BETA

6 Amendments of Iskra MIHAYLOVA related to 2014/2149(INI)

Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 – a (new)
1a. Highlights that promoting conservation of cultural heritage assets and their inclusion in sustainable tourism products helps to strengthen the economy, including providing incentives for job creation, physical improvement of urban environment, general infrastructure, education, services and manufacturing industry. Notes that the integrated development of the cultural and historical sites, such as regeneration, protection, exhibiting, socialising, equipping, introducing innovative techniques and programmes for interpretation and animation, has also the potential aimed at leveraging cultural and natural assets to achieve economic and social development through sustainable tourism;
2015/04/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Regards the Pompei project, which was carried out under the 2007-2013 ERDF, as a prime example of such concentration and of the benefits of safeguarding Europe’s unique cultural heritage;deleted
2015/04/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that this ceiling, in particular because it relates to total costs, rather than total eligible costs, could seriously limit Member States’ ability to finance such projects of integrated nature contributing to the cultural heritage preservation and valorisation;
2015/04/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 – a (new)
10a. Points out that the cultural heritage assets preserved and developed through creating all-round tourist products based on an integrated local development strategy/plan, incl. marketing and improvement of the knowledge and skills of those maintaining this sphere, could substantially contribute to the socio- economic development of a particular region, as well as the local businesses therein; Highlights the necessity of applying an integrated approach, taking account of the cultural, economic, social and environmental elements of development of a cultural site and its importance for the local and regional development;
2015/04/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10b. Notes the importance of applying smart specialization in inclusion of cultural heritage in tourist products, as well as of the use of ICT tools, marketing tools and other innovative techniques for the purpose of enhancing the visibility of cultural heritage, making it sustainable, accessible and oriented to new technologies which are friendly also to the young people;
2015/04/14
Committee: REGI
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11 a (new)
11a. Draws attention to the need of creation of a unified EU database/portal, encompassing information about funded cultural heritage projects from all EU programmes and initiatives and providing opportunities for networking and exchange of best practices and experience.
2015/04/14
Committee: REGI