BETA

Activities of Stéphane SÉJOURNÉ related to 2020/2017(INI)

Shadow opinions (1)

OPINION on artificial intelligence in education, culture and the audiovisual sector
2020/09/22
Committee: JURI
Dossiers: 2020/2017(INI)
Documents: PDF(146 KB) DOC(75 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Angel DZHAMBAZKI', 'mepid': 124873}]

Amendments (6)

Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Underlines thatStresses that the European approach to artificial intelligence (AI) and related technologies are a tool to serve the people and that algorithmic systems can enable access to information, including listings of different kinds of cultural objects; notes the risks of intellectual property rights (IPR) infringement when blending AI and different technologies with a multiplicity of sources (documents, photos, films)must be human- centred, so that AI genuinely becomes an instrument in the service of people and the common good; points out that AI can support content creation in the education, culture and audiovisual sectors; emphasises, therefore, the importance of establishing a European framework for the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) in connection with the use of AI;
2020/06/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that AI could redefinbenefit the research by studying patterns in interest in the acquisition and movement of objects across borders; notes, furthermore, that predictive analytics can also play an important role in fine-tuning data analysissector, for example through the role predictive analytics can play in fine- tuning data analysis; stresses that the EU must step up investment and foster partnerships between industry and academia in order to enhance research excellence at European level;
2020/06/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that AI-improvedbased software, such as image recognition software, could vastly enhance the ability of educational facilities and relevant actors to provide and develop modern and innovative schooling methods while ensuring quality sources and respecting the protection of IPRs; notes, however, that this recognition software must be used only for educational purposes and not under any circumstances to monitor access to establishments;
2020/06/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that, if the use of AI is to benefit the education and research sector, the EU must encourage training in the skills of the future, in particular an ethical and responsible approach to AI technologies; adds, with that aim in view, that this training must not be reserved for pupils focusing on scientific and technical subjects, who are already more familiar with these tools, but must instead target as many people as possible, in particular in the younger generations;
2020/06/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Emphasises that the interaction between AI and the creative industries is complex and requires an in-depth assessment; welcomes the ongoing study ‘Trends and Developments in Artificial Intelligence - Challenges to the IPR Framework’ and the ‘Study on Copyright and New technologies: copyright data management and Artificial Intelligence’; underlines the importance of clarifying the use of copyright-protected content as data input (images, music, films, databases etc.) and in the production of cultural and audiovisual outputstakes the view that consideration should be given to protecting AI-generated technical and artistic creations, in order to encourage this form of creativity;
2020/06/25
Committee: JURI
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. AsksCalls for the intellectual property action plan announced by the Commission to assddress the impactquestion of AI and AI-its impact on the crelated technologies on the audiovisual and creative sector, in particular with regard to authorship andive sectors, taking account of the need to strike a balance between protecting IPRs and encouraging creativity in the areas of education, culture and research; considers that the EU can be a leader in the creation of AI technologies if it adopts an operational regulated questions. ory framework and implements proactive public policies, particularly as regards training programmes and financial support for research;
2020/06/25
Committee: JURI