2 Amendments of Jiří POSPÍŠIL related to 2015/2103(INL)
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that robots developed for both manufacturing and individual use of robots should be subject to product safety and consumer protection rules; believes that issues of data protection, liability and cybersecurity should be addressed in any policy on robotic ensuring minimum safety standards and addressing the heightened risk of accidents resulting from interaction with, or working in proximity to, humans; points to the need to adjust the current EU legal framework on data protection, liability and cybersecurity to the dynamic flow of data that may arise when robots become more autonomous and which is based on existing technical standards;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recognises that robotics and AI technologies are increasingly used in autonomous vehicles; notes that some Member States are already enacting or considering legislation in this area in particular; stresses that overregulation in robotics and robotic systems should be avoided, andthe legislation which has already been enacted in this area in particular in some Member States, or which is being considered, should reflect the common need for harmonized standardization for robotics, while avoiding overregulation; calls instead for future-proof minimum harmonisation, especially in relation to autonomous vehicles.