Activities of Notis MARIAS related to 2016/2247(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
Banking Union - Annual Report 2016 (debate) EL
Amendments (11)
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 29 a (new)
Citation 29 a (new)
- having regard to Protocol (No 1) to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) on the role of National Parliaments in the European Union,
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 29 b (new)
Citation 29 b (new)
- having regard to Protocol (No 2) to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality,
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital Β
Recital Β
B. whereas the capital and liquidity ratios of EU banks have steadily improved over the last years; whereasdeploring the fact that risks to financial stability nevertheless remain; whereas the current situation calls for caution when introducing regulatory changes;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. NotesExpresses concern at the high level of non- performing loans (NPLs) in some jurisdictions; considers that this issue is crucial and has yet to be solved; welcomdeplores the workinadequacy of the SSM and its draft guidance on this issue; looks forward to the results of the work on a minimum EU insolvency framework; calls on Member States to improve their insolvency legislation and to stimulate growth in order to tackle NPLs;
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that there are many risks associated with sovereign debt; notes, however, that modifying its prudential treatment could have a significant effect on the financial sector, which calls for caution in reform efforts; awaits with interest the results of the international work on this issue; considers that, in the end, a better regulatory framework, be it European or international, will be needed;
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Points out that guidance provided by international foraimmediate steps should be usedtaken in order to avoid the risk of regulatory fragmentation;
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Recalls the need to clarify the objectives of Pillar 2 and its place within the stacking order of capital requirements; is of the view that the use of capital guidance isought to be a relevant way forward in order to balancachieve financial stability concerns with flexibility needs;
Amendment 355 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
18. RegretsDeplores the fact that the Commission did not allow for more time to assess the implementation of the DGSD before proposing the EDIS and did not conduct a proper impact assessment of the proposal; stands ready, however,is bound to seize the opportunity generated by the proposal to discuss the DGSD and address some of the options and discretions it includes;
Amendment 388 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Welcomes aNotes the European approach to deposit insurance, which must make it possible to address outstanding DGSD implementation issues and phase inimmediately introduce the risk reduction measures;
Amendment 399 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Recommends thatCalls on the Commission, the ECB and the EBA to study the possibility and suitability of accompanying the introduction of the EDIS with an assessment of the capital and liquidity situation of banks in order to better quantify the risks to be insured;