9 Amendments of Kosma ZŁOTOWSKI related to 2019/2191(INI)
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E c (new)
Recital E c (new)
E c. Whereas it is of vital importance to create a framework of economic incentives to advance the responsiveness of the Railway undertakings in planning the investments in the retrofit of the rolling stock, while the procedures of authorization and conformity of the OBUs in the Member States should not represent a burden to the RUs investment decision;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Believes that the Agency should be provided with the appropriate financial resources and powers to overcome the challenges of ERTMS deployment and functioning that still exist (harmonisation of operational rules and requirement, specification maintenance and change, and public procurement procedures etc.), with the close cooperation of the Member States and due respect for the competences of rail infrastructure managers;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Highlights the role of the ERTMS Coordinator in defining the lines and corridors to be equipped with the ERTMS as a matter of priority, and in ensuring its deployment in the most cost-efficient way in close cooperation with the Member States and the stakeholders;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to come up with a decommissioning strategy for Class B systems used on interoperable lines with regulatory deadlines to be set at EU level; believes that the effectiveness of this strategy depends on the involvement of the actors concerned;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Deplores the fact that in the five years till mid-2019 almost 80 % of new vehicles introduced in Europe were either subject to a derogation or were exempted from the requirement to fit the ERTMS, and urges the Commission to take concrete initiatives to reverse this trend by enacting an appropriate regulatory framework and ensuring that a set of economic incentives are in place to foster the investments of the RUs on ERTMS on Board Units;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Deplores the facPoints out that in the five years till mid-2019 almost 80 % of new vehicles introduced in Europe were either subject to a derogation or were exempted from the requirement to fit the ERTMS; stresses that such derogations should be maintained for vehicles which are unable to use such a system on the route;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23 b (new)
Paragraph 23 b (new)
23 b. Calls on the Commission to evaluate the opportunity to grant ERTMS strategic projects under the CEF funding a co-financing factor even higher than 50% when such projects are embedded in ambitious large-scale accelerated plans to scale-up the ERTMS deployment, in order to incentivize ambitious strategies for ERTMS in the Member States;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Recalls that EU funds are not sufficient to cover all the expected needs. and therefore calls on the Commission and Member States to cooperate closely to further improve the attractiveness of investing in the ERTMS, and to guarantee legal certainty for private investors. Particularly, in the case of CEF grants for ERTMS, it calls for the duration of the grants agreements to be extended to better reflect and match the cycles related to public procurement procedures;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25 a. Stresses the importance of the key opportunity of using funding under the Recovery and Resilience Facility to advance on ERTMS deployment. In this sense, calls on the European Commission to make sure that Member States include ERTMS related investments in their National Recovery Plans;