16 Amendments of Iskra MIHAYLOVA related to 2021/0106(COD)
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1
(1) ‘artificial intelligence system’ (AI system) means software that is developed with one or more of the techniques and approaches listed in Annex I anda machine-based system that can, for a given set of human-defined objectives, generate outputs such as content,make predictions, recommendations, or decisions influencing the environments they interact withreal or virtual environments; AI systems can be designed to operate with varying levels of autonomy and can be developed with one or more of the techniques and approaches listed in Annex I;
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 1
Article 4 – paragraph 1
The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 73 to amend the list of techniques and approaches listed in Annex I within the scope of the definition of an AI system as provided for in Article 3(1), in order to update that list to market and technological developments on the basis of characteristics that are similar to the techniques and approaches listed therein.
Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. High-risk AI systems which make use of techniques involving the training of models with data shall be developed on the basis of training, assessment, validation and testing data sets that meet the quality criteria referred to in paragraphs 2 to 5.
Amendment 402 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The common practices standards for a high-risk AI system assessment shall be developed by the European Artificial Intelligence Board.
Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Training, assessment, validation and testing data sets shall be subject to appropriate data governance and management practices. Those practices shall concern in particular, the following elements:
Amendment 415 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point f
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) examination in view of possible biases that are likely to affect health and safety of persons or lead to discrimination prohibited by Union law;
Amendment 458 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 15 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The definition of "appropriate level" in terms of cybersecurity shall be provided by the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) in line with Article 42(2).
Amendment 459 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 2
Article 15 – paragraph 2
2. The levels of accuracy and the relevant accuracy metrics of high-risk AI systems shall be declared in the accompanying instructions of use. European Artificial Intelligence Board shall define a common methodology for the definition and communication of these metrics also referred to in Article 9(7).
Amendment 463 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 15 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
The robustness of high-risk AI systems may be achieved through technical redundancy solutions, which may include backup or fail-safe plans by the provider, or where appropriate the users of the product with input from the user, where considered necessary.
Amendment 510 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 42 – paragraph 1
Article 42 – paragraph 1
1. Taking into account their intended purpose and based on the risk evaluation, high-risk AI systems that have been trained and tested on data concerning the specific geographical, behavioural and functional setting within which they are intended to be used shall be presumed to be in compliance with the requirement set out in Article 10(4).
Amendment 573 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) provide small-scale providers andSME providers, including start-ups with priority access to the AI regulatory sandboxes to the extent that they fulfil the eligibility conditions;
Amendment 575 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) organise specific awareness raising and enhanced digital skills development activities about the application of this Regulation tailored to the needs of the small-scale providerSME providers, including start-ups and users;
Amendment 577 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 55 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) where appropriate, establish a dedicated channel for communication with small-scale providersSME providers, including start-ups, and user and other innovators to provide guidance and respond to queries about the implementation of this Regulation.
Amendment 579 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 55 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 580 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 2
Article 55 – paragraph 2
2. The specific interests and needs of the small-scale providersSME providers, including start-ups, shall be taken into account when setting the fees for conformity assessment under Article 43, reducing those fees proportionately to their development stage, size and market size.
Amendment 582 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 55 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The Commission shall regularly assess the certification and compliance costs for SMEs, including start-ups, through consultations with the SME providers, start-ups and users.