3 Amendments of Geoffroy DIDIER related to 2020/2017(INI)
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Expresses its concern that schools and other public education providers are becoming increasingly dependent on educational technology services, including AI applications, provided by just a few technology companiesbig high-tech undertakings which have virtual monopolies and prohibit any sharing of their information assets based on the gathering of personal data concerning people's relationships and behaviour; stresses that this may leads to unequal access to data and limit competition by restricting consumer choice; calls for this data to be shared with the relevant public authorities so it can be used in the development of curricula, restricting competition, certainly, but also leading to new forms of power and dominance which are particularly detrimental in the field of access to knowledge, culture and pedagogical practices (in particular since these services are purchased with public money or offered to publicucation; calls on the Commission, in cooperation with Member States, to develop alternative infrastructures for education, providers for free, and because education is a common good)ivate cloud storage and smart working;
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the importance of putting in place a proper framework for the public procurement of such services for the public sector, including for education providers, to ensure consumer choice and the respect of fundamental rights; stresses the need for public buyers to take into account specific criteria, such as non-discrimination and data privacy, and, specifically when purchasing services for public education providers, the involvement of educators and learners; calls for the implementation of a research and development plan for artificial intelligence focusing on education, knowledge and culture which can stop the brain drain and loss of skills from Europe; calls also for facilitation of the acquisition of cognitive skills and for the gulf that exists in our societies with regard to access to the means to acquire such skills to be reduced;
Amendment 84 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Underlines the unreliability of the currenat automated means of removing illegal content from online platforms on which audiovisual content is shared; calls for a ban on generalised moderation and automated content filtcopyright works that are posted without authorisation on online platforms on which audiovisual content is shared should be standardised at European level to ensure their proper functioning for the benefit both of users and of copyright-holders;