14 Amendments of Daniel BUDA related to 2020/2217(INI)
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that common regulatory framework provisions for data will enable the European Union to benefit effectively from access thereto and use thereof in various ways, such as: increasing productivity, developing market competitiveness, improving citizens’ health and well-being, environmental protection, transparent governance and effective public services; stresses that the establishment of a single market for data will pave the way for the EU to assume a leading role in the global data-driven economy;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Points out that common regulatory framework provisions for data will enable the European Union to benefit effectively from access thereto and use thereof in various ways, such as: increasing productivity, developing market competitiveness, improving citizens’ health and well-being, environmental protection, transparent governance and effective public services; stresses that the establishment of a single market for data will pave the way for the EU to assume a leading role in the global data-driven economy;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the EU approach to digitisation should be human-centred, value-oriented and based on the concept of the social market economy; underlines that choosing a third path to digitisation should not mean that the EU becomes protectionist; stresses, therefore, that every non-EU player should still be welcome to operate in the single European data space as long as they meet comply withe EU’ law and meet its ethical, technological, privacy and security standards, which should not be compromised by regulatory demands outside the EU;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the EU approach to digitisation should be human-centred, value-oriented and based on the concept of the social market economy; underlines that choosing a third path to digitisation should not mean that the EU becomes protectionist; stresses, therefore, that every non-EU player should still be welcome to operate in the single European data space as long as they meet comply withe EU’ law and meet its ethical, technological, privacy and security standards, which should not be compromised by regulatory demands outside the EU;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Udraws attention to the importance of avoiding regulatory fragmentation, which can pose a major risk to the creation and development of a common European data space; notes that a number of some Member States have already started to adopt rules on data use and processing; urges the Commission, prior to any initiatives, to perform an in- depth evaluation and mapping of the existing legislation at both national and Union level to assess whether adjustments or additional requirements are needed to support the EU data industry and safeguard fair competition for all affected actors and to avoid legal overlaps with potential upcoming legislation to implement the Data Strategy;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Udraws attention to the importance of avoiding regulatory fragmentation, which can pose a major risk to the creation and development of a common European data space; notes that a number of some Member States have already started to adopt rules on data use and processing; urges the Commission, prior to any initiatives, to perform an in- depth evaluation and mapping of the existing legislation at both national and Union level to assess whether adjustments or additional requirements are needed to support the EU data industry and safeguard fair competition for all affected actors and to avoid legal overlaps with potential upcoming legislation to implement the Data Strategy;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to assess the possibility of defining fair contractual conditions with the aim of addressing imbalances in market power, especially regarding access to data and the use thereof by small and medium-sized enterprises; underlines that a single European data space will require companies to be allowed to closely cooperate with each other, and therefore considers that safe harbours and block exemptions on cooperation for data sharing and pooling, as well as more guidance for businesses on competitiveness and competition law matters from the Commission, are needed;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to assess the possibility of defining fair contractual conditions with the aim of addressing imbalances in market power, especially regarding access to data and the use thereof by small and medium-sized enterprises; underlines that a single European data space will require companies to be allowed to closely cooperate with each other, and therefore considers that safe harbours and block exemptions on cooperation for data sharing and pooling, as well as more guidance for businesses on competitiveness and competition law matters from the Commission, are needed;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Recommends further strengthening interoperability and establishing consensus-based, industry-led common standards in order to guarantee that the movement of data between different machines and entities can take place in an innovative manner; stresses the need to identify common standards of data quality, authenticity and integrity so that their value can be properly exploited, especially for the purposes of AI deployment;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Recommends further strengthening interoperability and establishing consensus-based, industry-led common standards in order to guarantee that the movement of data between different machines and entities can take place in an innovative manner; stresses the need to identify common standards of data quality, authenticity and integrity so that their value can be properly exploited, especially for the purposes of AI deployment;
Amendment 86 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Commission to consider whether the rules on the responsible use of data should be clarified; stresses the need to promote the principle of facilitating voluntary data exchange;
Amendment 86 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 a (new)
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Calls on the Commission to consider whether the rules on the responsible use of data should be clarified; stresses the need to promote the principle of facilitating voluntary data exchange;
Amendment 94 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Is of the belief that the data-driven digital economy does not require major changes to the existing IPR framework and thus notes that the Commission should carefully assess what legal adjustments are really necessary in order to avoid any regulatory overlap; welcomes, in this regard, the Commission’s intention to revise the Database Directive and clarify the application of the Trade Secrets Directive;
Amendment 94 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Is of the belief that the data-driven digital economy does not require major changes to the existing IPR framework and thus notes that the Commission should carefully assess what legal adjustments are really necessary in order to avoid any regulatory overlap; welcomes, in this regard, the Commission’s intention to revise the Database Directive and clarify the application of the Trade Secrets Directive;