7 Amendments of Enrique CALVET CHAMBON related to 2014/2252(INI)
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomesExpresses concern at the fact that the closer participation of national parliaments in the European legislative process, which has resulted in a positiven increase in awareness of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality in the interinstitutional context; takes the view that it is vital to define appropriate criteria to assess compliance with both principles, so as to ensure that their application does not go beyond the provisions of the Treaties and jeopardise the building of a united Europe;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes the importancePoints out that the involvement of regional parliaments, – especially those with legislative powers, and of their territorial impact and closeness to its citizens, and calls, where appropriate, for their greater involvement in the early warning system – in the early warning system, where possible, can increase the risk that legislative proposals geared towards attaining the EU’s objectives will be challenged on the basis of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Highlights the facPoints out that 2012 saw national parliaments show their first ‘yellow card’ in the context of the subsidiarity control mechanism, in response to the proposal for a regulation on the exercise of the right to take collective action within the context of the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services, and that it is possible that the proposal may be withdrawn by the Commission; expresses concern about the adverse effect that the withdrawal of that proposal, as well as many others, could have as regards building a sound European Union in the long term;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. WelcomesConsiders appropriate the increasing emphasis placed by the Commission on the policy cycles, and calls on the committee responsible to systematically review Commission impact assessments and to review Parliament’s ex-ante impact assessment analysis as early as possible in the legislative process, with reference at all times to appropriate criteria as regards assessing compliance with both principles.
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Takes the view that there needs to be a debate on the EU’s competences, and that changing the competences would enable the EU to take action in areas in which it does not yet have exclusive competence and would prevent disputes with regard to subsidiarity and proportionality; points out that the consolidation of a European project that is successful in the long term will depend on those principles being applied in the areas in which they are needed.