43 Amendments of Paloma LÓPEZ BERMEJO related to 2015/2344(INI)
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that the success of the eurozone is dependent on increasing the welfare of all its citizens, and on well- functioning labour markets and welfare systems, based on decent work with rights, a strong role for the social partners, social dialogue, collective bargaining and collective agreements, and preventing individual Member States from trying to gain an unfair competitive advantage by infringing workers’ rights or,by promoting social dumping, by dismantling collective agreements, or by lowering the workers' social protection;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8
Citation 8
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the Treaty on European Union establishes the creation of the single market, whose currency is the euro; whereas the European Monetary Union currently consists of 19 members, two of whom have opt-out clauses, the remaining seven EU Member States having yet to join; whereas no financial liability will be incurred by the two countries with opt-outs from EMU in the framework of any fiscal capacity for the euro area;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Regrets the fact that the current system of European economic governance is highly unbalanced and focuses almost exclusively on fiscal stability and wage competitiveness, while concerns about economic recovery, public investment policies and more and better jobs and social cohesion are largely ignored; notes that the economic governance framework has proven to be counter-productive as it forces Member States to adopt pro- cyclical measures; points out that the narrow focus on public deficit and debt numbers along with austerity measures pursued among others through MoUs promoted the distortion of social security and wage levels in several Member States;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas it became apparent during the sovereign debtfinancial crisis that the European Treaties do not provide the euro area with the instruments to deal effectively with shocks; whereas the economic governance framework has, in fact proven to be counter-productive as it forces Member States to adopt pro-cyclical measures;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas progress has been achieved in addressing the flaws of EMU throughausterity measures prescribed in legislation such as the Six- Pack and the Two-Pack regulations, as well as through the introduction of the European Semester and the creation of new instruments such as the ESMe European Semester and enforced as conditions for financial assistance from the ESM have deepened the economic crisis and led to a depression in some Member States;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital J
Recital J
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses that the introduction of the euro as a common currency has eliminated tried and tested policy options for counterbalancing asymmetric shocks such as exchange rate fluctuation; reiterates that the relinquishing of autonomy over monetary policy therefore requires alternative adjustment mechanisms to cope with asymmetric macroeconomic shocks in order to make the euro zone an optimal currency area able, inter alia, to implement a proper policy mix to achieve real and social convergence priorities under full democratic control;
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that EMU exposed its vulnerability in the context of the global financial and economic crisis when unsustainable imbalances, triggered by capital flows fromcaused by beggar-thy-neighbour policies in core euro area nations to the periphery and a rising public spending ratio in some Member States, aggravated and led to a sovereign debt crisis, in which government borrowing costs dramatically increased in some Member Stateand by capital flows to the periphery leading to elevated debt levels (private or public), which caused a dramatic increase in government borrowing costs in some Member States, following the rise in public spending due to bank bailouts and initial counter- cyclical policy responses to the crisis, jeopardising, in the absence of a proper fiscal backstop, the mere existence of the euro area;
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Points out that the narrow focus on public deficit and debt level does not address the main causes of the euro crisis; stresses that unsustainable current account imbalances had developed before the crisis, due to beggar-thy-neighbour policies in some Member States, which led to increasing debt levels (public and private) in deficit countries;
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Points out that the crisis has proved that a common monetary policy without a common fiscalplementary fiscal, industrial, social and cohesion policyies cannot address asymmetric shocks to the euro area; reiterates that mere coordination of national fiscal policies withe fiscal policy response, especially throut credible enforcement mechanisgh the fiscal adjustment programs, has not preventcaused an investment gap, has proved insufficient to trigger growth-enhancing, sustainable and socially balanced structural reforms and has not enhanced depressing growth, and severely hampering the national capacity to absorb economic shocks;
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Acknowledges the results achieved since the crisis broke in terms of risk reduction and better coordination; points in particular to the many measures taken by the EU institutions to address the shortcomings revealed by the crisis by strengthening coordination of national fiscal policies, in particular via the adoption of the Six-Pack and the Two- Pack Regulations; welcomes furtherNotes the fact that the EU institutions have set up frameworks for action in current and future crises, namely by creating the European Financial Stability Mechanism (EFSM), the temporary European Financial Stabilisation Facility (EFSF) and its permanent successor, the European Stability Mechanism (ESM); underlines, however,stresses that these mechanisms dramatically lack transparency, democratic oversight and parliamentary control, and hence ownership;
Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Recalls the four pillars set out in the Five Presidents’ Report: completing the economic, financial and fiscal Union and strengthening democratic accountability, legitimacy and the institutional setting; emphasises that this report reiterates the view set out in the Blueprint of the Commission and the Four Presidents’ Report, coordinated by then President of the European Council Mr Herman van Rompuy,Stresses that a shock absorption capacity at euro area level is needed to complement automatic stabilisers at national level, whose functioning is limited, as was shownhas been limited by the imposition of deficit constraints on Member States budgets and austerity policies during the crisis;
Amendment 263 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Makes it clear that rapid action is needed to ensure the sustainability of the euro providing proper living conditions for all citizens; stresses that this requires strong joint efforts on the part of the EU and its Member States to complete the EMU and to restore the trust of citizens and markets;
Amendment 340 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Takes the view that the European Investment bank (EIB) supported by guarantees from the European Central Bank (ECB) can complement a fiscal capacity and play a key role in promoting public investment programs in the EU;
Amendment 351 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Considers that three different functions have to be fulfilled; argues, first, that in order to foster economic and social convergence within the euro area and to improve the economic competitiveness and resilience of the euro area, Member States’ structural reforms should be incentivised in good economic times; argues, secondly, that differences in the business cycles of euro area Member States stemming from structural differences create the need for; argues that structural differences of euro area Member States create the need for coherent, cohesion and industrial, policies as well as an instrument to address asymmetric shocks; considers, thirdly, that symmetric shocks should be addressed so as to increase the resilience of the euro area as a whole;
Amendment 373 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. Argues in consequence that three pillars of a fiscal capacity should be distinguished, wherein action should be undertaken in the framework of a common toolbox to address the different functions, i.e. incentivising convergence and sustainable structural reformsfostering social and regional convergence through public investment , absorbing asymmetric shocks, and absorbing symmetric shocks; takes note of the various proposals regarding designs put forward on this matter by politicians and academia;
Amendment 387 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
Amendment 436 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21 a (new)
Paragraph 21 a (new)
21a. Calls for the ESM to be dismantled, and for the funds used until now as public guarantees for the bond issuing to be transferred to the EU budget, over and above the ceilings of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), and thus put under democratic control by the Parliament;
Amendment 446 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
Amendment 454 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
Amendment 469 #
Motion for a resolution
Subheading 4
Subheading 4
Pillar 1: A convergence code to promote convergence and incentivise the implementation of structural reformssocial and regional convergence
Amendment 478 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Stresses that significant progress in convergence and sustainable structural reforms is needed in order to reconcile fiscal consolidation,social and regional convergence is needed in order to promote growth, jobs, productivity, competitiveness andand to strengthen the European social model across all Member States so as to effectively prevent asymmetric shock; considers that financial support from the European level for the implementation of agreed structural reforms in the Member States, while keeping the responsibility for implementation at the national level, is therefore indispensable;
Amendment 490 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24 c (new)
Paragraph 24 c (new)
24c. A crucial challenge to highlight is how to advance in the field of financial and fiscal regulation in order to halt the boost of rentist practices in the banking system;
Amendment 493 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
Amendment 562 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26 – indent 3 – paragraph 2
Paragraph 26 – indent 3 – paragraph 2
Amendment 574 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
Amendment 585 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Considers that a financial instrument is needed to work as an incentive-based mechanism for convergence and sustainable structural reforms with clear conditionality; believes that the Structural Reform Support Programme (SRSP), which is designed to provide technical support to national authorities for measures aimed at reforming institutions, governance, administration, and economic and social sectors with a view to enhancing growth and jobs, can be further developed as a contribution to this function of the fiscal capacis are limited and problematic tools, insofar they include private investors, which could indirectly condition the use or the success of the fund. Their guarantees on the bond issuing are based in national and intergovernmental contributions putting in risk decision making in fully democratic terms on how to apply the fund. The well-known financial instruments put already in practice have been imposing unfair, hard and counterproductive conditionalities for entire Member States, eroding their sovereignty;
Amendment 586 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27 a (new)
Paragraph 27 a (new)
27a. The EU needs to establish an automatic fiscal mechanism in order to correct imbalances of the payment balance among the Member States, based in higher wage evolution indicators for those Members with recurrent external surpluses and further investment plans in the most deprived regions within Members States with external deficits. Searching for real convergence has to be understood as a path towards fiscal harmonisation, measures against unemployment in those regions with a higher rate, a higher minimum wage standard, a European unemployment benefit scheme, among other measures to foster European public investment.
Amendment 600 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
28. Is convinced that increased social and regional convergence within the euro area will significantly increase the capacity of its Member States to absorb asymmetric shocks; believes, however, that no matter how great the efforts regarding convergence and sustainable structural reforms, asymmetric shocks with an impact on the stability of the euro area as a whole cannot be ruled out completely, given the strong integration of the euro area Member States; stresses, therefore, the need to have an instrument available for this emergency which provides an immediate stabilisation effect;
Amendment 651 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 31
Paragraph 31
31. Acknowledges that the model of a European Unemployment Benefit Scheme wcould foster convergence of labour markets in the medium term; insists that the a European Unemployment Benefit Scheme must be complemented by policies that enhance the creation of decent employment;
Amendment 667 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 32
Paragraph 32
32. Considers that the EMF should provide thefiscal capacity should be endowed with sufficient financial resources for either of these models, which could require increasing the amount of capital; points out that the fund should avoid long-term redistribution effects by ensuring Member States’ contributions are balanced over the cycle effective stabilisation of Member States whose currency is the euro;
Amendment 684 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 33
Paragraph 33
33. Warns that future symmetric shocks could destabilise the euro area as a whole since the currency area is not endowed with the instruments to cope with another crisis of the extent of the previous one; is convinced that the right instrument to deal with symmetric shocks depends on the nature of the shock; recalls that the EMF should be used as an appropriate financial resource;
Amendment 698 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 34
Paragraph 34
34. Considers that in the case of symmetric shocks brought about by a lack of internal demand, monetary policy alone cannot reignite the economy, particularly in a context of zero lower bounds; is therefore convinced that public and private investment must be increased, withe administrative burden reduced and a proper regulatory framework developed, with a view to stimulating view to stimulating potential growth and crowding-in private investment; is also convinced that public policies oriented to directly increase internal demand should be pursued by Member States and supportential growthd at EU level;
Amendment 716 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 35
Paragraph 35
35. Considers that symmetric shocks that are caused by a lack of supply must be diminished by improving the competitivenessapacity of the eEuro area via appropriate financial incentives, including via the financing of professional training or financial incentives for R&D spendingpean economy, through a crucial and democratic public action in strategic sectors at European, national and regional level;
Amendment 722 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
Paragraph 36
36. Considers that instability in the financial sector could also poses severe challenges for the euro area as a whole; urges completion of the Banking Union in order to lessen these challenges; calls for the fiscal capacity to operate as a fiscal backstop for the Banking Union, as agreed in the SRM;
Amendment 723 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 36
Paragraph 36
36. Considers that instability in the financial sector could also pose severe challenges for the euro area as a whole; urges completion of the Banking Union in order to lessen these challenges; calls for the fiscal capacity to operate as a fiscal backstop forfor a new financial regulation across Europe, establishing a banking tax for those practices qualified as rentist, demanding full compliance with the social function of credit, and the reinforcement of balance sheets of the Bbanking Union, as agreed in the SRM;system through resources coming from dividends, shareholders and senior financial creditors
Amendment 741 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 37
Paragraph 37
37. Points out that the fiscal capacity has to be of significant size in order to be able to address, these euro-area-wide shocks and to finance its functions; insists that in order to provide sufficient financial resourcogether with the Member States, these euro -area fiscal capacity, including the EMF, should be able-wide shocks and to fincrease the issuance of equities via a rise in guarantees; considers that these common issued equities should have the highest credit rateance its functions;
Amendment 772 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
Paragraph 40
Amendment 784 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
Paragraph 41
Amendment 804 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
Paragraph 42
Amendment 817 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 43
Paragraph 43
43. Acknowledges that the current political climate characterised by deep inequality, mistrust and uncertainty is not conducive to proper reformspolicy to achieve and complete EMU; believes, therefore, that a comprehensive roadmap, including clear milestones within an agreed timetable and taking into account the political situation, should be urgently adopted with a clear commitment by euro area Heads of State and Government to achieving a genuine and completeprogressive and democratic EMU;