3 Amendments of Răzvan POPA related to 2017/2007(INI)
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
C. whereas expectations are high in many areas, for example but not limited to, the medical, aeronautics, aerospace, automotive, building, architecture and design sectors;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas 3D-printing technology could help to create new jobs that are less physically demanding and less dangerous (maintenance technicians, engineers, designers, etc.) and, thus with the creation of new technician positions (ex. operator for 3D Printers) new liabilities will emerge and the 3D-printing industry will need to provide the appropriate trainings in order for the technicians to be at the same level with their counterparts in traditional manufacturing; 3D-printing technology will also reduce production and storage costs (low-volume manufacturing, personalised manufacturing, etc.);
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
Recital O
O. whereas general liability rules also apply to 3D printing; whereas a specific liability regime cshould be envisaged for damage caused by an object created using 3D-printing technology, as the number of stakeholders involved in the process often makes it difficult for the victim to identify the person responsible; whereas those rules could make the creator or vendor of the 3D file liable, or the producer of the 3D printer, the producer of the software used in the 3D printer, the supplier of the materials used or even the person who created the object, depending on the cause of the defect discovered;