[ParlTrack]

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point c – point i

Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 23 a

(i) paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: ‘ 1. Without prejudice to paragraph 4, the aid under the school scheme allocated for the distribution of products, the accompanying educational measures and the related costs referred to in Article 23(1) shall not exceed EUR 220 804 135 per school year. Within that overall limit, the aid shall not exceed: (a) EUR 130 608 466 per school year; (b) per school year.'; ’deleted for school fruit and vegetables: for school milk: EUR 90 195 669

2018/12/12
Committee: AGRI

Michel DANTIN, Peter JAHR, Norbert LINS

Proposal for a regulation
Article premier – paragraph 1 – point 22 b (new)

Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Article 149 – paragraph 2 – point c – subpoint i

(22b) In point (c) of Article 149(2), subpoint (i)is replaced by the following: ‘(i) the volume of raw milk covered by such negotiations does not exceed ~~3,5~~ 4% of total Union production, ’ Or. fr (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:02013R1308- 20180101&from=EN)

2018/12/12
Committee: AGRI

Norbert LINS

Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 32 a (new)

Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013
Annex VII – Part III – point 6 – paragraph 1

(32a) In Annex VII, part III, point 6, the paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: “6. In respect of a product other than those described in points 1, 2 and 3 of this Part, no label, commercial document, publicity material or any form of advertising as defined in Article 2 of Council Directive 2006/114/EC (34) or any form of presentation may be used which claims, implies or suggests that the product is a dairy product the following shall be prohibited: (a) any direct or indirect commercial use of a dairy protected designation in respect of products not covered by the protection where those products are comparable to the products protected under that designation or where using the designation exploits the reputation of the protected designation; (b) any misuse, comparison, imitation or evocation, even if the true nature of the product is indicated or if the protected designation is translated or accompanied by an expression such as ‘style’, ‘type’, ‘imitation’, ‘alternative to’, ‘to be used as’ or similar; (c) any other false or misleading indication as to the nature or essential qualities of the product that is used on the inner or outer packaging, advertising material or documents relating to the product concerned, and the packing of the product in a container liable to convey a false impression as to its true characteristics; (d) any other practice liable to mislead the consumer as to the true nature of the product” Or. en (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:02013R1308- 20180101&from=FR)

2018/12/12
Committee: AGRI

Norbert LINS

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012
Article 10 – paragraph 1

(4) in paragraph 1 of Article 10, the introductory sentence is replaced by the following: ‘ ‘ A reasoned statement of opposition as referred to in Article 51(1) shall be admissible only if it is received by the Commission within the time limit set out in that paragraph and if it:’; ‘deleted

2018/12/12
Committee: AGRI

Norbert LINS

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012
Article 21 – paragraph 1

(8) in paragraph 1 of Article 21, the introductory sentence is replaced by the following: ‘ A reasoned statement of opposition as referred to in Article 51(1) shall be admissible only if it is received by the Commission before expiry of the time limit and if it:; ‘deleted

2018/12/12
Committee: AGRI

Norbert LINS

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point a

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012
Article 51 – paragraph 1

(a) paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: ‘ 1. Within three months from the date of publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, the authorities of a Member State or of a third country, or a natural or a legal person having a legitimate interest and established in a third country may lodge a reasoned statement of opposition with the Commission. A natural or a legal person having a legitimate interest, established or resident in a Member State other than that from which the application was submitted, may lodge a reasoned statement of opposition with the Member State in which it is resident or established within a time limit permitting an opposition to be lodged pursuant to the first subparagraph.; ‘deleted

2018/12/12
Committee: AGRI

Norbert LINS

Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 – point b

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012
Article 51 – paragraph 2

(b) paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: ‘ 2. the admissibility of the reasoned statement of opposition based in particular on grounds of opposition laid down in Article 10 as regards protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications and based in particular on the grounds for opposition laid down in Article 21 as regards traditional specialities guaranteed.; ‘deleted The Commission shall examine

2018/12/12
Committee: AGRI

7 Amendments of Norbert LINS related to 2018/0218(COD)

ParlTrack - 2011-2024