BETA

40 Amendments of Jonás FERNÁNDEZ related to 2023/0115(COD)

Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 1 a (new)
(1a) At present, the banking union rests on just two of its intended three pillars, namely, the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) and the Single Resolution Mechanism (SRM). It therefore remains incomplete, due to the absence of its third pillar, the European deposit insurance scheme (EDIS). The completion of the banking union forms an integral part of economic and monetary union and of financial stability, most notably by mitigating the risks of so-called ‘doom loop’ that arise as a result of the bank-sovereign nexus.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
(18) Pursuant to Article 10(2) of Directive 2014/49/EU, Member States are to ensure that by 3 July 2024, the available financial means of a DGS reach a target level of 0,8 % of the amount of the covered deposits of its members. To objectively assess whether DGSs fulfil that requirement, a clear reference period should be set to determine the amount of covered deposits and DGSs’ available financial means. In consideration of the scope expansion for DGS use, the adequacy of the 0,8% target level should be subject to close monitoring and assessment.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 22 a (new)
(22a) To avoid a DGS becoming insufficiently funded and unable to support a new intervention, robust and favourable alternative funding arrangements are required. Therefore, to prevent temporary financing by the Member States, and to ensure that it remains a last resort, the Single Resolution Board should be able to provide a guarantee based on the Single Resolution Fund to a DGS in order to facilitate its access to markets at favourable financing conditions. The Single Resolution Fund's guarantee should be provided when the DGS is required to intervene in resolution, yet available financial means are insufficient to satisfy the needs of such action.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 22 b (new)
(22b) The provision of Single Resolution Fund guarantees to DGSs pursuing alternative funding arrangements must not preclude, nor delay, any progress in the establishment of a fully-fledged European deposit insurance scheme, which remains the optimal solution.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 25
(25) Measures to prevent failure of a credit institution through sufficiently early interventions can play an effective role in the continuum of crisis management tools to maintain depositor confidence and financial stability. Those measures can take various forms - capital support measures through own funds instruments (including Common Equity Tier 1 instruments) or other capital instruments, guarantees, or loans. DGSs have had heterogeneous recourse to those measures. To ensure the continuum of crisis management tools and recourse to preventive measures in a manner consistent with the resolution framework and the state aid rules, it is necessary to specify the timing and conditions for their application. Preventive measures are not appropriate for the absorption of incurred losses when the credit institution is already failing or likely to fail and should be used early to prevent deterioration of the financial situation of the bank. DesignatedCompetent authorities should therefore verify whether the conditions for such DGS intervention have been fulfilledconfirm that the circumstances for failing or likely to fail are not met and that preventive measures are needed to secure the financial soundness and long- term viability of the credit institution. DGSs, or where relevant, designated authorities should then verify that the conditions for using DGSs’ available financial means in the context of preventive measures are met. Finally, those conditions for the use of DGS available financial means should be without prejudice to the assessment by the competent authority of whether an IPS fulfils the criteria laid down in Article 113(7) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council41 . __________________ 41 Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1).
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
(27) To ensure that credit institutions receiving support from DGSs in the form of preventive measures deliver on their commitments, competent authorities should request a remediation plan from credit institutions that failed to fulfil their commitments or to repay the amount contributed under the preventive measures. Where a competent authority is of the opinion that the measures in the remediation plan are not capable of achieving the credit institution’s long-term viability, the DGS should not provide any further preventive support to the credit institution and the relevant authorities should carry out an assessment on whether the institution is failing or is likely to fail, in accordance with Article 32 of Directive 2014/59/EU. The same consequences should apply in cases where the credit institution fails to comply with the remediation plan or fails to repay the preventive measures. To ensure a consistent approach to the application of preventive measures across the Union, the EBA should issue guidelines to assist credit institutions to draft such a remediation plan.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
(29) Since the main aim of DGSs is to protect covered deposits, DGSs should only be allowed to finance interventions other than payouts where such interventions are cheaper than payoutsmore efficient than payouts and are able to ensure, in a more effective way, the depositors’ access to their deposits . Experience with the application of that rule (‘least cost test’) has revealed several shortcomings as the current framework does not detail how to determine the cost of those interventions nor the cost of the payout. To ensure a consistent application of the least cost test across the Union, it is necessary to specify the calculation of those costs. At the same time, it is necessary to avoid excessively stringent conditions that would effectively disable the use of DGS funds for other interventions than payout. When carrying out the least cost assessment, DGSs should first verify that the cost to finance the selected measure is lower than the cost of reimbursement of covered deposits. The methodology for the least cost assessment should take into account the time value of money.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 34
(34) Credit institutions may change affiliation to a DGS because they move their headquarters to another Member State or convert their subsidiary into a branch or vice versa. Article 14(3) of Directive 2014/49/EU requires that the contributions of that credit institution paid during the 12 months preceding the transfer are transferred to the other DGS in proportion to the amount of covered deposits transferred. To ensure that the transfer of contributions to the receiving DGS is not dependent on divergent national rules regarding invoicing or actual date of payment of contributions, the DGS of origin should calculate the amount to be transferred on the basis of contributions due rather than contributions paidthe methodology to be developed by the EBA.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 45
(45) Directive 2014/49/EU allows Member States to recognise an IPS as a DGS if it fulfils the criteria laid down in Article 113(7) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 and complies with Directive 2014/49/EU. To take into account the specific business model of those IPSs, in particular the relevance of preventive measures at the core of their mandate, it is appropriate to provide for the possibility of Member States to allow IPSs to adapt to the new safeguards for the application of preventive measures within a 63-year period. This possibly longer compliance period takes into account the timeline for the build-up of a segregated fund for IPS purposes other than deposit insurance as agreed between the European Central Bank, the national competent authority and the relevant IPSs.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point a
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 1 – paragraph 1
1. This Directive lays down rules and procedures relating to the establishment and the functioning of deposit guarantee schemes (DGSs), the coverage and repayment of deposits, and the use of DGS funds for measures that aim to ensure the access of depositors to their deposits, and the rules governing DGSs’ access to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF) guarantee, as provided in Article 79a of Regulation 806/2014.;
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point a
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Members States shall ensure that where a credit institution does not comply with its obligations as a member of a DGS, that DGS shall immediately notify the designated authority and the competent authority of that credit institution thereof. Member States shall ensure that the competent authority, in cooperation with that DGSdesignated authority, uses the supervisory powers laid down in Directive 2013/36/EU, and promptly takes all measures to ensure that the credit institution concerned complies with its obligations, including where necessary by imposing administrative penalties and other administrative measures in accordance with the national laws adopted in addition to the implementation of provisions of Title VII, Chapter 1, Section IV, of Directive 2013/36/EU.;
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 – point a – point v a (new)
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point k a (new)
(va) the point (ka) is added: (ka) deposits by persons or legal entities subject to targeted financial sanctions adopted by the Union.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8 – point a
3. By way of derogation from paragraph 1, Member States shall allow DGSs to apply a longer repayment period for the deposits referred to in Article 6(2), Article 7(3) and Article 8b, which shall not exceed 20 working days from the date on which those DGSs received the complete documentation they requested from a depositor or, where appropriate, an account holder, to examine the claims and verify that the conditions for repayment are met. For the deposits referred to in Article 6(2) and Article 7(3), where DGSs are not able to make the repayable amount available in less than seven working days, they shall ensure that depositors have access to an appropriate amount of their covered deposits to cover living costs within five working days of making a request for that amount. ;
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point a – point i
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
When determining whether the DGS has reached that target level, Member States shall only take into account available financial means directly contributed by, or recovered from, members to the DGS, net of administrative fees and charges. Those available financial means shall include investment income derived from funds contributed by members to the DGS, but shall exclude repayments not claimed by eligible depositors during payout procedures, and loans, including between DGSs.;
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 – point g
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 10 – paragraph 11
11. Member States shall ensure that in the context of the measures referred to in Article 11(1), (2), (3) and (5), DGSs may use the funds originating from the alternative funding arrangements referred to in Article 10(9) which are not financed through public funds, before using the available financial means and before collecting the extraordinary contributions referred to in Article 10(8). Member States shall ensure that DGSs use alternative funding arrangements financed through public funds only as a last resort, after all other options have been exhausted.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 11 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall ensure that DGSs use the available financial means to finance the resolution of credit institutions in accordance with Article 109 of Directive 2014/59/EU. Member States shall ensure that resolution authorities determine the amount that a DGS is to contribute to the financing of resolution of credit institutions, after those resolution authorities have consulted the DGS on the results of the least cost test referred to in Article 11e of this Directive. Member States shall ensure that DGSs respond, without delay, to such consultation.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – introductory part
3. Member States may allow DGSs toshall ensure that a DGS may use the available financial means for preventive measures as referred to in Article 11a for the benefit of a credit institution where all of the following applies:
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) the competent authority has confirmed that none of the circumstances referred to in Article 32(4) of Directive 2014/59/EU are present;
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)
(aa) the DGS has confirmed that the intervention is necessary to preserve financial soundness and long-term viability of the credit institution;
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 11 – paragraph 4 – point a
(a) the need to repay depositors or to intervene in resolution arises and the available financial means of the DGS amount to less than two-thirds of the target level;
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 11 – paragraph 5
5. Where a credit institution is wound up in accordance with Article 32b of Directive 2014/59/EU in order to exit the market or terminate its banking activity, Member States may allow DGSsshall ensure that a DGS may to use the available financial means for alternative measures to preserve the access of depositors to their deposits, including the transfer of assets and liabilities and a deposit book transfer, provided that the DGS confirms that the cost of the measure does not exceed the cost of repaying depositors as calculated in accordance with Article 11e of this Directive and that all the conditions laid down in Article 11d of this Directive are met.’;
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 11a – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Where Member States allow the use of DGS funds for preventive measures as referred to in Article 11(3), Member States shall ensure that DGSs use the available financial means for the preventive measures referred to in Article 11(3), provided that all of the following conditions are met:
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 11a – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the credit institution has consulted the competent authority onhas assessed the measures envisaged in the note referred to in Article 11b and confirmed that the measures are necessary to secure the financial soundness and the long-term viability of the credit institution;
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 11a – paragraph 4
4. Member States shall ensure that the DGS which uses its available financial means for capital support measures, where the conditions under Article 11b are met, transfers its holdings of shares or other capital instruments in the supported credit institution to the private sector as soon as commercial and financial circumstances allow.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 11b – paragraph 2a (new)
2a. Where the financial means of a DGS are used for preventive measures in accordance with paragraph 3, the competent authority shall require the beneficiary credit institution to update the recovery plan referred to in Article 5 or 7 of Directive 2014/59/EU, as applicable. The competent authority shall direct the supported credit institution to implement the measures referred to in Article 6(6), third subparagraph, of Directive 2014/59/EU.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
3. Member States shall ensure that in the event of a capital support measure, the note referred to in paragraph 1 identifies all capital raising measures that can be implemented, including safeguards preventing outflows of funds, a forward- looking capital adequacy assessment, and, a subsequent determination ofs determined by the competent authority, the capital shortfall that the DGS has to cover.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 11b – paragraph 3a (new)
3a. In the event of a capital support measure, Member States shall ensure that shareholders and debt holders of the supported credit institution have contributed to reducing the capital shortfall to the maximum extent.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 11b – paragraph 5
5. Where relevant, Member States shall ensure that the measures envisaged in the note referred to in paragraph 1 are aligned with the capital conservation plan referred to in Article 142 of Directive 2013/36/EUcompetent authorities establish that no dividends, share buy-backs or variable remuneration are paid out and that no irrevocable commitment to pay out dividends, share buy-backs or variable remuneration is undertaken by the supported credit institution. Member States shall ensure that the restrictions under this paragraph remain in place until the supported credit institutions has replenished the DGS with the same amount used for such measures.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 11b – paragraph 6a (new)
6a. The competent authority shall provide the note to the resolution authority. The resolution authority may examine the note with a view to identifying any actions which may adversely impact the resolvability of the institution and make recommendations to the competent authority with regard to those matters. The resolution authority shall communicate its assessment and recommendations within the timeframe set by the competent authority.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 11c – paragraph 2
2. In the situation referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall ensure that the competent authority shall requests the credit institution to submits a remediation plan to the designated authority and the DGS describing the steps the credit institution will take to ensure or restore compliance with supervisory requirements, to ensure its long term viability and to repay the due amount contributed by the DGS to the preventive measure, as well as the associated timeframe. The designated authority and the DGS shall consult the competent authority as regards the measures envisaged in the remediation plan.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 11c – paragraph 3
3. Where the competent authority is not satisfied that the remediation plan is credible or feasible, the DGS shall not grant any further preventive measures to that credit institution or where the credit institutions fails to comply with the remediation plan foreseen in Article 11c(1) or fails to repay the amount contributed under the preventive measures at maturity, the DGS shall not grant any further preventive measures to that credit institution and the relevant authorities shall carry out an assessment of whether the institution is failing or is likely to fail, in accordance with Article 32 of Directive 2014/59/EU.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 11d – paragraph 1
1. Where Member States shall allow the use of DGS funds for the alternative measures referred to in Article 11(5), they shall ensureing that when DGSs finance such measures the credit institutions market, or make arrangements for the marketing of, the assets, rights and liabilities those credit institutions intend to transfer. Without prejudice to the Union State aid framework, such marketing shall comply with all of the following:
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 11e – paragraph 5
The EBA, taking into account the regulatory technical standards developed in accordance with Article 36(15) of Directive 2014/59/EU and adopted pursuant to Article 36(16) thereof, shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify:
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 13 a (new)
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 12a (new)
(13a) the following Article 12a is added: Support by the Single Resolution Fund to alternative funding arrangements 1. Where the intervention of a DGS within the Banking Union is necessary in the context of a resolution but its available financial means are insufficient to achieve the purposes of its intervention, the DGS may request support, in the form of a guarantee, from the Single Resolution Fund (SRF). 2. The DGS request shall include all relevant information, including: (i) the shortfall of the deposit guarantee scheme for the purposes of the specific intervention in the resolution; (ii) the conditions offered to the deposit guarantee scheme in other alternative funding arrangements; (iii) the expected length of the requested support. 3. The Single Resolution Board shall take a decision, including on the terms applicable to the guarantee provision, according to Article 79a of Regulation 806/2014 (EU). 4. The SRF guarantee provided to the DGS shall be used as collateral for alternative funding arrangements as referred to in Article 10(9) of Directive 2014/49/EU, thus ensuring access to markets in more favourable conditions.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14 – point d
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that where a credit institution ceases to be member of a DGS and joins a DGS of another Member State, or if some of the credit institution’s activities are transferred to a DGS of another Member State, the DGS of origin shall transfer to the receiving DGS the contributions due for the last 12 monthan amount that reflects the additional potential liabilities borne by the receiving DGS as a result of the transfer, taking into account the impact of the transfer on the financial situation of both DGSs preceding the change of DGS membership, with the exception of the extraordinary contributions referred to inlative to the risks they cover. EBA shall develop draft regulatory technical standards to specify the methodology for the calculation of the amount to be transferred. EBA shall submit those draft regulatory technical standards to the Commission by ... [12 months after the date of entry into force of this amending Directive]. Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Directive by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the second subparagraph in accordance with Articles 10(8).; to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 16
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 15a – subparagraph 1a (new)
The EBA shall issue guidelines specifying the circumstances in which designated authorities should approve the coverage of depositors at branches that have been set up in third countries by DGSs’ member credit institutions.
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 16a – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall ensure that, by 31 March each year, DGSs inform the EBA and the SRB of the amount of covered deposits in their Member State on 31 December of the preceding year. By the same date, DGSs shall also report to the EBA and the SRB the amount of their available financial means, including the share of borrowed resources, payment commitments and the timeline for reaching the target level in case of usefollowing a disbursement of DGS’s funds referred to in Article 10(2).
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 18
Directive 2014/49/EU
Article 16a – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Member States shall ensure that the designated authorities notify the EBA and the Single Resolution Board, without undue delay, about all of the following:
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 2
2. By way of derogation from Article 11(3) of Directive 2014/49/EU, as amended by this Directive, and Articles 11a, 11b, 11c and 11e in relation to preventive measures, until [OP – please insert the date = 7236 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive], Member States may allow IPS referred to in Article 1(1), point (c), to comply with the national provisions implementing Article 11(3) of Directive 2014/49/EU as applicable on [OP – please insert the date of entry into force of this Directive].
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
They shall apply those provisions from … [OP – please insert the date = 24 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive]. However, they shall apply the provisions necessary to comply with Article 11(3), as amended by this Directive, and Articles 11a, 11b, 11c and 11e in relation to preventive measures from … [PO – please insert the date = 4836 months after the date of entry into force of this Directive].
2023/11/06
Committee: ECON