BETA


2014/2149(INI) Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead CULT DIACONU Mircea (icon: ALDE ALDE) ŠOJDROVÁ Michaela (icon: PPE PPE), MORGANO Luigi (icon: S&D S&D), KRASNODĘBSKI Zdzisław (icon: ECR ECR), MARAGALL Ernest (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), ADINOLFI Isabella (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Committee Opinion AFET
Committee Opinion DEVE
Committee Opinion ECON
Committee Opinion EMPL
Committee Opinion ITRE
Committee Opinion IMCO
Committee Opinion TRAN KYRKOS Miltiadis (icon: S&D S&D) Curzio MALTESE (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion REGI COZZOLINO Andrea (icon: S&D S&D) Ivan JAKOVČIĆ (icon: ALDE ALDE), Ivana MALETIĆ (icon: PPE PPE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2016/02/24
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2015/09/08
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2015/09/08
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 613 votes to 70 with 19 abstentions, a resolution entitled ‘Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe’.

Members recalled that culture and cultural heritage are shared resources and are common goods and values that cannot be subject to an exclusive use, and their full potential for sustainable human, social and economic development has yet to be fully recognised and properly exploited, both at the level of EU strategies and the UN post-2015 development goals.

Parliament considered that an integrated approach is necessary if one wishes to achieve cultural dialogue and mutual understanding. In this context, it addressed the following recommendations to the Commission:

to establish a common approach within the Commission through improved cooperation between the different policy areas dealing with cultural heritage, and to report back to Parliament on the results of this closer cooperation; to communicate to potential beneficiaries, in a straightforward and accessible way such as through a single information platform and exchange of best practices in the EU, concerning the existing European funding lines for cultural heritage; to designate, preferably for 2018, a European Year of Cultural Heritage , with an adequate budget and to submit the draft programme for the European Year to Parliament no later than 2016; to acknowledge, within its political and transversal approach , cultural heritage as both movable and immovable, tangible and intangible, and as a non-renewable resource whose authenticity must be preserved.

European funding : in addition to setting up a single EU portal dedicated to tangible and intangible cultural heritage, Parliament called on the Commission to:

support, with dedicated funding , studies, research and pilot measures specifically designed to: (i) analyse the impacts of cultural heritage promotion processes; (ii) develop specific indicators and benchmarks in relation to the direct and indirect contribution of that heritage to economic and social development processes, and (iii) directly support cultural and social innovation integrated into local settings in which cultural heritage can drive development and help improve people’s quality of life; strengthen the newly established principle of multifunding , which allows the complementary use of different European funds within the same large-scale project; review the EUR 5 million benchmark in relation to cultural heritage projects submitted in the framework of the small-scale infrastructure action, bringing it to at least the same level as UNESCO projects, i.e. EUR 10 million .

Member States are invited to look into possible fiscal incentives in relation to restoration, preservation and conservation work, such as reductions in VAT or other taxes, given that European cultural heritage is also managed by private bodies. The Commission is urged to take stock of best practices in fiscal policies in Europe and recommend the appropriate ones to the Member States.

Stressing the importance of cross-border cultural projects, Members called for measures to be taken to strengthen and expand support for funding through public-private partnership agreements.

Moreover, they stressed the need for new governance models to include a system of quality control in all alternative forms of funding and administration of cultural heritage.

The economic and strategic potential of cultural heritage: the report noted that cultural heritage contributes to innovative jobs, products, services and processes and that it plays a vital role in several of the Europe 2020 flagship initiatives , such as the Digital Agenda , the Innovation Union, the Agenda for New Skills and Jobs and the industrial policy for the globalisation era.

Therefore, Members called for greater recognition of the role of European cultural heritage as a strategic resource for smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth in the mid-term review of the Europe 2020 strategy.

Cultural tourism : this sector, which accounts for 40 % of European tourism, is a key economic sector in terms of potential for growth and employment. It underlined the possibility of focusing more strongly on cultural tourism in developing macro-regional strategies designed to make it a more integral part of the strategic framework for European cooperation.

Members recalled the importance of promoting the conservation of cultural heritage assets and encouraging all forms of sustainable tourism by shaping sustainable, less invasive and higher value-added forms of cultural and natural tourism,

Members insisted on the need to:

give cultural heritage its clear place in the Commission’s Investment Plan for Europe and to ensure that adequate funds and initiatives are directed to the valorisation of Europe’s cultural heritage; promote excellence, innovation and competitiveness in the cultural and creative sectors by supporting the work of artists, creators and cultural professionals; propose a set of indicators that could be used for monitoring and evaluation of the situation of cultural heritage and that would be uniform for all Member States; develop and promote opportunities for mobility and exchange of experiences for those working in the cultural heritage sector, by ensuring that there is genuine professional reciprocity; promote in school curricula the inclusion of art, music, theatre and film education as a key to developing knowledge of cultural heritage.

Opportunities and challenges : overall, Members encouraged the creation of all-round tourist products based on an integrated development/strategy plan in order to enhance the visibility of the cultural heritage. The resolution also insisted, inter alia, on:

the need to improve the level of digitisation , preservation and online availability of cultural heritage, in particular the European film heritage; the importance of developing a true democratic and participative narrative for European heritage, including that of religious and ethnic minorities. Religious heritage constitutes an intangible part of European cultural heritage, regardless of its religious origins; the importance of intercultural dialogue both within and outside Europe. The Union should promote such dialogue as an appropriate tool against radicalism of whatever origin; supporting cultural activities of migrant communities; improving accessibility to cultural heritage sites for people with disabilities; the importance of the gastronomic heritage, which must be protected and supported; strengthening efforts to fight the stealing, smuggling and illegal trafficking of cultural heritage assets inside and outside the EU; the importance of protecting and conserving cultural heritage, not only from the ravages of time but also from hooliganism and despoliation.

Lastly, Parliament encouraged the adoption of international agreements to prevent illicit trafficking of cultural heritage . In this regard, the EU, together with the UN and UNESCO, should defend heritage in danger and fight looting and destruction of cultural objects in conflict areas.

Documents
2015/09/08
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2015/09/07
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2015/06/24
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Culture and Education adopted an own-initiative report by Mircea DIACONU (ADLE, RO) entitled ‘Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe’.

Members recalled that culture and cultural heritage are shared resources and are common goods and values that cannot be subject to an exclusive use, and their full potential for sustainable human, social and economic development has yet to be fully recognised and properly exploited , both at the level of EU strategies and the UN post-2015 development goals.

The report considered that an integrated approach is necessary if one wishes to achieve cultural dialogue and mutual understanding . In this context, Members addressed the recommendations to the Commission:

to establish a common approach within the Commission through improved cooperation between the different policy areas dealing with cultural heritage, and to report back to Parliament on the results of this closer cooperation; to communicate to potential beneficiaries, in a straightforward and accessible way such as through a single information platform and exchange of best practices in the EU, concerning the existing European funding lines for cultural heritage; to designate, preferably for 2018, a European Year of Cultural Heritage , with an adequate budget and to submit the draft programme for the European Year to Parliament no later than 2016; to acknowledge, within its political and transversal approach , cultural heritage as both movable and immovable, tangible and intangible, and as a non-renewable resource whose authenticity must be preserved.

European funding : in addition to setting up a single EU portal dedicated to tangible and intangible cultural heritage, the report called on the Commission to:

support, with dedicated funding , studies, research and pilot measures specifically designed to analyse the impacts of cultural heritage promotion processes; strengthen the newly established principle of multifunding , which allows the complementary use of different European funds within the same large-scale project; review the EUR 5 million benchmark in relation to cultural heritage projects submitted in the framework of the small-scale infrastructure action1, bringing it to at least the same level as UNESCO projects, i.e. EUR 10 million.

Member States are invited to look into possible fiscal incentives in relation to restoration, preservation and conservation work, such as reductions in VAT or other taxes, given that European cultural heritage is also managed by private bodies.

New governance models : the report asked the Member States to ensure the development of legal tools that allow alternative funding and administration models, such as community involvement, the participation of civil society and public-private partnerships , with a view to implementing actions related to cultural heritage (conservation, restoration, preservation, development and promotion).

Members proposed initiating a Europe-wide dialogue between policymakers across all levels of governance , together with cultural and creative industries, networks of tourism operators, partnerships between private and public actors, and NGOs.

Stressing the importance of cross-border cultural projects , Members called for measures to be taken to strengthen and expand support for funding through public-private partnership agreements.

Moreover, they stressed the need for new governance models to include a system of quality control in all alternative forms of funding and administration of cultural heritage.

The economic and strategic potential of cultural heritage : the report noted that cultural heritage contributes to innovative jobs, products, services and processes and that it plays a vital role in several of the Europe 2020 flagship initiatives, such as the Digital Agenda , the Innovation Union, the Agenda for New Skills and Jobs and the industrial policy for the globalisation era.

Therefore, Members called for greater recognition of the role of European cultural heritage as a strategic resource for smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth in the mid-term review of the Europe 2020 strategy.

The report pointed out that cultural tourism , which accounts for 40 % of European tourism, is a key economic sector in terms of potential for growth and employment. It underlined the possibility of focusing more strongly on cultural tourism in developing macro-regional strategies designed to make it a more integral part of the strategic framework for European cooperation.

Members recalled the importance of promoting the conservation of cultural heritage assets and encouraging all forms of sustainable tourism .

Members insisted on the need to:

give cultural heritage its clear place in the Commission’s Investment Plan for Europe ; promote excellence, innovation and competitiveness in the cultural and creative sectors by supporting the work of artists, creators and cultural professionals; propose a set of indicators that could be used for monitoring and evaluation of the situation of cultural heritage and that would be uniform for all Member States; develop and promote opportunities for mobility and exchange of experiences for those working in the cultural heritage sector, by ensuring that there is genuine professional reciprocity; promoting in school curricula the inclusion of art, music, theatre and film education as a key to developing knowledge of cultural heritage.

Opportunities and challenges : overall, Members encouraged the creation of all-round tourist products based on an integrated development/strategy plan in order to enhance the visibility of the cultural heritage. The report also insisted, inter alia , on:

the need to improve the level of digitisation , preservation and online availability of cultural heritage, in particular the European film heritage; the importance of developing a true democratic and participative narrative for European heritage, including that of religious and ethnic minorities. Religious heritage constitutes an intangible part of European cultural heritage, regardless of its religious origins; the importance of intercultural dialogue both within and outside Europe. The Union should promote such dialogue as an appropriate tool against radicalism of whatever origin; supporting cultural activities of migrant communities; improving accessibility to cultural heritage sites for people with disabilities; the importance of the gastronomic heritage, which must be protected and supported; strengthening efforts to fight the stealing, smuggling and illegal trafficking of cultural heritage assets inside and outside the EU; the importance of protecting and conserving cultural heritage, not only from the ravages of time but also from hooliganism and despoliation.

Lastly, Members encouraged the adoption of international agreements to prevent illicit trafficking of cultural heritage . In this regard, the EU, together with the UN and UNESCO, should defend heritage in danger and fight looting and destruction of cultural objects in conflict areas.

Documents
2015/06/16
   EP - Vote in committee
2015/05/08
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/05/07
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2015/03/31
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/03/03
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2015/02/04
   IT_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2014/11/24
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2014/11/18
   EP - KYRKOS Miltiadis (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2014/10/31
   PT_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2014/10/21
   DE_BUNDESRAT - Contribution
Documents
2014/09/22
   EP - COZZOLINO Andrea (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
2014/09/03
   EP - DIACONU Mircea (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in CULT
2014/07/22
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: presentation of a Communication proposing an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe.

BACKGROUND: c ultural heritage is a shared resource, and a common good. It can be vulnerable to over-exploitation and under-funding, which can result in neglect, decay and, in some cases, oblivion.

It is, therefore, our common responsibility, while heritage protection is primarily a matter for national, regional and local authorities. The European Union has no less a role to play in line with the EU Treaties and in respect of the principle of subsidiarity.

This is why the Commission proposes this Communication, which has been informed by several years of dialogue with EU Presidencies and stakeholders, responding to the invitation of the Council to "pursue the analysis of the economic and social impact of cultural heritage in the EU and contribute to a development of a strategic approach".

The overall objective is to examine available information on the economic and social impacts of cultural heritage, as well as plans to improve the evidence base and to explore the challenges and opportunities for the heritage sector.

The communication sets out the tools available at EU level, complementing national and regional programmes, to help protect and enhance the intrinsic and social value of heritage, to strengthen its contribution to economic growth and job creation, and develop its potential for the EU's public diplomacy.

CONTENT: the European experience shows that it is possible to progress from an appreciation of the uniqueness of one's own heritage to an interest in and respect for the heritage of others. In this context, the Communication describes the measures available to strengthen policy cooperation at different levels, and projects being developed to support new models of heritage governance.

The overall aim is to help Member States and stakeholders make the most of the significant support for heritage available under EU instruments, progress towards a more integrated approach at national and EU level, and ultimately make Europe a laboratory for heritage-based innovation .

Economic base of cultural heritage : according to the most recent statistics (France, 2011), heritage generated EUR 8.1 billion and UK studies have shown that the historic environment can offer a high return on investment: each £1 invested generating up to £1.60 of additional economic activity over ten years. In the area of tourism, heritage is estimated to contribute EUR 415 billion to the EU GDP and 3.4 million tourism enterprises account for 15.2 million jobs – many linked to heritage, directly or indirectly. In 2013, 52% of EU citizens visited at least one historical monument or site and 37% a museum or gallery in their respective countries, while 19% visited a historical monument or site in another EU country.

Heritage, therefore, has great capacity to promote social cohesion and integration, through regeneration of neglected areas, creation of locally-rooted jobs, and promotion of shared understanding and a sense of community.

However, to increase understanding of the actual and potential role of heritage in policy development, it is important to improve systematic data on its economic and social impacts.

Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage : to strengthen Europe's position in the field of cultural heritage preservation, restoration and valorisation, the Commission proposes to:

· encourage the modernisation of the heritage sector by actions raising awareness and engaging new audiences ;

· apply a strategic approach to research and innovation , knowledge sharing and smart specialization;

· seize the opportunities offered by digitisation ; to reach out to new audiences and engage young people in particular;

· identify skills needs and improve the training of heritage professionals ; and

· continue developing more participative interpretation and governance models that are better suited to contemporary Europe, through greater involvement of the private sector and civil society.

To achieve these objectives, several actions are envisaged including actions relating to:

Research and innovation : p ooling resources in order to apply the latest technologies and stimulate new scientific approaches can greatly improve the understanding, preservation and dissemination of cultural heritage. To this end, the Horizon 2020 programme for research and innovation ( with nearly EUR 80 billion available from 2014 to 2020) will further reinforce the EU's position in the field of cultural heritage preservation, restoration and valorisation.

Digitisation : the digitisation of heritage contributes to the European Agenda for Culture, by improving public access to different forms of cultural and linguistic expressions. The Europeana cultural platform ( www.europeana.eu ) now provides access to some 30 million cultural objects from more than 2,500 organisations. However, much remains to do to rare and old material, including film. Initiatives are proposed within the framework of a parallel communication on the digitisation of cinematographic works.

Raising awareness : the new programme " Creative Europe " will support cross-border cooperation to promote the modernisation of the heritage sector. It will also improve civil society capacity to operate transnationally by supporting networks and platforms. Other initiatives will contribute to the awareness of common European heritage such as the " European Capitals of Cultural " (ECC), the European Heritage Label , or even the programme " Europe for Citizens " which seeks to encourage reflection on the causes of totalitarian regimes in modern European history.

Local and regional development and cultural heritage : the EU's cohesion and rural development policies can be instrumental in promoting the restoration of cultural heritage, supporting cultural and creative industries and financing the training and upgrading of skills of cultural professionals. Conserving, promoting and managing cultural heritage is currently well supported under the EU Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF). In 2007-2013, the European Regional Development Fund allocated EUR 3.2 billion for protecting and preserving cultural heritage, EUR 2.2 billion to develop cultural infrastructure and EUR 553 million for cultural services, which also benefited cultural heritage. Cultural heritage will remain eligible, under certain conditions, to benefit from ESIF investments in heritage in 2014-2020.

Promoting tourism and strengthening training : the EU provides grants for the creation or improvement of European cultural routes crossing several countries and joining them in a common narrative. The Commission also intends reviving old skills and developing new ones. To achieve this, it aims to increase the attractiveness of heritage-related professions and to provide more opportunities for continuous training, taking advantage, for instance, of the opportunities provided by the European Social Fund.

In addition, building on the achievements of the Lifelong Learning Programme, the Erasmus+ programme will provide increased opportunities for learning mobility and tackle skills gaps by supporting transnational partnerships between entreprises.

Strengthening the cooperation in external relations : the EU and its Member States are active in multilateral fora and organisations that address cultural heritage policies, such as the Council of Europe and UNESCO.

Initiatives are also planned to fight against illicit trafficking (notably in Africa) as well as to strengthen the policy dialogues that the Commission conducts with the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM), China, India, Brazil, and the European Neighbourhood Policy countries.

Strengthening cultural governance : cooperation at EU level can and does make a decisive contribution towards heritage policies and governance at national and local levels. Legislative action has already been taken in areas of EU competence. In addition, the recent revision of the Environmental Impact Assessment ( Directive 2014/52/EU ) strengthens the requirement for Member States to assess the effects of certain public and private projects on material assets and cultural heritage.

The next Council Work Plan for Culture starting in 2015 offers the opportunity to step up cooperation between the Member States within the Open Method of Coordination (OMC).

Heritage will also feature in the Commission's structured dialogue with civil society (for example: within the framework of the European Expert Network on Culture ).

Next steps : the Commission now invites all stakeholders to jointly look into how public policies at all levels, including the EU, could better be marshalled to draw out the long term and sustainability value of Europe's cultural heritage, and develop a more integrated approach to its preservation and valorisation.

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0207/2015 - Mircea Diaconu - § 3, point c #

2015/09/08 Outcome: +: 597, -: 82, 0: 9
DE IT ES PL RO FR PT HU BE CZ EL BG AT FI SK LT HR SE NL IE SI LV LU CY MT EE DK GB
Total
86
68
48
49
30
69
19
19
18
21
17
14
17
12
13
11
11
19
25
9
7
7
6
6
6
5
13
62
icon: PPE PPE
201
2

Sweden PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
178

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

3

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ECR ECR
62

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: ENF ENF
37

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

A8-0207/2015 - Mircea Diaconu - § 6 #

2015/09/08 Outcome: +: 606, -: 77, 0: 6
DE IT ES PL FR RO PT HU CZ BE EL BG AT SK FI LT HR SE NL LV IE SI LU EE MT CY DK GB
Total
89
67
49
46
70
29
19
19
20
18
18
14
17
13
12
11
11
20
24
8
10
7
6
6
6
5
13
61
icon: PPE PPE
204
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
172

Czechia S&D

3

Belgium S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

For (2)

2

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Romania ALDE

3

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ECR ECR
60

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
10

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: ENF ENF
37

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

A8-0207/2015 - Mircea Diaconu - § 7, point b/2 #

2015/09/08 Outcome: +: 596, -: 95
DE IT ES PL RO FR HU PT BE CZ BG SK SE FI EL LT HR AT IE SI LV LU MT NL CY EE DK GB
Total
88
69
50
47
28
67
20
19
18
21
14
13
20
12
18
11
10
18
10
7
7
6
6
23
5
6
13
64
icon: PPE PPE
204
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
179

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

3

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

France Verts/ALE

4

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
34

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

A8-0207/2015 - Mircea Diaconu - § 7, point f #

2015/09/08 Outcome: +: 590, -: 62, 0: 47
DE FR ES IT PL RO HU PT CZ BE EL BG SE AT SK FI HR LT IE NL SI LV EE CY MT LU DK GB
Total
90
70
49
69
49
30
20
19
20
18
17
14
20
18
13
12
11
10
10
25
7
7
6
6
6
5
12
65
icon: PPE PPE
206
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
182

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
61

Romania ALDE

3

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ECR ECR
64

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Belgium ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
37

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
10

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

A8-0207/2015 - Mircea Diaconu - § 13 #

2015/09/08 Outcome: +: 549, -: 128, 0: 24
DE PL ES RO IT HU FR BE BG AT CZ PT SE SK LT HR FI NL SI LV GB LU EE MT IE DK CY EL
Total
91
46
49
31
69
20
71
19
14
18
21
19
20
12
11
11
12
24
7
7
64
6
6
6
10
12
6
18
icon: PPE PPE
204
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
182

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

3

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

France NI

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

A8-0207/2015 - Mircea Diaconu - § 30 #

2015/09/08 Outcome: +: 639, -: 55, 0: 6
DE FR IT ES PL RO HU CZ BE PT EL SE AT BG NL FI SK LT HR IE SI LV EE MT LU CY DK GB
Total
90
71
68
50
49
31
20
21
19
18
18
20
18
13
26
12
12
11
11
10
7
7
6
6
5
5
12
63
icon: PPE PPE
203
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
182

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
62

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

A8-0207/2015 - Mircea Diaconu - § 62 #

2015/09/08 Outcome: +: 559, -: 96, 0: 44
DE IT ES RO PL FR HU BE CZ BG PT SE EL SK LT FI HR AT NL LV SI LU EE MT IE CY DK GB
Total
89
69
48
31
46
69
20
19
21
13
18
20
18
13
11
11
11
18
26
8
7
6
6
6
10
6
13
65
icon: PPE PPE
201
2

Finland PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
182

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Romania ALDE

3

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Portugal GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
37

Romania ENF

1

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

A8-0207/2015 - Mircea Diaconu - § 63 #

2015/09/08 Outcome: +: 587, -: 92, 0: 20
DE IT ES PL RO FR HU BE PT CZ BG SE FI LT HR NL AT EL SK LV SI LU EE MT IE CY DK GB
Total
89
68
50
48
31
71
20
18
18
21
12
20
12
11
11
26
18
17
12
7
7
6
6
6
10
6
13
64
icon: PPE PPE
203
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
180
3

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
68

Romania ALDE

3

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
62

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

A8-0207/2015 - Mircea Diaconu - § 74/2 #

2015/09/08 Outcome: +: 566, -: 128, 0: 10
DE IT PL ES RO FR BE HU BG SE AT PT LT HR SK FI CZ LV SI LU EE MT NL DK IE EL CY GB
Total
87
68
49
50
31
71
19
19
14
20
18
19
11
11
13
12
21
7
7
6
6
6
26
13
10
18
6
65
icon: PPE PPE
204
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
183

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

3

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: ECR ECR
63

Italy ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
40

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

A8-0207/2015 - Mircea Diaconu - Considérant H #

2015/09/08 Outcome: +: 584, 0: 63, -: 57
DE IT ES FR RO PL HU BE PT SE AT CZ BG FI EL LT NL IE HR SK LV SI LU EE CY MT DK GB
Total
90
69
49
70
31
48
20
19
19
20
17
21
14
12
17
11
26
10
11
13
8
7
6
6
6
6
13
64
icon: PPE PPE
206
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
180

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

3

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Romania ENF

1
2

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

2

Poland NI

1

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
64

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

A8-0207/2015 - Mircea Diaconu - Considérant O/2 #

2015/09/08 Outcome: +: 596, -: 86, 0: 22
DE IT ES PL RO FR BE PT HU CZ SE BG AT FI LT HR NL IE SK LV SI EL MT LU EE DK CY GB
Total
90
68
49
48
31
71
19
19
20
21
20
14
18
12
11
11
26
10
12
8
7
18
6
5
5
13
6
65
icon: PPE PPE
207
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
180

Croatia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

3

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ECR ECR
63

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Slovakia ECR

Against (1)

3

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

1

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

France NI

2

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

A8-0207/2015 - Mircea Diaconu - Résolution #

2015/09/08 Outcome: +: 613, -: 70, 0: 19
DE FR ES PL IT RO GB CZ BE HU PT AT SE BG SK FI EL LT HR LV IE NL SI LU EE MT CY DK
Total
90
71
48
47
69
31
64
21
18
20
18
18
20
13
13
12
18
11
11
8
10
26
7
6
6
6
6
13
icon: PPE PPE
208
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
180

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
67

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
61

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

France GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
38

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

3
icon: NI NI
11

Germany NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

Netherlands NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
366 2014/2149(INI)
2015/03/16 TRAN 139 amendments...
source: 551.933
2015/03/31 CULT 170 amendments...
source: 551.750
2015/04/14 REGI 57 amendments...
source: 554.716

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/3
name
MALTESE Curzio
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE546.783
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-PR-546783_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE551.750
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AM-551750_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.110&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-549110_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.097&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-549097_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2015-06-24T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0207_EN.html title: A8-0207/2015
summary
events/3
date
2015-06-24T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0207_EN.html title: A8-0207/2015
summary
events/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150907&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
events/6
date
2015-09-08T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0293_EN.html title: T8-0293/2015
summary
events/6
date
2015-09-08T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0293_EN.html title: T8-0293/2015
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
rapporteur
name: DIACONU Mircea date: 2014-09-03T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2014-09-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DIACONU Mircea group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
rapporteur
name: KYRKOS Miltiadis date: 2014-11-18T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2014-11-18T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KYRKOS Miltiadis group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/8
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
rapporteur
name: COZZOLINO Andrea date: 2014-09-22T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/8
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2014-09-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: COZZOLINO Andrea group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
docs/4/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0207&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0207_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0293
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0293_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2014-09-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DIACONU Mircea group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2014-09-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DIACONU Mircea group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
activities
  • date: 2014-07-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0477 title: COM(2014)0477 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52014DC0477:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/ title: Education and Culture Commissioner: NAVRACSICS Tibor type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2014-11-24T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: ŠOJDROVÁ Michaela group: S&D name: MORGANO Luigi group: ECR name: KRASNODĘBSKI Zdzisław group: GUE/NGL name: MALTESE Curzio group: Verts/ALE name: MARAGALL Ernest group: EFD name: ADINOLFI Isabella responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2014-09-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: ALDE name: DIACONU Mircea body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2014-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: COZZOLINO Andrea body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2014-11-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: S&D name: KYRKOS Miltiadis
  • date: 2015-06-16T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: ŠOJDROVÁ Michaela group: S&D name: MORGANO Luigi group: ECR name: KRASNODĘBSKI Zdzisław group: GUE/NGL name: MALTESE Curzio group: Verts/ALE name: MARAGALL Ernest group: EFD name: ADINOLFI Isabella responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2014-09-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: ALDE name: DIACONU Mircea body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2014-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: COZZOLINO Andrea body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2014-11-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: S&D name: KYRKOS Miltiadis
  • date: 2015-06-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0207&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0207/2015 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2015-09-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150907&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-09-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0293 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0293/2015 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Education, Youth, Sport and Culture commissioner: NAVRACSICS Tibor
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2014-09-03T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: DIACONU Mircea group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
CULT
date
2014-09-03T00:00:00
committee_full
Culture and Education
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: DIACONU Mircea
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Development
committee
DEVE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
opinion
False
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
opinion
False
committees/6
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
committee
TRAN
date
2014-11-18T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: KYRKOS Miltiadis group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
REGI
date
2014-09-22T00:00:00
committee_full
Regional Development
rapporteur
group: S&D name: COZZOLINO Andrea
committees/8
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2014-09-22T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: COZZOLINO Andrea group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/8
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
TRAN
date
2014-11-18T00:00:00
committee_full
Transport and Tourism
rapporteur
group: S&D name: KYRKOS Miltiadis
docs
  • date: 2015-03-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE546.783 title: PE546.783 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2015-03-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE551.750 title: PE551.750 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2015-05-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.110&secondRef=02 title: PE549.110 committee: TRAN type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2015-05-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE549.097&secondRef=02 title: PE549.097 committee: REGI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-02-24T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=25924&j=0&l=en title: SP(2015)748 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2015-02-04T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2014)0477 title: COM(2014)0477 type: Contribution body: IT_SENATE
  • date: 2014-10-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2014)0477 title: COM(2014)0477 type: Contribution body: DE_BUNDESRAT
  • date: 2014-10-31T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2014)0477 title: COM(2014)0477 type: Contribution body: PT_PARLIAMENT
events
  • date: 2014-07-22T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0477 title: EUR-Lex title: COM(2014)0477 summary: PURPOSE: presentation of a Communication proposing an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe. BACKGROUND: c ultural heritage is a shared resource, and a common good. It can be vulnerable to over-exploitation and under-funding, which can result in neglect, decay and, in some cases, oblivion. It is, therefore, our common responsibility, while heritage protection is primarily a matter for national, regional and local authorities. The European Union has no less a role to play in line with the EU Treaties and in respect of the principle of subsidiarity. This is why the Commission proposes this Communication, which has been informed by several years of dialogue with EU Presidencies and stakeholders, responding to the invitation of the Council to "pursue the analysis of the economic and social impact of cultural heritage in the EU and contribute to a development of a strategic approach". The overall objective is to examine available information on the economic and social impacts of cultural heritage, as well as plans to improve the evidence base and to explore the challenges and opportunities for the heritage sector. The communication sets out the tools available at EU level, complementing national and regional programmes, to help protect and enhance the intrinsic and social value of heritage, to strengthen its contribution to economic growth and job creation, and develop its potential for the EU's public diplomacy. CONTENT: the European experience shows that it is possible to progress from an appreciation of the uniqueness of one's own heritage to an interest in and respect for the heritage of others. In this context, the Communication describes the measures available to strengthen policy cooperation at different levels, and projects being developed to support new models of heritage governance. The overall aim is to help Member States and stakeholders make the most of the significant support for heritage available under EU instruments, progress towards a more integrated approach at national and EU level, and ultimately make Europe a laboratory for heritage-based innovation . Economic base of cultural heritage : according to the most recent statistics (France, 2011), heritage generated EUR 8.1 billion and UK studies have shown that the historic environment can offer a high return on investment: each £1 invested generating up to £1.60 of additional economic activity over ten years. In the area of tourism, heritage is estimated to contribute EUR 415 billion to the EU GDP and 3.4 million tourism enterprises account for 15.2 million jobs – many linked to heritage, directly or indirectly. In 2013, 52% of EU citizens visited at least one historical monument or site and 37% a museum or gallery in their respective countries, while 19% visited a historical monument or site in another EU country. Heritage, therefore, has great capacity to promote social cohesion and integration, through regeneration of neglected areas, creation of locally-rooted jobs, and promotion of shared understanding and a sense of community. However, to increase understanding of the actual and potential role of heritage in policy development, it is important to improve systematic data on its economic and social impacts. Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage : to strengthen Europe's position in the field of cultural heritage preservation, restoration and valorisation, the Commission proposes to: · encourage the modernisation of the heritage sector by actions raising awareness and engaging new audiences ; · apply a strategic approach to research and innovation , knowledge sharing and smart specialization; · seize the opportunities offered by digitisation ; to reach out to new audiences and engage young people in particular; · identify skills needs and improve the training of heritage professionals ; and · continue developing more participative interpretation and governance models that are better suited to contemporary Europe, through greater involvement of the private sector and civil society. To achieve these objectives, several actions are envisaged including actions relating to: Research and innovation : p ooling resources in order to apply the latest technologies and stimulate new scientific approaches can greatly improve the understanding, preservation and dissemination of cultural heritage. To this end, the Horizon 2020 programme for research and innovation ( with nearly EUR 80 billion available from 2014 to 2020) will further reinforce the EU's position in the field of cultural heritage preservation, restoration and valorisation. Digitisation : the digitisation of heritage contributes to the European Agenda for Culture, by improving public access to different forms of cultural and linguistic expressions. The Europeana cultural platform ( www.europeana.eu ) now provides access to some 30 million cultural objects from more than 2,500 organisations. However, much remains to do to rare and old material, including film. Initiatives are proposed within the framework of a parallel communication on the digitisation of cinematographic works. Raising awareness : the new programme " Creative Europe " will support cross-border cooperation to promote the modernisation of the heritage sector. It will also improve civil society capacity to operate transnationally by supporting networks and platforms. Other initiatives will contribute to the awareness of common European heritage such as the " European Capitals of Cultural " (ECC), the European Heritage Label , or even the programme " Europe for Citizens " which seeks to encourage reflection on the causes of totalitarian regimes in modern European history. Local and regional development and cultural heritage : the EU's cohesion and rural development policies can be instrumental in promoting the restoration of cultural heritage, supporting cultural and creative industries and financing the training and upgrading of skills of cultural professionals. Conserving, promoting and managing cultural heritage is currently well supported under the EU Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF). In 2007-2013, the European Regional Development Fund allocated EUR 3.2 billion for protecting and preserving cultural heritage, EUR 2.2 billion to develop cultural infrastructure and EUR 553 million for cultural services, which also benefited cultural heritage. Cultural heritage will remain eligible, under certain conditions, to benefit from ESIF investments in heritage in 2014-2020. Promoting tourism and strengthening training : the EU provides grants for the creation or improvement of European cultural routes crossing several countries and joining them in a common narrative. The Commission also intends reviving old skills and developing new ones. To achieve this, it aims to increase the attractiveness of heritage-related professions and to provide more opportunities for continuous training, taking advantage, for instance, of the opportunities provided by the European Social Fund. In addition, building on the achievements of the Lifelong Learning Programme, the Erasmus+ programme will provide increased opportunities for learning mobility and tackle skills gaps by supporting transnational partnerships between entreprises. Strengthening the cooperation in external relations : the EU and its Member States are active in multilateral fora and organisations that address cultural heritage policies, such as the Council of Europe and UNESCO. Initiatives are also planned to fight against illicit trafficking (notably in Africa) as well as to strengthen the policy dialogues that the Commission conducts with the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM), China, India, Brazil, and the European Neighbourhood Policy countries. Strengthening cultural governance : cooperation at EU level can and does make a decisive contribution towards heritage policies and governance at national and local levels. Legislative action has already been taken in areas of EU competence. In addition, the recent revision of the Environmental Impact Assessment ( Directive 2014/52/EU ) strengthens the requirement for Member States to assess the effects of certain public and private projects on material assets and cultural heritage. The next Council Work Plan for Culture starting in 2015 offers the opportunity to step up cooperation between the Member States within the Open Method of Coordination (OMC). Heritage will also feature in the Commission's structured dialogue with civil society (for example: within the framework of the European Expert Network on Culture ). Next steps : the Commission now invites all stakeholders to jointly look into how public policies at all levels, including the EU, could better be marshalled to draw out the long term and sustainability value of Europe's cultural heritage, and develop a more integrated approach to its preservation and valorisation.
  • date: 2014-11-24T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-06-16T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-06-24T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0207&language=EN title: A8-0207/2015 summary: The Committee on Culture and Education adopted an own-initiative report by Mircea DIACONU (ADLE, RO) entitled ‘Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe’. Members recalled that culture and cultural heritage are shared resources and are common goods and values that cannot be subject to an exclusive use, and their full potential for sustainable human, social and economic development has yet to be fully recognised and properly exploited , both at the level of EU strategies and the UN post-2015 development goals. The report considered that an integrated approach is necessary if one wishes to achieve cultural dialogue and mutual understanding . In this context, Members addressed the recommendations to the Commission: to establish a common approach within the Commission through improved cooperation between the different policy areas dealing with cultural heritage, and to report back to Parliament on the results of this closer cooperation; to communicate to potential beneficiaries, in a straightforward and accessible way such as through a single information platform and exchange of best practices in the EU, concerning the existing European funding lines for cultural heritage; to designate, preferably for 2018, a European Year of Cultural Heritage , with an adequate budget and to submit the draft programme for the European Year to Parliament no later than 2016; to acknowledge, within its political and transversal approach , cultural heritage as both movable and immovable, tangible and intangible, and as a non-renewable resource whose authenticity must be preserved. European funding : in addition to setting up a single EU portal dedicated to tangible and intangible cultural heritage, the report called on the Commission to: support, with dedicated funding , studies, research and pilot measures specifically designed to analyse the impacts of cultural heritage promotion processes; strengthen the newly established principle of multifunding , which allows the complementary use of different European funds within the same large-scale project; review the EUR 5 million benchmark in relation to cultural heritage projects submitted in the framework of the small-scale infrastructure action1, bringing it to at least the same level as UNESCO projects, i.e. EUR 10 million. Member States are invited to look into possible fiscal incentives in relation to restoration, preservation and conservation work, such as reductions in VAT or other taxes, given that European cultural heritage is also managed by private bodies. New governance models : the report asked the Member States to ensure the development of legal tools that allow alternative funding and administration models, such as community involvement, the participation of civil society and public-private partnerships , with a view to implementing actions related to cultural heritage (conservation, restoration, preservation, development and promotion). Members proposed initiating a Europe-wide dialogue between policymakers across all levels of governance , together with cultural and creative industries, networks of tourism operators, partnerships between private and public actors, and NGOs. Stressing the importance of cross-border cultural projects , Members called for measures to be taken to strengthen and expand support for funding through public-private partnership agreements. Moreover, they stressed the need for new governance models to include a system of quality control in all alternative forms of funding and administration of cultural heritage. The economic and strategic potential of cultural heritage : the report noted that cultural heritage contributes to innovative jobs, products, services and processes and that it plays a vital role in several of the Europe 2020 flagship initiatives, such as the Digital Agenda , the Innovation Union, the Agenda for New Skills and Jobs and the industrial policy for the globalisation era. Therefore, Members called for greater recognition of the role of European cultural heritage as a strategic resource for smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth in the mid-term review of the Europe 2020 strategy. The report pointed out that cultural tourism , which accounts for 40 % of European tourism, is a key economic sector in terms of potential for growth and employment. It underlined the possibility of focusing more strongly on cultural tourism in developing macro-regional strategies designed to make it a more integral part of the strategic framework for European cooperation. Members recalled the importance of promoting the conservation of cultural heritage assets and encouraging all forms of sustainable tourism . Members insisted on the need to: give cultural heritage its clear place in the Commission’s Investment Plan for Europe ; promote excellence, innovation and competitiveness in the cultural and creative sectors by supporting the work of artists, creators and cultural professionals; propose a set of indicators that could be used for monitoring and evaluation of the situation of cultural heritage and that would be uniform for all Member States; develop and promote opportunities for mobility and exchange of experiences for those working in the cultural heritage sector, by ensuring that there is genuine professional reciprocity; promoting in school curricula the inclusion of art, music, theatre and film education as a key to developing knowledge of cultural heritage. Opportunities and challenges : overall, Members encouraged the creation of all-round tourist products based on an integrated development/strategy plan in order to enhance the visibility of the cultural heritage. The report also insisted, inter alia , on: the need to improve the level of digitisation , preservation and online availability of cultural heritage, in particular the European film heritage; the importance of developing a true democratic and participative narrative for European heritage, including that of religious and ethnic minorities. Religious heritage constitutes an intangible part of European cultural heritage, regardless of its religious origins; the importance of intercultural dialogue both within and outside Europe. The Union should promote such dialogue as an appropriate tool against radicalism of whatever origin; supporting cultural activities of migrant communities; improving accessibility to cultural heritage sites for people with disabilities; the importance of the gastronomic heritage, which must be protected and supported; strengthening efforts to fight the stealing, smuggling and illegal trafficking of cultural heritage assets inside and outside the EU; the importance of protecting and conserving cultural heritage, not only from the ravages of time but also from hooliganism and despoliation. Lastly, Members encouraged the adoption of international agreements to prevent illicit trafficking of cultural heritage . In this regard, the EU, together with the UN and UNESCO, should defend heritage in danger and fight looting and destruction of cultural objects in conflict areas.
  • date: 2015-09-07T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150907&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-09-08T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=25924&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2015-09-08T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0293 title: T8-0293/2015 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 613 votes to 70 with 19 abstentions, a resolution entitled ‘Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe’. Members recalled that culture and cultural heritage are shared resources and are common goods and values that cannot be subject to an exclusive use, and their full potential for sustainable human, social and economic development has yet to be fully recognised and properly exploited, both at the level of EU strategies and the UN post-2015 development goals. Parliament considered that an integrated approach is necessary if one wishes to achieve cultural dialogue and mutual understanding. In this context, it addressed the following recommendations to the Commission: to establish a common approach within the Commission through improved cooperation between the different policy areas dealing with cultural heritage, and to report back to Parliament on the results of this closer cooperation; to communicate to potential beneficiaries, in a straightforward and accessible way such as through a single information platform and exchange of best practices in the EU, concerning the existing European funding lines for cultural heritage; to designate, preferably for 2018, a European Year of Cultural Heritage , with an adequate budget and to submit the draft programme for the European Year to Parliament no later than 2016; to acknowledge, within its political and transversal approach , cultural heritage as both movable and immovable, tangible and intangible, and as a non-renewable resource whose authenticity must be preserved. European funding : in addition to setting up a single EU portal dedicated to tangible and intangible cultural heritage, Parliament called on the Commission to: support, with dedicated funding , studies, research and pilot measures specifically designed to: (i) analyse the impacts of cultural heritage promotion processes; (ii) develop specific indicators and benchmarks in relation to the direct and indirect contribution of that heritage to economic and social development processes, and (iii) directly support cultural and social innovation integrated into local settings in which cultural heritage can drive development and help improve people’s quality of life; strengthen the newly established principle of multifunding , which allows the complementary use of different European funds within the same large-scale project; review the EUR 5 million benchmark in relation to cultural heritage projects submitted in the framework of the small-scale infrastructure action, bringing it to at least the same level as UNESCO projects, i.e. EUR 10 million . Member States are invited to look into possible fiscal incentives in relation to restoration, preservation and conservation work, such as reductions in VAT or other taxes, given that European cultural heritage is also managed by private bodies. The Commission is urged to take stock of best practices in fiscal policies in Europe and recommend the appropriate ones to the Member States. Stressing the importance of cross-border cultural projects, Members called for measures to be taken to strengthen and expand support for funding through public-private partnership agreements. Moreover, they stressed the need for new governance models to include a system of quality control in all alternative forms of funding and administration of cultural heritage. The economic and strategic potential of cultural heritage: the report noted that cultural heritage contributes to innovative jobs, products, services and processes and that it plays a vital role in several of the Europe 2020 flagship initiatives , such as the Digital Agenda , the Innovation Union, the Agenda for New Skills and Jobs and the industrial policy for the globalisation era. Therefore, Members called for greater recognition of the role of European cultural heritage as a strategic resource for smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth in the mid-term review of the Europe 2020 strategy. Cultural tourism : this sector, which accounts for 40 % of European tourism, is a key economic sector in terms of potential for growth and employment. It underlined the possibility of focusing more strongly on cultural tourism in developing macro-regional strategies designed to make it a more integral part of the strategic framework for European cooperation. Members recalled the importance of promoting the conservation of cultural heritage assets and encouraging all forms of sustainable tourism by shaping sustainable, less invasive and higher value-added forms of cultural and natural tourism, Members insisted on the need to: give cultural heritage its clear place in the Commission’s Investment Plan for Europe and to ensure that adequate funds and initiatives are directed to the valorisation of Europe’s cultural heritage; promote excellence, innovation and competitiveness in the cultural and creative sectors by supporting the work of artists, creators and cultural professionals; propose a set of indicators that could be used for monitoring and evaluation of the situation of cultural heritage and that would be uniform for all Member States; develop and promote opportunities for mobility and exchange of experiences for those working in the cultural heritage sector, by ensuring that there is genuine professional reciprocity; promote in school curricula the inclusion of art, music, theatre and film education as a key to developing knowledge of cultural heritage. Opportunities and challenges : overall, Members encouraged the creation of all-round tourist products based on an integrated development/strategy plan in order to enhance the visibility of the cultural heritage. The resolution also insisted, inter alia, on: the need to improve the level of digitisation , preservation and online availability of cultural heritage, in particular the European film heritage; the importance of developing a true democratic and participative narrative for European heritage, including that of religious and ethnic minorities. Religious heritage constitutes an intangible part of European cultural heritage, regardless of its religious origins; the importance of intercultural dialogue both within and outside Europe. The Union should promote such dialogue as an appropriate tool against radicalism of whatever origin; supporting cultural activities of migrant communities; improving accessibility to cultural heritage sites for people with disabilities; the importance of the gastronomic heritage, which must be protected and supported; strengthening efforts to fight the stealing, smuggling and illegal trafficking of cultural heritage assets inside and outside the EU; the importance of protecting and conserving cultural heritage, not only from the ravages of time but also from hooliganism and despoliation. Lastly, Parliament encouraged the adoption of international agreements to prevent illicit trafficking of cultural heritage . In this regard, the EU, together with the UN and UNESCO, should defend heritage in danger and fight looting and destruction of cultural objects in conflict areas.
  • date: 2015-09-08T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/ title: Education and Culture commissioner: NAVRACSICS Tibor
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
CULT/8/01732
New
  • CULT/8/01732
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 4.45.06 Heritage and culture protection, movement of works of art
New
4.45.06
Heritage and culture protection, movement of works of art
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0477:EN
activities/3/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Culture and Education adopted an own-initiative report by Mircea DIACONU (ADLE, RO) entitled ‘Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe’.

    Members recalled that culture and cultural heritage are shared resources and are common goods and values that cannot be subject to an exclusive use, and their full potential for sustainable human, social and economic development has yet to be fully recognised and properly exploited, both at the level of EU strategies and the UN post-2015 development goals.

    The report considered that an integrated approach is necessary if one wishes to achieve cultural dialogue and mutual understanding. In this context, Members addressed the recommendations to the Commission:

    • to establish a common approach within the Commission through improved cooperation between the different policy areas dealing with cultural heritage, and to report back to Parliament on the results of this closer cooperation;
    • to communicate to potential beneficiaries, in a straightforward and accessible way such as through a single information platform and exchange of best practices in the EU, concerning the existing European funding lines for cultural heritage;
    • to designate, preferably for 2018, a European Year of Cultural Heritage, with an adequate budget and to submit the draft programme for the European Year to Parliament no later than 2016;
    • to acknowledge, within its political and transversal approach, cultural heritage as both movable and immovable, tangible and intangible, and as a non-renewable resource whose authenticity must be preserved.

    European funding: in addition to setting up a single EU portal dedicated to tangible and intangible cultural heritage, the report called on the Commission to:

    • support, with dedicated funding, studies, research and pilot measures specifically designed to analyse the impacts of cultural heritage promotion processes;
    • strengthen the newly established principle of multifunding, which allows the complementary use of different European funds within the same large-scale project;
    • review the EUR 5 million benchmark in relation to cultural heritage projects submitted in the framework of the small-scale infrastructure action1, bringing it to at least the same level as UNESCO projects, i.e. EUR 10 million.

    Member States are invited to look into possible fiscal incentives in relation to restoration, preservation and conservation work, such as reductions in VAT or other taxes, given that European cultural heritage is also managed by private bodies.

    New governance models: the report asked the Member States to ensure the development of legal tools that allow alternative funding and administration models, such as community involvement, the participation of civil society and public-private partnerships, with a view to implementing actions related to cultural heritage (conservation, restoration, preservation, development and promotion).

    Members proposed initiating a Europe-wide dialogue between policymakers across all levels of governance, together with cultural and creative industries, networks of tourism operators, partnerships between private and public actors, and NGOs.

    Stressing the importance of cross-border cultural projects, Members called for measures to be taken to strengthen and expand support for funding through public-private partnership agreements.

    Moreover, they stressed the need for new governance models to include a system of quality control in all alternative forms of funding and administration of cultural heritage.

    The economic and strategic potential of cultural heritage: the report noted that cultural heritage contributes to innovative jobs, products, services and processes and that it plays a vital role in several of the Europe 2020 flagship initiatives, such as the Digital Agenda, the Innovation Union, the Agenda for New Skills and Jobs and the industrial policy for the globalisation era.

    Therefore, Members called for greater recognition of the role of European cultural heritage as a strategic resource for smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth in the mid-term review of the Europe 2020 strategy.

    The report pointed out that cultural tourism, which accounts for 40 % of European tourism, is a key economic sector in terms of potential for growth and employment. It underlined the possibility of focusing more strongly on cultural tourism in developing macro-regional strategies designed to make it a more integral part of the strategic framework for European cooperation.

    Members recalled the importance of promoting the conservation of cultural heritage assets and encouraging all forms of sustainable tourism.

    Members insisted on the need to:

    • give cultural heritage its clear place in the Commission’s Investment Plan for Europe;
    • promote excellence, innovation and competitiveness in the cultural and creative sectors by supporting the work of artists, creators and cultural professionals;
    • propose a set of indicators that could be used for monitoring and evaluation of the situation of cultural heritage and that would be uniform for all Member States;
    • develop and promote opportunities for mobility and exchange of experiences for those working in the cultural heritage sector, by ensuring that there is genuine professional reciprocity;
    • promoting in school curricula the inclusion of art, music, theatre and film education as a key to developing knowledge of cultural heritage.

    Opportunities and challenges: overall, Members encouraged the creation of all-round tourist products based on an integrated development/strategy plan in order to enhance the visibility of the cultural heritage. The report also insisted, inter alia, on:

    • the need to improve the level of digitisation, preservation and online availability of cultural heritage, in particular the European film heritage;
    • the importance of developing a true democratic and participative narrative for European heritage, including that of religious and ethnic minorities. Religious heritage constitutes an intangible part of European cultural heritage, regardless of its religious origins;
    • the importance of intercultural dialogue both within and outside Europe. The Union should promote such dialogue as an appropriate tool against radicalism of whatever origin;
    • supporting cultural activities of migrant communities;
    • improving accessibility to cultural heritage sites for people with disabilities;
    • the importance of the gastronomic heritage, which must be protected and supported;
    • strengthening efforts to fight the stealing, smuggling and illegal trafficking of cultural heritage assets inside and outside the EU;
    • the importance of protecting and conserving cultural heritage, not only from the ravages of time but also from hooliganism and despoliation.

    Lastly, Members encouraged the adoption of international agreements to prevent illicit trafficking of cultural heritage. In this regard, the EU, together with the UN and UNESCO, should defend heritage in danger and fight looting and destruction of cultural objects in conflict areas.

activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20150907&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/4/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/5/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0293 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0293/2015
activities/5/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/4/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/5
date
2015-09-08T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0207&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0207/2015
activities/3
date
2015-06-24T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/2/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: ŠOJDROVÁ Michaela group: S&D name: MORGANO Luigi group: ECR name: KRASNODĘBSKI Zdzisław group: GUE/NGL name: MALTESE Curzio group: Verts/ALE name: MARAGALL Ernest group: EFD name: ADINOLFI Isabella responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2014-09-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: ALDE name: DIACONU Mircea
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2014-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: COZZOLINO Andrea
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2014-11-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: S&D name: KYRKOS Miltiadis
activities/2/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0477:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0477:EN
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52014DC0477:EN
activities/3/date
Old
2015-07-06T00:00:00
New
2015-09-07T00:00:00
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: presentation of a Communication proposing an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe.

    BACKGROUND: cultural heritage is a shared resource, and a common good. It can be vulnerable to over-exploitation and under-funding, which can result in neglect, decay and, in some cases, oblivion.

    It is, therefore, our common responsibility, while heritage protection is primarily a matter for national, regional and local authorities. The European Union has no less a role to play in line with the EU Treaties and in respect of the principle of subsidiarity.

    This is why the Commission proposes this Communication, which has been informed by several years of dialogue with EU Presidencies and stakeholders, responding to the invitation of the Council to "pursue the analysis of the economic and social impact of cultural heritage in the EU and contribute to a development of a strategic approach".

    The overall objective is to examine available information on the economic and social impacts of cultural heritage, as well as plans to improve the evidence base and to explore the challenges and opportunities for the heritage sector.

    The communication sets out the tools available at EU level, complementing national and regional programmes, to help protect and enhance the intrinsic and social value of heritage, to strengthen its contribution to economic growth and job creation, and develop its potential for the EU's public diplomacy.

    CONTENT: the European experience shows that it is possible to progress from an appreciation of the uniqueness of one's own heritage to an interest in and respect for the heritage of others. In this context, the Communication describes the measures available to strengthen policy cooperation at different levels, and projects being developed to support new models of heritage governance.

    The overall aim is to help Member States and stakeholders make the most of the significant support for heritage available under EU instruments, progress towards a more integrated approach at national and EU level, and ultimately make Europe a laboratory for heritage-based innovation.

    Economic base of cultural heritage: according to the most recent statistics (France, 2011), heritage generated EUR 8.1 billion and UK studies have shown that the historic environment can offer a high return on investment: each £1 invested generating up to £1.60 of additional economic activity over ten years. In the area of tourism, heritage is estimated to contribute EUR 415 billion to the EU GDP and 3.4 million tourism enterprises account for 15.2 million jobs – many linked to heritage, directly or indirectly. In 2013, 52% of EU citizens visited at least one historical monument or site and 37% a museum or gallery in their respective countries, while 19% visited a historical monument or site in another EU country.

    Heritage, therefore, has great capacity to promote social cohesion and integration, through regeneration of neglected areas, creation of locally-rooted jobs, and promotion of shared understanding and a sense of community.

    However, to increase understanding of the actual and potential role of heritage in policy development, it is important to improve systematic data on its economic and social impacts.

    Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage: to strengthen Europe's position in the field of cultural heritage preservation, restoration and valorisation, the Commission proposes to:

    ·        encourage the modernisation of the heritage sector by actions raising awareness and engaging new audiences;

    ·        apply a strategic approach to research and innovation, knowledge sharing and smart specialization;

    ·        seize the opportunities offered by digitisation; to reach out to new audiences and engage young people in particular;

    ·        identify skills needs and improve the training of heritage professionals; and

    ·        continue developing more participative interpretation and governance models that are better suited to contemporary Europe, through greater involvement of the private sector and civil society.

    To achieve these objectives, several actions are envisaged including actions relating to:

    Research and innovation: pooling resources in order to apply the latest technologies and stimulate new scientific approaches can greatly improve the understanding, preservation and dissemination of cultural heritage. To this end, the Horizon 2020 programme for research and innovation (with nearly EUR 80 billion available from 2014 to 2020) will further reinforce the EU's position in the field of cultural heritage preservation, restoration and valorisation.

    Digitisation: the digitisation of heritage contributes to the European Agenda for Culture, by improving public access to different forms of cultural and linguistic expressions. The Europeana cultural platform (www.europeana.eu) now provides access to some 30 million cultural objects from more than 2,500 organisations. However, much remains to do to rare and old material, including film. Initiatives are proposed within the framework of a parallel communication on the digitisation of cinematographic works.

    Raising awareness: the new programme "Creative Europe" will support cross-border cooperation to promote the modernisation of the heritage sector. It will also improve civil society capacity to operate transnationally by supporting networks and platforms. Other initiatives will contribute to the awareness of common European heritage such as the "European Capitals of Cultural" (ECC), the European Heritage Label, or even the programme "Europe for Citizens" which seeks to encourage reflection on the causes of totalitarian regimes in modern European history.

    Local and regional development and cultural heritage: the EU's cohesion and rural development policies can be instrumental in promoting the restoration of cultural heritage, supporting cultural and creative industries and financing the training and upgrading of skills of cultural professionals. Conserving, promoting and managing cultural heritage is currently well supported under the EU Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF). In 2007-2013, the European Regional Development Fund allocated EUR 3.2 billion for protecting and preserving cultural heritage, EUR 2.2 billion to develop cultural infrastructure and EUR 553 million for cultural services, which also benefited cultural heritage. Cultural heritage will remain eligible, under certain conditions, to benefit from ESIF investments in heritage in 2014-2020.

    Promoting tourism and strengthening training: the EU provides grants for the creation or improvement of European cultural routes crossing several countries and joining them in a common narrative. The Commission also intends reviving old skills and developing new ones. To achieve this, it aims to increase the attractiveness of heritage-related professions and to provide more opportunities for continuous training, taking advantage, for instance, of the opportunities provided by the European Social Fund.

    In addition, building on the achievements of the Lifelong Learning Programme, the Erasmus+programme will provide increased opportunities for learning mobility and tackle skills gaps by supporting transnational partnerships between entreprises.

    Strengthening the cooperation in external relations: the EU and its Member States are active in multilateral fora and organisations that address cultural heritage policies, such as the Council of Europe and UNESCO.

    Initiatives are also planned to fight against illicit trafficking (notably in Africa) as well as to strengthen the policy dialogues that the Commission conducts with the Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM), China, India, Brazil, and the European Neighbourhood Policy countries.

    Strengthening cultural governance: cooperation at EU level can and does make a decisive contribution towards heritage policies and governance at national and local levels. Legislative action has already been taken in areas of EU competence. In addition, the recent revision of the Environmental Impact Assessment (Directive 2014/52/EU) strengthens the requirement for Member States to assess the effects of certain public and private projects on material assets and cultural heritage.

    The next Council Work Plan for Culture starting in 2015 offers the opportunity to step up cooperation between the Member States within the Open Method of Coordination (OMC).

    Heritage will also feature in the Commission's structured dialogue with civil society (for example: within the framework of the European Expert Network on Culture).

    Next steps: the Commission now invites all stakeholders to jointly look into how public policies at all levels, including the EU, could better be marshalled to draw out the long term and sustainability value of Europe's cultural heritage, and develop a more integrated approach to its preservation and valorisation.

activities/2/date
Old
2015-05-05T00:00:00
New
2015-06-16T00:00:00
activities/3/date
Old
2015-06-09T00:00:00
New
2015-07-06T00:00:00
activities/0/commission/0
DG
Commissioner
NAVRACSICS Tibor
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
NAVRACSICS Tibor
activities/1
date
2014-11-24T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
CULT/8/01732
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities
  • date: 2014-07-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2014&nu_doc=0477 celexid: CELEX:52014DC0477:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2014)0477 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC commission:
  • date: 2015-05-05T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2015-06-09T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Foreign Affairs committee: AFET
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: ŠOJDROVÁ Michaela group: S&D name: MORGANO Luigi group: ECR name: KRASNODĘBSKI Zdzisław group: GUE/NGL name: MALTESE Curzio group: Verts/ALE name: MARAGALL Ernest group: EFD name: ADINOLFI Isabella responsible: True committee: CULT date: 2014-09-03T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: ALDE name: DIACONU Mircea
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Development committee: DEVE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs committee: EMPL
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection committee: IMCO
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2014-09-22T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: S&D name: COZZOLINO Andrea
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: TRAN date: 2014-11-18T00:00:00 committee_full: Transport and Tourism rapporteur: group: S&D name: KYRKOS Miltiadis
links
other
    procedure
    reference
    2014/2149(INI)
    title
    Towards an integrated approach to cultural heritage for Europe
    legal_basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    stage_reached
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    subtype
    Initiative
    type
    INI - Own-initiative procedure
    subject
    4.45.06 Heritage and culture protection, movement of works of art