2 Amendments of Irena JOVEVA related to 2020/2019(INL)
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that communication always takes place in a given context, which is why automated procedures may support individual decisions on the legality of content, but may under no circumstances replace them; notes that editorial decisions, algorithmic processes and arbitrary content removal by online platforms can have a large impact on freedom of expression and access to information; calls for a safe digital environment promoting diversity of opinion, net neutrality, freedom of speech, and access to information and a balanced approach between individual freedom and fundamental rights;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Points out that in addition to transparency obligations, regulations on the findability of content and restrictions on self-referencing can make a significant contribution to the dissemination of lawful content.; points out that after “notice and take down” actions against dissemination of disinformation, large social platforms can target users who accessed fake news, inform them of being victims of a disinformation campaign and give them correct, credible information; calls for the use of all technologically feasible means and specific measures to detect and remove harmful or illegal content on the Internet, while securing access to diverse and quality content in today’s digital environment; stresses that such proportionate measures should be in line with existing legal provisions; recalls good practices of self-regulatory codes of conduct; however, suggests balanced solutions regarding content removals, with cooperation between platforms, regulative authorities, fact-checkers and users, who can substantially contribute to the prevention of spreading false information, especially if users have control over the content proposed to them and flag arguable content;