Activities of Marcel KOLAJA related to 2020/2012(INL)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION with recommendations to the Commission on framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies
Amendments (9)
Amendment 5 #
1. Recalls that the creationdevelopment and the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the areas of culture, education and information policy raises and will continue to raise a wide range of ethical issues;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses the need to develop criteria for the use of AI in education, media and creative sectors, by developing benchmarks forfining principles of ethically responsible and acceptedtrustworthy uses of AI technologies in these areas; underlines that these criteria must be constantly adjustedadaptable to the progress in AI technologies;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notices that AI personalisedtechnology and AI- driven learning systems are increasingly being deployed in schools and universities, which is changing the role of teachers in the learning process to one more of facilitation; emphasises that education should empower citizens to develop new forms of thinking, including AI literacy and algorithm awareness and the ability to evaluate the impact of AI on information, knowledge, and decision-making; stresses that this shift should be reflected in educational curricula;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Acknowledges the great potential of AI in the areas of information and media; underlines that, if not regulated, it might have also ethically adverse effects by generating and spreading fake news, creating information bubbles and exploiting biases incorporated into AI algorithms;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Considers that the use of certain types of AI, such as facial recognition and behaviour detection systems, may have a damaging effect on the role of media and journalists as watchdogs of democracy; underlines, therefore, that the use of those systems in public spaces should be prohibited;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises the importance for transparency and accountability of algorithms used by media streaming companivideo-on-demand and television broadcasting services, in order to ensure access to culturally and linguistically diverse content; stresses that such algorithms should be designed in such a way that they do not privilege specific works by limiting their ‘personalised’ suggestions to the most popular works;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Emphasises that educational institutions should only use AI systems for education purposes that have been audited and certified as ethical, beneficial and acting consistently with human rights principles; reminds that open source software and open technologies are best suited for such purposes;
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Notes that the use of AI technologies is increasingly raising questions of fair competition in sport; stresses that this area needs a regulatory framework.