Activities of Marcus PRETZELL related to 2018/2089(INI)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on autonomous driving in European transport
Amendments (7)
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Welcomes the Commission’s communication on an EU strategy for mobility of the future; acknowledges its potential, the spill-over effects on many sectors and the new business models enabled by automated driverless mobility, which willare expected to bring benefits for companies with a view to making Europe a leader in vehicle technologies; draws attention also to its implications for all users, including persons with special needs or, disabilities and, the visually impaired;, whether they be familiar or not with IT.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that theis depveloypment of connected and automated mobility can contribute to road safety, help to reduce road fatalities to zero in Europe by 2050, and favour lower emissions, social inclusion and overall transport efficiency;will offer benefits, but also disclose points of attack, e.g., unwanted and unperceived intervention, supervision, remote control, data hacking etc., the prevention of which must be ensured by correct and safe application and protection systems; therefore stresses that societal acceptance will only be achieved only if the highest safety and security standards are guaranteed;, especially as regards data protection aiming at preventing any kind of supervision of the vehicle and any car passenger; is convinced that the benefits of this deployment of connected and automated mobility, if applied safely, correctly, as well as in accordance with the privacy rights of any individual, may result in an improvement of road safety, the reduction of road fatalities and emissions, as well as the optimisation of overall transport.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that clearthorough and comprehensible information about the automated features of a vehicle must be made available to potential consumers before they acquire a vehicle and dur, including, its lifetimef necessary, lifelong updates, and that a level playing field and fair access to different market players offering repair and maintenance is essential to ensure fair competition, especially for independent SMEs; if able to guarantee the same data protection level as the carmakers IT suppliers
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Calls for the utmost, i.e. state-of- the art, security against the collection, mining, tracking and transfer of data, no matter whether these affect driving routes, passenger information or else.
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Highlights the importance of users being in control of all their personal data collected by connected and automated cars; emphasises the importance of the transmission and storage of data between vehicles and connected infrastructure being protected by a minimumstate-of-the-art set of security measures, at least including encryption, software updates and strong authentication mechanisms, while respecting data protection legislation and the principle of privacy, providing the highest levels of security by design and by default; stresses that consumers must be offered the maximum level of protection against hacking and cyber attacks;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Affirms that technical standards adapted by different brands must not only be aligned with global guidelines, be drafted using a technology-neutral approach and ensure interoperability, but also must ensure the utmost security against any sort of hacking, skimming, intervention or supervision;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Under this premise, urges all stakeholders, Members States and authorities involved to cooperate in fostering innovation, in ensuring investment in infrastructure fit for automated mobility and in facilitating cross-border testing.