BETA

6 Amendments of Sara SKYTTEDAL related to 2020/2005(INL)

Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 11 a (new)
— having regard to the non-paper1a by Austria, Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, the Netherlands and Sweden, containing input for the declaration of the Porto Social Summit, __________________ 1a https://www.permanentrepresentations.nl/ documents/publications/2021/04/23/social -summit-non-paper
2023/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 – indent 2
- increased access to traineeships by trainees with disabilities and trainees from other marginalised groups, using an intersectional approach,
2023/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Calls on the Commission to propose a directive to ensure adequate remuneration for traineeships in order to avoid exploitative practices;deleted
2023/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 26
26. Requests that the Commission submit on the basis of Article 153(2)(b) TFEU in conjunction with Article 153(1)(b) TFEU, a proposal for a framework directive setting out minimum requirements for adequate remuneration for traineeships, following the recommendations set out in Annex I hereto;deleted
2023/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I
RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO THE CONTENT OF THE PROPOSAL REQUESTED A European framework directive for adequate remuneration for traineeships The European Parliament considers that the future legislative proposal for a framework directive setting out minimum requirements for adequate remuneration for traineeships should follow these principles and aims: 1. The directive should set out minimum requirements for adequate remuneration for traineeships. 2. trainees who are considered to be workers, namely, people who have an employment relationship as defined by the national law or practice of collective agreements, taking into account the criteria established by the Court of Justice of the European Union (Court of Justice) for determining the status of a worker (including cases 66/85, Lawrie-Blum, C- 3/90, Bernini, C-109/04, Kranemann, C- 229/14, Balkaya, in which the Court of Justice gave indications as to when trainees may be considered to be workers under Union law). Provided that trainees fulfil those criteria, the directive should apply to such trainees in both the private and the public sectors. 3. The directive should include a penalties provision.deleted The directive should apply to
2023/02/10
Committee: EMPL
Amendment 275 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point b
(b) increased access to traineeships by trainees with disabilities and trainees from other marginalised groups, using an intersectional approach,
2023/02/10
Committee: EMPL