5 Amendments of Daniel BUDA related to 2014/2149(INI)
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission, in the context of the Juncker investment plan and the revision of the Europe 2020 strategy, to support European cultural heritage projects, including large-scale projects, on the grounds that they create jobs in the regions, particularly for young people; notes the multiple benefits of investment in the cultural heritage and stresses the need to consolidate public- private partnerships for funding purposes;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that this ceiling, in particular because it relates to total costs, rather than total eligible costs, could seriously limit Member States’ ability to finance such projects; notes the rapid improvement in access to digitisation and urges the Commission to review eligible project costs in the light of recent developments;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Highlights the fact that ERDF cultural heritage projects are a practical example of multilevel governance and of the principle of subsidiarity; stresses the importance of cross-border cultural projects that contribute to increasing economic and social cohesion and encourage inclusion
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Takes the view that, thanks to joint funding under the Joint Strategic Framework and the Juncker initiative, investments for the development of EU cultural infrastructures will have a major economic impact and will contribute to increasing employment;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that projects of this kind often provide examples of good practice in carrying out integrated projects in urban areas, thereby contributing to the development of the urban agenda; stresses the urban dimension of the European cultural capital initiatives, which contribute to the development of cultural networks in cities and promote creative initiatives in the long term;