #

2016/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. SRecognises that illicit trafficking in wildlife contributes to damage to ecosystems and rural livelihood, including those based on ecotourism, undermines good governance and the rule of law and, in some cases, threatens national stability; stresses the need to responsibly manage the risks associated with combating poaching, which is often perpetrated by heavily armed and well- organised criminal groups;
2016/07/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 54 #

2016/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for actions that enable local actors to directly benefit from engaging in wildlife protection, reduce the costs of living with wildlife, and, in parallel with measures to discourage illicit wildlife- related activities, improve possibilities of earning a living without such involvement;
2016/07/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 59 #

2016/2076(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for a step change in intelligence-gathering, lawmaking and law enforcement, fighting corruption, in relation to wildlife trafficking in EU Member States and other destination and transit countries.
2016/07/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 3 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that Sustainable Development Goal 3, with nine quantitative and four qualitative targets, clearly states that by 2030 everyone should have access to good mental and physical health throughout their lives, which cannot be achieved without efficient and effective investment in new improved prevention, treatment and diagnostic tools; underlines that, each year, 100 million people fall into poverty because of health costs which are disproportionate to their incomes, and that, according to the WHO, over one third of the world’s population, with over 50 % in Africa, does not have access to medicines;
2016/09/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 17 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Stresses the importance of developing a comprehensive access to medicines policy that ensures that all EU policies (global public health, development, research and trade) are consistent with, and beneficial for, access to affordable medicines for citizens in the EU and low-and middle-income countries alike;
2016/09/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 28 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Urges not to use free trade agreements with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to introduce TRIPS- plus intellectual property (IP) rules that extend monopoly protection, and not to introduce new IP enforcement rules or investment protection to the detriment of access to medicines;deleted
2016/09/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 36 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Welcomes the option for voluntary licensing that allows to produce generic drugs with allowance and adapted remuneration of the originator at reduced prices; reminds that in case of national emergency or other circumstances of extreme urgency TRIPS allows compulsory licensing as enables developing countries to produce generics without consent of the originator; stresses that originators usually grant waivers to LDCs and low income countries that exempts them from TRIPS provisions;
2016/09/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 42 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Supports competition in generic medicines within the negotiated rules, which allows broad access to medicines in LMICs; calls, in particular, for the EU to support actively governments that use the available legal measures, including TRIPS safeguards and flexibilities, to protect and promote public health; calls also for the EU to immediately stop targeting countries such as India that have implemented progressive TRIPS-compliant IP policies which promote access to medicines, through its watch-list of ‘priority countries’ in case of emergency;
2016/09/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 50 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses that in LMICs limited accessibility of health medical tools is - next to affordability - also linked to issues such as weak distribution systems and insufficient regulatory capacities, and that for most poverty-related and neglected tropical diseases, acceptable, safe and effective vaccines, drugs and diagnostics are still lacking; calls on the Commission and Member States to step up efforts to address this persisting research gap, and to support LMICs in building respective capacities;
2016/09/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 55 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that, without basic transparency of research and development costs to originator companies and information on the actual prices paid for medicines across the EU, any discussion on fair medicine prices remains impossiblfair pricing is difficult to determine; recalls the Commission’s commitment to greater transparency of EU positions, specific legal proposals, and negotiating texts in the TTIP negotiations;
2016/09/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 66 #

2016/2057(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Urges to take advantage of the ongoing review process of the EU Tiered Pricing Regulation to repeal it unless it can be amended, in close collaboration with the Commission’s Directorates- General for International Cooperation and Development (DG DEVCO) and for Health and Food Safety (DG SANTÉ), in order to support all measures that countries have at their disposal to ensureopen a broader and transparent discussion on pricing regulation and strategies that improve access to affordable access to medicines.;
2016/09/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 14 #

2016/0371(CNS)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
(7 a) Communication between the Commission and Member States should be adequate and effective, with a view to attaining the objectives of this Regulation in a timely manner.
2017/06/28
Committee: ECON
Amendment 74 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 4
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 83b
(83b) 'resolution group' means: (a) a resolution entity and its subsidiaries that are not: (i) resolution entities themselves and that are not subsidiaries of another; (ii) subsidiaries of other resolution entities; or (iii) entities established in a third country that are not included in the resolution group in accordance with the resolution plan and their subsidiaries; (b) credit institutions affiliated to a central body, the central body and any institution under the control of the central body when at least one of those entities is a resolution entity;.
2018/01/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 109 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 13
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Where a substantive impediment to resolvability is due to a situation referred to in Article 141a(2) of Directive 2013/36/EU the institution shall, within two weeks of the date of receipt of a notification made in accordance with paragraph 1, propose to the resolution authority possible measures to ensure that the institution complies with Articles 45f or 45g and the requirement referred to in Article 128(6) of Directive 2013/36/EU. The two week deadline may be extended by the resolution authority, in consultation with the competent authority, taking into account the specific circumstances of the case.
2018/01/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 120 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 17
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 18 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Where those impediments are due to a situation referred to in Article 141a(2) of Directive 2013/36/EU, the Union parent undertaking shall, within two weeks of the date of receipt of a notification made in accordance with paragraph 2, propose to the group-level resolution authority possible measures to address or remove those impediments. The two week deadline may be extended by the resolution authority, in consultation with the competent authority, taking into account the specific circumstances of the case.
2018/01/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 125 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 18
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point i
18. In Article 27(1), the following point (i) is added: ‘(i) Article 29a are complied with, suspend any payment or delivery obligation to which an institution or entity referred to in point (b), (c) or (d) of Article 1(1) is a party.’.deleted where the conditions laid down in
2018/01/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 138 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 19
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 29a
[...]deleted
2018/01/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 182 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 22 a (new)
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 44 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point g a (new)
22 a. In Article 44(2), the following point (ga) is added: “(ga) deposits by public authorities.”
2018/01/29
Committee: ECON
Amendment 203 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45b – paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, liabilities issued before ... [the date of entry into force of this amending Directive] which do not meet the conditions set out in points (d) and (g) to (o) of Article 72b(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 may be included in the amount of own funds and eligible liabilities of resolution entities.
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 220 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45b – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Resolution authorities may decide that the requirement referred to in Article 45f is fully or partially met by resolution entities with instruments that meet all conditions referred to in Article 72a of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 with a view to ensure that the resolution entity can be resolved in a manner suitable to meet the resolution objectives. For each resolution entity the level of required instruments that meet all conditions referred to in Article 72 a of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 shall not exceed the level of the requirement specified in Article 92a(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 taking into account the transitional provisions specified in Article 494 of that Regulation.
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 238 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The requirement referred to in Article 45(1) of each entity shall be determined by the resolution authority, after having consultedin cooperation with the competent authority, on the basis of the following criteria:
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 251 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The resolution authority shall ensure that the level of the requirement referred to in Article 45(1) is proportionate to the specificities of the business and funding models of the resolution entity, taking into account: (i) the prevalence of deposits in the funding structure; (ii) the lack of experience in issuing debt instruments due to the limited access to cross-border and wholesale capital markets; (iii) the fact that the institution will rely primarily on CET1 and capital instruments to meet the requirement referred to in Article 45(l).
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 263 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Without prejudice to the last subparagraph, for resolution entities, tThe amount referred to in paragraph 2 shall not exceed the greater of the following:
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 274 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
(i) the amount of losses to be absorbed in resolution that corresponds to the requirements referred to in Article 92(1)(a),(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and Article 104a of Directive 2013/36/EU of the resolution entity at sub- consolidated resolution group level,
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 279 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
(ii) a recapitalisation amount that allows the resolution group resulting from resolution to restore compliance with its total capital ratio requirement referred in Article 92(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and its requirement referred to in Article 104a of Directive 2013/36/EU at consolidated resolution group sub- consolidated levellevel after the implementation of the preferred resolution action;
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 285 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) the amount of losses to be absorbed in resolution that corresponds to the resolution entity's leverage ratio requirement referred to in theArticle 92(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 at consolidated resolution group sub- consolidated level; and
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 288 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point ii
(ii) a recapitalisation amount that allows the resolution group resulting from resolution to restore compliance with the leverage ratio requirement referred to in Article 92(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 at consolidated resolution group sub-consolidated levellevel after the implementation of the preferred resolution action.
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 296 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
When determining the recapitalisation amounts referred to in the previous subparagraphs, the resolution authority shall: (a) use the values for the relevant total risk exposure amount or leverage ratio exposure amount as adjusted for any changes resulting from resolution actions foreseen in the resolution plan; (b) after consulting the competent authority, adjust downwards the requirement referred to in Article 104a of Directive 2013/36/EU currently applicable to the resolution entity, to determine the requirement that will be applicable to the resolution entity after the implementation of the resolution actions foreseen in the resolution plan.
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 298 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 4
The resolution authority shall set the recapitalisation amounts referred to in the previous subparagraphs in accordance with the resolution actions foreseen in the resolution plan and may adjust those recapitalisation amounts to adequately reflect risks that affect resolvability arising from the resolution group’s business model, funding profile and overall risk profile.deleted
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 310 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
4. Without prejudice to the last subparagraph, fFor entities that are not themselves resolution entities, the amount referred to in paragraph 2 shall not exceed the greater of any of the following:
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 318 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point i
(i) the amount of losses to be absorbed in resolution that corresponds to the requirements referred to in Article 92(1)(a),(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and Article 104a of Directive 2013/36/EU of the entity, and
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 320 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point ii
(ii) a recapitalisation amount that allows the entity to restore compliance with its total capital ratio requirement referred in Article 92(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and its requirement referred to in Article 104a of Directive 2013/36/EU after the exercise of the power to write down or convert relevant capital instruments and eligible liabilities in accordance with Article 59;
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 325 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) the amount of losses to be absorbed in resolution that corresponds to the entity's leverage ratio requirement referred to in the Article 92(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, and
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 327 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point ii
(ii) a recapitalisation amount that allows the entity to restore compliance with its leverage ratio requirement referred to in the Article 92(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 after the exercise of the power to write down or convert relevant capital instruments and eligible liabilities in accordance with Article 59;
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 334 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
When determining the recapitalisation amounts referred to in the previous subparagraphs, the resolution authority shall: (a) use the values for the relevant total risk exposure amount or leverage ratio exposure amount as adjusted for any changes resulting from actions foreseen in the resolution plan; (b) after consulting the competent authority, adjust downwards the requirement referred to in Article 104a of Directive 2013/36/EU currently applicable to the relevant entity, to determine the requirement that will be applicable to the entity after the implementation of the actions foreseen in the resolution plan.
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 335 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45c – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 4
The resolution authority shall set the recapitalisation amounts referred to the previous subparagraphs in accordance with the resolution actions foreseen in the resolution plan and may adjust those recapitalisation amounts to adequately reflect risks that affect the recapitalisation needs arising from the entity's business model, funding profile and overall risk profile.deleted
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 363 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45d – paragraph 1
1. Tdeleted the requirement referred to in Article 45(1) of a resolution entity that is a G-SII or part of a G-SII shall consist of the following: (a) Article 92a of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; and (b) own funds and eligible liabilities determined by the resolution authority specific to the entity in accordance with paragraph 2, which shall be met with liabilities that meet the conditions of Article 45b.any additional requirement for
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 369 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45d – paragraph 2
2. The resolution authority may impose an additional requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities referred to in point (b) of paragraph 1 only: (a) in point (a) of paragraph 1 is not sufficient to fulfil the conditions set out in Article 45c; and (b) required own funds and eligible liabilities does not exceed a level that is necessary to fulfil the conditions of Article 45c.deleted where the requirement referred to to an extent that the amount of
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 378 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45d – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Where more than one G-SII entity belonging to the same EU G-SII are resolution entities, the relevant resolution authorities shall calculate the amourequirement referred to in paragraph 2Article 92a of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013,
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 380 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45d – paragraph 4
4. The resolution authority's decision to impose an additional requirement of own funds and eligible liabilities under point (b) of paragraph 1, shall contain the reasons for that decision, including a full assessment of the elements referred to in paragraph 2.deleted
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 389 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45e – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The resolution authority may give guidance to an entity to have own funds and eligible liabilities that fulfil the conditions of Article 45b(1) or 45g(3) in excess of the levels set out in Article 45c and Article 45d that provides for additional amounts for the following purposes:
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 393 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45e – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) to ensure that, in the event of resolutionfollowing resolution or the exercise of the power to write down or convert relevant capital instruments and eligible liabilities in accordance with Article 59, a sufficient market confidence in the entity is sustained through capital instruments in addition to the requirement in point (b) of Article 45c(2) ('market confidence buffer').
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 396 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45e – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
The amount of the guidance given in accordance with point (a) of paragraph 1 may be set only where the competent authority has already set its own guidance in accordance with Article 104b of Directive 2013/36/EU and the resolution authority determines that the requirement referred to in point (a) of Article 45c(2) would not be sufficient to absorb all the losses in resolution taking into account the entity’s business model, funding model and risk profile or to reduce or remove an impediment to resolvability or absorb losses on holdings of MREL instruments issued by other entities included in the same resolution group. The amount of the guidance given in accordance with point (a) of paragraph 1 shall not exceed the level of that guidance.
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 399 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45e – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The amount of the guidance given in accordance with point (b) of paragraph 1 shall not exceed the amount of the combined buffermay be set when the resolution authority determines that the requirement referred to in point (6b) of Article 128 of Directive 2013/36/EU, except for the requirement referred to in point (a) of that provision, unless a higher level is necessary to ensure that, following the event of resolution, the entity continues to meet the conditions for its authorisation for an appropriate period of 45c(2) would not be sufficient to sustain market confidence and ensure both the continued provision of critical economic functions by the entity and the access to funding without recourse to extraordinary financial support other than contributions from resolution financing arrangements. The amount of the guidance given in accordance with point (b) of paragraph 1 shall not exceed the amount of the combined buffer requirement referred to in point (6) of Article 128 of Directimve that is not longer than one year2013/36/EU, except for the requirement referred to in point (a) of that provision.
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 407 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45e – paragraph 3
3. Where an entity consistently fails to have additional own funds and eligible liabilities as expected under the guidance referred to in the first paragraph, the resolution authority may require that the amount of the requirement referred to in Article 45c(2) be increased to cover the amount of the guidance given pursuant to this Article.deleted
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 438 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45g – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. By way of derogation from point (a)(ii) of paragraph 3, liabilities issued before ... [date of entry into force of this amending Directive] which do not meet the conditions set out in points (b)and (g) to (o) of Article 72b(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 may be included in the amount of own funds and eligible liabilities.
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 462 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45g – paragraph 5 – point a
(a) both the subsidiary and the resolution entity are subject to authorisation and supervision by the same Member State;
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 476 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45g – paragrapgh 5 – point g
(g) the competent authority of the subsidiary has fully waived the application of individual capital requirements to the subsidiary under Article 7(1) or Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 494 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive2014/59/EU
Article 45i – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
The requirement referred to in the first subparagraph shall not apply to the guidance for the minimum requirement of own funds and eligible liabilities referred to in Article 45e.
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 502 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 23
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 45k – paragraph 1 a (new)
Any breach of the guidance referred to in Article 45e shall be addressed by the relevant authorities on the basis of at least one of the powers referred to in point (a), (b) and (d) of paragraph 1.
2018/01/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 523 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 24
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 55 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
(a) that the liabilities or instruments referred to in the first subparagraph can be subject to write down and conversion powers by the resolution authority of a Member State pursuant to the law of the third country or to a binding agreement concluded with that third country; or
2018/02/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 532 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 24
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 55 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
The liabilities referred to in points (b) and (c) shall not include unsecured bonds or similar debt instruments which are unsecured liabilities, Additional Tier 1 instruments, and Tier 2 instruments. Moreover, they shall be senior to the liabilities which count towards the minimum requirement for own funds and permissible liabilities.
2018/02/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 535 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 24
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 55 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
The liabilities which fail to include the contractual term as required by paragraph 1 or for which, in accordance with points (b) and (c), do not include the contractual term referred to in paragraph 1 is not required, shall not be counted towards the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities.
2018/02/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 540 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 24
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 55 – paragraph 4
4. Where an institution or entity referred to in point (b), (c) or (d) of Article 1(1) fails todoes not include in the contractual provisions governing a relevant liability a contractual term as required in accordance with paragraph 1, that failure shall not prevent the resolution authority from exercising the write down and conversion powers in relation to that liability.
2018/02/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 558 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 26
Directive 2014/59/EU
Article 63 – paragraph 1a
1a. The period of the suspension pursuant to paragraph 1(n) shall not exceed the minimum period of time that the resolution authority considers necessary for the effective application of one or more resolution tools or for the purposes of the valuation pursuant to Article 36 and in any event shall not exceed 52 working days.
2018/02/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 583 #

2016/0362(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)
Member States shall apply Article 45i(2) from 1 January 2028.
2018/02/01
Committee: ECON
Amendment 77 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) The Union's ambitious External Investment Plan (EIP) is needed to support investments starting in Africa and the Union's Neighbourhood as a means to promote the sustainable development goals of the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development ('the 2030 Agenda'), in particular poverty eradication, as well as the commitments under the recently revised European Neighbourhood Policy thus addressing root causes of migrationmigratory pressures stemming from poverty, underdevelopment, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities as well as from climate change. It should also contribute to the implementation of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change (COP 21).
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 92 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) The EFSD should contribute to the implementation of the UN's Agenda 2030 which recognizes international migration as a multi-dimensional reality of major relevance for the development of countries of origin, transit and destination, and requiring coherent and comprehensive responses while underlining the potential for migrants contributing to inclusive growth and sustainable development.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 100 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) The European Fund for Sustainable Development (EFSD), as part of the EIP, should provide an integrated financial package to finance and attract investments starting in regions of Africa for countries that are signatories to the Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States of the one part, and the European Community and its member Statesfostering sustainable and inclusive economic and social development and promoting the socio- economic resilience of partner countries, while maximising additionality, addressing market failures and sub- optimal investment situations, and crowding-in private sector funds. The EFSD's operations should be clearly distinct from, and complementary to, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 200022 and the Neighbourhood countries, thereby creating growth and er support, in particular the external lending mandate operations of the European Investment Bank (EIB), the Economic Resilience Initiative, and the ACP-IF Facility. EFSD guarantee operations should also be comployement opportunities, maximary to the existing additionality, delivering innovative products, and crowding-in private sector funds. __________________ 22OJ L 317, 15.12.2000 as last amended by OJ L 287, 4.11.2010ctivities of other eligible financial institutions and cover blind spots in investment that they are currently not able to meet.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 112 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4 a (new)
(4a) In order to fulfil the political commitments of the Union on renewable energy and climate change, including resource efficiency, a minimum share of 35 % of the funding allocated under the EFSD should be devoted to financing and investment operations relevant for those sectors, thus contributing to the implementation of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 132 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) Moreover, the Strategic Board should support the Commission in setting strategic guidance and overall investment goals. The Strategic Board should also support coordination and coherence between the regional platforms. This should ensure complementarity of the various instruments in external action. The Strategic BThe strategic board should be co- chaired by the Commission and the High Representative of the Unioin for Foreign Affairs and Security Policyder to ensure consistency and coherence with Union external policy objectives, and partnership frameworks with third countrieswith the Union's other efforts addressing the root causes of migration, as well as Policy Coherence for Development.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 136 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) European Union Delegations in partner countries should promote access to, and actively provide information on the EFSD, and enhance coherence between the use of the guarantee, use of blended finance under the regional platforms, the provision of enhanced targeted technical assistance, and policy dialogues in their respective country.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 144 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) The EFSD guarantee should be managed so as to provide a level playing field for eligible counterparts, avoid conflicts of interest and be efficient with due regard to the objective of crowding in private sector for financing investments and maximising additionality.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 152 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) As the funds of the EDF are to be used for the countries eligible under the 11th European Development Fund (EDF)25, it requires the allocation of a minimum of EUR 400 000 000 of EFSD Guarantee coverage for investments throughout the implementation period of the EFSD Guarantee. The EFSD Guarantee should only become available when a contribution of EUR 400 000 000 of 11th EDF funds have been allocated to the EFSD Guarantee Fund has been confirmed. __________________ 25 Internal Agreement between the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the Council, on the financing of European Union aid under the multiannual financial framework for the period 2014 to 2020, in accordance with the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement and on the allocation of financial assistance for the Overseas Countries and Territories to which Part Four of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union applies (OJ L 210, 6.8.2013, p. 1).
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 159 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The Commission should report annually to the European Parliament and the Council and the Joint Parliamentary Assembly ACP-EU on the financing and investment operations covered by the EFSD Guarantee with a view to ensuring accountability to the European citizens and partner countries. The report should be made public in order to allow relevant stakeholders, including civil society, to express their views. The Commission should also report annually to the European Parliament and the Council on the management of the EFSD Guarantee Fund so that accountability and transparency are ensured.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 163 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16 a (new)
(16a) In order to ensure the monitoring and accountability of the EFSD and of the External Investment Plan, the European Parliament may organise regular and structured exchanges of views as part of an investment dialogue with the Commission, the High Representative, the EIB and other eligible financial institutions as well as private sector and civil society organisations.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 171 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19 a (new)
(19a) In order to reflect political developments and needs for Union action in the world, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amendments to the Annex of this Regulation listing the regions eligible for support through EFSD Guarantee. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making 1a. In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the European Parliament and the Council receive all documents at the same time as Member States' experts, and their experts systematically have access to meetings of Commission expert groups dealing with the preparation of delegated acts. __________________ 1a OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 188 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The EFSD shall contribute to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals of the 2030 Agenda with a particular focus on sustainabland be guided by the objectives set out in Article 21 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and Article 208 TFEU and the internationally agreed development effectiveness principles, thus contributing to the Union's development and Neighbourhood policies, with a particular focus on poverty eradication, long-term sustainable and inclusive growth, job creation, socio-economic sectors and on the support to micro, small and medium sized enterprises, thus addressing. In so doing, the EFSD shall, inter alia, contribute to addressing the specific socio-economic root causes of migration and contributing tofoster sustainable reintegration of returned migrants inmigrants returning to their countries of origin while maximising additionalor transity, delivering innovative products and crowding in private sector fundas well as strengthen resilience of host communities.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 197 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 a (new)
Article 3a In the regions and countries where it operates, the EFSD shall contribute to the objectives set out in the basic acts of the relevant Union external financing instruments and shall be consistent with the priorities contained in the national or regional programmes, where available.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 201 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2
2. The management of the EFSD shall be ensured by the Commission. The Commission shall work in close cooperation with the EIB and with the other eligible counterparts as regards the operational management of the EFSD Guarantee. To that end, a technical working group shall be put in place. An agreement shall be concluded with the EIB specifying the conditions of their cooperation in the management of the EFSD, in consultation with other eligible counterparts.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 207 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
ItThe strategic board shall provide strategic guidance and support the Commission in setting overall investment goals as regards the use of the EFSD Guarantee. The strategic board shall also support overall co, as well as in monitoring an appropriate and diversified geographical and thematic coverage ford ination and coherence between the regional investment platforms and with the external lending mandate operationvestment windows, while giving special attention to Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and fragile States. It shall make sure that the EFSD operations support the strategic priorities of Union external action and development policy, and in particular its guiding principles managed by the EIB, including the EIB resilience initiad objectives as referred to Article 21 TEU and 208 TFEU respectively.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 209 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. As soon as possible in the implementation phase of the EFSD, the Strategic Board shall adopt and publish guidelines setting out in detail how conformity of EFSD operations with the objectives and eligibility criteria laid down in Art. 8 is to be ensured.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 219 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. The strategic board shall be composed of representatives of the Commission and of the High Representative, of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (High Representative), of thecontributing Member States and of the EIB. The Commission may invite other contributors to become members of the strategic board having regard where appropriate to the view of the board. Partner CThe European Parliament shall have observer status. Observers designated by the European Parliament shall have the right to contribute to the deliberations without the right to vote. Partner countries and relevant regional organisations, and the eligible counterparts and the European Parliament may be given observer status, where appropriate. The strategic board shall be co-chaired by the Commission and the High Representative.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 224 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 a (new)
Article 5a Technical assistance and advisory support The Commission and the High Representative, through a central secretariat as well the Union delegations, shall act as a single point of entry for authorities, and project promoters. It shall proactively provide advisory support in the identification, preparation, development and promotion of investment projects, on the use of technical assistance for project structuring, and on the use of innovative financial instruments and public-private partnerships as well as on identifying opportunities for promoting gender equality. In doing so, it shall seek to use the expertise of the EIB and other eligible counterparts. The Commission shall maintain a public investment pipeline containing current projects and attracting future ones under the EFSD. It shall establish a dedicated project web-portal. In the context of the annual budgetary procedure, the budgetary authority may decide to reinforce the relevant programmes with a view to increase the amount for technical assistance. Technical assistance may also be used to achieve the objectives set out in Art. 5 c on policy dialogue.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 225 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 b (new)
Article 5b Policy dialogue In the context of the Union's existing political relations with partner countries, the Commission and the High Representative shall maintain policy dialogues aimed at improving the investment climate and overall policy environment and developing legal frameworks, policies and institutions that are more effective and promote economic stability, sustainable investment and inclusive growth. The policy dialogues shall include, among other issues, the fight against corruption and organised crime, illicit financial flows, sustainable energy and climate action, respect of human rights and the rule of law as well as gender-responsive policies with a focus on addressing the policy and regulatory restrictions, which contribute to gender gaps in access to finance and entrepreneurship. In implementing the EFSD, its governing bodies and the Commission shall look more favourably to financing and investment operations in partner countries that undertake measures aimed at facilitating the success of investments backed by the EFSD and at contributing further to achieving the objectives set out in this Regulation.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 228 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The EFSD Guarantee shall support financing and investment operations in partner countries in the regions included in the Annex to this Regulation. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 20a concerning amendments to the Annex.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 231 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3
3. The maximum period allowed for eligible counterparts to conclude agreements with co-financing private sector partners, financial intermediaries or final beneficiaries shall be four years after the conclusion of the relevant guarantee agreement.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 234 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The financing and investment operations eligible for support through the EFSD Guarantee shall be in line with the purpose of the EFSD, as described in Article 3, and in full respect of the list of excluded activities listed in Article 20. They shall be consistent and aligned with Union policies, in particular development and neighbourhood policies of the Union, as well as the partner countries' strategies and policies and aim at supporting the following general objectives:
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 251 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) targetstrengthen socio-economic sectors, in particular infrastructure including renewable and sustainable energy, water and waste, transport, information and communications technologies, environment, sustainable use of natural resources and blue growth, social infrastructure, human capital, in order to improve the socio-economic environment;
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 254 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) provide finance in favour ofsupport private sector development with a particular focus on local companies and micro-, small- and medium- sized enterprises with a particular focus on private sector developmentespecially those operating in fragile states and LDCs;
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 265 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) provide financial instruments aimed at addressing the bottlenecks to private investaddress bottlenecks to private investments by providing financial instruments, including first loss guarantees to portfolios guarantees to private sector projects such as loan guarantees for small and medium-sized enterprises and guarantees for specific risks for infrastructure projects and other risk capital; financial instruments provided may include be denominated in local currencies of partner countries;
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 271 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) contribute to climate action, environmental protection and management, thus producing climate co- benefits allocating at least 35 % of the financing to investments with components that contribute to climate action, renewable energy and resource efficiency.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 294 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The EFSD shall not be used to replace government responsibility for public services.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 299 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission mashall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 20 a to supplement this Regulation by defineing investment windows for specific regions or partner countries or for both, for specific sectors, for specific projects or for specific categories of final beneficiaries or for both to be funded by instruments referred to in Article 9 to be covered by the EFSD Guarantee up to a fixed amount. All requests for financial support within investment windows shall be made to the Commission.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 302 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 20a to supplement this Regulation by establishing and publishing a scoreboard of indicators to be used to ensure an independent and transparent assessment of the potential and actual operations backed by the EFSD Guarantee.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 310 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission shall ensure a level-playing field for eligible counterparts and promote cooperation between them. It shall ensure an absence of conflicts of interest throughout the stages of implementation of the EFSD. In order to ensure complementarity, the eligible counterparts shall provide any relevant information about their non- EFSD operations.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 321 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
At the request of the Member States and subject to approval by the Strategic Board, the contributions made by them may be earmarked for the initiation of projects in specific regions, countries, sectors or or existing investment windows.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 327 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)
(aa) the objectives and purpose of this Regulation, a needs assessment and an indication of the expected results taking into account the promotion of corporate social responsibility, including in particular through adherence to all internationally agreed by the EU guidelines, principles and legal instruments, in particular those listed in Annex a.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 329 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 4 – point c
(c) the amount of own resources as well as private sector co-financing that the counterpart is ready to mobilise for the investment window.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 361 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. By 31 December 202019, the Commission shall evaluate the functioning of the EFSD, its management and its effective contribution to the purpose and objectives of this regulation. The Commission shall submit its evaluation report to the European Parliament and the Council, containing an independent evaluation of the application of this Regulation. This report shall be submitted without delay by the Commission in the event that accompanied by a reasoned proposal with a view to reviewing or amending this Regulation, as appropriate, in particular withe approved financing and view to extending the initial investment operations absorb in full the amount of the EFSD Guarantee available before 30 June 2020iod referred to in Article 7(2). That evaluation report shall be accompanied by an opinion of the Court of Auditors.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 365 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. by 30 June 2018, the Commission, in cooperation with the European External Action Service (EEAS) shall establish a framework and methodology for assessing the compliance with Article 21 TEU.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 368 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1
In accordance with its transparency policies and general Union principrules on access to documents and information, the eligible counterparts shall proactively and systematically make publicly available on their websites information relating to all financing and investment operations covered by the EFSD Guarantee under this Regulation, relating in particular to the manner in which those operations contribute to the requirements of this Regulation. Where possible, such information shall be broken down at project level and include information on the ultimate beneficiaries, taking into account the protection of confidential and commercially sensitive information.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 381 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The EFSD shall not support financing and investment operations which: (a) are in, or closely linked with, the armament, defence or security sectors; (b) support nuclear energy or fossil fuels, with duly justified exceptions for conventional natural gas; (c) do not respect the ILO Conventions set out in Annex a (new); (d) are assessed to have a clear and negative environmental impact in the partner countries; (e) likely to lead to displacements; (f) likely to have negative effects on the food security of populations in partner countries;
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 385 #

2016/0281(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 a (new)
Article 20a Exercise of the delegation 1. The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article. 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 6 shall be conferred on the Commission from the date of entry into force of this Regulation until 31 December 2020. 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 6 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 4. Before adopting a delegated act, the Commission shall consult experts designated by each Member State in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making. 5. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council. 6. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 6 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 386 #

2016/0281(COD)

ANNEX a LIST OF INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES, PRINCIPLES AND ILO CONVENTIONS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLES 12 (3) and 20 (3) (a) International Guidelines and Principles – United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment – United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights – OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises – FAO (Committee on World Food Security) Principles for Responsible Investment in Agriculture and Food Systems (b) International Labour Organization Conventions – ILO Convention 87 on Freedom of Association and the Protection of the Right to Organise; – ILO Convention 98 on the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining; – ILO Convention 29 on Forced Labour; – ILO Convention 105 on the Abolition of Forced Labour; – ILO Convention 138 on Minimum Age; – ILO Convention 111 on Discrimination (Employment and Occupation); – ILO Convention 100 on Equal Remuneration; – ILO Convention 182 on Worst Forms of Child Labour;
2017/03/27
Committee: AFETDEVEBUDG
Amendment 26 #

2016/0275(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 1
(1) The international community faces an unprecedented refugee crisis which requires solidarity, efficient mobilisation of financial resources and the need to confront and surmount the existing challenges in a concerted manner. All actors need to work together to apply sustained, medium and long-term policies and an efficient use of existing processes and programmes in order to support initiatives which contribute to addressing root causes of migrationory pressures stemming from poverty, underdevelopment, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities as well as from climate change.
2017/03/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 35 #

2016/0275(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 9
(9) In order to allow the ELM to respond to potential upcoming challenges and Union priorities, as well as to provide a strategic response addressing root causes of migrationory pressures stemming from poverty, underdevelopment, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities as well as from climate change, the maximum ceiling for the EIB financing operations under the EU guarantee should be increased to EUR 32 300 000 000 by releasing the optional additional amount of EUR 3 008 470 000 000. Under the general mandate, the amount of EUR 1 400 000 000 should be earmarked for projects in the public sector directed to refugees and host communities in crisis affected areas.
2017/03/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 44 #

2016/0275(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 11
(11) Addressing root causes of migration should be added as a new objective of the mandateory pressures stemming from poverty, underdevelopment, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities as well as from climate change should be added as a new objective of the mandate; every project financed under the new objective should fulfil the criteria for Official Development Assistance (ODA) established by the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the OECD and be in compliance with Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and UN´s Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
2017/03/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 53 #

2016/0275(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 15
(15) The EIB should develop and implement a set of indicators in its Results Measurement framework for projects in the public sector and in the private sector directed to refugees and host communitiincluding indicators that can, in an effective way, measure and assess the project´s contribution to Sustainable Development Goals, the involvement of local civil society, the alignment with Union external and Union budget priorities and other indicators agreed at international level by the Union and its Member States. Therefore, an assessment of the contribution of EIB financing operations addressing root causes of migrationthose mentioned factors should be included in the Commission's annual reporting to the European Parliament and to the Council on EIB financing operations.
2017/03/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 56 #

2016/0275(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Recital 16
(16) Only where it concerns the need to address urgencies and crisis situations that could arise within the mandate period and which are recognised as Union external policy priorities, the ceiling for reallocation between the regions by the EIB in the course of the mandate should be increased from 10 % to 20 %. The EIB should notify the European Parliament any reallocation decision by providing a justification report and an impact assessment. The private sector mandate of EUR 2 300 000 000 and the amount of EUR 1 400 000 000 dedicated to public sector projects cannot be reallocated because its purpose is to address root causes of migration.
2017/03/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 59 #

2016/0275(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 1– subparagraph 1
The maximum ceiling of the EIB financing operations under EU guarantee throughout the period 2014-20 shall not exceed EUR 32 308 470 000 000. Amounts initially earmarked for financing operations but subsequently cancelled shall not count against the ceiling.
2017/03/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 60 #

2016/0275(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point a
(a) a maximum amount of EUR 30 006 170 000 000 under a general mandate, of which an amount of up to EUR 1 400 000 000 is earmarked for projects in the public sector directed to refugees and host communitiesaddress the root causes of migratory pressures stemming from poverty, underdevelopment, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities as well as from climate change;
2017/03/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 66 #

2016/0275(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point (d)
(d) strategic response to addressing root causes of migration.migratory pressures stemming from poverty, underdevelopment, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities as well as from climate change;
2017/03/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 68 #

2016/0275(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
To ensure that private sector investments have the greatest development impact, the EIB shall endeavour to strengthen as a priority the local private sector in beneficiary countries through support to local investment as provided for in point (a) of paragraph 1. EIB financing operations supporting the general objectives set out in paragraph 1 shall endeavour to also enhance its support to investment projects run by SMEs from the Union. In order to effectively monitor and evaluate the use of funds for the benefit of the SMEs concerned, the EIB shall establish and maintain adequate contractual provisions imposing standard reporting obligations on both the financial intermediaries and the beneficiaries;
2017/03/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 73 #

2016/0275(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 3
Over the period covered by this decision, the EIB should endeavour to sustain the current high level of climate-relevant operations, while the minimum volume of those operations shall represent at least 25 % of the total EIB financing operations, gradually increasing that target to at least 35% by 2020.
2017/03/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 76 #

2016/0275(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 3 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1
EIB financing operations supporting the general objectives set out in point (d) of paragraph 1 shall back investment projects that address root causes of the migrationmigratory pressures stemming from poverty, underdevelopment, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities as well as from climate change and contribute to long-term economic resilience and safeguard sustainable development in beneficiary countries while ensuring compliance with the SDGs. EIB financing operations shall, in particular, address increased needs for infrastructure and related services to cater for the migrants influx, and boost employment opportunities for host and refugee communities to foster economic integration and enable refugees to become self-reliant.strengthen humanitarian action and support for decent job creation, while ensuring the full respect of human, labour and social rights, fundamental freedoms and gender mainstreaming by implementing a rights- based approach (RBA) encompassing all human and social rights in line with transparency, participation, non- discrimination and accountability. EIB financing operations shall recognise that gender equality is a cross cutting issue to achieving sustainable development. A gender perspective shall be applied to all financing operations. The EIB shall ensure that it develops a Gender Action Plan by 31 December 2017 and that all EIB operations under this mandate comply with the principles of its Gender Strategy approved in December 2016
2017/03/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 85 #

2016/0275(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point a
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) Indicators for projects providing strategic response addressing root causes of migration shall be developed by the EIB; in consultation and in cooperation with stakeholders and the civil society;
2017/03/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 89 #

2016/0275(COD)

Proposal for a decision
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5 – point b
Decision No 466/2014/EU
Article 11 – paragraph 1 – point j
(j) An assessment of the contribution of EIB financing operations in providing strategic response addressing root causes of migration. migratory pressures stemming from poverty, underdevelopment, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities as well as from climate change;
2017/03/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 4 #

2016/0274(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) The amount of the Guarantee Fund in surplus exceeding 10% of the Union's total outstanding capital liabilities should be paid back to the general budget of the Union in order to better protect the budget against potential additional risk of default of the EIB financing operations addressing root causes of migrationmigratory pressures stemming from poverty, underdevelopment, inequality, demographic growth, lack of employment and economic opportunities as well as from climate change.
2017/03/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 10 #

2016/0274(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) The financial management of the Guarantee Fund should be transferred from the EIB to the Commission, which has an established practice of managing similar investments. By taking over the asset management of the Guarantee Fund, the Commission should be able to further streamline and consolidate its asset management activities, building on existing structures and a good track record.
2017/03/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 18 #

2016/0274(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009
Article 8 – paragraph 1
By 31 March of each year, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Court of Auditors, in the context of the financial statements of the Commission, all the required information on the situation of the Guarantee Fund.
2017/03/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 19 #

2016/0274(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009
Article 8 – paragraph 2
In addition, it shall, by 31 May of each year, submit to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the Court of Auditors an annual report on the management of the Guarantee Fund in the previous calendar year. The annual report shall contain the presentation of the financial position of the Guarantee Fund at the end of the previous calendar year, the financial flows during the previous calendar year as well as the significant transactions and any relevant information on the financial accounts. The report shall also include information about the financial management and performance and the risk of the Guarantee Fund at the end of the previous calendar year. Finally, it shall include an assessment of the adequacy of the 9% target and of the 10% threshold/ceiling, and of the asset management of the Guarantee Fund performed by the Commission.
2017/03/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 34 #

2016/0230(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20 a (new)
(20 a) This regulation should be implemented within the scope of the Paris Agreement, in particular by observing the importance of ensuring the integrity of all ecosystems and respect for the livelihoods and resilience of communities living in forested areas.
2017/03/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 35 #

2016/0230(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20 b (new)
(20 b) Climate change has a profound effect on the development of communities around the world. The Union has made commitments to the UNFCCC whereby, when taking action to address climate change, it will respect, promote and consider its obligations with regard to human rights, the right to health, the rights of indigenous peoples, local communities, migrants, children, persons with disabilities and people in vulnerable situations. In addition, it will respect, promote and consider its obligations with regard to the right to development, as well as gender equality, empowerment of women and intergenerational equity.
2017/03/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 36 #

2016/0230(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20 c (new)
(20 c) A holistic approach to tropical deforestation should be ensured, taking into account all deforestation drivers, as well as the objective declared by the Commission in the UNFCCC negotiations to halt global forest cover loss by 2030 at the latest and to reduce gross tropical deforestation by at least 50 percent by 2020 compared to current levels.
2017/03/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 37 #

2016/0230(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20 d (new)
(20 d) The Union has made commitments to the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals, which can be met only with proper forest management and a commitment to stall and reverse deforestation and drive forward reforestation.
2017/03/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 38 #

2016/0230(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20 e (new)
(20 e) This regulation, in accordance with the UNFCCC agreement, should follow a country-driven, gender- responsive, participatory and fully transparent approach, taking into consideration vulnerable groups, communities and ecosystems. Furthermore, it should be based on and guided by the best available science and, as appropriate, traditional knowledge, knowledge of indigenous peoples and local knowledge systems, with a view to integrating adaptation into relevant socioeconomic and environmental policies and actions.
2017/03/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 39 #

2016/0230(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 20 f (new)
(20 f) Forestry and forests should be managed responsibly and should make a real contribution to the economic development of a country, offering viable economic opportunities to farmers, provided that no deforestation of sensitive ecosystems occurs, that no plantations are established on peat lands, that plantations are managed using modern agroecological techniques to minimise adverse environmental and social outcomes and that land rights, the rights of indigenous communities as well as human rights and workers' rights are respected.
2017/03/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 19 #

2016/0207(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) The United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted in September 2015, underoutlines the importance of promoting peaceful and inclusive societies both as a Sustainable Development Goal (SDG 16) and in order to achieve other development policy outcomSustainable Development Goals (SDGs), first of which is the eradication of poverty (SDG 1). SDG 16 underlines the importance of promoting peaceful and inclusive societies. SDG 16.a specifically requests to “strengthen relevant national institutions, including through international cooperation, for building capacities at all levels, in particular in developing countries, for preventing violence and combatting terrorism and crime”.17 __________________ 17 United Nations, A/RES/70/1, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015
2017/05/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 26 #

2016/0207(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Supporting security sector actors, including the military under exceptional circumstances, in third countries in a conflict prevention, crisis management or stabilisation context is essential to ensure appropriate conditions for poverty eradication and development, including good governance for an effective use of development cooperation, whose main goal is poverty eradication. Those actions are particularly necessary to ensure the protection of civilian populations in the areas affected by conflict, crises or fragility. Good governance and effective democratic control and civilian oversight of the security system, including the military, as well as compliance with human rights and the rule of law principles are essential attributes of a well-functioning State in any context, and should be promoted through a wider security sector reform support to third countries.
2017/05/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 32 #

2016/0207(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The Council conclusions on Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) of 18 May 2015 called to explore options to enhance coherence and coordination between EU security and development actions, as well as to improve the delivery of capacity building in support of security and development, notably in terms of financing instruments.19 They also invited to develop an EU-wide strategic framework for Security Sector Reform, bringing together CSDP and all other relevant Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) tools as well as development cooperation instruments and freedom, security and justice actors. __________________ 19 Foreign Affairs Council (Defence formation) conclusions on CSDP, document 8971/15 of 18 May 2015
2017/05/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 37 #

2016/0207(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) The primary objective of ODA is not to finance security-related instruments.
2017/05/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 53 #

2016/0207(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
2. Assistance may cover in particular the provision ofshall be eligible to cover capacity building programmes in support of security and development, including training, mentoring and advice, as well as the provision of equipment, infrastructure improvements and provision of other services.
2017/05/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 54 #

2016/0207(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) No 230/2014
Article 3a – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The services whose provision is eligible for financial assistance under this instrument shall be listed in the Annex. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article ... concerning amendments to the list contained in the Annex.
2017/05/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 55 #

2016/0207(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Regulation (EU) 230/2014
Article 3a – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. The funding for the instrument established by this Regulation shall come from instruments other than the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) or the European Development Fund (EDF) or any other mechanisms that benefit from those instruments.
2017/05/12
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 42 #

2016/0151(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) Certain widely recognised nutritional guidelines exist at national and international level, such as the WHO Regional Office for Europe's nutrient profile model, in order to differentiate foods on the basis of their nutritional composition in the context of foods television advertising to children. Member States should be encouraged to ensure that self-and co- regulatory codes of conduct are used to effectively reduce the exposure of children and minors to audiovisual commercial communications regarding foods and beverages that are high in salt, sugars or fat or that otherwise do not fit these national or international nutritional guidelines.
2016/12/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 43 #

2016/0151(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10 a (new)
(10a) In addition, Member States should ensure that self- and co-regulatory codes of conduct aim to effectively reduce the exposure of children and minors to audiovisual commercial communications relating to the promotion of gambling. Certain co-regulatory or self-regulatory systems exist at Union and national level in order to promote gambling responsibly, including in audiovisual commercial communications. Those systems should be further encouraged, in particular those aiming at ensuring that responsible gambling messages accompany audiovisual promotional communications for gambling.
2016/12/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 48 #

2016/0151(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) Similarly, Member States should be encouraged to ensure that self-and co- regulatory codes of conduct are used to effectively limit the exposure of children and minors to audiovisual commercial communications for alcoholic beverages. Certain co- regulatory or self-regulatory systems exist at Union and national level in order to market responsibly alcoholic beverages, including in audiovisual commercial communications. Those systems should be further encouraged, in particular those aiming at ensuring that responsible drinking messages accompany audiovisual commercial communications for alcoholic beverages.
2016/12/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 62 #

2016/0151(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) Product placement should not be admissiblebe prohibited in news and current affairs programmes, consumer affairs programmes, religious programmes and programmes with a significant children’s audience. In particular, evidence shows that product placement and embedded advertisements can affect children’s behaviour as children are often not able to recognise the commercial content. There is thus a need to continue to prohibit product placement in programmes with a significant children’s audience. Consumer affairs programmes are programmes offering advice to viewers, or including reviews on the purchase of products and services. Allowing product placement in such programmes would blur the distinction between advertising and editorial content for viewers who may expect a genuine and honest review of products or services in such programmes.
2016/12/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 81 #

2016/0151(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
(28) An important share of the content stored on video-sharing platforms is not under the editorial responsibility of the video-sharing platform provider. However, those providers typically determine the organisation of the content, namely programmes or user-generated videos, including by automatic means or algorithms. Therefore, those providers should bare required to take appropriateffective measures to protect minors from content that may impair their physical, mental or moral development and protect all citizens from incitement to violence or hatred directed against a group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to sex, race, colour, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin.
2016/12/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 119 #

2016/0151(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Member States and the Commission shall encouragsure the development of self- and co- regulatory codes of conduct regarding inappropriate audiovisual commercial communications, accompanying or included in programmes with a significant children’s audience, of foods and beverages containing nutrients and substances with a nutritional or physiological effect, excessive intakes of which in the overall diet are not recommended, in particular fat, trans-fatty acids, salt or sodium and sugars.
2016/12/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 124 #

2016/0151(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
The Commission and ERGA shall encouragsure the exchange of best practices on self- and co-regulatory systems across the Union. Where appropriate, the Commission shall facilitate the development of Union codes of conduct.";
2016/12/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 138 #

2016/0151(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 9 – paragraph 3
3. Member States and the Commission shall encouragsure the development of self- and co-regulatory codes of conduct regarding inappropriate audiovisual commercial communications for alcoholic beverages. Those codes should be used to effectively limit the exposure of minors to audiovisual commercial communications for alcoholic beverages.
2016/12/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 139 #

2016/0151(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 9 – paragraph 3 a (new)
(3a) Member States and the Commission shall ensure the development of self- and co-regulatory codes of conduct regarding inappropriate audiovisual commercial communications for gambling. Those codes shall be used to effectively limit the exposure of minors to audiovisual commercial communications for gambling.
2016/12/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 140 #

2016/0151(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point b
Directive 2010/13/EU
Article 9 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission and ERGA shall encouragsure the exchange of best practices on self- and co-regulatory systems across the Union. If considered appropriate, the Commission shall facilitate the development of Union codes of conduct.";
2016/12/02
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 58 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex 8
(8) In view of the long duration of certain posting assignments, it is necessary to provide that, in case of posting lasting for periods higher than 24 months, the host Member State is deemed to be the country in which the work is carried out. In accordance with the principle of Rome I Regulation, the law of the host Member Sates therefore applies to the employment contract of such posted workers if no other choice of law was made by the parties. In case a different choice was made, it cannot, however, have the result of depriving the employee of the protection afforded to him by provisions that cannot be derogated from by agreement under the law of the host Member State. This should apply from the start of the posting assignment whenever it is envisaged for more than 24 months and from the first day subsequent to the 24 months when it effectively exceeds this duration. This rule does not affect the right of undertakings posting workers to the territory of another Member State to invoke the freedom to provide services in circumstances also where the posting exceeds 24 months. The purpose is merely to create legal certainty in the application of the Rome I Regulation to a specific situation, without amending that Regulation in any way. The employee will in particular enjoy the protection and benefits pursuant to the Rome I Regulation.deleted
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 75 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
(4) Almost twenty years after its adoption, it is necessary to assess whether important to ensure that the Posting of Workers Directive stillcontinues to strikes the right balance between the need to promote the freedom to provide services and the need to protect the rights of posted workers. The complete transposition of the Directive 2014/67/EU is essential to the protection of the rights of the posted workers.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 87 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) The principle of equal treatment and the prohibition of any discrimination based on nationality are enshrined in EU law since the founding Treaties. The principle of equal pay has been implemented through secondary law not only between women and men, but also between employees with fix term contracts and comparable permanent workers, between part-time and full-time workers or between temporary agency workers and comparable workers of the user undertaking.deleted
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 95 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) The Rome I Regulation generally permits employers and employees to choose the law applicable to the employment contract. However, the employee must not be deprived of the protection of the mandatory rules of the law of the country in which or, failing that, from which the employee habitually carries out his work. In the absence of choice, the contract is governed by the law of the country in which or, failing that, from which the employee habitually carries out his work in performance of the contract.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 116 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex 13
(13) The elements of remuneration under national law or universally applicable collective agreements should be clear and transparent to all service providers. It is therefore justified to impose on Member States the obligation to publish the constituent elements of remunerationa minimum wage on the single website provided for by Article 5 of the Enforcement Directive 96/71/EC.
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 117 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) In view of the long duration of certain posting assignmecase of posting assignments lasting for periods longer than 24 months, it is necessary to provide that, in case of posting lasting for periods higher than 24 months, the host Member State is deemed to be the country in whichthe host Member State becomes the country in which the work is carried out, with the possibility to extend this period based on a prior request submitted to the competent authority in the Member State whose legislation the person concerned wishes to apply to him/her, and based on an agreement between the twork is carried out Member States (host and sending). In accordance with the principle of Rome I Regulation, the law of the host Member Sates therefore applies to the employment contract of such posted workers if no other choice of law was made by the parties. In case a different choice was made, it cannot, however, have the result of depriving the employee of the protection afforded to him by provisions that cannot be derogated from by agreement under the law of the host Member State. This should apply from the start of the posting assignment whenever it is envisaged for more than 24 months and from the first day subsequent to the 24 months when it effectively exceeds this duration. This rule does not affect the right of undertakings posting workers to the territory of another Member State to invoke the freedom to provide services in circumstances also where the posting exceeds 24 months. The purpose is merely to create legal certainty in the application of the Rome I Regulation to a specific situation, without amending that Regulation in any way. The employee will in particular enjoy the protection and benefits pursuant to the Rome I Regulation.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 138 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point -1 (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 2
(-1) Article 1(2) is amended as follows: ‘2. This Directive shall not apply to merchant navy undertakings as regards seagoing personnel or to road or rail transport.’
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 144 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 2 a
(1) The following Article 2a is added: ‘Article 2a Posting exceeding twenty-four months 1. effective duration of posting exceeds twenty-four months, the Member State to whose territory a worker is posted shall be deemed to be the country in which his or her work is habitually carried out. 2. case of replacement of posdeleted When the anticipated workers performing the same task at the same place, the cumulative duration of the posting periods of the workers concerned shall be taken into account, with regard to workers that are posted for an effective duration of at least six months. ’ the For the purpose of paragraph 1, in
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 174 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) In a competitive internal market, service providers compete not only on the basis of a labour costs but also on factors such as cost, productivity and efficiency, or the quality and innovation of their goods and services.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 195 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
For the purpose of this Directive, ‘remuneration’ means all the elements of remuneration rendered mandatory by national law, regulation or administrative provision, collective agreements or arbitration awards which have been declared universally applicable and/or, in the absence of a system for declaring collective agreements or arbitration awards to be of universal application, other collective agreements or arbitration awards within the meaning of paragraph 8 second subparagraph, inthe concept of 'minimum wage’ shall be defined by the national law and/or practice of the Member State to whose territory the worker is posted.
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 197 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
(12) It is within Member States' competence to set rules on remunerationates of pay in accordance with their law and practice. However, national rules on remunerationates of pay applied to posted workers must be justified by the need to protect posted workers and must not disproportionately restrict the cross-border provision of services by enabling unfair competition.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 205 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new)
Directive 96/71
Article 3 – paragraph -1 a (new)
(aa) the following paragraph is added: ‘-1a. Service providers are exempted from the obligation to settle the fine for paying less than the minimum wage as set by the law of the host Member State where there is evidence that the host Member State has not met the obligation to publish on the national official single website provided for in Article 5 of Directive 2014/67/EU the constituent elements of remuneration, as per letter (c), or the information is not provided in a clear, transparent and unambiguous manner. Subparagraph 2 of paragraph 7 in Article 3 of Directive 96/71/EC is deleted.’
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 207 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 13
(13) The elements of remunerationates of pay under national law or universally applicable collective agreements should be clear and transparent to all service providers. It is therefore justified to impose on Member States the obligation to publish the constituent elements of remunerationand should therefore be mandatory for them to publish the constituent elements of rates of pay including all the bonuses and allowances in accordance with point (c), on the single website provided for by Article 5 of the Enforcement Directive.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 213 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b a (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a a (new)
(ba) the following paragraph is added: ‘1aa. The contractor is required to provide the subcontractor with information on working conditions, including remuneration, which apply in a clear, transparent and unambiguous manner. The subcontractor is exempted from the obligation to guarantee certain terms and conditions of employment, to cover the minimum wage as per paragraph 1 established within the entrepreneur's undertaking where there is evidence that the entrepreneur was not properly informed by the contractor.’
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 217 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c a (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1b a (new)
(ca) the following paragraph is added: ‘1ba. The undertaking user shall inform in a clear, transparent and unambiguous manner the temporary work agency of the regulation applied as regards working conditions and wages.’
2017/03/27
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 239 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
(14) Laws, regulations, administrative provisions or collective agreements applicable in Member States may ensure that subcontracting does not confer on undertakings the possibility to avoid rules guaranteeing certain terms and conditions of employment covering remunerationates of pay. Where such rules on remunerationates of pay exist at national level, the Member State may apply them in a non-discriminatory manner to undertakings posting workers to its territory provided that they do not disproportionately restrict the cross-border provision of services.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 253 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
(16) In accordance with the Joint Political Declaration of 28 September 2011 of Member States and the Commission on explanatory documents6, Member States have undertaken to accompany, in justified cases, the notification of their transposition measures with one or more documents explaining the relationship between the components of a directive and the corresponding parts of national transposition instruments. With regard to this Directive, the legislator considers the transmission of such documents to be justified, _________________ 6 OJ C 369, 17.12.2011, p. 14.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 290 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 2a – paragraph 1
1. When the anticipated or the effective duration of posting exceeds twenty-four months, the Member State to whose territory a worker is posted shall be deemed to be the country in which his or her work is habitually carried out. When it can be foreseen (or becomes clear after the posting period has already commenced) that the activity will take more than 24 months, the employer or the person concerned can submit, without delay, a request to the competent authority in the Member State whose legislation will continue to be applied to the posted worker. Based on an agreement reached between the posting State and State/s of employment, the duration of the posting can be extended. The undertakings shall include in the request for extension of the posting, reasoned grounds justifying that the nature of the service provided still remains temporary after the lapse of the initial 24 months, as well as specify the time frame to which these reasoned grounds apply.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 363 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – point b
(b) minimum paid annual holidaysdeleted
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 369 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – indent 2 – point c
(c) remunerationates of pay, including overtime rates, minimum paid annual leave, bonuses for dirty, heavy or dangerous work, board and lodging allowances; this point does not apply to supplementary occupational retirement pension schemes;
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 393 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
For the purpose of this Directive, remuneration means all the elements of remuneration rendered mandatory by national law, regulation or administrative provision, collective agreements or arbitration awards which have been declared universally applicable and/or, in the absence of a system for declaring collective agreements or arbitration awards to be of universal application, other collective agreements or arbitates of pay are defined by the national law and/or praction awards within the meaning of paragraph 8 second subparagraph, ince of the Member State to whose territory the worker is posted.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 426 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3
Member States shallmust publish without delay in the single official national website referred to in Article 5 of Directive 2014/67/EU the constituent elements of remuneration in accordance with point (c)ates of pay, including all the bonuses and allowances in accordance with point (c), as established by national law, regulation or administrative provision, collective agreements or arbitration awards which have been declared universally applicable and/or, in the absence of a system for declaring collective agreements or arbitration awards to be of universal application, other collective agreements or arbitration awards within the meaning of paragraph 8 second subparagraph.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 472 #

2016/0070(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point c a (new)
Directive 96/71/EC
Article 3 – paragraph 1 b a (new)
(ca) the following paragraph is added: 1ba. The undertakings must inform the temporary employment agency, in a clear, transparent and unambiguous manner, on the working conditions, rates of pay, including various allowances and bonuses, which they apply.
2017/03/08
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 67 #

2015/2342(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas humanitarian aid base on needs and the respect of the principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality and independence, as well on the respect on international humanitarian law and the human rights provided by the Geneva Conventions and the additional protocols thereto, must be at the core of all EU external actions; whereas aid independence, i.e. aid that is free from any political, economic or security considerations or any type of discrimination, must prevail;
2016/10/20
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 90 #

2015/2342(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas the increase in human mobility, if managed in a safe, orderly, regular and responsible manner, can provide significant benefits, as recognised by the 2030 Agenda, but these are often largely underestimated; whereas the ageing of the European population requires, among other measures, relying on foreign workers in order to guarantee an adequate balance between activepersons in remunerative work and retired people;
2016/10/20
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 96 #

2015/2342(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas the EU has a responsibility to supports its implementing partners to carry out rapid, effective, quality assistance and protection and be accountable to affected-population; in that regard the EU's partners require timely and predictable funding, decisions on allocations of funding for changing or new priorities should give them sufficient time for planning and mitigation measures;
2016/10/20
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 111 #

2015/2342(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines the fact that we are witnessing in today´s world an unprecedented level of human mobility, and stresses that one of the most urgent actions the international community must urgently undertake is the strengthening of a common response to address the challenges and opportunities that this phenomenon represents; stresses that this response must be guided by the full protection of the rights and dignity of everyone forced by any circumstance to flee their homes in search of a better and safer life, ; underlines that, though their treatment is governed by separate legal frameworks, refugees and migrants (including migrants in an irregular situation) have the same universal human rights and fundamental freedoms, which need to be safeguarded regardless of their legal status; recalls that the EU must abide by its values and principles in all common policies and promote them in its external relations, recognises that the effects of externalisation of EU migration and asylum policies and the lack of legal avenues to the EU are worrying, and translate in significant abuses at all stages of the migratory and refugee movement; recalls that the external dimension of the EU asylum and migration agenda should be rooted in solidarity and in the principle of protection of the fundamental rights;
2016/10/20
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 156 #

2015/2342(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Recognises that the humanitarian aid system is dangerously overstretched and that it will never be sufficient to respond to forced displacement crises, in particularnotably given the protracted nature of a majority of them; welcomes therefore the new policy framework outlined in the Commission communication on "Forced Displacement and Development" of April 2016 and calls on the EEAS and the European Commission to implement its content within the new Partnership Framework with third countries; notes the importance of promoting closer humanitarian-development links, and the need to engage with different partners – governments, local authorities, civil society, including refugees themselves, and the private sector – to develop targeted evidence-based strategies to tackle this challenge while respecting that humanitarian aid is not a crisis management tool as stated in the EU Consensus for Humanitarian Aid;
2016/10/20
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 209 #

2015/2342(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the crucial role of women 5. in cases of forced displacement, not only as they are more vulnerable to certain abuse, but also because of the role they play in responding to emergencies, their socioeconomic contributions and their active participation in conflict resolution and prevention; notes that a focus on women’s empowerment is therefore necessary to address the deeper causes of forced displacement; reiterates the importance of adding a gender and age perspective to the EU policies addressing movements of migrants and refugees;
2016/10/20
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 386 #

2015/2342(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12 a (new)
12a. Expresses concerns regarding the list of identified partners in the foreseen migration compacts include governments with poor human rights records; considers that cooperation with these countries, and making significant payments to such regimes is setting worrying precedents, and risk reinforcing some of the root causes that force people to migrate.
2016/10/20
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 400 #

2015/2342(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Expresses concerns regarding the quantitative approach in the new Partnership Framework and the related ‘migration compacts’, which see the ‘measurable increases in the number and rate of returns’ as one of the EU’s main goals, as the number of returns clearly depends on the nature of migration flows and on the situations in the countries of origin; stresses that the short-term objectives of the compacts should focus on how best to address the challenges faced by third countries, including by developing legal migration channels such as family reunification, resettlement or humanitarian visas, as a result of which the levels of irregular migration and death tolls in the Mediterranean will decrease;
2016/10/20
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 407 #

2015/2342(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Underlines that partnership agreements such as mobility partnerships, should ensure that migrants can be received in countries of transit and origin safely, in a manner entirely consistent with their fundamental rights. Stresses that the European Parliament has a clear say in EU readmission and mobility agreements as state in the Lisbon Treaty (Article 79(3) TFEU) and specifically states that the EP must give its consent prior to the conclusion of association and similar agreements (Article 218(6)(v) TFEU) and that shall be immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure (Article 218(10) TFEU;
2016/10/20
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 429 #

2015/2342(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Underlines that EU cooperation assistance is tailored to achieve poverty reduction, the empowerment of individuals and the promotion of the rule of law; recalls that both donors and the governments of aid-receiving countries must work to improve the effectiveness of aid, especially by tackling root cause for migration and strengthening democratic ownership, increasing civil society participation, and improving accountability for the use and distribution of aid; underlines that development assistance should not be made conditional to the willingness and/or capacities of States to engage in migration management activities, including through return and readmission clauses or border controls;
2016/10/20
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 432 #

2015/2342(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15b. Stresses that in order to avoid duplication of effort, maximize the impact and effectiveness of global aid and ensure that the main focus is on development, and not on border control and security to the detriment of migrants, calls therefore on the Commission, to maintain a strong dialogue with local and international NGO, Civil society and local governments in partner countries as well as the UN for design, implementation and evaluation of the migration, displacement and refugee policies;
2016/10/20
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 509 #

2015/2342(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Call for the trust funds to follow the same rules and regulations applying to EU traditional funding instruments in relation to transparency, equal treatment of partners and capacity to provide predictable and timely funding to partners;
2016/10/20
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 529 #

2015/2342(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Welcomes the use of common security and defence policy (CSDP) missions such as EUCAP Sahel Niger and EUNAVFOR MED, cooperation with NATO, and EU initiatives such as Europol’s Joint Operational Team (JOT) Mare to gather intelligence and fight smugglers, while underlining that global mobility should not be considered a threat but an opportunity; recommends the use of CSDP tools for early warning (forecasting), mediation and conflict resolution, while stressing the importance of starting to plan for durable solutions as early as possible in conflict situations;
2016/10/20
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 542 #

2015/2342(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Calls on the EU to carefully and systematically evaluate the impact of the actions funded on migration, displacement and refugees base on the quality delivery of humanitarian aid and development aid;
2016/10/20
Committee: AFETDEVE
Amendment 1 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
– having regard to the Bekou Trust Fund established in 2014
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 11 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas the Bekou Trust Fund has shown positive results in the Central African Republic;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 13 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas Africa continues to experience very high rates of population growth and a slow decline of fertility rates, leading in the near future to a sharp rise of the young working-age populations and great potential social and economic benefits; whereas equipping young people with the education and skills they need to realise their potential and the creation of employment opportunities are essential to foster stability, sustainable economic growth, social cohesion and development in the region;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 15 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the EUTF is intended to be a development tool that pools resources from different donors in order to enable a quick, flexible, transparent and collective response by the EU to the different dimensions of an emergency situation;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 18 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the EUTF has been conceived in order to assist a band of countries across three African regions (the Horn of Africa; the Sahel and Lake Chad basin; North Africa) that contain some of the most fragile African countries, are affected by migration as countries of origin, transit or destination if not all three, and will draw the greatest benefit from this form of EU financial assistance; whereas the eligible countries’ African neighbours may also benefit, on a case-by-case basis, from Trust Fund projects having a regional dimension with a view to addressing regional migration flows and related cross-border challenges;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 31 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that the EU’s financial allocation for the EUTF for Africa comes mainly from the 11th EDF; stresses that the EUTF was established because the EU budget lacks the resources and the flexibility needed to address crises such as those in question promptly and comprehensively; calls for the EU to agree a more holistic solution in the framework of next year’s revision of the 2014-2020 MFF and the revision of the Financial Instruments in 2016, with a view to increasing the effectiveness and reactivity of humanitarian and development assistance available under the EU budget;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 37 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses the need for contributions by Member States and other different sources; notes that the contributions from the Member States are still too low and do not match up the contribution from the European Commission;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 40 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Strongly underlines that funds from EDF and ODA sources must be devoted exclusively to development ends; recalls that all other expenses related to security, counter-terrorism and border controls, migration management, etc have to be funded from different sources that are pooled in the Trust Fund; stresses the need for contributions by Member States and other different sources, and recalls that leveraging is one of the foremost reasons for the creation of this instrument devoted to such different and heterogeneous ends; condemns any use of ODA sources, even a small percentage, for any purposes different from development;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 49 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Insists that national authorities must be consulted and that they must be full partners as long as there is full guarantee of efficiency and good governance in accordance with the principles of aid effectiveness;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 55 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Considers that the EU Trust Fund for Africa should contribute to the strengthening and improving of local services (health, education, nutrition) and of governance, mainly through community-based projects, and that civil society, non- governmental organisations (NGOs) and international NGOs should play a pivotal role in addressing the root causes of migration and improving local services;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 59 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Regrets the limited engagement of civil society in the discussions, conceptualisation and programming of the Trust Fund; recalls that the issue of creating ownership and a close partnership with a wide range of civil society actors are essential to the implementation of the EUTF;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 63 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls that regional and local authorities, civil society and NGOs are natural partners for an effective development policy; stresses the need for a stronger cooperation with local authorities and NGOs in states demonstrating unsufficient guarantees of good governance and transparency; calls for respect for the principle of subsidiarity also in this field of action; stresses that NGOs and civil society should be strongly involved in the implementation phase of the EUTF;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 71 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Strongly believes that the Trust Fund should focus not only on macroeconomic issues but also on grassroots projects with the specific aim of improving quality and equity of services, particularly in education and the health sector, which is key to increasing inclusiveness and enhancing the wellbeing of local populations, as it can respond to the needs of vulnerable communities, including minorities, while also being able to provide better and more equitable and sustainable services to the general population;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 91 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Asks the Commission to enhance the transparency of the Fund and underlines that monitoring and evaluation of the projects and programmes financed will be essential, to make sure the Fund serve its purposes helping directly those in need and not financing governments responsible for human rights violations;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 110 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Recalls that the rules and criteria that govern development aid for projects financed by the Trust Fund must respect Europe’s fundamental values; in this respect, underlines that EU policy regarding cooperation on security, border controls and organised crime with governments that do not respect human rights or the rights of people on the move should include specific provisions aimed at enhancing respect for human rights and the rule of law, with particular attention to women’s rights, sexual and reproductive health and rights, children’s rights, and the rights of minorities and other particularly affected groups;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 116 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses the need to carefully and systematically check how the funds from the EU Trust Fund for Africa are employed and what the EU is actually financing through the Trust Fund, given the extraordinary lack of clarity in its objectives, the lack of solidarity and consensus among Member States, and the clear desire to achieve security goals by means of an instrument theoretically conceived to pursue development ends; in particular, calls on the Council and the Commission to inform Parliament in detail on the specific actions undertaken by both the EU and the African states when employing these funds;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 120 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Recalls the need for a better communication between the Commission, the Member States and the European Parliament in programming and implementing actions of the Trust Fund in general for further planning of potential further Trust Funds
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 121 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 b (new)
20b. underlines that the Trust Fund should function only as a complementary flexible and rapid instrument and should not undermine the long-term development cooperation of the European Union;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 123 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Underlines that the lack of involvement of Parliament thus far in the establishment of the Trust Fund should at least give rise to detailed and regular reporting by the Commission on how the African Trust Fund is been implemented, enabling Parliament to play its role of watchdogscrutiny;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 125 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Believes that, given the extraordinary flexibility and rapidity proper to a Trust Fund, periodical reporting to Parliament should be undertaken at least once every six months; strongly underlines the need for transparent performance monitoring, evaluation and auditing;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 130 #

2015/2341(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Underlines the need for a thorough monitoring of the implementation of the provisions on the creation of ‘hotspots’, redistribution, replacement in countries of origin, and Member States’ financial commitments, paying particular attention to human rights;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 10 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that the effectiveness of EU law is systematically undermined by its unsatisfactory application by Member Stfundamental in achieving an "ever closer" Union as enshrined in the TEU; recognizes the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union of same legal value as the Treaties; n. Notes that thise lack of enforcement is at the root of a number of European crisesof EU law weakens the EU itself;
2016/03/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 17 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes with concern that 11 directives in the area of banking and finance legislation are being infringed by one or more Member States, with Germany being the only country to comply with all existing legislation in this field, and Austria the only other Member State with fewer than three infringements1 ; __________________ 1 Particularly worrying are the cases of Poland (10 infringements), Luxembourg (9) and Slovenia, Spain and Estonia (8 each).;
2016/03/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 19 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that the Late Payments Directive is still not implemented well in 11 Member States, and that the situation is worst in Italy, Cyprus, Spain, Portugal and Greeceis also correlated to the state of public finances affected by the economic crisis; notes as well that the delay in B2B payments is well above average; points out that also the directive on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, wthere the delay in B2B2 payments is well above average3 directive on requirements for budgetary framework of the Member States and the directive on consumer rights have not yet been transposed; __________________ 2 Business-to-business. 3 See ‘Transposition and implementation of the Directive on Late Payments in Commercial Transactions’, European Parliamentary Research Service.
2016/03/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 25 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that non-compliance with the Maastricht criteria, and the lenient enforcement of the Stability and Growth Pact rules by the Commission and the Council before 2010, contribufollowing the global financial crisis which led to a European debt crisis, the EU has further strengthened its economic coordination and banking supervision; stresses the importance of completing the Banking Union, deepening the EMU and creating a CMU that finances the real economy and growth in Europe; invites all Member Stateds to the emergence of the European debt crisis that followed the global financial crisismake full use of flexibility within the existing rules of the Stability and Growth Pact as per Commission's Communication COM (0215)12;
2016/03/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 36 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Points out that in 2014 only 10 of the 157 main recommendations made to Member States in the framework of the European Semester were fully implemented or showed substantial progress4 ; ; and believes that, in order to improve implementation, there is a need to better identify clearly articulated priorities at European level as well as to increase genuine public debate, political willingness and commitment at national level, leading to greater relevance and national ownership; welcomes the recommendation on the economic policy of the euro area, proposed by the Commission six months before country- specific recommendations, as a step to deepen policy coordination in the follow- up to the Five Presidents' Report and relevant resolutions of the European Parliament; __________________ 4 Success rate of around 6.5%: Zsolt Darvas and Alvaro Leandro, ‘The Limitations of Policy Coordination in the Euro Area under the European Semester’, Bruegel, November 2015.
2016/03/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 45 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Is very concerned by the fact that the Deposit Guarantee Scheme Directive (DGSD) has still not been implemented by 10 Member States6 , which undermines the efforts to build a, and calls on the Commission to ensure that it is implemented; welcomes the Commission proposal on European Deposit GuaInsurantece Scheme, that would complete the Banking Union; __________________ 6Belgium, Cyprus, Estonia, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, Poland, Romania, Slovenia and Sweden; Commission press release, 10 December 2015.e third and final pillar of the Banking Union, needed to safeguard deposits throughout Europe;
2016/03/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 48 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Welcomes the European Commission's first proposals in the area of the Capital Markets Union and stresses the importance of encouraging more investments in the real economy;
2016/03/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 53 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the European Investment Bank to evaluate whether the banking systems of Member States that do not comply with the BRDD and the DGSD should be intermediaries in its actions; calls on the European Central Bank to make a similar evaluation regarding the use of emergency liquidity assistance;deleted
2016/03/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 65 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Is of the opinion that financial penalties for non-compliance with EU law should include a multiplier for those Member States for which several procedures are openbe effective, proportionate and dissuasive;
2016/03/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 70 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Considers that the number of formal infringement procedures decreased also due to the effectiveness of the structured dialogue with Member States via EU Pilot;
2016/03/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 71 #

2015/2326(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 b (new)
10b. Welcomes the Commission's efforts to improve access to information on the application of the Union Law. Encourages further efforts to enhance transparency;
2016/03/31
Committee: ECON
Amendment 10 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Regrets that, although PCD was endorsed in the UN Millennium Declaration4 , the Lisbon Treaty and the Busan Forum on Aid Effectiveness5 , little progress has been made as to its concrete implementation; believes that, especially considering the framework of the 2030 Agenda, more prominence must be given to PCD, which has to be mainstreamed and implemented at an international, national and local level; __________________ 4 http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ ares552e.htm 5 http://www.oecd.org/development/effectiv eness/49650173.pdf
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 14 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for an EU-wide debate on PCD in the framework of the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda, so as to understand better how the concept might fit with the more universal concept of PCSD; recalls that PCD requires policy changes both in internal and external policies;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 16 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls for the inclusion of PCSD as a core issue in the coming debates on EU policies, particularly on the Global strategy, and the mid-term review of the Multi-annual Financial Framework;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 21 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recalls that PCD must be made a clear priority for the EEAS and the Delegations by further strengthening the EU's policy dialogue with CSOs, local parliaments and other stakeholders, by asking them to gather evidence on lack of either inconsistency or incoherence, by improving PCD references in programming documents and making them operational, and by developing a training programme for all new EEAS staff to ensure that they are able to understand and apply PCD; believes that adequate resources for this task must be allocated;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 24 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Proposes that in preparation for that summit, the Commission and the EEAS should address a paper to the EU heads of state and government with concrete recommendations on how to implement PCD and how to define more clearly the responsibilities of each EU institution in achieving PCD commitments; believes that such a process should be as inclusive, involving as possible, involving local and regional governments, civil society organisations and think-tanks;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 29 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that the mechanisms used by EU delegations to provide feedback to the Commission’s 2015 PCD Report should be extended to all EU delegations, and that this should become a yearly exercise; considers furtheralls on EU delegations to ensure that PCD ishould be on the agenda of the respective bilateral meetings and joint assembly meetings, such as the yearly meeting of EU Heads of Delegations in Brussels;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 31 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Regrets the fact that although impact assessments represent a significant tool for achieving PCD, assessments of development impacts remain few in number; hopes that the Better Regulation Package and its guidelines will improve this situation; believes that impact assessment have to be made public before the policy proposal, in order to open up opportunities for external stakeholders, including CSOs and developing country stakeholders, to comment and put forward evidence-based material that should be taken into account; considers the need to establish more systematic ex-post assessment of the impact of EU policies on developing countries during policy implementation;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 33 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls for more participatory impact assessments, to allow relevant stakeholders, including developing countries, civil society and NGOs to participate effectively in the IA process and give their views;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 35 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Welcomes the proposal for an independent system within the Union for receiving complaints by people or communities affected by the Union's policies;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 43 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Calls on the Commission to produce a regular analysis of the cost of incoherencies and toblacklist of incoherencies and a regular analysis of their cost by developing adequate monitoring and progress-tracking mechanisms on PCD;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 55 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Emphasises that the EU needs greater harmonisation of migration and asylum policies, both within the Union itself and with its international partners; suggests that a truly efficient and holistic migration policy has to fully integrate EU internal and external policies, including particular within EU working structures;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 57 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Calls for an inclusive approach to tackle the root causes of migration, including local stakeholders in the first instance; emphasises the need to ensure that development and tackling root causes of migration will be the main approaches leading to a sustainable settlement of the current migration crisis;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 60 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13 a (new)
13a. Insists that EU policies which seek to manage migration should be compatible with those that seek to reduce poverty in developing countries and to tackle the root causes of migration; considers that development aid programmes and budgets should not be used for migration control purposes;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 65 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Underlines that the EU and its Member States remain the most important Aid for Trade donor in the world (EUR 11.7 billion in 2013 - SWD(2015)0128); welcomes the Commission’s aims to make trade agreements development-friendly, while recognising that Official Development Assistance (ODA) is a key source of financing for sustainable development, if mobilised efficiently; recalls the commitment by Member States to make concrete efforts towards the target of 0.7 percent of gross national product (GNP) as ODA to developing countries;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 82 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Strongly believes that EU trade policy must take into account the realities and development situation of developing countries in order to achieve PCD objectives; recalls the right of development countries to establish their own development strategies without being exposed to unfair competition;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 87 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Supports an efficient, fair and transparent tax system in line with good governance principles; welcomes the package of tax transparency measures presented by the Commission on 18 March 2015 and the Anti-Tax Avoidance Package presented on 28 January 2016, including its Communication on an external strategy to promote tax good governance internationally; considers that international cooperation is vital for tackling illicit financial flows and tax evasion;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 94 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Recalls that EU tax policies can have negative impacts on developing countries, and reiterates its call to conduct a spill- over analysis of all national and EU tax policies, in order to assess the impact on developing countries and remove policies and practices which negatively affect them;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 96 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Calls for an evaluation of the impact of price subsidies for exports, tariffs and trade barriers on developing countries;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 100 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Recalls that efforts to secure access to raw materials from developing countries must not undermine local development and poverty eradication but support developing countries in translating their mineral wealth into real development;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 101 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 b (new)
16b. Calls on the Member States properly to ensure a fair treatment of developing countries when negotiating tax treaties, taking into account their particular situation and ensuring a fair distribution of taxing rights between source and residence countries; calls Member States, in this regard, to adhere to the UN model tax convention rather than the OECD model, to conduct comprehensive impact assessments ensuring that negative impacts are avoided, to desist from reducing withholding tax rates and to ensure transparency around treaty negotiations;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 111 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Calls on the EU to evaluate systematically the impact of, among others, EU agricultural, trade and energy policies – such as biofuel policy – on food security in the developing world; urges the Commission to continue to concentrate on small- and medium-scale farming, and to promote sustainable and agro-ecological practices; recalls the need to ensure that the deployment of CAP measures do not jeopardise the food production capacity and long-term food security of developing countries; stresses that substantive issues of policy coherence and impact need to be addressed in the ongoing monitoring of the EU’s Food Security Policy Framework (COM(2010)0127);
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 113 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18a. Calls for a consideration of the impact of fisheries agreements on the food security of developing countries;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 117 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls for determined action from the EU in implementing the Paris Agreement6 ; stresses that the EU and the other developed countries must continue to support climate action to reduce emissions and build resilience to climate change impacts in developing countries; recalls the crucial importance of the provision of adequate climate finance in this context; supports the process of EU energy transition and the shift towards renewable energy in this regard; welcomes the proposal to mainstream environmental concerns into development cooperation programmes; __________________ 6 https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop2 1/eng/l09r01.pdf
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 118 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls for determined action from the EU and governments at all levels in implementing the Paris Agreement6 ; stresses that the EU and the other developed countries must continue to support climate action to reduce emissions and build resilience to climate change impacts in developing countries; recalls the crucial importance of the provision of adequate climate finance in this context; __________________ 6 https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop2 1/eng/l09r01.pdf
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 133 #

2015/2317(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Calls on the EU to strengthen its capacities for crisis prevention and to reinforce the synergies between the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) and development instruments, finding a balance between short-term responses to crises and longer-term development strategies; suggests that creating a new instrument dedicated to the development-security nexus might limit incoherencies and increase the efficiency of PCD; calls for the inclusion of governmental and civil society actors' concerns, priorities and policies of the regions and countries concerned into the elaboration of EU strategies for security and development;
2016/03/09
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 1 #

2015/2316(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that migration is a human right enshrined in Article 13 of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights; urges the Commission and, the EU Member States and the international community to respect this article and all otherthe relevant international obligations concerning refugees and migrants, and to recognise the contribution that refugees and migrants make to our societies; considers that forced migration has root causes (notably economic, political and social reasons) that must be tackled; underlines the need for urgent action to address all human rights violations faced by migrants, which are most acute in situations of pressure due to security challenges and natural disasters; stresses that the EU and its Member States must lead by example in the promotion and the protection of the human rights of migrants, notably within its own borders, in order to be credible when discussing migration and human rights in third countries;
2016/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 6 #

2015/2316(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes the integration of migration into the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), namely in SDG 10, which sets the framework for global development policy until 2030; recalls that the States committed to cooperate internationally to ‘ensure safe, orderly and regular migration involving full respect for human rights and the humane treatment of migrants regardless of migration status, of refugees and of displaced persons’; notes that forced displacement is not only a humanitarian issue but also a development challenge, therefore there should be a better coordination between humanitarian and developmental actors; considers that the implementation of the SDGs is an opportunity to reinforce a rights-based approach in the asylum and migration policies and to mainstream migration into development strategies; calls on the international community to adopt measurable indicators of the SDGs on migration, as well as to collect and publish disaggregated data on migrants access to decent work, healthcare and education, especially in developing destination countries, in order to improve migration governance;
2016/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 7 #

2015/2316(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Warns that the human rights of third- country migrants are systematically violated in the EU, at its borders and in its partner countries; stresses that this happens particularly in detention centres, and that migrants are often victims of deportation, illegal refoulement, and violations of their rights to health and education;deleted
2016/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 16 #

2015/2316(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the EU and its Member States to assume their responsibilities with respect to forced migration and human rights viRecognises the complexity of the ‘development-migration nexus’, without denying that development can help mitigate forced migration by increasing development cooperation, improving capacity-building, supporting conflict resolautions and promoting third countries, and to address the root causes both of human rights violations in third countries and of forced migration from third countries to Europee respect of human rights; considers that development aid should address effectively the root causes of migration, either economic, political, social or environmental; stresses that development assistance programmes should not be used for purely migration and border management purposes; notes that EU development policy main objective should be the eradication of poverty;
2016/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 21 #

2015/2316(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recognises the positive contribution of refugees and migrants to our societies, benefiting destination countries, transit countries, countries of origin - amongst which developing countries; calls on the EU and the international community to identify specific actions that governments can take to amplify the potential of legal migration as a development enabler; stresses that political leadership and strong advocacy are required, especially in destination countries, to combat xenophobia and to facilitate the social integration of migrants;
2016/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 22 #

2015/2316(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Recalls that the majority of the world’s refugees and migrants are being hosted by developing countries; recognises the efforts carried out by third countries in the reception of migrants and refugees; stresses that the support systems of these countries face critical challenges which may cause severe threats to the protection of a growing displaced population; calls on the EU to pursue policy coherence and to use various policy instruments in its relations with developing countries in order to promote human rights and the rights of migrants, especially of women and children who are particularly vulnerable to violence, trafficking and abuse; in this regard, calls on the EU and its Member States to systematically incorporate migration issues as a component of development programmes and in the political dialogue with third countries, as well as to provide technical assistance to improve national and local-level migrant integration policies, always ensuring the proper involvement of NGOs and civil society;
2016/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 25 #

2015/2316(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Urges the EU to integrate the migration dimension in the post-Cotonou framework which will define the future relations between the EU and ACP countries; notes that a greater involvement of third countries in the design and negotiation of GAMM instruments would enhance the ‘partnership’ nature of these instruments, improving their local ownership and their efficiency;
2016/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 26 #

2015/2316(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 d (new)
3d. Asks the Commission to enhance the transparency and flexibility of the EU Emergency Trust Fund for Africa and calls on EU Member States to contribute, at least at the same level as the Commission, to this Fund; underlines that it is essential to make sure, through proper monitoring and evaluation of the programmes, that the Trust Fund serves its purpose, namely helping those in need, fighting bad governance, corruption and promoting the rule of law in African countries;
2016/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 28 #

2015/2316(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Condemns the negative effects of activities by EU multinationals and of EU trade policies in third countries, such as general impoverishment and the systematic violation of human rights through the exploitation of these countries’ human and natural resources; calls on the Commission to urgently present and implement a legally binding international instrument on business activities in third countries and human rights;deleted
2016/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 32 #

2015/2316(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Condemns the use of development funds to finance migration policies, and rejects any instrumentalisation of development cooperation agreements aimed at imposing migration, trade and economic policies in third countries and interfering in their internal affairs and economic planning;deleted
2016/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 37 #

2015/2316(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the EU to put an urgent end to any form of migration agreement with third countries in which governments violate human rights;deleted
2016/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 38 #

2015/2316(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the link between military interventions by EU Member States in third countries and the increase in human rights violations and forced migration; calls on the Commission to present and implement a legally binding regulation that forbids any arms trade with countries in conflict or in which human rights are violadeleted;
2016/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 40 #

2015/2316(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls for the cancellation of the exInsists that sustainable debt solutions, including standards for responsible lending and borrowing, must be facilitated through a multilaternal debt of impoverished countries, as such debt makes it impossible for their governments to develop public policies that guarantee respect for human rights. legal framework for sovereign debt restructuring processes, with a view to alleviating the debt burden and avoiding unsustainable debt in order to create the conditions for the protection of human rights in the long term;
2016/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 14 #

2015/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the increasingly dangerous and challenging security environment within and outside the Union, characterised by terrorist attackshe most serious security challenges since the end of the Cold War ranging from conventional military threats to hybrid warfare and mass murderymmetric threats which no Member State can cope with alone, calls for the strengthening of the EU’s security and defence policy to make it a more effective policy instrument and a real guarantee of the safety of EU citizens and the promotion of European interests and values;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 21 #

2015/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B
B. whereas the Union needs to contribute to the fight against terrorismsecurity challenges at home and abroad, including by supporting third countries in combating therrorism; whereas the Union needs to make its external borders more secure;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 40 #

2015/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas space capabilities for European security and defence are appropriate for a range of situations, ranging from day-to- day peacetime use to crisis management and even full-scale warfaremore acute security challenges ; whereas the development of such capabilities is a long- term venture; whereas the development of future capabilities needs to be programmed when current capabilities are being deployed;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 45 #

2015/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas in the area of defence and security the Union acts among others through such institutions as the European Defence Agency and the EU Satellite Centre;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 60 #

2015/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that space-based capabilities and services play a key role, among other areas, in the context of European security and defence; is convinced that current and future space- based capabilities and services will provide Member States and the Union with improved operational capacity for the implementation of the common security and defence policy and of other EU policies in areas such as external action, border management, maritime security, agriculture, the environment, climate action, energy security, disaster management, humanitarian aid and transport;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 66 #

2015/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that the Union should improve space-based communication, situational awareness, precision navigation and Earth observation capabilities, and ensure European non-dependence as regards critical space technologies and access to space; underlines the commitment for non-militarisation of the space;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 76 #

2015/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that the Union’s space policy promotes scientific and technical progress, industrial competitiveness and the implementation of all EU policies, including security and defence policy; invites the Council, the VP/HR and the Commission to ensure that European space programmes develop space-based capabilities and services with relevance for European security and defence;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 83 #

2015/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Considers a holistic, integrated and long- term approach to the space sector at an EU level to be necessary; believes that the space sector should be one of the priorities for the new EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy, bearing in mind the need to develop EU civil space programmes that can be used for both civil and militarysecurity and defence purposes;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 91 #

2015/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that cooperation between the Commission, the European External Action Service, the European Defence Agency, the European Space Agency and the Member States is crucial to improving European space capabilities and services; takes the view that the Union, namely the VP/HR, should coordinate, facilitate and support such cooperation in the area of security and defence; express its conviction that the European Space Agency should play a significant role in the implementation of security and defence policy;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 94 #

2015/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Recognises the crucial nature of the relationship between the Union and the European Space Agency; is convinced that the European Space Agency should play a significant role in the implementation of security and defence policy; invites the VP/HR to coordinate and advance the necessary initiatives and efforts to this end;deleted
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 112 #

2015/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Is convinced that the EU-USNATO relationship in the field of security and defence policy should be further developed; considers that EU-UStransatlantic cooperation on future space-based capabilities and services for security and defence purposes would be mutually beneficial; notes the work undertaken towards the third US Offset Strategy; calls for increased cooperation with the Japan Space Agency; urges the Union to take this development into account when preparing its own Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy, and to include space-based capabilities for security and defence within the remit of that strategy; invites the VP/HR to discuss with defence ministers the strategic approach to be taken, and to inform Parliament as that debate unfolds;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 122 #

2015/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Recalls the need for stronger cooperation between the EU and NATO in the area of security and defence; is convincedExpresses its conviction that EU-NATO cooperation should cover the building of resilience by the two bodies and in conjunction with our neighbours, as well as defence investment; considers that cooperation on space-based capabilities and services offers prospects for improving compatibility and synergy between the two frameworks; is convinced that this would also strengthen NATO's role in security and defence policy and in collective defence;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 141 #

2015/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. Considers that the EU programmes in the space domain that provide capabilities and services relevant to the Union's security and defence policy, including the next stages of evolution of the Copernicus and Galileo systems, need to takeshould take the eventual security- and defence- related requirements into account from their inception; considers that space situational awareness, satellite communication, electronic intelligence and early warning are areas in need of EU-level cooperation in the public and private sectors, continuous investment by, and support for, agencies in the space, security and defence fields, such as the European Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) Agency;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 157 #

2015/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Remains cautiouExpresses its deep concerns about the risks associated with privatisation of the space sector;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 170 #

2015/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Expresses its concerns about the increased cost of the Copernicus and Galileo programmes far beyond the initial budgetary allocations; express its support for the further development of the EU space capabilities while asking for an adequate management of the financial resources;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 180 #

2015/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Considers that the Union should encourage all actors in the technology and know-how supply chains to turn their attention to space- based capabilities and servidual use technologies with relevances for security and defence, and should promote the development of innovative applications and new business ideas in this area, with a particular focus on small and medium- sized companies and on developing entrepreneurship in this sector; calls for a plan for the use of dual-use space technologies in the space sector, aimed at contributing to the development of the European militarydefence industry and to greater competition;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 188 #

2015/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Is convinced that EU-level investments in security and defence capabilities foster greater and more systematic European defence cooperation with a view to delivering key capabilities; welcomes, therefore, the European Council conclusions of June 2015; urges the Council, the VP/HR and the Commission to develop the necessary framework for EU-level funding;deleted
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 195 #

2015/2276(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Takes the view that an EU-level 'white book' on security and defence would be the appropriate means of structuring future EU engagement and investment in space-based security and defence capabilities; takes the view that this would also allow coherent development across all capability domains in relation to peace-keeping, conflict prevention and strengthening international security, in accordance with the principles of the United Nations Charter, and the progressive framing of a common EU defence policy;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 32 #

2015/2275(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Recalls that sexual violence is used as a weapon of war in many conflict areas; stresses that women and girls are especially vulnerable during conflicts; underlines their need for protection, supported by trained armed forces, who are respecting human rights.
2016/02/25
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 4 #

2015/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the aim of the new EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy to be comprehensive, enhance coherence between internal and external policies and improve coordination between institutions and with Member States; recalls in this context the Treaty obligation to consider Policy Coherence for Development (PCD) and minimiseto avoid contradictions between development and non-development policies that have an impact on developing countries; calls on the Member States therefore to establish and consolidate systems of coordination between respective Ministries and to further involve national Parliaments in the PCD agenda, and calls on the EU to reinforce a coordination mechanism for identifying the potential implications of policies on development objectives, integrating development aspects into policy initiatives from the outset and introducing a more systematic measurement of impacts and progress as regards PCD;
2016/02/04
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 8 #

2015/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Underlines that the realisation of the Sustainable development cooperation goals – in particular those of promoting good governance, human rights and gender equality, democracy and justice, combating poverty, reducing inequalities and social exclusion, tackling unemployment and barriers to economic growth, and improving health and education – all contributes to addressing the root causes of recent security and migration challenges; stresses in this context that in order to address the security-development nexus properly, dedicated mechanisms with flexibleharmonized financing must be developedshould be envisaged without jeopardizing and decreasing financing for development in favour of security;
2016/02/04
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 22 #

2015/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Supports the idea of redefining the EU relationship with Africa by upgrading the principle of good governance as annd human rights as essential elements of the post- Cotonou agreement and by building stronger links between EU development, trade, security and migration policies for mutual reinforcement; reiterates its call for budgetisation of the European Development Fund; calls for a fair and ambitious post-2020 EU-ACP partnership that better focuses on common challenges and interests and that is better adapted to make a real change to the security and prosperity of both parties.
2016/02/04
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 23 #

2015/2272(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Believes it is important to enhance the role of developing countries in international fora, such as the UN, in order to ensure a fairer representation of interest.
2016/02/04
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 1 #

2015/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that around 15 % of the world’s population, or an estimated 1 billion people, live with disabilities and 80% of these people live in low-income countries; underlines that 50 % of disabilities are preventable and directly linked to poverty and also that an estimated 98 % of children with disabilities in the developing world do not attend school;
2016/04/26
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 2 #

2015/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Underlines the fact that poverty is both a cause and a consequence of disability and that poverty is a barrier to accessing basic social services, such as nutrition, health, water and sanitation, and this can lead to disability;
2016/04/26
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 4 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas the increasingly volatilechallenging security environment calls for a strengthening of the CSDP to make it a more effective policy instrument, a real guarantee for the safety of EU citizens and for the promotion of European interests and values;
2015/03/03
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 4 #

2015/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1 b. Underlines the fact that persons with disabilities may face additional disability- related costs, higher rates of unemployment and lower incomes, which can put them and their families at higher risk of financial hardship;
2016/04/26
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 5 #

2015/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1 c. Underlines the fact that exclusion from education may lead to lower employment and earning potential among people with disabilities, making these individuals and their families more vulnerable to poverty and limiting national economic growth;
2016/04/26
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 6 #

2015/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1 d. Underlines the fact that inability to access and receive appropriate timely health care may result in continuously poor or worsening levels of functioning among people with disabilities, including the development of additional disabling conditions that lead to higher personal and societal medical and productivity costs in the long term;
2016/04/26
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 8 #

2015/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 f (new)
1 f. Underlines the fact that on-going conflicts and natural disasters are also contributing factors to the growing numbers of persons with disabilities;
2016/04/26
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 10 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas the European Council of December 2013 decided to examine the financial aspects of EU missions and operations, including the review of the Athena mechanism, in order to ensure that procedures and rules enable the Union to be faster, more flexible and efficient in the deployment of EU civilian missions and military operations;
2015/03/03
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 12 #

2015/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that significant progress has been achieved by the EU regarding the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) but that, as stated by the CRPD Committee, there is still a lot to do in terms of inequality, unemployment and education; also expresses concern regarding sexual violence and other forms of abuse of womens against people with disabilities, in particular women and childrens;
2016/04/26
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 15 #

2015/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Stresses the fact that any actions of information, awareness and training represent a fundamental element in order to implement the CRPD Convention;
2016/04/26
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 27 #

2015/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Calls the EU to take the lead on the promotion of the rights of persons with disabilities in the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction and of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development with its partner countries, regional organisations and at the global level;
2016/04/26
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 28 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Notes with concern that despite a combined yearly defence budget of some EUR 190 billion, the Member States are still unable to meet the 1999 Helsinki Headline Goals; recalls the ambitious civilian headline goals set by the EU; calls for the EU to be strengthened as an real actor in defence, and regrets the lack of a clear military doctrine which operationalises the tasks listed in Article 43 TEU (the expanded ‘Petersberg tasks’); strongly advocates closer security and defence coordination and cooperation between Member States and at EU level, in particular pooling and sharing of resources, capabilities and assets;
2015/03/03
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 29 #

2015/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5 c. Recommends the fact that the EU take the lead on disability-inclusive implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and establish a work plan and a mid-term review of the work plan in order to guarantee a monitoring and evaluation mechanism and ensure EU accountability;
2016/04/26
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 30 #

2015/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 d (new)
5 d. Stresses the fact that EU should ensure that all EU funded programmes and projects promote, protect and uphold the rights of persons with disabilities and are compliant with the articles of the UN CRPD;
2016/04/26
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 31 #

2015/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 e (new)
5 e. Underlines the necessity to establish mechanisms to collect and monitor disaggregated data by disability, sex, age and other characteristics and that the EU should implement such mechanisms in all EU funded projects and setup a clear timetable for producing disaggregated data across all its programmes;
2016/04/26
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 32 #

2015/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 f (new)
5 f. Stresses the importance that persons with disabilities and their representative organisations should be regularly consulted and participate in decision- making with EU institutions;
2016/04/26
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 33 #

2015/2258(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 g (new)
5 g. Underlines the importance to give a special support to the persons with disabilities in post emergency situations;
2016/04/26
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 39 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the concrete measures and pragmatic solutions introduced recently by the Commission within the existing framework of financial rules in order to shorten financial procedures; deplores, however, the still significant delays in procuring essential equipment and services to the missions under the CSDP, partially due to the often slow process of adopting decisions by the Council, to a very bureaucratic system of procurement, but also to a certain lack of flexibility of the financial rules, and the resulting negative effect on the missions’ functioning; recalls that the Court of Auditors already criticised this in its 2012 Special Report on the EU assistance to Kosovo related to the rule of law;
2015/03/03
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 46 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Urges the Commission to mitigate these shortfalls, and to propose the necessary adaptations to financial rules for civilian CSDP missions, in order to facilitate the rapid and, flexible and more efficient conduct of missions, while guaranteeing sound financial management of the EU resources and an adequate protection of the Union’s financial interests; takes the view that the budget implementation powers should be delegated to the Civilian Operation Commander, in the same way that has been done for Heads of EU Delegations;
2015/03/03
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 54 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Believes that the chronic constraints of the EEAS/Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability’s administrative budget should be fast alleviated, as the yearly budget allocation remains too small to cater for all planning, conduct and support tasks, notably when more missions are launched almost simultaneously;
2015/03/03
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 56 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Takes the view that the permanent CSDP Warehouse, which currently only serves new CSDP civilian missions, should quickly be upgraded by enlarging its scope to include existing missions and by improving the availability of stored equipment, and enlarge, as well, the diversity of the necessary equipment, and that it should be managed by the future SSC;
2015/03/03
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 67 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Calls for better military-civilian synergies where appropriate, notably in the areas of planning and coordination, logistics, transport and the security of missions, while respecting the different chains of command and the different nature of civilian and military missions;
2015/03/03
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 73 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Welcomes the review of Crisis Management Procedures (CMP) agreed in 2013, as it led to improvements in the planning and launching of CSDP missions; stresses, however, that much more needs to be done to overcome the persistent ‘silos’ separating different parts of the EU foreign policy machinery;
2015/03/03
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 87 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Acknowledges that military operations are financed by the Member States outside the EU budget and that their common costs are covered by the Athena mechanism; underlines that Athena is crucial to the fast deployment of those operations and is an instrument of solidarity between Member States, as well as a major incentive, notably for those lacking financial resources, to contribute to CSDP operations; regrets, however, that the proportion of the common costs remains very low (estimated at around 10-15 % of all costs) and that the ‘costs lie where they fall’ outdated principle further deters Member States from taking an active part and leads to delays or even complete blockages in decision-making; finds that the long-term, better financing of military missions should be ensured;
2015/03/03
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 107 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Recalls that the Lisbon Treaty provides the EU with new CSDP provisions which are yet untapped; encourages the Council to make use of Article 44 TEU, enabling a group of willing Member States to go ahead with the implementation of a CSDP task; considers the urgent need for a faster decision making process; takes the view that the ad hoc funding mechanisms for a military operation should cover more than the traditional common costs reimbursed by Athena;
2015/03/03
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 113 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Calls on the Council to initiate as soon as possible the setting-up of the start-up fund (foreseen by Article 41(3) TEU) for the urgent and rapid financing of the initial phases of military operations, which could also serve as a strong tool for capacity development; notes that, while civilian missions benefit from a dedicated budget for preparatory measures, the deployment and efficiency of military missions will remain structurally hindered as long as this possibility is not used; strongly encourages Member States to engage in the permanent structured cooperation provided for by Article 46 TEU, which would also considerably strengthen the EU rapid reaction capability;
2015/03/03
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 127 #

2015/2258(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Takes the view that the next European Council on defence should not waste an opportunity to have a deep discussion and produce concrete proposals on reforming the financial arrangements for CSDP missions and operations; in order to make them more efficient, more successful urges the Member States to deliver on the commitments undertaken at the European Council of December 2013;
2015/03/03
Committee: AFETBUDG
Amendment 1 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that EU trade and investment policies are interlinked with EU development policies and have an impact on developing countries; calls for the Commission to respect the principle of Policy Coherence for Development in all trade negotiations; stresses the need to focus on the effective implementation and monitoring of the sustainable development chapters in trade agreements, in line with the Sustainable Development Goalat TiSA should incorporate the principles of Aid for Trade strategy; emphasises that the economic prosperity of the EU cannot be detrimental to that of other countries, particularly to the social and economic condition of developing countries;
2015/11/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 15 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. UrgesWelcomes the present efforts of the EU to increase transparency of its trade agreements; urges, however, the Commission to increase transparency and democratic accountability on the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) negotiation process, and on all trade policies, by duly taking into account concerns expressed by trade unions and civil society organisations, including the CSOs of developing countries;
2015/11/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 26 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Rejects TiSA and other macro-trade agreements on the basis that they are a tool to bypass multilateral and democratic fora in which developing countries are properly represented in order to set global standards; recalls that TiSA, contrary to the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), does not currently have special and differential treatment provisions; urges the Commission to immediately propose such a clause based on GATS Article IV; reiterates the need for a strengthened multilateral approach to global trade that is to be achieved by means of an intensified cooperation between the EU and international bodies such as UNCTAD, G20, WTO and the World Bank;
2015/11/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 33 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. RecCalls TiSA’s risks of increasing asymmetric international trade relations between countrieson the Commission to take into account the impact of TiSA on countries that are not part of the agreement, especially developing countries; stresses that to mitigate any potentially negative effects, the EU should intensify its actions to include developing countries into global value chains in services, and to consider a more flexible approach for developing countries when subscribing to the level of ambition of the agreement;
2015/11/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 44 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Rejects TiSA and other macro-trade deals, taking the view that they are a tool for the privatisation of public services and liberalisation of public procurement, such public services and public procurement being key elements for sustainable development and for ensuring respect fCalls on the Commission to explicitly exclude public services from TiSA, regardless of how the services are funded, organised or opeople’s dignity; askrated; invites the Commission to respect the policy space of developing countries’ governments and parliaments to take decisions in order to ensure internationally agreed standards on labour, the environment and human rightsupport and monitor the capacity-building of developing countries in providing sustainable and efficient public services;
2015/11/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 54 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls the Commission to mainstream gender equality and women’s empowerment in its trade policy and to consider the negative impact that TiSA and other trade agreements may have in this respect in developing countries, in light of existing concerns, closely monitor the impact of EU trade agreements on gender equality;
2015/11/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 60 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls the primacy of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union over TiSA and any other international treaty negotiated by the EU, and calls on the Court of Justice of the European Union to effectively guarantee this juridical supremacy;deleted
2015/11/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 66 #

2015/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Recalls Uruguay’s decision to withdrawInvites the Commission to reflect on the recent withdrawal of Uruguay from the TiSA negotiations on the basis of concerns that TiSA could threaten the country’s policand to draw the necessary conclusions by space on strategic sectors and services; urges the Commission to take this withdrawal into serious considerationying more attention to the needs of developing countries which are subscribing to TiSA.
2015/11/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 24 #

2015/2229(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Encourages the Member States and the EU to really implement a HRBA approach in their development policies and aid, for example by emphasising the importance of human rights, good governance and democracy in budget and sector support dialogues and to ensure democratic ownership, participation of civil society and transparency and accountability of development aid; underlines that, particularly in countries which have poor records both in development and respect for human rights, development aid should be maintained and even strengthened, but should preferably be channelled through civil society organisations and non- governmental local partners, and be systematically monitored, along with governmental commitments to improve the human rights situation on the ground;
2015/10/21
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 46 #

2015/2229(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the EU and its delegations to increase their political dialogue with governments in breach of human rights, democracy and the rule of the law, and insists that the political dialogue on human rights between the EU and third countries must cover a more inclusive and comprehensive definition of non- discrimination, inter alia on the basis of religion or belief, sex, racial or ethnic origin, age, disability, sexual orientation and gender identity.; encourages the EU to consolidate its basic value of solidarity and full respect for human rights, both home and abroad;
2015/10/21
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 50 #

2015/2229(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Urges the Commission and the Member States to ensure that human rights are genuinely protected in the remit of any trade and investment agreements concluded or revised, through binding and non-negotiable human rights clauses; insists that the Commission conducts systematic human rights impact assessments of trade and investment agreements to help ensure effective enforcement of human rights;
2015/10/21
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 54 #

2015/2229(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Stresses the need to link security, development and human rights, as illustrated by the chaotic situations faced by many regions in EU's neighbourhood or vicinity, such as Middle-east, Horn of Africa, North Africa, Sahel, Western and Central Africa;
2015/10/21
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 55 #

2015/2229(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Encourages the EU Annual Report on Human Rights to dedicate more importance to the role of development cooperation;
2015/10/21
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 17 #

2015/2203(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Underlines the importance of continuously improving the impact assessment of development cooperation and humanitarian aid projects funded through EU external financial instruments; emphasises the need for an in-depth, accurate and global analysis of the different monitoring and reporting arrangements to avoid any mismanagement, lack of transparency and misappropriation of EU funds;
2016/01/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 26 #

2015/2189(DEC)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Concludes that EIOPA’s mixed financing arrangement is inflexible, burdensome and a potential threat to its independence, especially when 60% of its budget is financed by the competent national supervisory authorities; therefore calls on the Commission to reconsider the financing arrangement in favour of an independent budget line from the budget of the Union and the introduction of fees by market participants.
2016/01/19
Committee: ECON
Amendment 5 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Takes note of the 2014 EIB Annualctivity Report and the increase by 6.92% to EUR 80.3 billion in the EIB Group’s lending; is very concerned at the increasingbout still very high unemployment, inequality and poverty levels, as well as weak investment in Europe and the continuous uncertainty in the financial markets, also in view of a worsening global economic outlook;
2015/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 18 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Regrets that overall EU investment in 2013 decreased by 13% compared with the pre- crisis period with investment in some countries decreasing 25% and even by as much as 60% in others, creating a dangerous investment imbalance in the EU; is of the opinion that this constitutes a major challenge for the EIB Group and will require extraordinary efforts from its side for the years to come, as part of an overall EU effort to implement a renewed long-term strategy for sustainable, convergent and inclusive growth;
2015/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 27 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes the urgent need for an increase in EIB lending activityGroup investment activity, including innovative financial instruments with greater additional risk-bearing capacity, and for the improvement of its activity in line with Protocol (No 28) on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion;
2015/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 43 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls on the EIB Group to re-examine its strategic planning programme, given the high degree of concentration of funding for the four biggest economies in the EU accounting for more than 45%, and the disproportionate rise in unemployment levels and investment gaps in some other countries which remains at alarming levels, and which could hamper economic convergence in the EU and further damage growth prospects and social cohesion in specific countries and regions in the EU;
2015/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 60 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Takes note ofWelcomes the establishment of the European Fund for Strategic Investment (EFSI) and emphasises the need for the EFSI to function in an effective, transparent and fair way, to honour fully the requirement of additionality, and to take into account that priority should be given to projects in strategic sectors, countries in adjustment programmewhere investment gaps have widened most during the economic crisis and regions which have difficulties in attracting funding because of their high risk environment; their geographical or historical disadvantage translates into a higher high risk profile in an economic environment marked by uncertainty; Regrets the selection procedure used to appoint the Managing Director and the Deputy Managing Director and stresses the need to finalise as soon as possible the inter-institutional agreement between the EIB and the Parliament on reporting and on the selection procedure for both positions;
2015/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 69 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Urges the EIB Group to develop an increased focus on economic and labour market resilience in the context of technological changes, environmental constraints, globalisation and demographic trends; calls on it to prioritise investment operations with high potential in terms of job creation and environmental sustainability, particularly in areas of greatest need, and to expand its cooperation with other development banks in this direction;
2015/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 70 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Calls on the EIB Group to consider strengthening non-financial criteria in its project assessment models, giving greater weight to projects' contribution to sustainable and inclusive development and cohesion in line with Protocol (No 28) on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion, while aiming at maximum transparency;
2015/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 87 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the EIB to refrain from cooperating with financial partners with a negative track record and to enforce prevention measures against tax havens, fraud and evasion as well as aggressive tax avoidance; calls for these prevention measures to include ensuring that no EIB funding can go to ultimate beneficiaries or financial intermediaries which make use of tax havens or harmful tax practices;
2015/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 88 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the EIB Group to refrain from cooperating with financial partners with a negative track record, particularly in the field of corporate taxation, and to enforce prevention measures against tax havens, tax fraud and tax evasion as well as aggressive tax avoidance; requests a list of outstanding EIB Group transactions involving counterparts established in jurisdictions featuring on the Commission's list of "top 30" tax havens around the world;
2015/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 91 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the EIB to adopt an effective and up-to-date Responsible Taxation Policy, to be overseen by a Tax Unit and detailed within an Annual Tax Report; calls for this policy to include regular country tax assessments in order to identify problematic jurisdictions; calls for this policy to involve the EIB actively using its relocation clause and systematically publishing the domicile of funds which benefit from EIB support, as well as the domicile of the ultimate beneficiaries of the funds if they are supported by financial intermediaries;
2015/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 112 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the EIB Group to further enhance transparency and access to information both internafor the Parliament and other EU institutions as welly ands for the public, especially regarding the selection, monitoring and evaluation of activities and programmes;
2015/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 127 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Requests the EIB to increase its reporting to Parliament regarding its decisions, progress achieved and the impact of its lending activities within and outside the EU; requests that this include regular reports to the European Parliament and other stakeholders on the implementation of its Non-Compliant Jurisdiction Policy, including the number of applications which have been turned down for failing to comply with this policy, as well as the number of relocations which have been requested and implemented.
2015/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 128 #

2015/2127(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Requests the EIB Group to increase its reporting to Parliament regarding its decisions, progress achieved and the impact of its lending activities within and outside the EU; calls on the EIB Group to engage in deeper dialogue with the Parliament on all its activities within the same scheme for reporting and accountability as set out in the EFSI regulation and to fully comply with the spirit and letter of the EFSI regulation, notably concerning inter-institutional cooperation with the Parliament.
2015/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 6 #

2015/2112(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that climate change poses a major threat to poor and least developed countries (LDCs); stresses that failure to limit global warming to 2°C maywill undermine development gains;
2015/07/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 8 #

2015/2112(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that climate change poses a major threat to poor and least developed countries (LDCs); stresses that failure to limit global warming to 2°C may undermine development gains; and acknowledges that whereas the Paris agreement aims to put the world on a course for not more than a 2°C warming scenario; a 2°C warming scenario will still bring significant loss and damage to environment and communities and more than this will bring catastrophic effects;
2015/07/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 9 #

2015/2112(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Draws attention to the recent Adaptation Gap report produced by UNEP which estimates that the cost of adapting to climate change in Africa alone, even assuming international efforts keep global warming below 2°C this century, will rise to US$50 billion per year by 2050. Considers that even if all cost- effective adaptation is realised, there will be further ‘residual’ damages where adaptation is no longer possible. Recognises that these residual damages will double the adaptation costs in the period 2030-2050;
2015/07/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 23 #

2015/2112(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that in order to reduce GHG emissions in developing countries, it is necessary to put in place mechanisms that would increase the use of efficient, alternative energy sources and industrial capacities with zero or low carbon footprint;
2015/07/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 50 #

2015/2112(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Expects the European Commission to assume a pro-active role in negotiations; calls on it to make it clear that the climate challenge is the top strategic priority to this Commission and to organise itself in a way which reflects this, at all levels and across all policy areas.
2015/07/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 52 #

2015/2112(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Calls for a commitment for an allocation of climate finance towards supporting development goals that are at risk of being undermined by climate change, with particular reference to the food security objectives as laid out in the Millennium Development Goals and reiterated in the Post 2015 development Agenda.
2015/07/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 53 #

2015/2112(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 d (new)
7d. Calls on major developed economies to harness their existing advanced infrastructure to promote, enhance and develop sustainable growth and to commit to support developing countries to build their own capacity to help ensure future economic growth in all parts of the world is achieved at no further cost to the environment.
2015/07/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 54 #

2015/2112(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 e (new)
7e. Calls on the EU and its Member States to clearly define the role of private finance in the context of additional leverage of funding, while recognising that this cannot replace the need for public finance, in particular for adaptation, to emphasise the need for transparent reporting and accountability of such finance and to ensure the implementation of relevant social and environmental safeguards;
2015/07/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 55 #

2015/2112(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 f (new)
7f. Calls on the EU to help settle ongoing discussions around additionality of climate finance to development aid and to stop the diversion of existing aid to climate finance by providing guarantees to developing countries that climate finance that qualifies as ODA will be part of an overall ODA budget that is rising at least at the same rate. Calls for a robust monitoring and accountability framework for effective follow-up of the implementation of climate finance commitments and objectives to help provide clarity on these issues;
2015/07/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 56 #

2015/2112(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 g (new)
7g. Stresses the importance of the role that the Development Community, OECD and OECD DAC should play in working closely with stakeholders and relevant organisation to assess and mitigate the worst human impacts of climate change, which are expected to be challenging even below a 2°C warming level.
2015/07/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 57 #

2015/2112(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 h (new)
7h. Recalls the principle of EU Policy Coherence in this, the European Year for Development, which seeks to take account of development objectives in all policies that are likely to affect developing countries and therefore calls on negotiators to aim with their COP strategy to minimise contradictions and ensure synergy between the EU negotiating position and different EU policies to benefit developing countries and increase the effectiveness of development cooperation.
2015/07/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 58 #

2015/2112(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 i (new)
7i. Highlights the importance of policy scrutiny to ensure that policies aimed at mitigating climate change do not inadvertently undermine communities rights to land, water and food; such as in the case of biofuels.
2015/07/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 59 #

2015/2112(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 j (new)
7j. Recognises and proposes action on the implications of high carbon food sources and related agricultural emissions, such as methane and nitrous oxide; Also calls for action on deforestation arising from change of land use for feed and pasture with an aim to avoid emissions associated with food source markets. Calls for action to be taken to raise awareness of the climate impacts of high impact food production methods and to help businesses and people change behaviour. Demands that side measures, including action on curbing food waste should be part of national mitigation plans, especially in those countries with higher than average levels of consumption;
2015/07/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 60 #

2015/2112(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 k (new)
7k. Recalls the importance of monitoring, reporting and reducing maritime and air transport GHG emission reductions, and the need for swift progress and ambition in reaching satisfactory and timely outcomes before 2016, on the part of both the International Maritime Organisation and the International Civil Aviation Organisation, in line with the scale and urgency of the climate challenge; calls for dedicating revenues derived from these to post-2020 international climate finance and the Green Climate Fund;
2015/07/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 61 #

2015/2112(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 l (new)
7l. Considers that while Less Developed Countries and Small Island Developing States have contributed the least to climate change, they are disproportionately affected by the adverse consequences and are often in a lesser position to mitigate and adapt to these changing conditions. Calls therefore for a strong focus in the Paris agreement for supporting adaptation and mitigation measures for Less Developed Countries through technology transfer and finance.
2015/07/10
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 4 #

2015/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that organised crime has a transnational dimension and encompasses a various range of criminal activities including drug trafficking, smuggling of migrants, money-laundering, trafficking in counterfeit goods, firearms, wildlife and cultural property; highlights the need for a joint action based on accessible information and increased cooperation between the police and the judicial authorities of various Member States and developing countries, which should be assisted by ad hoc joint coordination bodies;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 5 #

2015/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Notes that the costs of corruption cannot only be calculated in economic terms, and that these costs are very high, especially in developing countries, which undermines public trust in public authorities and democratic institutions, increases inequalities that disproportionately affect the poorest and most vulnerable, and reduces the effectiveness of development aid;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 8 #

2015/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Recalls that illicit financial flows, estimated at $1 trillion a year, are major obstacles to the mobilisation of domestic revenue for development, and drain resources that should be invested in developing countries;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 10 #

2015/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Recalls that the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development recognises the need to fight corruption in all its forms, calling on States to reduce illicit financial flows, bribery and corruption and to build effective, accountable and transparent institutions;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 11 #

2015/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Calls on the Commission to develop a comprehensive strategy for corruption risk management in developing countries and to implement fully the anti-fraud strategy issued in 2013, especially when implementing EU aid in all its modalities, including the EDF and trust funds, and when delegating development projects to third parties;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 12 #

2015/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 e (new)
1e. Calls on the EU to support the establishment of strong national systems and institutions to address corruption in developing countries, including central and local government systems, tax authorities, law enforcement agencies, but also NGOs, media and parliaments; stresses that budget support to developing countries should be accompanied by a clear strategy to minimise corruption risks;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 22 #

2015/2110(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Stresses that whistleblowing is an essential anti-corruption tool, and that a proper system to protect whistleblowers should be established both inside and outside the EU; stresses in particular a direct reporting mechanisms is needed for citizens in EU aid recipient countries who bring attention to irregularities in EU- funded aid programmes;
2016/04/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 5 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Emphasises that open trade ismust be an engine for growth, development and wealth creation and sustainable development; recalls that the countries most integrated into the world economy are also among the richest;
2016/02/22
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 14 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that the importance of the potential contribution of trade policy to sustainable development was recently reaffirmed in the Addis Ababa outcome document and in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; recalls that the Sustainable Development Goals include several trade-related targets across a number of policy areas;
2016/02/22
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 15 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Welcomes that the communication "Trade for All" reaffirms the principle of policy coherence for development and aims at 'a more responsible' trade and investment policy, namely by contributing to the SDGs and the inclusive growth in developing countries; welcomes also the commitment to undertake in-depth analysis of the potential effects of new FTAs on LDCs; urges the Commission to put its words into action and to make all EU trade-related instruments consistent with the SDGs;
2016/02/22
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 25 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Welcomes the advances made at the World Trade Organisation's Ministerial Conference in Nairobi, in particular in the area of agriculture (e.g. the elimination of trade-distorting agriculture export subsidies, and progress on market access for the least developed countries (LDCs)); calls on the Commission to support developing and LDCs in the implementation of the Agreement on Trade Facilitation and welcomes, in this regard, EU's initiative of targeting EUR 400 million in funding over five years for supporting trade facilitation reforms and projects such as improving the customs systems of developing and LDCs;
2016/02/22
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 32 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls on the Commission to enforce supply chain due diligence; calls on the Commission to support developing countries to increase their domestic value added in order to upgrade along the global value chains;
2016/02/22
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 34 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the crucial role of Aid for Trade (AfT) in trade-related capacity-building, technical assistance, business support policies for SMEs and regional integration; notes, however, that without serious efforts by the countries directly concerned and significant improvements in governance, trade cannot – in isolation – help countries to overcome development constraints; calls the EU and its Member States to commit to increase Aid for Trade (AfT) support for developing countries, LDCs, while addressing fair and ethical trade in the upcoming revision of its Aid for Trade strategy, as announced in the communication "Trade for All";
2016/02/22
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 44 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls that Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) arcan be a key development instrument for helping to alleviate poverty in the long run; stresses, however, that their scope is still mainly limited to goods, and that expanding them to services and investment would considerably increase potential for growth and promote human rights; calls on the EU to establish specific monitoring structure in the EPAs dedicated to sustainable development and that ensure the proper involvement of civil society organisations and trade unions as well as to include stronger human rights clauses with coherent means of implementation;
2016/02/22
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 49 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Regrets that the communication "Trade for All" does not make any reference to the Cotonou Agreement, which expires in 2020; calls on the EU to engage in a broad consultation and dialogue process, including with our ACP countries, about the post-Cotonou framework;
2016/02/22
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 52 #

2015/2105(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Calls on the Commission to include strong and comprehensive sustainable development chapters, which are effectively implemented and enforced, in EU's trade and investment agreements; calls in particular for provisions that ensure human rights, labour rights, environmental and social protection as well as gender equality;
2016/02/22
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 5 #

2015/2104(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the cooperation of the EU and the UNDPnited Nations in promoting shared values and supporting governments, civil society and populations in over 100 countries in important policy areas such as capacity development, institutional development, the fight against corruption, equality between men and women, electoral assistance, crisis prevention and recovery, disaster risk reduction and climate changeto save and improve the lives of millions of people in developing countries and fragile States;
2015/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 7 #

2015/2104(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls forInvites the fEurther deepening and strengthening of the Strategic Partnership between the EU and the UNDP and of its goals of combating poverty and promoting peace, development and human rightsopean Commission and United Nations specialized agencies, funds and programmes to establish a high-level dialogue on the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals, with a view to coordinate the policies, programmes and operations of the EU and UN; underlines the importance of disaggregated and accessible data to monitor progress and evaluate the results of the EU-UN partnership;
2015/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 10 #

2015/2104(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the importance of EU-UNDP cooperation on aid effectiveness; underlines the commitment of both to the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation and to encouraginges all states as well as private- sector actors also to commit to it;
2015/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 14 #

2015/2104(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Calls for further EU-UN cooperation in the areas of health, HIV/AIDS, education, food and nutrition, water, sanitation and hygiene, child protection, gender equality, social inclusion, climate action, humanitarian aid, migration, human rights, non-discrimination on all grounds, good governance and democracy-building, notably in order to fight corruption, tax evasion and illicit financial flows and support conflict prevention measures;
2015/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 18 #

2015/2104(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Underlines the importance of the EU- UN partnership to improve the lives of future generations and stresses the special vulnerability of children, as well as their pivotal role in achieving sustainable and equitable development for all; acknowledges the longstanding cooperation between the EU and UNICEF as crucial to protect children in emergencies and achieve all child-related Sustainable Development Goals;
2015/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 19 #

2015/2104(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Reiterates the fact that the EU must be in the lead of the fight against climate change and further cooperate with UN on this area, taking into account the particular situation of developing countries, notably ahead of the adoption of the SDGs and the agreement in Paris of COP21;
2015/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 20 #

2015/2104(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5c. Welcomes the EU's support of the Women, Peace and Security agenda at the United Nations, and its commitment to gender equality in external action; considers that the EU should proactively align its approach to conflict with that of the Women, Peace and Security agenda, and specifically its commitment to international humanitarian law;
2015/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 22 #

2015/2104(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Points to the importance of EU-UN partnership in addressing the root causes and consequences of global refugee crises and humanitarian emergencies; reiterates the fundamental importance of coordinated action by all international actors at the same time as providing technical assistance and mobilising adequate resources;, in order to protect the most vulnerable population, including children; and calls, therefore, for further cooperation and dialogue in the preparation of the 2016 World Humanitarian Summit.
2015/09/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 9 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that the migration crisis can be addressed only within the context of a European approach and not by bilateral meetings among Members States; calls for a newwelcomes the European agenda on migration under the leadership of the Commission and the European Council, underpinned by solidarity among the Member States. This agenda mighust include the replacement of the Dublin regulation with a centralised European asylum system;
2015/09/25
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 30 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Reiterates the complexity of the development-migration nexus, diverging from the common view of development as a means to reduce, if not eliminate, migration, without denying that development can help mitigate some of thesignificantly contribute to address the root causes of forced migration, such as conflicts or state fragilityresponding to political and economic instability, human rights violations, conflicts, global inequalities, poverty, unemployment and climate change; recalls that emigration rises with economic development until countries reach an upper-middle-income country status (around USD 7000-8000 per capita), at which point it begins to decrease;
2015/09/25
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 64 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Considers the issues and problems faced by women migrants in the migration process and its impact on women’s empowerment and human rights to be of major importance; stresses that an explicit gender perspective in migration policies is vital; calls in particular for gender discrimination to be removed in the legal aspects of migration; insists on the need to respect the human and individual rights of the weakest among the migrants, namelyin particular women and children (including the need for education for migrating and refugee children), and on the need to include these rights in the post-2015 development agenda;
2015/09/25
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 71 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Takes note of the creation of an ‘Emergency Trust Fund for stability and addressing root causes of illegal immigration in Africa’ and strongly encourages the Member States to contribute to the Fund in order to effectively help to foster stability and to address the root causes of migration; asks the Commission to enhance the transparency of the Fund and underlines that monitoring and evaluation of the projects and programmes financed will be essential, to make sure the Fund serve its purposes helping directly those in need and not financing governments responsible for human rights violations;
2015/09/25
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 76 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission and the EU to fully respect the principle of Policy Coherence for Development (Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) in its migration and Mediterranean policies, and in particular in the implementation of its European Agenda on Migration; underlines the need for a more systematic incorporation of the development dimension in migration policies;
2015/09/25
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 80 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Recommends an incorporation of migration issues in the dialogue with partner countries and regions, ensuring that cooperation with third countries does not lead to trap migrants in abusive situations or preventing them from accessing fair asylum procedures;
2015/09/25
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 83 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Welcomes the November Summit in La Valletta as a real opportunity to discuss solutions to the migration crisis with developing countries; recalls the need for the summit to address not only the fight against human trafficking and the need to secure access to protection and asylum, but also the root causes of migration and the need of stabilisation and development of the African countries concerned;
2015/09/25
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 86 #

2015/2095(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Calls for the development of policies and mechanisms to maximize the development impact of remittances, continuing efforts to decrease their costs;
2015/09/25
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 7 #

2015/2067(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Is convinced that the Agreement is a development opportunity that by helping to create a more favourable business environment enhances export competitiveness and brings expanded trade opportunities, in particular to small and medium-sized enterprises and land- locked developing countries, and can attract more private sector investment;
2015/06/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 8 #

2015/2067(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Acknowledges that the implementation of the Agreement will improve the conditions for the deepening of regional economic integration, enhance the efficiency of cross-border trade flows and thus increase regional trade exchanges, notably in Africa; notes that regional initiatives should be pursued in line with the WTO Agreement;
2015/06/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 11 #

2015/2067(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Recognises that private sector expertise can play a central role in promoting trade facilitation measures and in providing assistance and support for TFA implementation in developing countries; takes note of a planned USAID initiative for a public-private alliance towards this end; calls on the Commission to encourage private sector involvement and to explore possibilities for partnerships with European industries in support of implementing the TFA;
2015/06/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 12 #

2015/2067(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5b. Acknowledges that the implementation of trade facilitation reforms has broader development benefits; notes in this context the key role that customs can play in facilitating the expeditious movement of consignments of disaster relief items; stresses that emergency humanitarian assistance should benefit from simplified customs clearance procedures to speed up aid deliveries, and, moreover, be exempt from duties and taxes.
2015/06/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 6 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A
A. whereas illicit financial flows (IFFs), i.e. all unrecorded private financial outflows involving capital that is illegally earned, transferred or utilised, typically originate from tax evasion activities, trade misinvoicing and abusive transfer pricing, against the principle that taxes should be paid where profits have been generated, and tax evasion and avoidance have been identified as major obstacles to the mobilisation of domestic revenue for development by all major international texts and conferences on financing for development;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 34 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Ea. whereas the need for an increase of domestic revenues has become more pressing due to the financial and economic crisis;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 35 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
Eb. whereas the amount of resources raised by developing countries through domestic revenue mobilisation has been increasing steadily, and important progress has been done in this field with the aid of international donors;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 40 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F a (new)
Fa. whereas developing countries still rely heavily on taxes from trade, which exposes national budgets to volatile commodity price, and are having difficulties in compensating for the decline in trade taxes resulting from the current global context of trade liberalisation, and in shifting to other types of domestic resources;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 44 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital F b (new)
Fb. whereas corporate tax revenues constitute a significant share of developing countries' national income, and in the past years developing countries have continually lowered corporate tax rates;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 47 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas, comparatively speaking, developing countries raise substantially less revenue than advanced economies (with-a-tax to GDP ratio ranging between 10 to 20%, as opposed to 30 to 40% of OECD economies) and are characterised by extremely narrow tax bases, and there is considerable potential for increasing the tax-to-GDP ratio, especially in the least industrialised countries (LICs);
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 52 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas developing countries have been offering various tax incentives and exemptions, which are not transparent and guided by proper cost-benefit analyses and often fail to attract real and sustainable investments, putting developing economies against each other, competing to offer the most favourable tax treatments, and leading to harmful tax competition and a ‘race to the bottom’ that brings greater benefit to multinational corporations (MNCs) than to developing countries;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 55 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
Ha. whereas tax havens and secrecy jurisdictions that allow banking or financial information to be kept private, combined with 'zero-tax' regimes to attract capital and revenues that should have been taxed in other countries generate harmful tax competition and particularly affect developing countries, with a loss of an estimated $189 billion of tax revenue annually;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 58 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H b (new)
Hb. whereas the fiscal treatment of mining investments varies across countries, and arrangements between developing countries' governments and extracting companies are usually ad hoc and negotiated without transparency and clear guidelines, with the risk of hampering tax collection;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 60 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital H c (new)
Hc. whereas the existence of large informal sectors in developing countries' economies makes broad-based taxation next to impossible, and in countries where a large proportion of the population lives in poverty a considerable share of GDP is not taxable;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 68 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas the amount of aid in support of domestic resource mobilisation is still low, accounting for less than one percent of total ODA in 2011;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 70 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I b (new)
Ib. whereas a recent impact assessment carried out by the Netherlands government concluded that the Dutch tax system facilitated avoidance of withholding tax, leading to foregone dividends and interest from withholding tax revenues in developing countries in the range 150-550 million euros per year;1 b __________________ 1b'Evaluation issues in financing for development Analysing effects of Dutch corporate tax policy on developing countries', Study commissioned by the Policy and Operations Evaluation Department (IOB) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands, November 2013
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 72 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital J a (new)
Ja. whereas the Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters is a subsidiary body of the Economic and Social Council which pays special attention to developing countries and countries with economies in transition;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 72 #

2015/2058(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses the urgent need for a study on the impact of international tax treaties and for a strengthened international cooperation in the field of taxation;
2015/04/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 77 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Ka. whereas the European Investment Bank supports private companies in developing countries directly by providing loans, or indirectly by supporting financial intermediaries such as commercial banks and private equity funds, which then on-lend or invest in enterprises;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 80 #

2015/2058(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
10. Calls for a code of conduct to be established for governments of the countries concerned in order to ensure tax systems are managed efficiently and that harmful tax practices are avoided;
2015/04/15
Committee: ECON
Amendment 84 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Insists that effective mobilisation of domestic resources and a strengthening of tax systems will be an indispensable factor in achieving the post-2015 framework that will replace the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), which represents a viable strategy to overcome foreign aid dependency in the long term, and that efficient and fair tax systems are crucial for poverty reduction, fighting inequalities, good governance and state- building;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 89 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that tax avoidance and tax evasion represent a considerable financial loss for developing countries, and that taking appropriate measures at national, European and international level against these practices should be a top priority for the EU, taking into account the needs and constraints that developing countries face in gaining access to their tax revenues; considers that the EU should be taking a leading role in driving international efforts to combat tax havens, tax fraud and evasion, leading by example; and that it should cooperate with developing countries in counteracting aggressive tax avoidance practices by certain transnational companies, as well as in seeking ways to help them withstand pressures to engage in tax competition;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 94 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Urges the Commission to support developing countries and regional tax administration frameworks, such as the African Tax Administration Forum and the Inter-American Centre of Tax Administrations, in the fight against tax dodging, in developing fairer tax policies, in promoting administrative reforms and in order to increase the share, in terms of aid and development, of financial and technical assistance to the national tax administrations of developing countries;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 102 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Asks the Commission to give good governance in tax matters and fair tax collection a high place on the agenda in its policy dialogue (political, development and trade) and in all development cooperation agreements with partner countries, enhancing ownership and domestic accountability by fostering an environment where national parliaments are enabled to meaningfully contribute to the formulation and oversight of national budgets, including on domestic revenues and tax matters, and supporting the role of civil society in ensuring public scrutiny of tax governance and monitoring of cases of tax fraud, inter alia by setting up effective systems for protecting whistleblowers and journalistic sources;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 108 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Urges that information on beneficial ownership of companies, trusts and other institutions be made publicly available in open-data formats, in order to prevent anonymous shell companies and similar legal structures from being used to launder money, finance illegal activities or terrorist activities, conceal the identity of corrupt and criminal individuals, hide the theft of public funds and profits from illegal traffic and illegal tax evasion;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 115 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the EU and the Member States to enforce the principle that multinational companies, and especially those companies extracting natural resources, must adopt country-by-country reporting (CBCR) as standard, requiring them to publish as part of their annual report on a country-by-country basis for each territory in which they operate the names of all subsidiaries, their financial performance, relevant tax information, assets and number of employees, and to ensure that this information is publicly available; calls on the OECD to recommend that its proposed CBCR template should be made public by all MNCs, to ensure that all tax authorities in all countries are able to access thorough information so they can assess transfer pricing risks and determine the most effective way to deploy audit resources;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 127 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Welcomes the adoption of an Automatic Exchange of Information mechanism, a fundamental tool for enhancing global transparency and cooperation in the fight against tax avoidance and tax evasion; acknowledges, however, that support and time is needed for developing countries to build the required capacity to send and process information; therefore stresses the importance of ensuring that the new OECD Global Standard on Automatic Exchange of Information include a transition period for developing countries, recognising that by making this standard reciprocal, those countries that do not have the resources and capacity to set up the necessary infrastructure to collect, manage and share the required information might effectively be excluded; moreover, considers that a single standard on confidentiality should be envisaged;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 142 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. UStrongly supports the range of existing international initiatives to reform the global system, with a focus on the increased participation of developing countries in the structures and procedures of international tax cooperation; urges the EU and the Member States to ensure that the UN taxation committee is transformed into a genuine intergovernmental body equipped with additional resources, ensuring that developing countries can participate equally in the global reform of existing international tax rules;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 148 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Stresses that gender analysis should be made central to tax justice, recognising that while tax evasion has an impact on the welfare of individuals across the world, it is especially damaging to poor and lower- income households, in many of which women are disproportionately represented;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 154 #

2015/2058(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the EIB to ensure that companies that receive EIB support do not participate in tax evasion and avoidance via offshore centres and tax havens, and to increase its transparency policy by, for example, making publicly available all of its reports and investigations;
2015/05/06
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 171 #

2015/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Stresses the decisive importance of good governance, the rule of law, separation of powers, institutional framework and regulatory instruments; especially supports the respect and the promotion of human and citizens’ rights and liberties, as well as investment in capacity-building, education, health, public services, social protection and the fight against poverty and inequality, including in terms of gender; recognises the need for infrastructures and selective public investments, as well as the sustainable use of natural resources, including by the extractive industries;
2015/03/26
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 203 #

2015/2044(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Stresses the importance of favourable conditions for private enterprise in developing countries, especially for SMEs; calls for alignment of the private sector with the sustainable development goals through appropriate partnerships, financial instruments, incentives and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR);
2015/03/26
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 3 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stress that EU trade and investment policies are interlink with social protection, development, human rights and environment policies; Calls on the Commission to respect the principle of Policy Coherence for Development in all external policies and specifically to include it in all treaties and develop legally binding mechanisms to ensure it;
2015/09/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 6 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls the 1986 UN Declaration on the Right to Development, which confirms the right to development as an inalienable human right; calls on the EU to respect the sovereignty of developing countries in setting policies aimed at responding to the demands of their populations, for human rights and dignityensuring people dignity and obligations and duties of all investors in order to guarantee internationally agreed social, environmental and human rights standards;
2015/09/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 7 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls the 1986 UN Declaration on the Right to Development, which confirms the right to development as an inalienable human right; calls on the EU to respect the sovereignty of developing countries in setting policies aimed at responding to the demands of their populations for human rights and dignity;
2015/09/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 8 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the European Union and its Member States to promote binding measures to ensure that multinational corporations pay taxes in the countries in which their profits are generated and to promote compulsory country-by-country reporting by the private sector, thus enhancing domestic resource mobilisation capacities of countries;
2015/09/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 11 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Calls for the EU to recognise the common but differentiated responsibility of developing countries, while ensuring equity when addressing the post-2015 Development Agenda; recalls the EU’s direct and historical responsibility in its dealings with partner countries, particularly as regards tax, trade and investment;
2015/09/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 19 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Finds regrettable the significant lack of adequate information and transparency as regards the actions of corporations and their impact on social and environmental standards and human rights; calls for an effective increase in the transparency of corporations and for independent ex-ante impact analysis prior to the signing of any trade agreement; calls for a new monitoring and enforcement mechanism to ensure corporations comply with social, environmental and human rights standards;
2015/09/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 20 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Finds regrettable the significant lack of adequate information and transparency as regards the actions of corporations and their impact on social and environmental standards and human rights; calls for an effective increase in the transparency of corporations and for independent ex-ante impact analysis prior to the signing of any tradeinternational agreement;
2015/09/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 27 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Considers it regrettable that a regulatory framework on the way corporations comply with human rights and obligations with respect to social and environmental standards is still lacking, which allow certain States and companies to circumvent them with impunity; finds it regrettable that current human rights clauses in free trade agreements and other economic partnership agreements are ineffective and are usually not respected; urges the Commission to further promote binding initiatives for responsible mining, logging and sourcing of commodities so as toand private sustainability-bound schemes throughout supply chains and to step-up environmental and social product and process life cycle analysis so as to improve consumers information and to effectively ensure the accountability of companies;
2015/09/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 28 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Considers it regrettable that a regulatory framework on the way corporations comply with human rights and obligations with respect to social and environmental standards is still lacking; finds it regrettable that current human rights clauses in free trade agreements and other economic partnership agreements are ineffective and are usually not respectedreiterates its call for the European Commission to be more committed to promoting binding and non- negotiable human rights and social and environmental clauses in negotiations of international agreements; urges the Commission to further promote initiatives for responsible mining, logging and sourcing of commodities so as to ensure the accountability of companies;
2015/09/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 29 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Calls for the EU to follow UNCTAD´s Comprehensive Investment Policy Framework for Sustainable Development recommendations to ensure responsible transparent and accountable investments to not undermine social and environmental standards, human rights, development and people´s dignity, while guarantee respect of human rights, gender equality, decent work, union rights, environmental protection, social protection, universal access to quality goods and public services (paying particular attention to public and universal health coverage), social protection, universal access to medicines, and food and product safety;
2015/09/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 31 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the EU to engage actively in the work of the UN’s Human Rights Council on aand of the UNEP on international treatyies to hold transnational corporations accountable for human rights abuses and violations of environmental standards.
2015/09/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 32 #

2015/2038(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for the EU and Member States to engage actively in the work of the UN’s Human Rights Council on an international treaty to hold transnational corporations accountable for human rights abuses.
2015/09/23
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 31 #

2015/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Is gravely concerned over the surge in armed conflict, hybrid war, instability and widespread human rights violations in the EU’s immediate neighbourhood and the threat of terrorism inside and outside the EU; believes that the current security threats are common to the EU as a whole and should be addressed in a united and coordinated fashion, pooling and sharing civilian and military resources; strongly believes, in this regard, that it is imperative not to waste resources and that it is essential to better use tax payers’ money and make progress on the establishment of a European defence equipment market and to develop a European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB);
2015/04/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 46 #

2015/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Warns of worrying developments in the European defence market that are increasing external dependencies in the European defence sector at a time of an increasingly complex and challenging security environment; warns, in particular, of the combination of Member States’ declining defence budgets, persisting market fragmentation despite new internal market rules, the growing dependence of the defence industry on extra-EU exports and increased foreign investment in Europe’s defence sector, yielding control of strategic national and European defence industries, assets and technologies;
2015/04/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 61 #

2015/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Urges the European Council to draw the necessary lessons and take concrete measures towards overcoming the defragmentation of the European defence market in order to guarantee, an issue that hampers innovation and leads to a duplication of defence and programmes and resources, in order to guarantee its transparency and competitivity as well as the availability of the defence capabilities needed to ensure European security and fulfil the objectives of the CSDP;
2015/04/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 98 #

2015/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Believes that EU export control policies should be substantially revamped with a view to developing a more integrated, coherent and comprehensive EU regime and a level playing field, making sure that overarching foreign and security policy objectives have priority over short-term financial, economic and commercial interests; notes that the Council has failed to ensure the uniform application of the common position on the control of exports of military equipment; is disconcerted that even in cases of flagrant non-compliance by a buyer country with several of the eight criteria, including those on the preservation of regional peace, security and stability, and on the behaviour of the buyer country with regard to the international community and its respect for international law, the common position is almost entirely absent from the political decision-making sphere and public discourse;
2015/04/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 130 #

2015/2037(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Considers mutual assurances of SoS between the Member States to be a fundamental element in the construction of an integrated European defence market; welcomes the EDA’s updated framework arrangement on SoS as an instrument which strengthens mutual confidence and solidarity, but notes that it does not create any legal obligations; takes the view that the EU- wide SoS regime needs to be based on legislation, and in particular on the full implementation of the directive on intra- EU transfers in order to remove barriers to the movement of defence products inside the EU;
2015/04/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 1 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that Afghanistan is one of the world’s largest recipients of development aid and that EU institutions committed EUR 3.6 billion in aid to the country between 2002 and 2016; regrets the fact that, despite international assistance,at the proportion of Afghans living in poverty has risen from 38 % (2012) to 55 % (2017) and highlights that the country has registered slow growth since 2014 with the draw- down of international security forces, accompanying reductions in international grants as well as a worsening security situation;
2018/10/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 3 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1 a. Recalls the EU commitment to support poverty reduction by focusing its efforts in areas in which it adds most value and by respecting the principles of aid efficiency and effectiveness, in line with “Policy Coherence for Development” (PCD);
2018/10/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 5 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recognises that this recent reversal in development progress is largely due to the intensification of long-lasting violence and conflict, and that internal displacement, the arrival of returnees from the surrounding region and climatic factors, such as drought, have all led to a deterioration of the humanitarian situation; urges therefore the EU and its Member States to enhance all their efforts to address key humanitarian challenges and human needs and to pay particular attention to vulnerable people, including people located in hard to reach areas;
2018/10/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 9 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Highlights that an estimated 10 million people have limited or no access to essential health services; emphasizes in this regard the need to remain committed to supporting the government to strengthen basic health provisions, with a focus on ensuring health care to vulnerable people including women, girls and children, as well as addressing disability and mental health care;
2018/10/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 10 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the CAPD will also enable the EU and Afghanistan to jointly address global challenges, such as nuclear security, non-proliferation and climate change;
2018/12/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 13 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Notes that rural economies and agriculture constitute the current main source of employment generation and calls on the EU to scale up its interventions in this area in order to improve food and nutrition security, rural livelihoods and employment, including the sustainable management of natural resources; underlines that particular attention should be given to the impact of natural hazards and climate change on small subsistence farmers;
2018/10/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 18 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. SRecalls that 8.7 million people have chronic needs which require longer- term systemic actions; stresses the need to comprehensively address humanitarian, development and security challenges and to better operationalise the nexuses between them; insists that pacifying the country and normalising the functioning of the state and its institutions are indispensable prerequisites for development in Afghanistan;
2018/10/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 25 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Welcomes the EU-Afghanistan 5. State Building Contract (SBC) (budget support), signed in 2016, as it can strengthen government institutions and their ownership of development policies; notes that the SBC draws on an overall positive review of the progress made by Afghanistan on key reform areas; stresses that resources must be used effectively and systematically monitored to prevent misuses; calls on the Commission to keep Parliament regularly informed of the SBC’s implementation. and underlines that the findings related to the latter should be used to prepare the continuation of the budget support operation for the period 2018-2021;
2018/10/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 28 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Emphasizes the importance of ensuring that civil society organisations (CSOs) will continue to play an essential role in exercising social control necessary to verify the good provision of public services;
2018/10/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 29 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Calls on the EU to further promote equality between women and men and women’s empowerment though its development efforts, bearing in mind that changing societal attitudes towards women's socio-economic role calls for accompanying measures in awareness raising, education and reform of the regulatory framework;
2018/10/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 30 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 c (new)
5 c. Regrets the lack of parliamentary oversight and democratic control on the conclusion of the Joint Way Forward informal readmission agreement between the EU and Afghanistan and stresses the importance of conducting continuous dialogue with the relevant actors in order to find a sustainable solution on the issue of Afghan refugees in its regional dimension; emphasizes that the EU development assistance to Afghanistan should not be seen through the prism of purely migration and border management purposes and considers that development aid should address effectively the root causes of migration, in line with its primary objective of poverty eradication;
2018/10/18
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 55 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The Agreement provides the basis for developing a mutually beneficial relationship in an increasing range of areas such as the rule of law, health, rural development, education, science and technology, as well as actions to combat corruption, money laundering, the financing of terrorism, organised crime and narcotics;
2018/12/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 81 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Recognises that support and positive co-operation from neighbouring countries and regional powers, in particular China, Iran, India, Russia and Pakistan, areis vital for peace and essential to thefor stabilisation and development of Afghanistan; regrets that a stable and successfulconsiders that closer relations with its neighbours are imperative for Afghanistan i's not always the end goal for these regional actorrmalization process to achieve stability; encourages them to cooperate constructively to promote a genuine and results-oriented negotiation process without preconditions;
2018/12/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 115 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Emphasises the EU’s continued support for the Afghan-led and Afghan- owned peace process; calls on the Taliban to denounce violence and join the peace process; recognises that a military presence will be required in the long termlong term assistance is need in order to assist the Afghan security forces in the suppression of violent extremists or terrorist groups that refuse to join the peace process;
2018/12/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 132 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Underlines the need to increase and strengthen capabilities of the Afghan National Defence and Security Forces (ANDSF) and National Police Force, critical for Afghanistan’s security and reconstruction;
2018/12/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 143 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Government of Afghanistan to increase political inclusiveness, strengthen accountability and actively combat corruption;
2018/12/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 149 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Supports and endorses the Government of Afghanistan’s new counter- narcotics strategy, backed by the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC); underscores the importance of a genuine internal reconciliation process; underlines that combating terrorism and its financing is a key ingredient of creating an environment conducive to security in Afghanistan;
2018/12/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 161 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Underlines the necessity to support Afghanistan´s system of education in favour of increasing the number of children following school classes at all levels;
2018/12/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 164 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Welcomes the fact that the EU- Afghanistan CAPD proposesreflects the principles and conditions for the EU-Afghanistan partnership with an emphasis on holding regular dialogues on human rightspolitical and economic issues, including thehuman rights of women and childrenand gender equality;
2018/12/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 166 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. The CAPD also foresees cooperation on migration and effectively reinforces EU assistance for Afghanistan in addressing migration and forced displacement challenges, in particular the reintegration of people on the move and returnees in Afghanistan;
2018/12/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 189 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Recognises that the end goal of EU aid to Afghanistan is to help the country’s government and economy develop to a state of independence and growth with internal development and regional cooperation through external trade and investment, as opposed to a reliance on aid that supports the state over the peoplef the Afghan people have on state aid;
2018/12/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 196 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Following the country’s accession to the WTO in 2016, which increased Afghanistan’s ties to the global economy, the EU granted Afghanistan the duty free and quota free access to the EU market, but further concrete measures are needed in order to allow the private sector to take the advantage of this regime and as such increase its internal development;
2018/12/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 198 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 b (new)
19b. Further efforts are need in order to increase the capacity of government institutions to formulate and implement trade strategies and policies, improve cross border movement of goods, and enhance the quality of products to meet international standards;
2018/12/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 210 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Reiterates the need for the international community to continue its engagement in Afghanistan and to contribute to rebuilding the country, developing the economy and resisting terrorism; encourages further financial engagement by the EU and the Member States;
2018/12/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 224 #

2015/0302M(NLE)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Welcomes the establishment of the joint cooperation bodies at executive level, with an emphasis on holding regular dialogues on political issues including human rights, in particular the rights of women and children and to address challenges and create opportunities for a stronger partnership, which are essential elements of this agreement;
2018/12/04
Committee: AFET
Amendment 18 #

2015/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 5
(5) The issue of the obligations and concomitant responsibilities and liabilities of the flag State and, where appropriate, the flag international organisation, for the conservation and management of the living resources of the high seas under UNCLOS has increasingly come into focus at international level. This has also been the case, under the heading of a due diligence obligation flowing from UNCLOS, for concurrent coastal State jurisdiction and flag State jurisdiction and, as appropriate, flag international organisation jurisdiction, to secure sound conservation of marine biological resources within sea areas under national jurisdiction. The Advisory Opinion of 2 April 2015 of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), rendered in response to questions raised by the West Africa Subregional Fisheries Commission, confirmed that the Union bears international responsibility before third countries and international organisations for the activities of its fishing vessels, and that such responsibility requires it to act with due diligence. A due diligence obligation is an obligation for a State to exercise best possible efforts and to do the utmost to prevent illegal fishing, which includes the obligation to adopt the necessary administrative and enforcement measures to ensure that fishing vessels flying its flag, its nationals, or fishing vessels engaged in its waters are not involved in activities which breach the applicable conservation and management measures. For these reasons, it is important to organise both the activities of Union fishing vessels outside Union waters as well as the governance system pertaining thereto in such a manner that the Union's international obligations can be efficiently and effectively discharged and that situations where the Union might be reproached for internationally wrongful acts are avoided.
2016/07/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 24 #

2015/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) The Union committed itself at the United Nations Summit on Sustainable Development on 25 September 2015 to implementing the resolution containing the outcome document entitled "Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development", including Sustainable Development Goal 14 "Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development", as well as Sustainable Development Goal 12 "Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns" and their targets.
2016/07/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 26 #

2015/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 b (new)
(7b) All the members of the FAO, including the Union and its developing countries partners, unanimously adopted in 2014 the Voluntary Guidelines on Securing Sustainable Small-scale Fisheries in the context of Food security and Poverty Eradication, including point 5.7 thereof, which highlights that small- scale fisheries should be given due consideration before agreements on resource access are entered into with third countries and third parties.
2016/07/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 33 #

2015/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point c – indent 4 a (new)
- available data on the global fishing effort in the fisheries concerned; and
2016/07/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 37 #

2015/0289(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 39 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) name and address of the economic owner/operator and beneficial owner;
2016/07/13
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 25 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 a (new)
(2a) The Union and its Member States, having signed the Paris Agreement, approved at the 21st conference of the parties (COP-21) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (the Paris Agreement), committed themselves to holding "the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1,5°Cˮ. They should bear this commitment in mind when working towards emissions reductions and low carbon investments.
2016/06/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 27 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 b (new)
(2b) The Paris Agreement represents a global accord to limit and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and seeks to achieve a 'just transition', from which developing nations must also benefit.
2016/06/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 29 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 2 c (new)
(2c) One of the best tools at the Union's disposal to meet the commitments laid down in the Paris Agreement is the EU ETS. It is recognised that in order to meet the challenges of global climate change, the EU ETS must function effectively and efficiently reduce emissions as well as support the transition to renewable energy, maximise energy efficiency and foster clean technology growth globally.
2016/06/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 32 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) The zero-rating of emissions from biomass in the EU ETS constitutes a support scheme within the meaning of the Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1a. Bioliquids, biofuels and solid and gaseous biomass should only receive support and count towards the national targets where they comply with sustainability criteria set out in the Directive 2009/28/EC or the Sustainable Bioenergy Policy. Consequently, the sustainability criteria must be applied for all sources of bioenergy that are consumed and zero- rated for greenhouse gas emissions within an installation or an aircraft operator's activities covered by the EU ETS. _________________________________ 1aDirective 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC (OJ L 140, 5.6.2009, p. 16).
2016/06/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 38 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a
(a) threfive new subparagraphs are added to paragraph 1: "From 2021 onwards, the share of allowances to be auctioned by Member States shall be 57at least 63%. 2% of the total quantity of allowances between 2021 and 2030 shall be auctioned to establish a fund to improve energy efficiency and modernise the energy systems of certain Member States as set out in Article 10d of this Directive (“the Modernisation Fund”). 2% of the total quantity of allowances between 2021 and 2030 shall be auctioned to establish the International Climate Action Fund to support climate action in vulnerable developing countries with low capacity, especially the Least Developed Countries, Small Island Development States and countries in Africa, in particular for adaptation to the impacts of climate change. Financial resources from the International Climate Action Fund will be used to replenish the United Nations Green Climate Fund on an annual basis, which has a goal to allocate 50% for adaptation, with half destined for highly vulnerable countries. 2% of the total quantity of allowances between 2021 and 2030 shall be auctioned to establish the Just Transition Fund to support local communities and workers in regions impacted most strongly by the ongoing transition to a decarbonised economy. The resources of that fund shall be used for investments aiming at creating jobs, financing job training and other employment and health services in alternative economic activities in regions where traditional carbon intensive sectors will lose a large number of jobs as a result of decarbonisation. A specific plan shall be developed by each Member State applying to utilise resources from this fund, in close partnership with the municipal and local authorities of the transformation regions as well as the social partners and civil society organisations. The total remaining quantity of allowances to be auctioned by Member States shall be distributed in accordance with paragraph 2.";
2016/06/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 64 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 a (new)
Directive 2003/87/EC
Article 27 – paragraph 1
(22a) In Article 27 paragraph 1is replaced by the following: "1. Following consultation with the operator, Member States may exclude from the Community scheme installations which have reported to the competent authority emissions of less than 25 000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent and, where they carry out combustion activities, have a rated thermal input below 35 MW, excluding emissions from biomass, in each of the three years preceding the notification under point (a), and which are subject to measures that will achieve an equivalent contribution to emission reductions, if the Member State concerned complies with the following conditions: (a) it notifies the Commission of each such installation, specifying the equivalent measures applying to that installation that will achieve an equivalent contribution to emission reductions that are in place, before the list of installations pursuant to Article 11(1) has to be submitted and at the latest when this list is submitted to the Commission; (b) it confirms that monitoring arrangements are in place to assess whether any installation emits 25 000 tonnes or more of carbon dioxide equivalent, excluding emissions from biomass, in any one calendar year. Member States may allow simplified monitoring, reporting and verification measures for installations with average annual verified emissions between 2008 and 2010 which are below 5 000 tonnes a year, in accordance with Article 14; (c) it confirms that if any installation emits 25 000 tonnes or more of carbon dioxide equivalent, excluding emissions from biomass, in any one calendar year or the measures applying to that installation that will achieve an equivalent contribution to emission reductions are no longer in place, the installation will be reintroduced into the Community scheme; (d) it publishes the information referred to in points (a), (b) and (c) for public comment. Hospitals may also be excluded if they undertake equivalent measures. content/EN/TXT/?qid=1464179550809&uri=CELEX:02003L0087-20151029)" Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-
2016/06/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 67 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 b (new)
Directive 2003/87/EC
Annex I – paragraph 1
(22b) Paragraph 1 of Annex I is replaced by the following: "Installations or parts of installations used for research, development and testing of new products and processes and installations exclusively using biomass are not covered by this Directive. re not covered by this Directive." Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?qid=1464179550809&uri=CELEX:02003L0087-20151029)
2016/06/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 68 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 22 c (new)
Directive 2003/87/EC
Annex I – paragraph 3
(22c) Paragraph 3 of Annex I is replaced by the following: "When the total rated thermal input of an installation is calculated in order to decide upon its inclusion in the Community scheme, the rated thermal inputs of all technical units which are part of it, in which fuels are combusted within the installation, are added together. These units could include all types of boilers, burners, turbines, heaters, furnaces, incinerators, calciners, kilns, ovens, dryers, engines, fuel cells, chemical looping combustion units, flares, and thermal or catalytic post- combustion units. Units with a rated thermal input under 3 MW and units which use exclusively biomass shall not be taken into account for the purposes of this calculation. 'Units using exclusively biomass' includes units which use fossil fuels only during start- up or shut-down of the unit. " Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?qid=1464179550809&uri=CELEX:02003L0087-20151029)
2016/06/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 69 #

2015/0148(COD)

Proposal for a directive
Annex III
Directive 2003/87/EC
Annex IV – Part A
In Annex IV, Part A,Part A of Annex IV to Directive 2003/87/EC, t is amended as follows: (1) The fourth paragraph under the second subheading entitled "Calculation" shall be replaced by the following: "Accepted emission factors shall be used. Activity-specific emission factors are acceptable for all fuels. Default factors are acceptable for all fuels except non- commercial ones (waste fuels such as tyres and industrial process gases). Seam- specific defaults for coal, and EU-specific or producer country-specific defaults for natural gas shall be further elaborated. IPCC default values are acceptable for refinery products. The emission factor for biomass waste and residues shall be zero."; (2) The paragraph under the fourth heading entitled "Monitoring of emissions of emissions of other greenhouse gases" shall be replaced by the following: "Standardised or accepted methods shall be used, developed by the Commission in collaboration with all relevant stakeholders and adopted pursuant to Article 14(1).". Or. en (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?qid=1464179550809&uri=CELEX:02003L0087-20151029)
2016/06/07
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 42 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
(5) The possibility that the provision of information may be refused where it would lead to the disclosure of a commercial, industrial or professional secret or of a commercial process, or of information whose disclosure would be contrary to public policy should not apply to provisions of mandatory automatic exchange of information on advance cross- border rulings and advance pricing arrangements in order not to reduce the effectiveness of these exchanges. The limited nature of the information that is required to be shared with all Member States should ensure sufficient protection of those commercial interests.
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 48 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 6
(6) In order to reap the benefits of the mandatory automatic exchange of advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing arrangements, the information should be communicated promptlyimmediately after and at the latest one month after the end of the quarter during which after they are issued and therefore regular intervals for the communication of the information should be established (at least twice a year).
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 51 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
(7) The mandatory automatic exchange of advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing arrangements should in each case include communication of a defined set of basic information to all Member States. The Commission should adopt any measures necessary to standardise the communication of such information under the procedure laid down in Directive 2011/16/EC for establishing a standard form to be used for the exchange of information. That procedure should also be used in the adoption of any necessary measures and practical arrangements for the implementation of the information exchange.
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 54 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
(8) Member States should exchange the basic information to be communicated also with the Commission. This would enable the Commission at any point in time to monitor and evaluate the effective application of the automatic exchange of information on advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing arrangements. Such communication will not discharge a Member State from its obligations to notify any state aid to the Commission.
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 64 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
(10) A Member State should be able to rely on Article 5 of Directive 2011/16/EU as regards the exchange of information on request to obtain additional information, including the full text of advance cross- border rulings or advance pricing arrangements, from the Member State having issued such rulings or arrangements.
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 65 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
(11) Member States should take all measures necessary to remove any obstacle that might hinder the effective and widest possible mandatory automatic exchange of information on advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing arrangements.
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 75 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
(15) The existing provisions regarding confidentiality should be amended to reflect the extension of mandatory automatic exchange of information to advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing arrangements.
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 85 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 3 – point 14 – introductory part
14. 'advance cross-border ruling' means any agreement, communication, or any other instrument or action with similar effects, including one issued in the context of a tax audit, which:
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 87 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 3 – point 14 – point c
(c) relates to a cross-border transaction or to the question of whether or not activities carried on by a legal person in the other Member State create a permanent establishment, and;
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 88 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 3 – point 14 – subparagraph 2
The cross-border transaction may involve, but is not restricted to, the making of investments, the provision of goods, services, finance or the use of tangible or intangible assets and does not have to directly involve the person receiving the advance cross-border ruling;
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 89 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 3 – point 15 – subparagraph 1
'advance pricing arrangement' means any agreement, communication or any other instrument or action with similar effects, including one issued in the context of a tax audit, given by, or on behalf of, the government or the tax authority of one or more Member States, including any territorial or administrative subdivision thereof, to any person that determines in advance of cross-border transactions between associated enterprises, an appropriate set of criteria for the determination of the transfer pricing for those transactions or determines the attribution of profits to a permanent establishment.
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 104 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 1
1. The competent authority of a Member State issuing or amending an advance cross-border ruling or an advance pricing arrangement after the date of entry into force of this Directive shall, by automatic exchange, communicate information thereon to the competent authorities of all other Member States as well as to the European Commission.
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 110 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 2
2. The competent authority of a Member State shall also communicate information to the competent authorities of all other Member States as well as to the European Commission on advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing arrangements issued within a period beginning ten years before the entry into force but still valid on the date of entry into force of this Directive;
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 120 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 3
3. Paragraph 1 shall notalso apply in a case where an advance cross-border ruling exclusively concerns and involves the tax affairs of one where the request for an advance ruling relates to a legal structure without legal personality. In that instance, the competent authority of the Member State issuing the advance ruling shall forward the information it has to the competent authorities of all other Member States and shall arrange for the memorandum of incorporation to be transferred to the Member State or States where the incorporator more natural persons incorporators and the beneficiary or beneficiaries are resident.
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 122 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) in respect of the information exchanged pursuant to paragraph 1: withinimmediately after and at the latest one month followingafter the end of the quarter during which the advance cross-border rulings or advance pricing arrangements have been issued or amended.
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 124 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 4 – point b
(b) in respect of the information exchanged pursuant to paragraph 2: before 31 December 2016within three months following the entry into force;
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 127 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 5 – point b
(b) the content of the advance cross-border ruling or advance pricing arrangement, including a description of the relevant business activities or transactions or series of transactions;
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 129 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 5 – point d
(d) the identification of the other Member States likely to be directly or indirectly concerned by the advance cross-border ruling or advance pricing arrangement;
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 130 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 5 – point e
(e) the identification of any person, other than a natural person, in the other Member States likely to be directly or indirectly affected by the advance cross-border ruling or advance pricing arrangement (indicating to which Member State the affected persons are linked).
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 131 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 5 – point e a (new)
(ea) as soon as it is available, the European Tax identification Number (TIN) as outlined in the Commission's Action Plan on the fight against tax fraud and tax evasion of 2012.
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 135 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Member States shall require each issuer to annually publicly disclose, specifying by Member State and by third country in which it has a subsidiary, the following information on a consolidated basis for the financial year : (a) name(s), nature of activities and geographical location, (b) turnover, (c) number of employees on a full-time equivalent basis, (d) profit or loss before tax, (e) tax on profit or loss, (f) public subsidies received.
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 136 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 6
6. To facilitate the exchange the Commission shall adopt any measures and practical arrangements necessary for the implementation of this Article, including measures to standardise the communication of the information set out in paragraph 5 of this Article, as part of the procedure for establishing the standard form provided in Article 20(5). In Member States where decentralised territorial or administrative bodies are endowed with fiscal-related competences, the Commission shall assist member states to ensure that they meet their responsibility to provide training and support to these bodies.
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 138 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 8
8. Member States – or their territorial or administrative bodies including local authorities if applicable – may, in accordance with Article 5, request additional information, including the full text of an advance cross- border ruling or an advance pricing arrangement, from the Member State which issued it.
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 139 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 8a – paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. A minimum tax rate shall be established.
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 157 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 20 – paragraph 5
5. The automatic exchange of information on advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing arrangements pursuant to Article 8a shall be carried out using a standard form once that form has been adopted by the Commission in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 26(2).
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 161 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 6
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 21 – paragraph 5
5. TOn 31 December 2016 at the latest, the Commission shall develop a secure central directory where information to be communicated in the framework of Article 8a of this Directive mayust be recorded in order to satisfy the automatic exchange provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 8a. The Commission shall have access to the information recorded in this directory. The necessary practical arrangements shall be adopted by the Commission in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 26(2).
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 173 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 a (new)
The following Article is inserted: “Article 23b The Commission must examine all sanctions to be established in instances of refusal or omission of information exchange.”
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 174 #

2015/0068(CNS)

Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 b (new)
Directive 2011/16/EU
Article 23 c (new)
The following Article is inserted: “Article 23c The Commission should accommodate and extend the working methods and the established criteria in the code of conduct in order to fight against the emergence of new forms of harmful fiscal practices within the present economic environment.”
2015/09/24
Committee: ECON
Amendment 37 #

2014/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Strongly supports the inclusion of the goal of ensuring safe, public drinking water and adequate sanitation and hygiene for all by 2030 among the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to be adopted in September 2015; stresses that realisation of all SDGs requires mobilisation from both developing and developed countries and deployment of much more financing for development than is currently provided, including from new sources;
2015/04/15
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 42 #

2014/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that assistance for safe, public drinking water and sanitation should be given high priority in the allocation of funds and in assistance programming; favours open-mindedness in relation to different aid modalities, but strict adherence to development effectiveness principles and to an unwavering focus on poverty eradication and the maximisation of the development impact; in this regard, supports the involvement of local partners in the realisation of projects in developing countries, as well as the principle of community ownership;
2015/04/15
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 48 #

2014/2239(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Emphasises the importance of technology sharing for the design, construction and maintenance of programs; calls for effective monitoring of projects carried out through external aid;
2015/04/15
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 13 #

2014/2238(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the fact that the creation of green jobs in the EU is linked in part to the implementation of environmental legislat(Does not affect the English version;.)
2015/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 59 #

2014/2238(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 d (new)
6d. Urges the Commission and the Member States to phase out all environmentally harmful subsidies;
2015/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 62 #

2014/2238(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 g (new)
6g. Maintains that public funding should be allocated with a view to spurring moves towards environment-friendly production methods;
2015/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 72 #

2014/2238(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 d (new)
7d. Maintains that to ease the transition to a green economy, investment has to be channelled into education, training, and research and development;
2015/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 75 #

2014/2238(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 g (new)
7g. Points out that SMEs are playing a key role in the transition to a green economy and hence in creating green jobs;
2015/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 77 #

2014/2238(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 i (new)
7i. Points to the importance of, and the need for, financial instruments aimed at SMEs;
2015/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 115 #

2014/2238(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 g (new)
11g. Calls on the Member States to coordinate policies more closely where the green economy is concerned and to share their best practice regarding employment opportunities in the green economy.
2015/03/19
Committee: ENVI
Amendment 11 #

2014/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Recognises that private investments and finance are likely to be the key engine for growth, which is projected to be approximately 5 % in developing countries in the coming years; emphasises that the future public-private partnerships (PPPs) within the post-2015 development agenda must have a greater focus on poverty reduction, climate change mitigation, energy and resource efficiency;
2015/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 28 #

2014/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that properly structured and efficiently implemented PPPs can bring many benefits such as innovation, competitiveness and economic growth; outlines that PPPs in developing countries are so far concentrated mostly in the energy and telecommunications sectors, whereas private engagement in social infrastructure remains rare;
2015/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 44 #

2014/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for increased technical assistance toand technology sharing with the governments of the partner countries;
2015/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 52 #

2014/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Is concerned that certain safeguards to guarantee the purposeful use of public finance are not always in place; points out that a pro-poor development ex-ante impact assessment is needed for each PPP project that benefits from official development aid; stresses that measurable output indicators and monitoring as well as evaluation mechanisms need to be agreed upon during the preparatory phase of the projects and effectively implemented; highlights the fundamental importance of the prior formal consultative and scrutiny role for parliaments and civil society in order to ensure full transparency, legitimacy and accountability;
2015/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 68 #

2014/2233(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Considers it indispensable to increasingly engage with both local and European SMEs and start-up companies in PPPs;
2015/03/30
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 61 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph E a (new)
Ea. Asks the Commission to move towards a fairer approach in its negotiations of Economic Partnership Agreements and suggests the loss of value in preferences from the TTIP be recognised;
2015/02/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 77 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph F a (new)
Fa. Asks the Commission to support developing countries in pursuing stronger regional integration in order to diminish possible negative effects of TTIP and enable them to become thriving trade partners of the EU and US;
2015/02/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 81 #

2014/2228(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph F b (new)
Fb. Calls on the Commission to increase the transparency and democratic nature of negotiations by enhancing dialogue with civil society and other stakeholders.
2015/02/02
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 12 #

2014/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights the need to address human rights in a holistic and indivisible fashion by emphasising and strongly committing to economic, social and, cultural and environmental rights, since without these rights there can be no development; stresses the need to tackle the root causes of poverty; highlights the obligation to respect international labour standards, in line with the fulfilment of the ILO Decent Work Agenda, and calls for the setting-up of a universal social protection floor; takes the view that social issues should have a more central place in the EU’s external relations; urges the EU to incorporate a social clause reflecting ILO core labour standards in all its external trade agreements;
2014/12/16
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 20 #

2014/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Recognises the importance of actively engaging the NGOs in planning, implementing and evaluating human rights provisions so as to have the widest possible involvement of civil society in policy-making and in ensuring the effectiveness of human rights provisions;
2014/12/16
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 35 #

2014/2216(INI)

Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Takes the view that the EU, including its delegations, should identify early warning signals, such as repression of minorities and human rights violations, that point to potential conflicts and humanitarian catastrophes; calls on the EU to design best practices for promoting and protecting human rights in post-disaster and post- conflict situations, paying special attention to disabled people and other vulnerable groups and with a focus on human rights mainstreaming in relief, recovery and reconstruction efforts, while respecting the humanitarian principles of humanity, impartiality, neutrality and independence and the needs-based approach to humanitarian assistance;
2014/12/16
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 3 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
- having regard to its report of 19 May 2015 on Financing for Development and especially its call for the alignment of the private sector with the SDGs,
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 8 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Citation 18 b (new)
- having regard to the UNIDO's Lima Declaration: Towards Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development (ISID)1, __________________ 1 http://www.unido.org/fileadmin/Lima_De claration.pdf
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 19 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital A b (new)
Ab. whereas the private sector is a very broad term encompassing a wide range of actors and needs to be specified;
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 26 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital B b (new)
Bb. whereas industrialisation (especially through the development of local Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) and Small and Medium Industries (SMIs)) is a driver for well-being and development: 1% of increase in Manufacturing Value Added (MVA) per capita decreases the poverty head count by almost 2%;1 __________________ 1 http://www.unido.org/fileadmin/user_med ia/Services/PSD/WP4_2014_Industrializat ion_and_social_well-being.pdf
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 42 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. whereas the average per capita manufacturing valued added (MVA) of industrialised countries is 10 times higher than that of developing countries and 90 times higher than the average of Least Developed Countries (LDCs); 1 __________________ 1 http://www.unido.org/fileadmin/user_med ia/Services/PSD/WP4_2014_Industrializat ion_and_social_well-being.pdf
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 80 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
Ia. whereas manufacturing with around 470 million jobs worldwide in 2009 and around half a billion jobs worldwide in 20131 , provides high potential for employment and wealth generation as well as for decent and highly qualified work; __________________ 1 https://www.unido.org/fileadmin/user_me dia/Research_and_Statistics/UNIDO_IDR _2013_main_report.pdf
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 89 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission's initiative to endorse the private sector in becoming, alongside other governmental and non- governmental development organisations, a truen important partner in achieving inclusive and sustainable development, poverty reduction and empowerment of the local economies;
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 92 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Calls the Commission to recognise the diversity of the private sector and the challenges that are faced in alleviating the poverty of the most marginalized and the hardest to reach;
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 97 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Notes that development cooperation is the primary responsibility of the State; notes that reducing poverty or inequality is not the primary objective of the private sector and therefore private sector involvement in development objectives must be carefully designed with special emphasis on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR);
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 117 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights the vast potential of the EU's value added in partnering with the private sector, in close coordination with its Member States, and relevant International Organisations;
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 128 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls the Commission to prioritise investment in domestic small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), as they offer the greatest potential to drive equitable development in countries;
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 168 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Highlights that the defence of human rights, gender equality, social cohesion and the fight against inequalities should remain at the core of development activities; recalls the need to comply with agreed international standards such as the International Labour Organisation (ILO) standards and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights; calls for binding international rules for firms on compliance with human rights, labour law and environmental standards and urges the European Commission to take the lead by developing a clearly defined framework agreement governing all partnership agreements with private sector in line with the Corporate Social Responsibility principles and standards;
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 172 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 c (new)
9c. Calls for European development efforts to play a significant role in implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, including working with European enterprises and investors to ensure full compliance with the guiding principles and the OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprise in their business activities and in their supply chains in developing countries;
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 173 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Emphasises that the private sector and especially local SMEs must be part of the policy dialogue, including industrial policies, alongside all other development partners; recognises that the private sector includes actors such as social enterprises and Fairtrade organisations which have social and environmental principles built in to their work; calls on the Commission to recognise these efforts in its work on the role of the private sector in development;
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 179 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Calls on the European Commission to champion the proposal from investors and other stakeholders to support binding rules on social, environmental and human rights reporting by business, consistent with the EU directive on non- financial reporting, which are encompassed as one of the new proposed UN Sustainable Development Goals;
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 183 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 c (new)
10c. Calls for greater transparency in finance to help combat corruption and illicit financial flows, including through the development of fair and effective tax systems;
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 199 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Highlights the vast potential forrisks associated with PPPs in agriculture, including land grabbing, which must be prevented; stresses the importance of focusing assistance on small-scale farmers, in particular women; calls on the Commission to couple any PPPs in the agriculture, undal sector involving EU money with comprehensive measures to protect small-holder farmers, pastoralists and other vulnerable land users a clearly defined legislative framework for property rights, to prevent land grabbing; gainst the potential loss of access to land or water; emphasises that safeguards should include social and environmental risk assessment, mandatory consultation with legitimate representatives of the affected communities, with their free, prior and informed consent as a condition for the launch of the respective project and legal support for these communities when they so need; asks the Commission to accompany projects with monitoring procedures and to negotiate revision of contracts in cases that turned out to be harmful to the local population; recommends to replace G8 New Alliance projects with initiatives under the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP); stresses that financial and social compensations have to be binding commitments and that alternative development plans should always be taken into consideration;
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 209 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Recommends that the EU continues to engage PPPs in renewable and green energy projects in developing countries in a sustainable manner; welcomes the fact that one of the priorities of the EIB's IFE is the investment in energy, widely recognised as a key element in unlocking economic growth in Africa;
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 211 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Urges the EU to develop a robust regulatory framework, based on development effectiveness criteria, within which the private sector must operate, including for the promotion of long term contractual PPPs; urges the EU to only promote PPPs if other less expensive and risky financing options are not available, on the basis of a cost-effective analysis; calls on the EU to implement effective safeguard policies for PPP projects to ensure human rights, including women's rights; insists that PPPs should be excluded for the provision of essential public services, such as health and education;
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 213 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 c (new)
15c. Calls on the EU to work on strengthening capacity building of partner countries to assess when it is appropriate to engage in PPP projects and how to manage them in the public interest, including in planning, contract negotiation, management, accounting and minimising contingent liabilities;
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 216 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Stresses, that support for local SMEs/SMIs can be enhanced not only through financing instruments, but also through technology transfer, capacity building, sustainable supplier development and business linkages;
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 254 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22 a (new)
22a. Urges the Commission to give the highest primacy to the full compliance with development effectiveness principles like ownership, accountability and transparency, before expanding the scope of blending operations; insists that the Commission clearly demonstrates the financial and development additionality of EU grants for blended projects, as recommended by the Court of Auditors; calls on the Commission to democratise the governance structure of the EU Blending Platform and the regional blending facilities, by properly engaging with all relevant stakeholders at the local level, including partner governments, national parliaments, private sector actors, trade unions and local communities;
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 255 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Welcomes the Commission's intention to expand the scope of blending to include areas beyond infrastructure, such as sustainable agriculture, social sectors and local private sector development; insists, however, that all blending operations must be fully consistent with development policy, making sure that it pursue the SDGs; calls on the Commission to strengthen its management capacities with regard to blending projects, as recommended by the Court of Auditors;deleted
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 262 #

2014/2205(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Calls for an expansion of the current EIB external lending mandate, to increase its role in achieving sustainable development and, in particular, to take a more active part in the new private sector strategy – through blending, co-financing of projects and local private sector development – with a focus on low- income countries and fragile states; calls, furthermore, for greater transparency and accountability in partnerships and projects associated with the EIB;deleted
2015/05/27
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 259 #

2014/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 a (new)
23a. Reiterates that in shaping competition policy the Commission must be fully accountable and must follow up Parliament’s resolutions;
2014/12/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 275 #

2014/2158(INI)

Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. Calls on the Commission to continue reporting to Parliament, on an annual basis, on developments and effects in the application of competition policy;
2014/12/17
Committee: ECON
Amendment 13 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Title
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL setting up a Union system for supply chain due diligence self-certification of responsible importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and goldfor natural resources originating in conflict-affected and high- risk areas
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 16 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1
(1) Natural mineral resources in conflict- affected or high risk areas − although holding great potential for development – can be a cause of dispute where their revenues are fuelling the outbreak or continuation of violent conflict, undermining national endeavours towards development, good governance and the rule of law. In these areas, breaking the nexus between conflict and illegal exploitation of mineralnatural resources is critical to peace and stability.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 18 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) Disputes over oil, gas, minerals, timber and other natural resources rank second as a source of conflicts worldwide; competition over resources, such as land and water, is on the rise, and exacerbates existing conflicts or triggers new ones; the mismanagement of land and natural resources is compounded by environmental degradation, population growth and climate change.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 20 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 1 b (new)
(1b) Human rights abuses are common within the extractive industry and include child labour, sexual violence, disappearance of people, violation of the right to a clean environment, loss of land and livelihoods without negotiation and without adequate compensation, forced resettlement and the destruction of ritually or culturally significant sites.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 25 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) The Union has been actively engaged in an Organisation for Economic Co- operation and Development (OECD) initiative to advance the responsible sourcing of minerals from conflict regions, which has resulted in a government-backed multi-stakeholder process leading to the adoption of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (OECD Due Diligence Guidance5 ) including supplements on tin, tantalum and tungsten, and on gold. In May 2011, the OECD Ministerial Council recommended to actively promote the observance of this Guidance. __________________ 5 OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas: Second Edition, OECD Publishing (OECD (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264185050- en.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 26 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 6
(6) The Commission in its 2008 Communication8 recognised that securing reliable and undistorted access to raw materials is an important factor for the EU’s competitiveness. The Raw Materials Initiative (RMI) is an integrated strategy aimed at responding to different challenges related to access to non-energy non-agriculture raw materials. The RMI recognises and promotes financial as well as supply chain transparency, and the application of corporate social responsibility standards. __________________ 8The Raw Materials Initiative – meeting our critical needs for growth and jobs in Europe, COM(2008) 699.deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 28 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 7 a (new)
(7a) On 26 February 2014, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on promoting development through responsible business practices, including the role of extractive industries in developing countries, in which the European Commission is requested to bring forward binding legislation on conflict minerals;
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 29 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8
(8) Union citizens and civil society actors have raised awareness with respect to companies operating under the Union’s jurisdiction for not being held accountable for their potential connection to the illicit extraction and trade of mineralnatural resources from conflict regions. The consequence is that such mineralnatural resources, potentially present in consumer products, link consumers to conflicts outside the Union. To this end, citizens have requested, notably through petitions, that legislation be proposed to the European Parliament and the Council holding companies accountable under the Guidelines as established by the UN and OECD.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 32 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9
(9) In the context of this Regulation, and in line with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, supply chain due diligence is an on-going, proactive and reactive process through which business operators monitor and administer their purchases and sales with a view to ensuring that they respect human rights and do not contribute to conflict and adverse impacts thereof.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 34 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 a (new)
(9a) This Regulation reflects the need for due diligence along the entire supply chain from the sourcing site to the final product, by requiring all companies who first place covered resources—including products that contain those resources—on the European market to conduct and publicly report on their supply chain due diligence. In line with the nature of due diligence, the individual due diligence obligations contained in this Regulation reflect the progressive and flexible nature of due diligence processes, and the need for obligations that are appropriately tailored to enterprises’ individual circumstances. Obligations are tailored to a company’s size, leverage, and position in its supply chain. Certain companies are recognised to have great influence over the due diligence that is conducted along the supply chain in the sourcing countries, due to their position in the supply chain. These actors, commonly referred to as choke points, are subject to more extensive obligations than other enterprises. Due diligence obligations duly reflect this difference. Downstream companies are required to make reasonable and good faith efforts to identify the relevant choke points in their supply chains, and do their best to assess the due diligence of these companies, for instance on the basis of the audited reports of said actors.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 35 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 9 b (new)
(9b) In accordance with OECD Due Diligence Guidance, companies should take reasonable steps and make good faith efforts to conduct due diligence to identify and prevent or mitigate any risks of adverse impacts associated with the conditions of access to natural resources and the relationship of suppliers operating in conflict-affected or high-risk areas.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 36 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 10
(10) Third-party auditing of a company’s supply chain due diligence practices ensures credibility for the benefit of downstream companies and contributes to the improvement of the upstream due diligence practices.deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 37 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 12
(12) Union companies have expressed their interest through the public consultation in the responsible sourcing of minerals and reported on current industry schemes designed to pursue their corporate social responsibility objectives, customer requests, or the security of their supplies. However, Union companies have also reported countless difficulties in the exercise of supply chain due diligence because of lengthy and complex global supply chains involving a high number of operators that are often insufficiently awaIn accordance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance it is recognized that due diligence in conflict-affected and high-risk areas presents practical challenges and that flexibility is there for ethically unconcerned. The cost of responsible sourcing and their potential impact on competitiveness notably on SMEs should be monitored by the Commissione needed in the application thereof. The nature and extent of due diligence that is appropriate for an enterprises’ individual circumstances depend on a number of factors, including its size and position in the supply chain, fully taking account of the challenges faced by SMEs.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 39 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
(13) Smelters and refiners are an importantrecognised choke points in global mineral supply chains as they are typically the last stage in which due diligence can effectively be assured by collecting, disclosing and verifying information on the mineral’s origin and chain of custody. After this stage of transformation it is often considered unfeasible to trace back the origins of minerals. A Union list of responsible smelters and refiners could therefore provide transparency and certainty to downstream companies as regards supply chain due diligence practicestheir respective supply chains with substantial influence over the due diligence that is conducted along the supply chain in the sourcing countries. A Union list of responsible choke-point actors could therefore provide transparency and certainty to companies in the downstream with a view to carrying out supply chain due diligence practices. Consistently with OECD Due Diligence Guidance, choke-point actors should undergo independent third-party audit of their supply chain due diligence practices, also with a view to being included in the list of responsible actors. Choke point actors based outside the Union should also have a possibility for being included in the list to ensure its global scope.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 44 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
(14) The Member State competent authorities are responsible to ensure the uniform compliance ofwith the self- certification of responsible importers by carrying out appropriate ex-post checks so as to verify whether the self-certified responsible importers of the minerals and/or metals within the scope of the Regulation comply with the supply chain due diligence obligationobligation of operators to carry out due diligence by carrying out appropriate ex-post checks. Records of such checks should be kept for at least 5 years. Member States are responsible to lay down the rules applicable to infringements of the provisions of this Regulation.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 46 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) With a view to enhancing the effective implementation of this Regulation, and addressing development needs directly linked to the exploitation of natural resources originating in conflict- affected and high-risk areas, accompanying measures should be implemented. The Commission and the European External Action Service should apply and further develop an integrated Union approach to responsible sourcing as initiated in the Joint Communication of 5 March 2014 to the European Parliament and the Council ‘Responsible sourcing of minerals originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas. Towards an integrated EU approach’1a. In particular, the promotion of responsible sourcing of natural resources originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas and the establishment of national and international due diligence frameworks for responsible sourcing should be integrated into internal and external policies and in particular into political and policy dialogues with partner countries, local authorities and private stakeholders. Particular attention should be given to addressing the contribution and challenges of the artisanal and informal mining sector for local livelihoods and sustainable development. _______________ 1a JOIN(2014) 8 final.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 47 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 15
(15) In order to ensure the proper implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. The implementing powers relating to the list of responsible smelters and refiners and the list of Member State competent authorities should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/201111 . __________________ 11 Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13)amend Annex I and Annex II to this Regulation, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU, following the provisions laid down in this Regulation.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 50 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Recital 16
(16) The Commission should report regularly to the Council and the European Parliament on the effects of the scheme. No later than three years after entering into force and every six years thereafter, the Commission should review the functioning and the effectiveness of this Regulation, including as regards the promotion of responsible sourcing of the minerals within its scope from conflict-affected and high-risk areas. The reports may be accompanied, if necessary, by appropriate legislative proposals, which may include mandatory measures,.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 55 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Regulation sets up a Union system for supply chain due diligence self- certification in order to curtail opportunities for armed groups and security forces12 to trade in tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold. It is designed to provide transparency and certainty as regards the supply practices of importers, smelters and refiners sourcing from conflict-affected and high- risk areas. __________________ 12‘Armed groups and security forces’ as defined in Annex II of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict- Affected and High-Risk Areas: Second Edition, OECD Publishing (OECD (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264185050- en.designed to:
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 57 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point a (new)
(a) increase certainty and transparency as regards the supply practices of companies sourcing from conflict-affected and high- risk areas,
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 58 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point b (new)
(b) curtail opportunities for the sourcing, transport and trade of natural resources to fund conflict and/or fuel human rights violations or abuses,
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 59 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point c (new)
(c) help companies respect human rights and avoid contributing to conflict through their activities and sourcing decisions.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 60 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2
2. This Regulation lays down the supply chain due diligence obligations of Union importers who choose to be self-certified as responsible importers of minerals or metals containing or consisting of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold, as set out in Annex I.deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 65 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point a
(a) ‘minerals’ means ores and concentrates containing tin, tantalum and tungsten, and gold as set out in the Annex I;deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 66 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point a a (new)
(aa) ‘OECD Due Diligence Guidance’ means the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas: Second Edition, OECD Publishing (OECD (2013))1a including all Council Recommendations, Annexes and Supplements, as may be amended or replaced periodically; _________________ 1a OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas: Second Edition, OECD Publishing (OECD (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264185050- en.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 67 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point a b (new)
(ab) ‘covered resources’ means all natural resources as set out in Annex I, as may be amended periodically in accordance with this Regulation;
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 68 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point a c (new)
(ac) ‘covered products’ means all covered resources and products comprising or containing covered resources;
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 69 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point a d (new)
(ad) ‘recycled resources’ means reclaimed end-user or post-consumer products, or scrap processed resources created during product manufacturing, including excess, obsolete, defective, and scrap materials which contain refined or processed resources that are appropriate to recycle in the production of any material. Minerals partially processed, unprocessed or a bi-product from another ore are not recycled resources;
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 70 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point a e (new)
(ae) ‘operator’ means any natural or legal person that places any covered product on the market for the first time;
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 71 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point a f (new)
(af) ‘placing on the market’ means the supply by any means, irrespective of the selling technique used, of products for the first time on the internal market for distribution or use in the course of commercial activity whether in return for payment or free of charge, including the supply by means of distance communication as defined in Directive 97/7/EC1a. ‘Placing on the market’ also includes the supply on the internal market of products derived from covered products already placed on the internal market. ________________ 1a Directive97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts (OJ L 144, 4.6.1997, p. 19).
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 72 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point b
(b) ‘metals’ means metals containing or consisting of tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold as set out in the Annex I;deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 74 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point c
(c) ‘mineralresources supply chain’ means the system of activities, organisations, actors, technology, information, resources and services involved in moving and processing the mineralresources from the extractionsourcing site to their incorporation in the final product;
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 75 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point c a (new)
(ca) ‘supply chain due diligence’ refers to the obligations of operators in relation to their management systems, risk management, third-party audits and disclosure of information with a view to identifying, addressing and publicly reporting on actual and potential risks linked to conflict-affected and high-risk areas to prevent or mitigate adverse impacts associated with their sourcing activities;
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 77 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point c b (new)
(cb) ‘model supply chain policy’ means the model supply chain policy in Annex II of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance;
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 78 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point d
(d) ‘chain of custody or supply chain traceability system’ means a system to identify and record of the sequence of entities which have custody of minerals and metalresources as they move through athe supply chain;
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 79 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point d a (new)
(da) ‘risk management plan’ means an operator’s written responses to the supply chain risks identified under Article 5 in accordance with its supply chain policy;
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 81 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point e
(e) ‘conflict-affected and high-risk areas’ means areas in a state of armed conflict, fragile post-conflict as well as areas witnessing weak or non-existent governance and security, such as failed states, and widespread and systematic violations of international law, including human rights abuses; dentified by the presence of armed conflict, widespread violence or other risks of harm to people and, for these purposes, it is recognized that: (i) armed conflict may take a variety of forms, such as a conflict of international or non-international character, which may involve two or more states, or may consist of wars of liberation, or insurgencies, civil wars; and (ii) high--risk areas may include areas of political instability or repression, institutional weakness, insecurity, collapse of civil infrastructure and widespread violence, both of which areas are often characterized by widespread human rights abuses and violations of national or international law;
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 83 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point f
(f) ‘downstream’ means the metal supply chain from the smelters or refiners to the end use;deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 86 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point g
(g) ‘importer’ means any natural or legal person declaring minerals or metals within the scope of this Regulation for release for free circulation within the meaning of Article 79 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/199213 ; __________________ 13Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ L 302, 19.10.1992, p. 1).deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 88 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point h
(h) ‘responsible importer’ means any importer who chooses to self-certify according to the rules set out in this Regulation;deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 90 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point i
(i) ‘self-certification’ means the act of declaring one’s adherence to the obligations relating to management systems, risk management, third-party audits and disclosure as set out in this Regulation;deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 92 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point j
(j) ‘grievance mechanism’ means an early- warning risk awareness mechanism allowing any interested party or whistle- blower to voice concerns regarding the circumstances of mineral extractionresource sourcing, trade, handling and export in respect of resources originating in conflict-affected and high-risk areas;
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 93 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point j a (new)
(ja) ‘Annex II operator’ refers to any operator of the type identified in Annex II;
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 94 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point j b (new)
(jb) ‘Annex II actor’ refers to any natural or legal person of the type identified in Annex II;
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 95 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point j c (new)
(jc) ‘responsible Annex II actor’ refers to any Annex II actor that complies with this Regulation or the OECD Due Diligence Guidance and has submitted audited reports as set out in Article 6 to a Member State authority in accordance with Article 7 (3) or 7 (7);
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 96 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point j d (new)
(jd) ‘business confidentiality and other competitiveness concerns’ means price information and supplier relationships without prejudice to subsequent evolving interpretation.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 97 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point k
(k) ‘model supply chain policy’ conforms to Annex II of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance outlining the risks of significant adverse impacts which may be associated with the extraction, trade, handling and export of minerals from conflict-affected and high risk areas;deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 98 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point l
(l) ‘risk management plan’ means the importers’ written response to the identified supply chain risks based on Annex III to the OECD Due Diligence Guidance14 ; __________________ 14OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas: Second Edition, OECD Publishing (OECD (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264185050- en.deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 99 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – point n
(n) ‘upstream’ means the mineral supply chain from the extraction sites to the smelters or refiners, included;deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 104 #
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 107 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Any importer of minerals or metals within the scope of the Regulation may self-certify as responsible importer by declaring to a Member State competent authority that it adheres to the supply chain due diligence obligations set out in this Regulation. The declaration shall contain documentation in which the importer confirms its adherence to the obligIn accordance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, operators shall take all reasonable steps and make good faith efforts to conduct their due diligence obligations pursuant to Article 4 and 5. Each operator shall ensure that they make progressive, measurable and timely improvement in complying with its obligations. The nature and extent of specific due diligence that is appropriate depends on individual circumstances and is affected by factors such as an operator’s position in the supply chain, the size of the operator, the location of the operator’s activities, the situations including results of the independent third-party audits carried out a particular country, the sector and nature of the products or services involved.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 109 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 2
2. The Member State competent authorities shall carry out appropriate ex- post checks in order to ensure that self- certified responsible importers of the minerals or metals within the scope of this Regulation comply with their obligations pursuant to Articles 4, 5, 6, and 7 of this Regulation.deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 113 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – introductory part
The responsible importer of the minerals or metalsEach operator shall, in accordance within the scope of this Regulation shallOECD Due Diligence Guidance:
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 117 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point b
(b) incorporate in its supply chain policy the standards against which supply chain due diligence is to be conducted consistent with the standards set forth in the model supply chain policy in Annex II to the OECD Due Diligence Guidance,
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 118 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point c
(c) structure its internal management systems to support supply chain due diligence, inter alia, by assigning responsibility to senior staff to oversee the supply chain due diligence process as well as maintain records for a minimum of 5 years,
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 119 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point c a (new)
(ca) establish a system of controls and transparency over the resources supply chain, including the identification of Annex II actors in the supply chain, which may be implemented through participation in industry-driven programmes,
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 120 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point d
(d) strengthen its engagement with suppliers, inter alia, by incorporating its supply chain policy into contracts and agreements with suppliers consistent with Annex II to the OECD Due Diligence Guidancethe model supply chain policy,
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 121 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point e
(e) establish a company-level, or industry- wide, grievance mechanism as an early- warning risk- awareness system or provide such mechanism through collaborative arrangements with other companies or organisations, or by facilitating recourse to an external expert or body (e.g. ombudsman),
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 122 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point f
(f) as regards minerals, operate a chain of custody or supply chain traceability system that provides, supported by documentation, the following information: (i) description of the mineral, including its trade name and type, (ii) name and address of the supplier to the importer, (iii) country of origin of the minerals, (iv) quantities and dates of extraction, expressed in volume or weight, (v) when minerals originate from conflict- affected and high-risk areas, additional information, such as the mine of mineral origin; locations where minerals are consolidated, traded and processed; and taxes, fees, royalties paid, in accordance with the specific recommendations for upstream companies as set out in the OECD Due Diligence Guidance.deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 123 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – point g
(g) as regards metals, operate a chain of custody or supply chain traceability system that provides, supported by documentation, the following information: (i) description of the metal, including its trade name and type, (ii) name and address of the supplier to the importer, (iii) name and address of the smelters or refiners in the importers’ supply chain, (iv) record of the smelters’ or refiners’ third-party audit reports, (v) countries of origin of the minerals in the smelters’ or refiners’ supply chain. (vi) when metals are based on minerals originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas, additional information shall be provided in accordance with the specific recommendations for downstream companies set out in the OECD Due Diligence Guidance.deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 127 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
In addition to the obligations set out in paragraph 1, Annex II type operators, shall operate a chain of custody or supply chain traceability system that provides, supported by documentation, the following information: (i) description of the resource including its trade name and type, (ii) name and address of the supplier to the Annex II actors, (iii) country of origin of the resource, (iv) quantities and dates of extraction, expressed in volume or weight, (v) when resources originate from conflict-affected and high-risk areas, additional information, such as extraction site; locations where resources are consolidated, traded and processed; and taxes, fees, royalties paid, in accordance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 128 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1 b (new)
Where an operator can reasonably conclude that covered products are derived only from recycled resources, it shall: (a) publicly disclose their determination; and (b) describe in reasonable detail the due diligence measures they exercised in making that determination.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 129 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The responsible importer of the minerals or metals within the scope of this Regulation shallEach operator shall, in accordance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, identify and assess the risks in its resources supply chain in accordance with Article 4, and:
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 130 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) identify and assess the risks of adverse impacts in its mineral supply chain on the basis of the information provided pursuant to Article 4 against the standards of its supply chain policy, consistent with Annex II and the due diligence recommendations of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance,deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 132 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i
(i) reporting findings of the supply chain risk assessment to its designated senior management of the operator,
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 133 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii – introductory part
(ii) devising and adopting a risk management measures consistent with Annex II and the due diligence recommendations of the OECD Due Diligence Guidanceplan, considering its ability to influence, and where necessary take steps to put pressurbuild leverage on suppliers who can most effectively prevent or mitigate the identified risk, by making it possible either to:
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 134 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Each operator other than an Annex II operator shall identify and assess the risks in its resources supply chain in accordance with paragraph 1 by: (a) identifying, to its best efforts, the Annex II actors in its resources supply chain; (b) assessing, to its best efforts, the due diligence practices of those Annex II actors identified under paragraph 1 a(a) above on the basis of any available audited reports and/or, as appropriate, other relevant information;
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 135 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. If a responsible importen Annex II operator pursues risk mitigation efforts while continuing trade or temporarily suspending trade, it shall, in accordance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, consult with suppliers and affected stakeholders, including local and central government authorities, international or civil society organisations and affected third parties, and agree on a strategy for measurable risk mitigation in the risk management plan.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 136 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. A responsible importeEach Annex II operator shall, in order to design conflict and high-risk sensitive strategies for mitigation in the risk management plan, relydraw on the measures and indicators under Annex III of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance and measure progressive improvement in accordance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 137 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. If an operator other than an Annex II operator pursues risk mitigation efforts while continuing trade or temporarily suspending trade it shall, as appropriate and in accordance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, consult suppliers and affected stakeholders, including local and central government authorities, international or civil society organisations and affected third parties, and agree on a strategy for measurable risk mitigation in the risk management plan.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 138 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 1
The responsible importer of the minerals or metals within the scope of this Regulation shall carry outAnnex II operators shall have their due diligence practices audits viaed by an independent third-party in accordance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 139 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
TIn accordance with the first paragraph and the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, the independent third-party audit shall:
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 140 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a
(a) include in the audit scope all of the responsible importeoperator’s activities, processes and systems used to implement supply chain due diligence regarding minerals or metals within the scope of the Regulation, including the responsible importecovered resources, including the operator’s management system, risk management, and disclosure of information,
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 141 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) determine as the objective of the audit the conformity of the responsible importeoperator’s supply chain due diligence practices with Articles 4, 5 and 7 of this Regulation,
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 142 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) respect the audit principles of independence, competence and accountability and any applicable audit scope, criteria and activities, as set out in the OECD Due Diligence Guidance.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 143 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 6 – paragraph 2 a (new)
All operators may cooperate through their industry organizations to ensure that the independent third-party audit is carried out in accordance with the second paragraph.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 144 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. By 31 March of each year at the latest, the responsible importer of minerals or metals within the scope of this Regulation all operators shall submit to the Member State competent authority the following documentation covering the previous year’s calendar period:
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 145 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) independent third-party audits carried out in accordance with Article 6 of this Regulation.deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 146 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. By 31 March of each year at the latest, the responsible importer of minerals wioperators other thian the scope of this RegulationAnnex II operators shall also submit to the Member State competent authority the documentation covering the previous year’s calendar period as regards the proportion of minerals originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas relative to the total amount of minerals purchased, as confirmed by independent third-party audits in accordance with Article 6 of this Regulation.management reports containing the following documentation covering the previous year’s calendar period:
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 147 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a (new)
(a) the operator’s supply chain due diligence policy, including the operator’s management structure responsible for its due diligence and the person directly responsible,
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 148 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b (new)
(b) the operator’s system of control and transparency over the resources supply chain, including the steps taken to identify upstream actors in the supply chain and to assess their due diligence practices,
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 149 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c (new)
(c) name and address of each of the Annex II actors in its supply chain, as identified by the operator in accordance with Article 4 and 5,
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 150 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point d (new)
(d) independent third-party audits regarding each of the Annex II actors in its supply chain carried out in accordance with the scope, objective and principles set out in Article 6 of the Regulation, as identified by the operator in accordance with Article 4 and 5,
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 151 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point e (new)
(e) potential or actual risks identified by the operator and action taken by the operator to manage risks during the reporting period in accordance with Article 5,
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 152 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point f (new)
(f) action taken by the operator to strengthen its due diligence efforts during the reporting period.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 153 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. By 31 March of each year at the latest, the responsible importer of metals within the scope of this RegulationAnnex II type operators shall also submit to the Member State competent authority the following documentation covering the previous year’s calendar period:
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 154 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) name and address of each of the responsible smelters or refiners in its supply chain,deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 156 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) independent third-party audits regarding each of the responsible smelters or refiners in its supply chain carried out in accordance with the scope, objective and principles set out incarried out in accordance with Article 6 of theis Regulation,; and
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 158 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) information on the proportion of mineralcovered resources originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas relative to the total amount of minerals purchased by each of those smelters or refinerscovered resources purchased, as confirmed by the independent third-party audits in accordance with Article 6 of this Regulation.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 159 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. The responsible importer of minerals or metals within the scope of this RegulationOperators shall make available to itstheir immediate downstream purchasers all information gained and maintained pursuant to its supply chain due diligence with due regard to business confidentiality and other competitive concerns, in accordance with the OECD Guidance.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 160 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. The responsible importer of minerals or metalsOperators shall publicly disclose in accordance within the scope of this Regulation shall publicly reportOECD Due Diligence Guidance and as widely as possible, including on the internet and on an annual basis on its supply chain due diligence policies and practices for responsible sourcing. The report shall contain the steps taken by the responsible importeoperator to implement the obligations as regards its management system, risk management set out in Article 4 and 5 respectively, as well as a summary report of the third-party audits, including the name of the auditorny independent third-party audits of responsible Annex II actors in the operators’ supply chain, with due regard to business confidentiality and other competitive concerns.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 161 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Responsible Annex II actors outside the territory of the Union may, for the purpose of being included in a Member State competent authority’s reports under Article 15(1) and the list referred to in Article 8, submit to that authority: (a) documentation in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 3 above, and (b) a written declaration of conformity with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, also containing its name, address, full contact details and a description of its commercial activities.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 162 #
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 164 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 1
1. On the basis of the information provided by the Member States in their reports as referred to in Article 15, the Commission shall adopt and make publicly available a decision listing the names and addresses of responsible smelters and refiners of minerals within the scope of this RegulationAnnex II actors.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 167 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall identify on the list referred to in paragraph 1 those responsible smelters and refineAnnex II actors that source – at least partially – from conflict- affected and high-risk areas.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 169 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall adopt the list in accordance with the template in Annex II and the regulatory procedure referred to in Article 13(2)I. The OECD Secretariat shall be consulted.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 170 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 4
4. The Commission shall update the information included in the list in a timely manner but not less than every six months. The Commission shall remove from the list the names of the smelters and refineAnnex II actors that are no longer recognised as responsible importeAnnex II actors by Member States in accordance with Article 14(3), or the names of the smelters and refiners in the supply chain of the no longer recognised responsible importers.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 176 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall make a decision to publish, including on the internet, a list of competent authorities in accordance with the template in Annex III and the regulatory procedure referred to in paragraph 2 of Article 13V. The Commission shall update the list regularly.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 178 #
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 179 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. The competent authorities of the Member States shall carry out appropriate ex-post checks in order to ensure whether self-certified responsible importers of minerals and metalthat operators within scope of this Regulation comply with the obligations set out in Articles 4, 5, 6 and 7.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 180 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2
2. The checks referred to in paragraph 1 shall be conducted by taking a risk-based approach. In addition, checks may be conducted when a competent authority is in possession of relevant information, including on the basis of substantiated concerns provided by third parties, concerning the compliance by a responsible importen operator with this Regulation.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 181 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) examination of the responsible importeoperator’s implementation of supply chain due diligence obligations including the management system, risk management, independent third-party audit and disclosure,
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 182 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new)
(ca) examination of the reporting requirements in accordance with the scope, objective and principles set out in Article 7,
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 183 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. Responsible importeOperators shall offer all assistance necessary to facilitate the performance of the checks referred to in paragraph 1, notably as regards access to premises and the presentation of documentation and records.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 184 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. The competent authorities of the Member States shall publish a report detailing the full findings of any ex-post checks, together with a reasonable explanation for making those findings and any documentation on which the competent authority based its findings.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 185 #
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 188 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall be assisted by a committee. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 189 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. WThere reference is made to this paragraph, Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply. Where the opinion of the committee is to be obtained by written procedure, that procedure shall be terminated without result when, within the time-limit for delivery of the opinion, the chair of the committee so decides or a simple majority of committee members so request power to adopt delegated acts referred to in the relevant Articles shall be conferred to the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from the date that this Regulation enters into force.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 190 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply. Where the opinion of the committee is to be obtained by written procedure, that procedure shall be terminated without result when, within the time-limit for delivery of the opinion, the chair of the committee so decides or a simple majority of committee members so request.deleted
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 191 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The delegation of powers referred to in the relevant Articles may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision of revocation shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the validity of any delegated acts already in force.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 192 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European Parliament and to the Council.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 193 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2 c (new)
2c. A delegated act adopted pursuant to the relevant Articles shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed by either the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 194 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 a (new)
Article 13 a Amending Annex I and Annex II 1. The Commission shall regularly review developments with regard to the contribution of global trade in natural resources to conflict and human rights abuses and violations in conflict-affected and high-risk areas, the development of international responsible sourcing standards and the experience gained in the implementation of this Regulation. In the course of the review, the Commission shall take into account, in particular, the information obtained by the Commission under and for the purposes of Article 15 and information provided by international or civil society organisations and affected third parties. 2. The Commission shall regularly review the scope of Annex I and II, in the light of the information obtained pursuant to paragraph 1 so as to achieve effectively the purpose of this Regulation, as stated in Article 1. Annex I shall be reviewed with a view to expanding the list of covered resources. Annex II shall be reviewed with a view to identifying additional choke points of transformation and traceability in covered resources supply chains with a view to strengthening supply chain due diligence with regard to all Annex I resources. Such a review shall take place not less than every 6 months. 3. The Commission may adopt delegated acts in order to expand the list of covered resources as stated in paragraph 2. 4. Delegated acts adopted under this Article shall enter into force without delay and shall apply as long as no objection is expressed in accordance with paragraph 5. The notification of a delegated act adopted under this Article to the European Parliament and to the Council shall state the reasons for the use of the urgency procedure. 5. Either the European Parliament or the Council may object to a delegated act in accordance with the procedure referred to in this Article. In such a case, the Commission shall repeal the act without delay following the notification of the decision to object by the European Parliament or the Council.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 197 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 2
2. In case of an infringement of the provisions of this Regulation, the competent authorities of Member States shall issue a notice of remedial action to be taken by the responsible importeoperator.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 199 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. In case of inadequate remedial action by the responsible importeoperator, the competent authority shall issue to the importeoperator a notice of non-recognition of its responsible importer certificate as regards the minerals or metals within the scope of this Regulation compliance and inform the Commission.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 203 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall submit to the Commission by 30 June of each year at the latest, a report on the implementation of this Regulation during the previous calendar year, including any information on responsible importersAnnex II actors, as set out in Article 7(1) (a), 7.2 and 7.3 (a) and (c(3) (a)-(b) and 7(7) (a).
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 206 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3
3. Three years after the entry into force of this Regulation and every six years thereafter, the Commission shall review the functioning and effectiveness of this Regulation, including on the promotion and cost of responsible sourcing of the mineralresources within its scope from conflict- affected and high-risk areas. The Commission shall submit a review report to the European Parliament and to the Council.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 209 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 a (new)
Article 15 a Accompanying measures 1. In order to effectively break the link between the exploitation of natural resources and conflict and to ensure their responsible sourcing, the Commission and the External Action Service shall implement accompanying measures to this Regulation aimed at the enhancement of responsible sourcing, the effective establishment of national and international due diligence frameworks and related support systems, including reliable certification and traceability systems, and the addressing of development needs linked to (a) the exploitation and trade in natural resources originating from conflict- affected and high-risk areas and (b) the implementation of this Regulation, including: (i) support to companies to responsibly source from conflict-affected and high risk areas providing technical and other assistance and guidance to operators, taking into account the situation of small and medium-sized enterprises and their position in the supply chain, in order to facilitate compliance with the requirements of this Regulation. (ii) targeted, rights-based development cooperation, particularly addressing the challenges of implementing responsible sourcing in the local context of conflict- affected and high risk areas, including poverty reduction, good governance and the security sector; (iii) meaningful policy dialogues on responsible sourcing with third countries and other stakeholders; (iv) close cooperation with the Member States, in particular complementary initiatives in the area of consumer, investor and customer information and when providing technical and other assistance in accordance with point (i). 2. The European Commission and the European External Action Service shall, as appropriate, implement the objectives of accompanying measures through political and policy dialogues, programming, and relevant internal and external policies. Where appropriate, legislative proposals should be presented to the European Parliament and the Council. 3. The European Commission shall present to the European Parliament and to the Council an annual report of the accompanying measures implemented pursuant to this Article and their impact and effectiveness.
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 212 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I -- title
List of minerals and metalresources within the scope of the Regulation classified under the Combined Nomenclature
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 213 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex I -- table
CN Code Product description 2609 00 00 Tin ores and concentrates 2611 00 00 Tungsten ores and concentrates 2615 90 00 Tantalum ores and concentrates 2616 90 00 Gold ores and concentrates 2825 90 40 Tungsten oxides and hydroxides 2849 90 30 Tungsten carbides 2849 90 50 Tantalum carbides 7108 Gold, unwrought or in semi-manufactured forms, or in powder form 8001 Tin, unwrought 8003 00 00 Tin bars, rods, profiles and wires 8007 00 Tin, other articles 8101 10 00 Tungsten, powder 8101 94 00 Tungsten, unwrought, including bars and rods obtained simply by sintering 8101 96 00 Tungsten wire 8101 99 Tungsten bars and rods, other than those obtained simply by sintering, profiles, plates, sheets, strip and foil, and other 8103 20 00 Tantalum, unwrought including bars and rods, obtained simply by sintering; powders 8103 90 Tantalum bars and rods, other than those obtained simply by sintering, profiles, wire, plates, sheets, strip and foil, and other Minerals Metals Precious stones Semi-precious stones
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 214 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex Ia (new)
Annex Ia List of choke points identified in the supply chains of covered resources -‘smelters’ -‘refiners’
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 215 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II -- title
List of responsible smelters and refiners’ template referred to in Article 8Annex Ia actors
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 216 #

2014/0059(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Annex II
Column A: Name of smelters or refinersAnnex Ia actor in alphabetical order Column B: Address of the smelter or refineAnnex Ia actor Column C: Annex Ia category of the actor Column CD: (*) indicator, if the smelter or refiner sources mineralAnnex Ia actor engages in responsible sourcing of resources originating from conflict- affected and high -risk areas
2015/02/03
Committee: DEVE
Amendment 702 #

2014/0020(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – title
DerogaExemption from the requirements of Chapter III
2015/02/03
Committee: ECON
Amendment 705 #

2014/0020(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. At the request of a Member State, tThe Commission may grant a derogan exemption from the requirements of this Chapter to a credit institution taking deposits from individuals and SMEs that are, which in case of a group can be in relation to the group as a whole or specifically to a group entity located in one or more Member States, that is subject to national primary legislation adopted bein force at the date of entry into force 29 January 2014of this Regulation when the national legislation complies with the following requirements:
2015/02/03
Committee: ECON
Amendment 719 #

2014/0020(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
A Member State wishing to obtain a derogation for a credit institution subject to the national legislation in The exemption may be requested either by a credit institution itself or, for reasons relating to the specificities of its banking sector structure, by the Member State concerned for one or more credit institutions chosen on objective grounds. The requestion, shall send a request for derogatbe submitted to the Commission, accompanied by a positive opinion issued by the competent authority supervising the credit institutionentity that is subject to the request for derogation, to the Commission. That requesexemption. That request, in case it is made by a credit institution that belongs to a group, shall originate from the EU parent, even if the exemption is sought only for a group entity located in one or more Member States. It shall provide all the necessary information for the appraisal of the national legislation and specify the credit institutions the derogaentity the exemption is applied for. Where the Commission considers that it does not have all the necessary information, it shall contact the requesting Member State concernedor credit institution, as the case may be, within two months of receipt of the request and specify what additional information is required. If the request is made by a credit institution, it may, within the same timeframe, also contact the Member State concerned which shall submit to the Commission any requested information on its national legislation.
2015/02/03
Committee: ECON
Amendment 724 #

2014/0020(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Once the Commission has all the information it considers necessary for appraisal of the request for derogaexemption, it shall within one month notify the requesting Member State or credit institution, as the case may be, that it is satisfied with the information.
2015/02/03
Committee: ECON
Amendment 728 #

2014/0020(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3
Within five months of issuing the notification referred to in the second subparagraph, the Commission shall, after having consulted the EBA on the reasons underlying its envisaged decision and on the potential impact of such a decision on the financial stability of the Union and the functioning of the internal market, adopt an implementing decision declaring the national legislation not incompatible with this Chapter and granting the derogaexemption to the credit institutions specified in the request referred to in the first subparagraph 1. Where the Commission intends to declare the applicable national legislation incompatible and to not grant the derogaexemption it shall set out its objections in detail and provide the requesting credit institution and the Member State concerned with the opportunity to submit written comments within one month from the date of notification of the Commission objections. The Commission shall within three months from the end of the time limit for submission adopt an implementing decision granting or rejecting the derogationexemption, which it shall notify to the requesting credit institution and to the Member State whose national legislation is concerned.
2015/02/03
Committee: ECON
Amendment 730 #

2014/0020(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 a (new)
Where, and as long as, national legislation not declared incompatible with this Chapter applies to a credit institution that has been granted an exemption from the requirements of this Chapter, the national supervisory authority of the Member State in question shall in relation to the entity subject to the exemption continue to exercise its powers as defined in the national legislation not declared incompatible, as in force at the time of the entry into force of this Regulation. In case of an exemption granted to a group entity, the exercise of these powers shall be without prejudice to the powers of the competent authority under this Regulation as regards the EU parent and the other group entities of the same group which were not granted an exemption.
2015/02/03
Committee: ECON
Amendment 733 #

2014/0020(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
Where the national legislation is amended, the Member State shall notify the amwhich the Commission has declared not incompatible is amended or no longer applies, the credit institution and the Member State concerned shall independments toly from each other notify the Commission. The Commission may, whether on the basis of such notification or on its own motion, review the implementing decision referred to in the third subparagraph. Where national legislation not declared incompatible with this Chapter no longer applies as in force at the date of entry into force of this Regulation to a credit institution that has been granted an exemption from the requirements of this Chapter, that exemption shall be withdrawn with regard to that credit institution.
2015/02/03
Committee: ECON
Amendment 737 #

2014/0020(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 5
Where the national legislation not declared incompatible with this Chapter no longer appliAn exemption granted to a credit institution upon request of a Member State shall expire at the latest five years after entry into force of this Regulation, unless to a credit institution that has been granted derogation from the requirements of this Chapter, that derogation shall be withdrawn with regard to that credit institutionhe Commission decides, in accordance with the first subparagraph, for reasons pertaining to the financial stability of the Union and taking into account the functioning of the internal market, to prolong the exemption for five more years.
2015/02/03
Committee: ECON
Amendment 741 #

2014/0020(COD)

Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 6
The Commission shall notify its decisions to the EBA. The EBA shall publish a list of the credit institutions that have been granted a derogan exemption in accordance with this Article. The list shall be continuously kept up-to-date.
2015/02/03
Committee: ECON