15 Amendments of Clara AGUILERA related to 2021/2056(INI)
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas due account needs to be taken of the marked differences between fleets, fleet segments, target species, fishing gear, productivity, and the consumption preferences and the amount of fish consumed per inhabitant inof the various EU Member States;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B a (new)
Recital B a (new)
Ba. whereas the current common fisheries policy does not properly define the concept of artisanal fishing or small- scale fishing or coastal fishing, basing it solely on the vessel’s length, while in international conventions other more appropriate and up-to-date definitions of this type of fishing are set out; whereas the European definitions of artisanal fishing, small-scale fishing and coastal fishing should be revised;
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas, therefore, the centralisation of fisheries management advocated by the common fisheries policy (CFP) and the resulting loss of Member State sovereignty has hindereommon fisheries policy (CFP) is not offering the clear and differentiated legislative support to small-scale fishing that could the necessary local management that is essential for ensuring the sector’s socio- economic viabilitylp to resolve its socio-economic viability, nor are the Member States establishing effective measures for this type of fishing;
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
Recital F
F. whereas the fisheries sector and small-scale fishing make an important contribution towards socio-economic well- being, employment and the promotion of economic and social cohesion in various coastal aregions and Member Stateas, the islands and in the outermost regions;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital M
Recital M
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
Recital O
O. whereas earnings from small-scale fisheries are considerably depressed by operating costs and limited competitiveness with other fleets;
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considers that co-management is a vital tool for small-scale fisheries, making it possible to optimise the management of fishing resources using an integrated approach, taking into consideration all the aspects of sustainability, including environmental, social and economic aspects, and incorporating the active participation and involvement of the administration, the fishing sector, the scientific community and civil society organisations;
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Warns of the difficulties that the fisheries sector is still experiencing, which have now been aggravated by rising fuel prices for fuel and other inputs;
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Takes the view that the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (EMFAF) and the new national operational programmes should make it possible to provide clear and specific support for small-scale fishing; in the form of fuel subsidiessists that Member States should implement a distribution of TACs and quotas that makes up for the comparative disadvantage of the small-scale fleet and creates the possibility of better conditions in the future;
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Takes the view that the EMFAF should lendstrengthen support to small-scale fishing as a priority, with a view to ensuring the sustainability and future viability of the countless coastal communities that are traditionally dependent on fishing
Amendment 296 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
13. Reiterates that the renewalsupport for the required renewal and modernisation of the fleet cannot be confused with expanding it or increasing fishing capacity;
Amendment 306 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Considers, therefore, that EMFAF must provide funding opportunities for the renewal, upgrading or even resizing of the small-scale coastal and artisanal fleet, particularly in the outermost regions;
Amendment 315 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Urges the Member States to ensure that the best safety, labour and living standards are in place on board fishing vessels, with geolocation systems on vessels being a viable option to help guarantee the on-board safety of fisheries workers;
Amendment 330 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
Amendment 347 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Reiterates that the reality of fisheries in the EU is complex and varies widely from Member State to Member State, and reaffirms that this great diversity requires the management at local levelof fisheries to be accompanied by exceptions that permit Member States and regions to implement more specialised management;