BETA

17 Amendments of Liliana RODRIGUES related to 2016/2016(INI)

Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C a (new)
Ca. having regard to chlordecone marine pollution, which is specific to the Antilles and is having a significant impact on authorised fishing zones, as well as to the presence of invasive species;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) recognises the specific characteristics of the ORs andand the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF), which were designed to tackle the problems and challenges of continental Europe, allows for a differentiated approach in these regionfor the ORs but can only provide a limited response to the specific characteristics of fisheries in the ORs;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Recommends taking into account the impact of the financial crisis and its serious economic repercussions, particularly in Portugal and Spain, which hamper the full exploitation of the specific scheme for the modernisation of their fleets (Regulation (EC) No 639/2004);
2016/12/12
Committee: REGI
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Recalls that marine biological resources around the ORs should be especially protected and hencethat particular attention should be paid to fishing; stresses, therefore, that only fishing vessels registered in OR ports arshould be allowed to fish;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Is of the opinion that the precautionary principle should prevail as long as the balance between fishing capacity and opportunities is not evidentStresses the need to maintain the balance between fishing capacity and opportunities in accordance with the precautionary principle and taking into account socio-economic realities;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Recalls that an aging fleet, comprising many vessels that are virtually obsolete, particularly the small vessels of the Canary Islands and Madeira (which on average are more than 40 years old), entails safety risks, is less efficient and affords less attractive working conditions than modern vessels.
2016/12/12
Committee: REGI
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Notes that, given the specific climatic difficulties of the ORs, fishermen in these regions have to cope with their vessels ageing more quickly, causing safety and efficiency problems and making the working conditions less attractive than on modern vessels;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Regrets the delay in the adoption of the EMFF and consequently in the approval of EMFF Operational Programmes and consequently the late implementation of supportive EMFF provisions, which has resulted in serious financial difficulties for some undertakings in the ORs;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the specific provisions for the ORs in the EMFF, such as the compensation for additional costs – which is higher than in the previous programming period but still not enough for some ORs – and the maximum public aid intensity, which is higher than for other regions;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission when proposing delegatedislative acts with regard to the criteria for calculation of additional costs resulting from the specific handicaps of ORs, to also consider the impact of climatic and geographical conditions and depredation;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Deplores the significant level of IUU fishing taking place in the ORs’ EEZEEZ of certain ORs attributable to both domestic and foreign vessels, and in surrounding sea areas in the case of others; points out that for the domestic part, such practices also result from local food supply issues;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15a. Stresses the need to carry out impact assessments for the ORs whenever they are affected by fisheries agreements concluded between the EU and third countries, in accordance with the provisions of Article 349 TFEU;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Notes that a rebetter structuring of the fishing sector in the ORs is needed and if necessary a reduction of the number of vessels should be considered;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 a (new)
16a. Notes that modernisation, and the development of the traditional or small- scale fishing fleet - including that which fishes for shrimps - in the ORs with the aid of public funding (European or national) is necessary, particularly because of the accelerated ageing of their vessels, which gives rise to problems with safety, compliance with European hygiene standards and efficiency, and the unsuitability of the fleet to reach the available resources or to combat IUU fishing; stresses furthermore that such restructuring will help to diversify fishing in the ORs, to improve its quality, to introduce innovation into its fishing activities and to increase efficiency; calls on the Commission therefore to eliminate all obstacles without delay in order to authorise public financing of the gradual renewal of small-scale or traditional fishing fleets - including those fishing for shrimps - of vessels which land their catches in ports in the ORs and which contribute to local, sustainable development of the fishing industry without damaging the sustainability of resources;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19a. Recalls that the ORs are dependent on the fish stocks in their EEZs, which are biologically highly vulnerable; considers, particularly in this context, that data on fishing in the ORs should be among the priorities for data gathering;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses that the potential of aquaculture should be better exploited in the ORs, as it might open up new export possibilities, with strong support from the European Union, in the context of very strong regional competition;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Advocates reconsidering the fleet segmentation basis under a potential future CFP, in order to make better use of capacity limits and facilitate developmentRecommends that the future CFP take full account of the specific features of the ORs and enable them to realise the strong economic, social and environmental potential created by the sustainable and rational development of the fisheries sectors in the ORs;
2017/02/06
Committee: PECH