BETA

39 Amendments of Benoît BITEAU related to 2019/2162(INI)

Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
- having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1241/2019 on the conservation of fisheries resources and the protection of marine ecosystems through technical measures,
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
- having regard to Directive 2014/89/EU of 23 July 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning (Maritime Spatial Planning Directive),
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 b (new)
- having regard to the Council Directive of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources (91/676/EEC), with regard to fertilizer run-off,
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 c (new)
- having regard to the Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents and Regulation (EC) 1367/2006 on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community institutions and bodies,
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to the Farm to Fork Strategy (COM(2020) 381 final),
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 b (new)
- having regard to its Resolution (2017/2055(INI)) on international ocean governance: an agenda for the future of our oceans in the context of the 2030 SDGs,
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 c (new)
- having regard to the 2002 Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development, the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation and to the report “The Future we Want” of the 2012 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20),
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 d (new)
- having regard to target 11 of the Aichi Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020,
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 6 a (new)
- having regard to the 2019 IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate,
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 7 a (new)
- having regard to the Sustainable Development Goal 14 of the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, on the conservation and sustainable use of the oceans, seas and marine resources,
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
- having regard to the 2020 STECF report on monitoring the performance of the CFP,
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 a (new)
- having regard to the 2017 Special report of the European Court of Auditors “More efforts needed to implement the Natura 2000 network to its full potential” (No 1/2017),
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 b (new)
- having regard to the Ombudsman’s case 640/2019/FP,
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 9 c (new)
- having regard to the EEA report No 3/2015 “Marine protected areas in Europe’s seas: An overview and perspective for the future”,
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 10 a (new)
- having regard to the European Commission Report assessing Member States’ programmes of measures under the MSFD (COM/2018/562),
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D a (new)
D a. whereas overcapacity is one of the key drivers of overfishing in Europe and worldwide, and efforts to reduce capacity have been broadly offset by technological progress in fishing efficiency;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
E a. whereas the CFP is not fully implemented yet and some of its measures such as the establishment of Fish Stock Recovery Areas haven’t been used;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E b (new)
E b. whereas globally 66% of the marine environment has been altered by human pressure according to IPBES and 34,2% of fish stocks are fished at biologically unsustainable levels according to FAO;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H a (new)
H a. whereas healthy habitats, including sandbanks, seagrass meadows and coral reefs, are essential to the restoration of marine ecosystem functioning and to the replenishment of fish stocks and to providing carbon sinks to mitigate climate change;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 62 #
H b. whereas well-managed Marine Protected Areas are essential to enhance biodiversity and to preserve natural habitats of other species such as birds.
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas there is a strong scientific consensus that MPAs are beneficial to fisheries because of their spillover effect and their positive effects on recruitment, for example through the protection of reproduction sites, protection of juveniles and big mother fishes with high reproductive capacities;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I a (new)
I a. whereas pollution originating from the land, especially in partially enclosed sea basins, and from other marine activities also have an impact on fish stock recovery;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I b (new)
I b. whereas the Ombudsman’s recommendation to proactively make public documents related to the adoption of the TAC regulations was so far not followed by the Council of the EU;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Urges the Commission to strengthen the implementation of the ecosystem approach to fisheries management in order to minimise the negative impacts on marine ecosystems, fish stocks and societyf fishing activities and other factors such as climate change on marine ecosystems, fish stocks and society, including by increasingly applying multi- species approaches;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Considers that the EU should go beyond current fisheries management practices and promote a transition towards low-impact fisheries in order, not only to preserve fish stocks at current levels but, more importantly, to rebuild fish stocks and restore marine ecosystems;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8 a. Considers that this approach should also be applied to the external dimension of the CFP.;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 b (new)
8 b. Urges the Commission to tackle the problem of overcapacity, including by requesting the STECF to implement a methodology that takes into account the ‘technological creep’ (i.e. gradual increase in fishing power) when assessing trends in fishing fleet capacity;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 c (new)
8 c. Demands that the Council proactively makes public all documents related to the adoption of TAC Regulations in line with the Ombudsman’s recommendation and comply with Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 and Regulation (EC) 1367/2006;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9 a. Highlights that successful MPAs offer large socio-economic benefits, especially for coastal communities, the fisheries and tourism sector;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls for MPAs to be established as part of a coherent network of connected areas, including offshore and deep-sea areas, and with a view to ensure balanced geographic distribution and ecological representativity; recalls the requirement to cease fishing with bottom-contacting gear below 400 m in areas where vulnerable marine ecosystems (VMEs) are known to exist or are likely to occur;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Urges Member States to set stronger and more effective management plans for the existing MPAs and to put in place stronger control measures to ensure that MPAs are respected, including by involving the fisheries sector, expanding the scope of the Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) such as by transmitting vessel position data close to real-time and strengthening of on-the-spot controls;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Calls on the Commission to start infringement procedures against Member States that are not respecting their obligations regarding the effectiveness of the protection of MPAs;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 b (new)
15 b. Calls on the Commission to take action when Member States fail to agree, within one year of ongoing negotiations (informal and formal), on the adoption of joint recommendations for fisheries management measures in offshore MPAs in line with Article 11 of the CFP, including by proposing its own measures or by taking emergency measures to protect the site as long as an agreement has not been reached;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 c (new)
15 c. Stresses that greater scrutiny over fisheries management measures within Natura 2000 sites, submitted by EU Member States, is necessary in order to ensure that conservation objectives are achieved in line with Article 11 of the Common Fisheries Policy,
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 d (new)
15 d. Emphasises that the designation of areas and development of management measures should be based on the best available scientific advice;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17 a. Expresses serious concern that 59% of northern Europe's Marine Protected Areas are commercially trawled1a, with average trawling intensity 38% higher than in non-protected areas, suggesting that MPAs do not reduce fishing pressure under current management _________________ 1a"Elevated trawling inside protected areas undermines conservation outcomes in a global fishing hot spot" By Manuel Dureuil, Kristina Boerder, Kirsti A. Burnett, Rainer Froese, Boris Worm, Published in Science 21 Dec 2018 : 1403- 1407
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Invites the Member States to expand the network of fish stock recovery areas under the CFP, emphasises the need to include the evaluation of designation and success of such areas in the upcoming report on the functioning of the CFP;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 a (new)
18 a. Calls on the European Commission and Member States to take a proactive role in the creation of new effectively-managed MPAs in the high seas, both in the framework of RFMOs and the upcoming international legally binding instrument under UNCLOS on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20 a (new)
20 a. Calls on the European Commission to publish a study on the impact of those diverse sources of pollution on the rebuilding fish stocks and on marine ecosystems;
2020/09/11
Committee: PECH