14 Amendments of Jiří POSPÍŠIL related to 2020/2012(INL)
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas such questions should be addressed through a comprehensive and future-proof legal frameworkthere are new issues arising related to the existing legal framework; whereas the legal framework should be future-proof and should reflecting the Union’s principles and values as enshrined in the Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights that would bring legal certainty to businesses and citizens alike;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. wWhereas eachthe Member State shoulds may, depending on their capacities, consider establishing a national supervisory authority responsible for ensuring, assessing and monitoring compliance, and for enabling discussion and exchange of points of view in close cooperation with the concerned stakeholders and the civil society;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
Recital L
L. whereas Parliament continues to calls for the establishment of a European Agency to ensure a harmonised approach to be ensured across the Union and addressfor the new opportunities and challenges to be addressed within its framework, in particular those of a cross- border nature, arising from ongoing technological developments.
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that the determination of whether artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies are to be considered high-risk as regards compliance with ethical principles should always follow from an impartial, regulated and external assessmentbe the subject of further discussion;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines that explainability is essential to ensuring that citizens trust these technologies, even if the degree of explainability is relative to the complexity of the technologies, and that it should be complemented by auditability and traceability of the records of their activities;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Emphasises that when remote recognition technologies are used by public authorities during times of national emergency, such as during a national health crisis, their use should always be proportionate, transparent, limited in time and respectful of human dignity and fundamental rights;
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
17. Observes that data are used in large volumes in the development of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies and that the processing, sharing of and access to such data must be governed in accordance with the requirements of quality, integrity, interoperability, security, privacy and control;
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Notes the added value of havingpossible role of national supervisory authorities in each Member State responsible for ensuring, assessing and monitoring compliance with ethical principles for the development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies;
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Indicates that such authorities shouldmay liaise not only among themselves but also with the European Commission and other relevant institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union in order to guarantee coherent cross-border action;
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Calls foronsiders that such authorities tocould be tasked with promoting regular exchanges with civil society and innovation within the Union by providing assistance to concerned stakeholders, in particular small and medium-sized enterprises or start-ups;
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Suggests that the European Agency for Artificial Intelligence develops common criteria and an application process relating toe development of common criteria and procedures governing the granting of a European certificate of ethical compliance following a request by any developer, deployer or user seeking to certify the positive assessment of compliance carried out by the respective national supervisory authority;
Amendment 255 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28
Amendment 257 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 29
Paragraph 29
29. Concludes, following the above reflections on aspects related to the ethical dimension of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, that the ethical dimension should be framed as a series of principles resulting in a legal framework at Union level supervised by national competent authorities, coordinated and enhanced by a European Agency for Artificial Intelligence and duly respected and certified within the internal marketwhile making maximum use of the existing legal framework;