14 Amendments of Manon AUBRY related to 2020/2012(INL)
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital K
Recital K
K. whereas each Member State should establish a national supervisory authority responsible for ensuring, assessing and monitoring the compliance, and for enabling of the development, deployment and use of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies with these ethical principles; and to allow discussions and exchange of points of views in close cooperation with the concerned stakeholders and the civil society;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Underlines that explainability is essential to ensuring that citizens trust these technologies, even if the degree of explainability is relative to the complexity of the technologies, and that it should be complemented by regulation and guidelines to ensure auditability and traceability;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Firmly believes that there is an urgent need to examine how fundamental human rights texts and principles, as well as the resultant obligations, should be applied effectively to ensure that these emerging technologies do not create gaps in terms of protection;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Affirms that possible bias in and discrimination by software, algorithms and data should be addressed by setting rules for the processes through which they are designed and used, as this approach would have the potential to turn software, algorithms and data into a considerable counterbalance to bias and discrimination, and a positive force for equal rights and social change;
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Stresses that the benefits of developing and using artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies must be shared in such a way as to reduce social inequalities;
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 b (new)
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. Asserts that the European model for developing artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies must be based on citizens’ trust and greater social cohesion;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 c (new)
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. Objects to the deployment of artificial intelligence systems such as facial, biometric or emotion recognition in public spaces, with the exception of certain establishments which might be visited by the public and which, by their nature, pose a high security risk to individuals and the state;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 d (new)
Paragraph 7 d (new)
7d. Considers any artificial intelligence mechanism which hinders or restricts freedom of expression exercised digitally, except in cases of abuse of that freedom as laid down by law and sanctioned by the judiciary, to be illegal under the fundamental principles of the European Union;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 e (new)
Paragraph 7 e (new)
7e. Calls for a ban on the deployment of any artificial intelligence system which restricts users’ access to public services;
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 a (new)
Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Emphasises, in particular, that job losses resulting from the deployment of artificial intelligence systems must lead to a corresponding sharing of productivity gains and to appropriate public policies such as a reduction of working time;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10a. Considers that, for the purposes of the previous paragraph, the environmental impact of developing and deploying artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies should always be evaluated throughout their lifetime and that the evaluation should include an estimate of the impact of the extraction of the materials needed, the energy consumption and the greenhouse gas emissions caused by their production, development and operation;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
12. HighlightAcknowledges that the development, deployment and use of these technologies provide numerous opportunities for the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals outlined by the United Nations;
Amendment 519 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point o
Annex I – part B – Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point o
(o) ‘injury or harm’ means physical, emotionpsychological or mental injury, bias, discrimination or stigmatization, suffering caused by a lackresulting in particular from a violation of inclusivity and diversity, financial or economic loss, loss of employment or educational opportunity, undue restriction of freedom of choice, wrongful conviction, environmental harm and any infringement of Union law that is detrimental to a person;
Amendment 619 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 12 – point 2
Annex I – part B – Article 12 – point 2
2. In accordance with Article 5(2), where remote recognition technologies, such as biometric recognition, are deployed or used by Member States’ public authorities for the purpose of responding to a national emergency, those authorities shall ensure that such deployment or use is limited to specific objectives and locations (some establishments might be visited by the public and pose, by their nature, a high security risk to individuals and to the State), restricted in time and carried out with due regard for human dignity and the fundamental rights set out in the Charter.