Activities of Barbara KAPPEL related to 2017/2053(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
The next MFF: Preparing the Parliament’s position on the MFF post-2020 - Reform of the European Union’s system of own resources (debate) DE
Amendments (18)
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the EU budget is primarily an investment budget with some redistributive functions between the Member States, and serves mainly to support common EU policies and objectives, providing seed money for medium- to long-term investments;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas the main goal of the EU budget should be to support accelerated growth in less developed regions to achieve an equivalent level of development within all Member States;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that own resources should focus on projects that canincreasing the share of own resources on total expenditure is not the best way to generate the highest European added value (EAV);: emphasises that expenditure should be focused on areas for which funding at European level is indispensable, or where funding at national level would be insufficient to achieve the European goal;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomesTakes note of the work of the High Level Group on Own Resources, and in particular the measures aimed at reducing the share of the GNI-based contribution, which is residual in nature; argues that this reduction should be compensated for by the use of genuine own resources;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Points out that the use of own resources should be oriented to public EU goods that can benefit all Member States equally; nNotes two areas of increased EAV that also enjoy a high approval rating among citizens, namely research and development, and both internal and external security;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Welcomes the increased use of own resources in projects related to research and development, although doubts remain as to the types of projects financed; hHighlights that expenditure should be focused on projects that are profitable in the long-term and bring benefits to the EU, rather than on funding programmes that produce only short-term benefits;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to submit a communication to Parliament explaining how it intends to reconcile long-term political objectives, such as the Europe 2020 Strategy, with the situation that will ensue after the 2020 multiannual financial framework (MFF), within the course of the next year; strongly believes that an EU agenda for the next decade should play a decisive role in the process of developing successive MFFs;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that long-term projects, such as Horizon 2020 and the Juncker Commission’s 10 priorities,Horizon 2020 should be taken into account when own resources are allocated; calls on the Commission to orient its priorities towards the successful achievement of theseis long-term projects;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Believes that simpler and clearer rules will contribute to a swift allocation of resources and will increase efficiency and transparency, with fewer errors occurring as a result; asks the Commission to draw up an action plan along these lines; stresses that simpler and cleared rules should not lead to increased discretion and curbed scrutiny in the allocation of means;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Believes that simpler and clearer budgetary rules will make the need for more own resources obsolete;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7