BETA

Activities of Damian BOESELAGER related to 2022/2150(INI)

Shadow opinions (1)

OPINION on the European Semester for economic policy coordination 2023
2023/02/10
Committee: BUDG
Dossiers: 2022/2150(INI)
Documents: PDF(132 KB) DOC(45 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Petri SARVAMAA', 'mepid': 112611}]

Amendments (5)

Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines the exceptionally uncertain EU economic outlook resulting from the lasting impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the consequences of the war against Ukraine and the energy and cost of living crisis;
2023/01/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the robustness of the 2. labour market; highlights the stabilising effect of national short-time work schemes supported by the European instrument for temporary support to mitigate unemployment risks in an emergency (SURE); welcomes the fact that the recovery and resilience facility is mitigating those consequences and contributing to the Union’s competitive sustainability the just transition transition and digitization; stresses the importance that reforms and investments under the Recovery and Resilience Plans meet the climate targets of the regulation and are in full respect of the “do no significant harm” principle and contribute to reaching the 2030 national climate and energy and to achieve climate neutrality by 2050 the latest; stresses that its successful implementation requires the completion of milestones and targets and the no regression in the achievements, in particular compliance with the rule of law and the general regime of conditionality, to be monitored transparently and thoroughly; welcomes the Commission’s proposal to include a REPowerEU chapter in the national recovery and resilience plans; insists that the financing of REPowerEU must not divert resources away from other EU priorities. Calls for a swift implementation of RepowerEU amendment of the RRF regulation and in particular to speed up investments in reneweables and energy efficiency to decrease dependence on fossil fuels as fast as possible;
2023/01/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Reminds that meeting the goals of the European Green Deal and Paris Agreement requires significant and targeted fiscal efforts; stresses the key role that national budgets will need to play in financing the green transition, in the absence of joint funding that would reduce the cost and align incentives as witnessed in the RRF process; highlights the need for an EU Sovereignty Fund to ensure all Member States have the fiscal leeway to accelerate the transition while preserving fair competition in the single market;
2023/01/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the Union budget primarily supports strategic, targeted and growth-enhancing investment and entails a lower risk of inflationary pressure compared to untargeted and extensive national fiscal stimulus; calls on the Commissfor using amortisation ands the Member States, in the revision of the EU economic governance framework, to treat gross national income-basedaccounting method for green and social investments and national co-financing of cohesion funds compliant with Paris agreement spreading the cost of net public investment over the life-cycle of an investment and thus allowing for speeding up of much needed investments; calls for the countributions to the Union budget in the same way as the national investment commitmenty specific debt adjustment paths should be based on key economic variables such as interest rate/growth differentials, initial debt level, composition of public debt stock;
2023/01/19
Committee: BUDG
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Is concerned about at the economic impact of the aforementioned crises on the Union budget and on national budgets; stresses that crisis response has led Member States to adopt extensive economic measures; highlights the long- term impact of these measures on economic sustainability, but considers that it should be possible to return to a state of economic discipline in the long run; Agrees with the Commission’s orientations as regard the simplification of the framework, differences in Member States’ fiscal paths, the use of a more comprehensive debt sustainability analysis and the general escape clauses; suggests the European Semester should mirror the medium-term nature of the future economic policy coordination framework; iIs also concerned about the potential impact of the Union’s increasing debt repayment obligations if not appropriately handled; stresses that Union borrowing should not increase further as long as there are no new own resources to cater for debt repaymentnew own resources to cater for debt repayment need to be implemented in urgency, in order to safeguard the integrity of the EU’s budget and policies as well as its financial capacity.
2023/01/19
Committee: BUDG