BETA


2018/2156(INI) Military mobility

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFET KELAM Tunne (icon: PPE PPE) AYALA SENDER Inés (icon: S&D S&D), VAN ORDEN Geoffrey (icon: ECR ECR), NART Javier (icon: ALDE ALDE), BUCHNER Klaus (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), CASTALDO Fabio Massimo (icon: EFDD EFDD), SCHAFFHAUSER Jean-Luc (icon: ENF ENF)
Committee Opinion TRAN TELIČKA Pavel (icon: ALDE ALDE) Marie-Christine ARNAUTU (icon: ENF ENF), Rolandas PAKSAS (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2018/12/11
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2018/12/11
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 437 votes to 155, with 63 abstentions, a resolution on military mobility.

Members stressed that military mobility is a central strategic tool enabling the EU to pursue its security and defence interests effectively and in a complementary manner with other organisations such as NATO.

The introduction of the action plan on military mobility in the Union is part of the major objective of improving mobility in the EU, and at the same time of responding to the logistics and mobility challenges set out in the Common Security and Defence Policy. This is why the ambitious timetable in the action plan should be adhered to, both by the EU institutions and by Member States in order to ensure that the current mobility gaps are filled as soon as possible and the level of ambition in defence and security policy are achieved.

EU’s role : while the achievement of military mobility in Europe depends above all on the commitment expressed by the Member States and their political will, the Union should contribute by guiding the process by setting a framework for requirements, providing funding, drafting protocols to facilitate the efficient movement of technical equipment and human resources, fostering cooperation and providing forums for an exchange of best practices, information and experiences involving both civilian and military authorities.

Stressing the importance of mobility when responding to a crisis, Members believe that an efficient military mobility policy will strengthen the EU's CSDP missions by increasing synergies between defence needs and strengthen the EU’s capacity to respond to emergency situations. Humanitarian missions and natural disaster responses in the EU should also benefit from greater military mobility.

Challenges to be addressed : Members acknowledged the complex nature of the challenge, which involves, among other aspects, issues relating to infrastructure construction, common standards, transport regulations, customs, taxes and travel authorisations, and which concerns all levels of government. They called for the establishment of frameworks to bring together civilian and military actors at all levels, including NATO and its partners, to discuss relevant issues and thus ensure added value and effective coordination and implementation.

Connecting European Facility (CEF) : Members welcomed the Commission's proposal to use the Connecting European Facility (CEF) to implement dual-use military mobility projects and the significant funds earmarked for this purpose. They see the implementation of the Action Plan as an opportunity to enable the civilian transport network to benefit from increased network capacity and to promote multimodal connections. They considered that any transport project of common interest financed by the CEF should integrate, if necessary, military mobility requirements at the conception phase with a view to optimising the use of EU funds.

Parliament pointed out the need for a customs and fiscal regulatory framework , in particular as regards VAT. In particular, it stressed the importance of achieving harmonised rules on permissions for cross-border movements, which constitute a major obstacle to rapid movement.

Member States should work together to maximise the effectiveness of cross-border dual use and to reduce administrative costs. In this regard, Members supported the ambition to speed up border crossing times by 2019, and – with that aim in mind – for diplomatic authorisations for land, sea and air movements to be issued within five days, and for that deadline to be even shorter for rapid reaction units.

Enhanced cooperation : the EU, its Member States and NATO are called on to intensify their cooperation and coordination , in particular by using funds for common projects, increasing political flexibility, formalising the EU-NATO relationship, broadening areas of cooperation and sharing information more widely, where this is in the interests of the Union's security.

Parliament strongly supported the Council's call on Member States to develop national military mobility plans by the end of 2019 and to make their implementation a priority.

Documents
2018/12/11
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2018/12/10
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2018/11/21
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Tunne KELAM (EPP, EE) on military mobility.

Members stressed that military mobility is a central strategic tool enabling the EU to pursue its security and defence interests effectively and in a complementary manner with other organisations such as NATO.

While the achievement of military mobility in Europe depends above all on the commitment expressed by the Member States and their political will, the Union should contribute by guiding the process by setting a framework for requirements, providing funding, drafting protocols to facilitate the efficient movement of technical equipment and human resources, fostering cooperation and providing forums for an exchange of best practices, information and experiences involving both civilian and military authorities.

Stressing the importance of mobility when responding to a crisis, Members believe that an efficient military mobility policy will strengthen the EU's CSDP missions by increasing synergies between defence needs and strengthen the EU’s capacity to respond to emergency situations. Humanitarian missions and natural disaster responses in the EU should also benefit from greater military mobility.

Members acknowledged the complex nature of the challenge , which involves, among other aspects, issues relating to infrastructure construction, common standards, transport regulations, customs, taxes and travel authorisations, and which concerns all levels of government. They called for the establishment of frameworks to bring together civilian and military actors at all levels, including NATO and its partners, to discuss relevant issues and thus ensure added value and effective coordination and implementation.

The report underlined that the development of the Action Plan on military mobility within the European Union is an integral part of the major objective of improving mobility within the Union and, at the same time, of meeting the logistical challenges of mobility set out in the CSDP.

Members welcomed the Commission's proposal to use the Connecting European Facility (CEF) to implement dual-use military mobility projects and the significant funds earmarked for this purpose. They see the implementation of the Action Plan as an opportunity to enable the civilian transport network to benefit from increased network capacity and to promote multimodal connections. They considered that any transport project of common interest financed by the CEF should integrate, if necessary, military mobility requirements at the conception phase.

The report pointed out the need for a customs and fiscal regulatory framework , in particular as regards VAT. In particular, it stresses the importance of achieving harmonised rules on permissions for cross-border movements, which constitute a major obstacle to rapid movement.

Member States should work together to maximise the effectiveness of cross-border dual use and to reduce administrative costs. In this regard, Members supported the ambition to speed up border crossing times by 2019, and – with that aim in mind – for diplomatic authorisations for land, sea and air movements to be issued within five days, and for that deadline to be even shorter for rapid reaction units.

Members called on the EU, its Member States and NATO to intensify their cooperation and coordination , in particular by using funds for common projects, increasing political flexibility, formalising the EU-NATO relationship, broadening areas of cooperation and sharing information more widely, where this is in the interests of the Union's security.

The report strongly supported the Council's call on Member States to develop national military mobility plans by the end of 2019 and to make their implementation a priority.

Documents
2018/11/12
   EP - Vote in committee
2018/10/12
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/09/13
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/07/13
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2018/07/11
   EP - TELIČKA Pavel (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2018/07/05
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2018/03/20
   EP - KELAM Tunne (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Votes

A8-0372/2018 - Tunne Kelam - Résolution 11/12/2018 12:46:44.000 #

2018/12/11 Outcome: +: 437, -: 155, 0: 63
IT PL DE RO ES BG BE PT HU CZ SK FI AT NL LT HR SI FR EE LU MT LV ?? EL CY GB DK IE SE
Total
63
44
85
27
46
17
19
18
18
19
10
12
18
21
10
9
8
67
5
6
6
5
1
18
6
61
12
8
14
icon: PPE PPE
197

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Latvia PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1

United Kingdom PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Sweden PPE

2
icon: S&D S&D
164

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

Abstain (2)

3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
3
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Germany ALDE

3

Romania ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: ECR ECR
66

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Abstain (1)

2

Czechia ECR

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Finland ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Sweden ECR

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
33

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
19

Germany NI

2

Hungary NI

2

France NI

2

NI

For (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark NI

1
icon: ENF ENF
30

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Italy GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
42

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3
AmendmentsDossier
228 2018/2156(INI)
2018/09/13 AFET 228 amendments...
source: 627.704

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/3
name
LÖSING Sabine
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE625.206
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-625206_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.704
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-627704_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE626.673&secondRef=04
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-626673_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2018-11-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0372_EN.html title: A8-0372/2018
summary
events/2
date
2018-11-21T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0372_EN.html title: A8-0372/2018
summary
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20181210&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2018-12-10-TOC_EN.html
events/5
date
2018-12-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0498_EN.html title: T8-0498/2018
summary
events/5
date
2018-12-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0498_EN.html title: T8-0498/2018
summary
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0372&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0372_EN.html
events/4
date
2018-12-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0498 title: T8-0498/2018
summary
events/4
date
2018-12-11T00:00:00
type
Results of vote in Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=31827&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
events/5
date
2018-12-11T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0498 title: T8-0498/2018
summary
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0498
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0498_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: KELAM Tunne date: 2018-03-20T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2018-03-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KELAM Tunne group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
rapporteur
name: TELIČKA Pavel date: 2018-07-11T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2018-07-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TELIČKA Pavel group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
activities
  • date: 2018-07-05T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: AYALA SENDER Inés group: ECR name: VAN ORDEN Geoffrey group: ALDE name: NART Javier group: GUE/NGL name: LÖSING Sabine group: Verts/ALE name: BUCHNER Klaus group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo group: ENF name: SCHAFFHAUSER Jean-Luc responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2018-03-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: KELAM Tunne body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2018-07-11T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: ALDE name: TELIČKA Pavel
  • date: 2018-12-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2018-03-20T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KELAM Tunne group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2018-03-20T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: EPP name: KELAM Tunne
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2018-07-11T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TELIČKA Pavel group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
TRAN
date
2018-07-11T00:00:00
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: TELIČKA Pavel
docs
  • date: 2018-07-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE625.206 title: PE625.206 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2018-09-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE627.704 title: PE627.704 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2018-10-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE626.673&secondRef=04 title: PE626.673 committee: TRAN type: Committee opinion body: EP
events
  • date: 2018-07-05T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-11-12T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-11-21T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0372&language=EN title: A8-0372/2018 summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted an own-initiative report by Tunne KELAM (EPP, EE) on military mobility. Members stressed that military mobility is a central strategic tool enabling the EU to pursue its security and defence interests effectively and in a complementary manner with other organisations such as NATO. While the achievement of military mobility in Europe depends above all on the commitment expressed by the Member States and their political will, the Union should contribute by guiding the process by setting a framework for requirements, providing funding, drafting protocols to facilitate the efficient movement of technical equipment and human resources, fostering cooperation and providing forums for an exchange of best practices, information and experiences involving both civilian and military authorities. Stressing the importance of mobility when responding to a crisis, Members believe that an efficient military mobility policy will strengthen the EU's CSDP missions by increasing synergies between defence needs and strengthen the EU’s capacity to respond to emergency situations. Humanitarian missions and natural disaster responses in the EU should also benefit from greater military mobility. Members acknowledged the complex nature of the challenge , which involves, among other aspects, issues relating to infrastructure construction, common standards, transport regulations, customs, taxes and travel authorisations, and which concerns all levels of government. They called for the establishment of frameworks to bring together civilian and military actors at all levels, including NATO and its partners, to discuss relevant issues and thus ensure added value and effective coordination and implementation. The report underlined that the development of the Action Plan on military mobility within the European Union is an integral part of the major objective of improving mobility within the Union and, at the same time, of meeting the logistical challenges of mobility set out in the CSDP. Members welcomed the Commission's proposal to use the Connecting European Facility (CEF) to implement dual-use military mobility projects and the significant funds earmarked for this purpose. They see the implementation of the Action Plan as an opportunity to enable the civilian transport network to benefit from increased network capacity and to promote multimodal connections. They considered that any transport project of common interest financed by the CEF should integrate, if necessary, military mobility requirements at the conception phase. The report pointed out the need for a customs and fiscal regulatory framework , in particular as regards VAT. In particular, it stresses the importance of achieving harmonised rules on permissions for cross-border movements, which constitute a major obstacle to rapid movement. Member States should work together to maximise the effectiveness of cross-border dual use and to reduce administrative costs. In this regard, Members supported the ambition to speed up border crossing times by 2019, and – with that aim in mind – for diplomatic authorisations for land, sea and air movements to be issued within five days, and for that deadline to be even shorter for rapid reaction units. Members called on the EU, its Member States and NATO to intensify their cooperation and coordination , in particular by using funds for common projects, increasing political flexibility, formalising the EU-NATO relationship, broadening areas of cooperation and sharing information more widely, where this is in the interests of the Union's security. The report strongly supported the Council's call on Member States to develop national military mobility plans by the end of 2019 and to make their implementation a priority.
  • date: 2018-12-10T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20181210&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2018-12-11T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0498 title: T8-0498/2018 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 437 votes to 155, with 63 abstentions, a resolution on military mobility. Members stressed that military mobility is a central strategic tool enabling the EU to pursue its security and defence interests effectively and in a complementary manner with other organisations such as NATO. The introduction of the action plan on military mobility in the Union is part of the major objective of improving mobility in the EU, and at the same time of responding to the logistics and mobility challenges set out in the Common Security and Defence Policy. This is why the ambitious timetable in the action plan should be adhered to, both by the EU institutions and by Member States in order to ensure that the current mobility gaps are filled as soon as possible and the level of ambition in defence and security policy are achieved. EU’s role : while the achievement of military mobility in Europe depends above all on the commitment expressed by the Member States and their political will, the Union should contribute by guiding the process by setting a framework for requirements, providing funding, drafting protocols to facilitate the efficient movement of technical equipment and human resources, fostering cooperation and providing forums for an exchange of best practices, information and experiences involving both civilian and military authorities. Stressing the importance of mobility when responding to a crisis, Members believe that an efficient military mobility policy will strengthen the EU's CSDP missions by increasing synergies between defence needs and strengthen the EU’s capacity to respond to emergency situations. Humanitarian missions and natural disaster responses in the EU should also benefit from greater military mobility. Challenges to be addressed : Members acknowledged the complex nature of the challenge, which involves, among other aspects, issues relating to infrastructure construction, common standards, transport regulations, customs, taxes and travel authorisations, and which concerns all levels of government. They called for the establishment of frameworks to bring together civilian and military actors at all levels, including NATO and its partners, to discuss relevant issues and thus ensure added value and effective coordination and implementation. Connecting European Facility (CEF) : Members welcomed the Commission's proposal to use the Connecting European Facility (CEF) to implement dual-use military mobility projects and the significant funds earmarked for this purpose. They see the implementation of the Action Plan as an opportunity to enable the civilian transport network to benefit from increased network capacity and to promote multimodal connections. They considered that any transport project of common interest financed by the CEF should integrate, if necessary, military mobility requirements at the conception phase with a view to optimising the use of EU funds. Parliament pointed out the need for a customs and fiscal regulatory framework , in particular as regards VAT. In particular, it stressed the importance of achieving harmonised rules on permissions for cross-border movements, which constitute a major obstacle to rapid movement. Member States should work together to maximise the effectiveness of cross-border dual use and to reduce administrative costs. In this regard, Members supported the ambition to speed up border crossing times by 2019, and – with that aim in mind – for diplomatic authorisations for land, sea and air movements to be issued within five days, and for that deadline to be even shorter for rapid reaction units. Enhanced cooperation : the EU, its Member States and NATO are called on to intensify their cooperation and coordination , in particular by using funds for common projects, increasing political flexibility, formalising the EU-NATO relationship, broadening areas of cooperation and sharing information more widely, where this is in the interests of the Union's security. Parliament strongly supported the Council's call on Member States to develop national military mobility plans by the end of 2019 and to make their implementation a priority.
  • date: 2018-12-11T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    AFET/8/13890
    New
    • AFET/8/13890
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 54
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 52
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting committee decision
    New
    Procedure completed
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 6.10.02 Common security and defence policy (CSDP); WEU, NATO
    New
    6.10.02
    Common security and defence policy (CSDP); WEU, NATO
    activities/0
    date
    2018-07-05T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    committees
    activities/1/committees
    • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: AYALA SENDER Inés group: ECR name: VAN ORDEN Geoffrey responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2018-03-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: KELAM Tunne
    • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
    activities/1/date
    Old
    2018-07-05T00:00:00
    New
    2018-12-10T00:00:00
    activities/1/type
    Old
    Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    New
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    committees/0/shadows/2
    group
    ALDE
    name
    NART Javier
    committees/0/shadows/3
    group
    GUE/NGL
    name
    LÖSING Sabine
    committees/0/shadows/4
    group
    Verts/ALE
    name
    BUCHNER Klaus
    committees/0/shadows/5
    group
    EFD
    name
    CASTALDO Fabio Massimo
    committees/0/shadows/6
    group
    ENF
    name
    SCHAFFHAUSER Jean-Luc
    committees/1/date
    2018-07-11T00:00:00
    committees/1/rapporteur
    • group: ALDE name: TELIČKA Pavel
    activities/0
    date
    2018-07-05T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    committees
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    AFET/8/13890
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    New
    Awaiting committee decision
    activities
      committees
      • body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: AYALA SENDER Inés group: ECR name: VAN ORDEN Geoffrey responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2018-03-20T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: KELAM Tunne
      • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Transport and Tourism committee: TRAN
      links
      other
        procedure
        reference
        2018/2156(INI)
        title
        Military mobility
        legal_basis
        Rules of Procedure EP 52
        stage_reached
        Preparatory phase in Parliament
        subtype
        Initiative
        type
        INI - Own-initiative procedure
        subject
        6.10.02 Common security and defence policy (CSDP); WEU, NATO