BETA

5 Amendments of Isabella DE MONTE related to 2018/2156(INI)

Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Recital D
D. whereas it is highly desirable to maintain and further increase the efficiency of CEF;
2018/09/13
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the joint communication by the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the Action Plan on Military Mobility, as itwhich recognises the strategic role played by the trans- European transport network (TEN-T) in integrating the Union’s infrastructure in order to achieve rapid and seamless mobility across the continent, thus further developing the internal market;
2018/09/13
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Strongly supports the decision to allocate the military mobility envelope under the centralised management of the CEF programme; takes note ofregrets the lack of clarity concerning the preliminary actions set by the Action Plan prior to the implementation of the military mobility which will be based on identification of and agreement on the military requirements, followed by the identification of sections of the TEN-T network suitable also for military transport and a list of priority projects, together with the eventual upgrade of the technical requirements applicable to the TEN-T network;
2018/09/13
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that the military mobility projects will have to follow the same criteria, conditions and procedures as set out in the CEF regulation in order to be eligible; stresses that the process of identification of the sections of the TEN-T network suitable for military transport must unconditionally maximisenecessarily involve dual civilian and military synergiesuse;
2018/09/13
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Believes that dual use of infrastructure, including in cases of connectivity with important industrial zones significant for the defence industry, is an essential precondition for the civil transport network to benefit from the Action Plan and the military mobility envelope; strongly believes, therefore, that projects financed under the CEF military mobility envelope should be eligible only and exclusively if adding to an existing civil infrastructure and projects within the framework of the TEN- T network and enabling dual use of the infrastructure;
2018/09/13
Committee: TRAN