BETA


2016/2247(INI) Banking union - Annual report 2016

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ECON HÜBNER Danuta Maria (icon: PPE PPE) DELVAUX Mady (icon: S&D S&D), LOONES Sander (icon: ECR ECR), TREMOSA I BALCELLS Ramon (icon: ALDE ALDE), CARTHY Matt (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), GIEGOLD Sven (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), VALLI Marco (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2017/08/31
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2017/02/15
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2017/02/15
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 504 votes to 153 with 28 abstentions, a resolution on Banking Union - Annual Report 2016.

The establishment of the Banking Union (BU) is an indispensable component of a monetary union and a fundamental building block of a genuine Economic and Monetary Union (EMU). However, further efforts are needed, as the Banking Union remains incomplete as long as it lacks a fiscal backstop and a third pillar on deposit insurance.

Supervision of non-performing loans : Members expressed concern at the high level of non-performing loans (NPLs), as, according to ECB data, by April 2016 banks in the euro area held EUR 1014 billion in such loans .

While welcoming the efforts already being made to reduce the level of NPLs in some Member States, Parliament called on the Commission to assist Member States in, among others, the establishment of dedicated asset management companies (or “bad banks”) and enhanced supervision. It reiterated, in this context, the importance of the ability to sell off NPLs in order to free up capital , which is especially important for bank lending to SMEs.

Members welcomed the Commission’s proposal on insolvency and restructuring and called on Member States, pending its adoption, to improve their relevant legislation, and more generally their legal framework concerning the restructuring of debt, and to implement necessary sustainable structural reforms aimed at economic recovery in order to tackle NPLs.

Risks associated with sovereign debt : the resolution stressed that an appropriate prudential treatment of sovereign debt might create incentives for banks to better manage their sovereign exposures. The European framework should enable market discipline in delivering sustainable policies and providing high- quality and liquid assets for the financial sector and safe liabilities for governments.

Access to finance : Members stressed that reliable access to finance and the sound allocation of capital in Europe's bank-based financing model depend heavily on robust balance sheets and proper capitalisation, the restoration of which after the financial crises was not and is not uniformly assured across the Union, thus hampering economic growth. They stated that the European banking sector plays a key role in financing the European economy and that this is supported by a strong supervision system. They welcomed, therefore, the intention of the Commission to maintain the SME Supporting Factor in the upcoming revision of CRD/ CRR and to extend it beyond its current threshold.

Systemically important banks : Parliament notes the risks stemming from “too-big-to-fail” financial institutions. It is committed to working swiftly on the legislative proposals for the implementation in the Union of measures designed to reduce risk that have been approved at the international level (particularly total loss-absorbing capacity, central clearing of derivatives, and capital and leverage ratio add-on for globally systemic banks). It welcomed efforts to pursue improvements to the stress-testing framework.

Representation in the BCBS : Members stressed the importance of the role of the Commission, the ECB and the EBA in terms of engaging in the work of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and providing Parliament and the Council with transparent and comprehensive updates on the state of play of the BCBS discussions. According to Members, the EU should work on having an appropriate representation in the BCBS, notably for the euro area. The BCBS and other fora should help promote a level playing field at the global level by mitigating - rather than exacerbating - the differences between jurisdictions.

National Systemic Risk Boards : while welcoming the establishment of National Systemic Risk Boards, Members stressed that the establishment of the Banking Union reinforces the need to strengthen macro-prudential policy at the European level in order to properly address potential cross-border spill-over of systemic risk. The Commission is urged to propose a coherent and effective macro-prudential supervision in its overall review of the macro-prudential framework in 2017. Members highlighted the need to reduce the institutional complexity and lengthy process in the interaction between ESRB, ECB/ Single Supervisory Mechanism ( SSM ) and national authorities, and between competent and designated national authorities, in the field of macro-prudential supervision.

Parliament also highlighted that the outcome of the referendum on the UK’s membership of the EU requires an assessment of the whole European System of Financial Supervision (ESFS), including the voting modalities inside the ESAs, in particular of the double majority mechanism provided under the EBA regulation. It stressed that possible negotiations following the referendum should not lead to an unlevelled playing field between EU and non-EU financial institutions, and should not be used to promote deregulation in the financial sector.

Resolution : Parliament recalls the need to adhere to state aid rules when dealing with future banking crises. The exception of extraordinary public support must be both precautionary and temporary in nature and cannot be used to offset losses that an institution has incurred or is likely to incur in the near future. It calls for the definition of efficient procedures between the SRB and the Commission for decision-making in the event of a resolution.

Furthermore, the Commission needs to assess whether the SRB and the national resolution authorities are equipped with sufficient early intervention powers and sufficient early intervention instruments to prevent disruptive outflows of banks’ capital and loss-absorbing capacity during a crisis.

Minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) : Parliament notes the Commission proposals introducing into Pillar 1 a minimum total loss absorbing capacity (TLAC) for global systemically important banks, in line with international standards.

Members stressed that proper attention should be paid, in calibrating and/or phasing in new MREL requirements, to the need to create a market for MREL-eligible liabilities. They recalled the importance of maintaining discretion for the resolution authority when setting MREL, and of making sure that banks hold sufficient subordinated and bail-inable debt.

Deposit insurance : Parliament reiterated its call for a third pillar in order to complete the Banking Union. It stated that the protection of deposits is a common concern for all EU citizens. The role of the Commission is to guarantee a level playing field in this area across the EU and that it should avoid any fragmentation within the internal market.

Documents
2017/02/15
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2017/02/14
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2017/02/02
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Details

The Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Danuta Maria HÜBNER (EPP, PL) on Banking Union - Annual Report 2016.

The establishment of the Banking Union (BU) is an indispensable component of a monetary union and a fundamental building block of a genuine Economic and Monetary Union (EMU). However, further efforts are needed as the Banking Union remains incomplete as long as it lacks a fiscal backstop and a third pillar on deposit insurance.

Supervision of non-performing loans : Members expressed concern at the high level of non-performing loans (NPLs), as, according to ECB data, by April 2016 banks in the euro area held EUR 1014 billion in such loans . It is crucial to reduce this level. While welcoming the efforts already being made to reduce the level of NPLs in some Member States, the Commission is called upon to assist Member States in, among other things, the establishment of dedicated asset management companies (or “bad banks”) and enhanced supervision. They reiterated, in this context, the importance of the ability to sell off NPLs in order to free up capital , which is especially important for bank lending to SMEs. They welcomed the Commission’s proposal on insolvency and restructuring including early restructuring and second chance, in the framework of the CMU and called on Member States, pending its adoption and in order to complement it, to improve their relevant legislation, especially with regard to the length of recovery procedures, the functioning of judicial systems, and more generally their legal framework concerning the restructuring of debt, and to implement necessary sustainable structural reforms aimed at economic recovery in order to tackle NPLs.

Access to finance : Members stressed that reliable access to finance and the sound allocation of capital in Europe's bank-based financing model depend heavily on robust balance sheets and proper capitalisation, the restoration of which after the financial crises was not and is not uniformly assured across the Union, thus hampering economic growth. The report stated that the European banking sector plays a key role in financing the European economy and that this is supported by a strong supervision system. They welcomed, therefore, the intention of the Commission to maintain the SME Supporting Factor in the upcoming revision of CRD/ CRR and to extend it beyond its current threshold.

Representation in the BCBS : Members stressed the importance of the role of the Commission, the ECB and the EBA in terms of engaging in the work of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and providing Parliament and the Council with transparent and comprehensive updates on the state of play of the BCBS discussions. According to Members, the EU should work on having an appropriate representation in the BCBS, notably for the euro area. The BCBS and other fora should help promote a level playing field at the global level by mitigating - rather than exacerbating - the differences between jurisdictions.

Bank structural reform : the report underlined the need to introduce a bank structural reform, including the reversal of the burden of proof, to end the problem of very large institutions being too big to fail.

National Systemic Risk Boards : while welcoming the establishment of National Systemic Risk Boards, Members stressed that the establishment of the Banking Union reinforces the need to strengthen macro-prudential policy at the European level in order to properly address potential cross-border spill-overs of systemic risk. The Commission is urged to propose a coherent and effective macro-prudential supervision in its overall review of the macro-prudential framework in 2017. Members highlighted the need to reduce the institutional complexity and lengthy process in the interaction between ESRB, ECB/ Single Supervisory Mechanism ( SSM ) and national authorities, and between competent and designated national authorities, in the field of macro-prudential supervision.

They also highlighted that the outcome of the referendum on the UK’s membership of the EU requires an assessment of the whole European System of Financial Supervision (ESFS), including the voting modalities inside the ESAs, in particular of the double majority mechanism provided under the EBA regulation. They stressed that possible negotiations following the referendum should not lead to an unlevel playing field between EU and non-EU financial institutions, and should not be used to promote deregulation in the financial sector.

Minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) : Members stressed that proper attention should be paid, in calibrating and/or phasing in new MREL requirements, to the need to create a market for MREL-eligible liabilities. They highlighted the importance of maintaining discretion for the resolution authority when setting MREL, and of making sure that banks hold sufficient subordinated and bail-inable debt.

Members suggested the adoption on legislation with the purpose of clarifying the responsibilities and powers of, respectively, resolution authorities and competent authorities, concerning early intervention measures to be taken in cases of breaches of MREL requirements.

Deposit insurance : Members reiterated their call for a third pillar in order to complete the Banking Union. They stated that the protection of deposits is a common concern for all EU citizens. The role of the Commission is to guarantee a level playing field in this area across the EU and that it should avoid any fragmentation within the internal market.

Documents
2017/01/25
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2016/12/20
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/12/20
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2016/12/06
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2016/12/06
   CSL - Council Meeting
2016/11/08
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2016/11/08
   CSL - Council Meeting
2016/10/11
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2016/10/11
   CSL - Debate in Council
Documents
2016/10/11
   CSL - Council Meeting
2016/10/06
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2016/06/15
   EP - HÜBNER Danuta Maria (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in ECON

Documents

Votes

A8-0019/2017 - Danuta Maria Hübner - Am 9

2017/02/15 Outcome: -: 451, +: 222, 0: 14
BE GB NL FI EE LT CZ IE DK LV HR LU SI CY PL SE SK MT BG HU AT DE EL PT RO ES FR IT
Total
19
53
25
13
6
10
21
10
11
8
11
6
8
6
51
19
12
6
15
16
18
87
20
21
30
51
73
60
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3
icon: ECR ECR
67

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Czechia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3
4

France Verts/ALE

6

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Poland NI

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

3

Italy NI

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
23

United Kingdom EFDD

3

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Germany EFDD

1

France EFDD

1
icon: ENF ENF
40

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
2

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
202

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
174

Belgium S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Czechia S&D

For (1)

4

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
3

Malta S&D

3

A8-0019/2017 - Danuta Maria Hübner - Am 5

2017/02/15 Outcome: -: 507, +: 171, 0: 9
EL IE CY EE LU FI LT DK HU SI LV MT FR SE NL AT HR PT SK CZ IT BE BG ES GB RO PL DE
Total
19
10
6
6
6
13
10
11
16
8
8
6
73
19
25
18
11
21
12
21
60
20
15
51
52
30
51
88
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ENF ENF
40

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

1
2

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
23

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

United Kingdom EFDD

3

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

France NI

Against (1)

3

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

3

Poland NI

1

Germany NI

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
67

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3
icon: S&D S&D
174

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2
3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2
3

Czechia S&D

4

Belgium S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
203

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0019/2017 - Danuta Maria Hübner - Am 6

2017/02/15 Outcome: -: 493, +: 172, 0: 19
EL FR IE CY NL IT EE LU FI LT AT DK HU SI LV MT SE HR SK BE CZ PT BG ES GB RO PL DE
Total
19
73
10
6
25
60
6
6
13
10
18
11
16
8
8
6
19
11
12
20
20
21
15
51
52
30
51
86
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ENF ENF
40

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

Against (1)

4

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

1
2

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
22

France EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

United Kingdom EFDD

3

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

France NI

Against (1)

3

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

3

Poland NI

1

Germany NI

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3
icon: ECR ECR
66

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
174

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2
3

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2
3

Belgium S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4
icon: PPE PPE
203

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0019/2017 - Danuta Maria Hübner - Am 10

2017/02/15 Outcome: +: 430, -: 217, 0: 39
PL DE FR ES BE NL CZ FI EL HU HR LV IE SI SK LT SE BG LU EE DK RO PT GB AT MT CY IT
Total
51
88
73
51
19
25
20
13
20
16
11
8
10
8
12
10
19
15
6
6
11
30
21
52
18
6
6
60
icon: PPE PPE
201

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

4

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
66

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2
2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Italy ECR

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
49

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

4

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: NI NI
17

Poland NI

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

3

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

Italy NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
40
2

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
23

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

United Kingdom EFDD

3
icon: S&D S&D
175

Belgium S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Lithuania S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

A8-0019/2017 - Danuta Maria Hübner - Am 3

2017/02/15 Outcome: -: 587, +: 71, 0: 25
IE LU EE CY MT LT LV SI DK FI HU EL HR SK NL BG AT SE CZ BE PT IT FR RO PL GB ES DE
Total
10
6
6
6
6
10
8
8
11
13
16
18
11
12
25
14
18
19
21
20
21
59
72
30
51
53
51
87
icon: ENF ENF
40

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

1
2

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
23

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

United Kingdom EFDD

3

Germany EFDD

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
15

Italy NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

3

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

3

Germany NI

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
48

Ireland GUE/NGL

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

Against (1)

4

Italy GUE/NGL

3

France GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
49

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: ECR ECR
66

Cyprus ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Finland ECR

Against (1)

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Italy ECR

Against (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Croatia ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
174

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2
3

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

4

Belgium S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
203

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania PPE

2

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

A8-0019/2017 - Danuta Maria Hübner - Am 7

2017/02/15 Outcome: -: 545, +: 78, 0: 50
EL CY IE LU EE MT LV FI LT DK SI HU HR SK PT AT SE NL CZ BE BG IT FR RO ES GB PL DE
Total
20
6
10
6
6
6
7
13
10
10
8
16
11
11
21
15
19
25
20
17
15
57
73
30
49
53
50
88
icon: ENF ENF
38

Austria ENF

2

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

France ENF

For (20)