BETA

3 Amendments of Gunnar BECK related to 2020/2017(INI)

Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines that artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies are acan be tools to serve the people, provided they are properly regulated, and that algorithmic systems can enable access to information, including listings of different kinds of cultural objects; notes the risks of intellectual property rights (IPR) infringement when blending AI and different technologies with a multiplicity of sources (documents, photos, films);
2020/06/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that AI could redefine research by studying patterns in interest in the acquisition and movement of objects across borders; notes, furthermore, that predictive analytics can also play an important role in fine-tuning data analysis;
2020/06/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that AI-improved image recognition software could vastly enhance the ability of educational facilities and relevant actors to provide and develop modern and innovative schooling methods while ensuring quality sources and respecting the protection of IPRs, provided that this does not serve as a pretext for doing away with schooling methods based on human intervention by a teacher who is physically present;
2020/06/25
Committee: JURI