62 Amendments of Andreas SCHIEDER related to 2020/0361(COD)
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14
Recital 14
(14) The concept of ‘dissemination to the public’, as used in this Regulation, should entail the making available of information to a potentially unlimited number of persons, that is, making the information easily accessible to users in general without further action by the recipient of the service providing the information being required, irrespective of whether those persons actually access the information in question. The mere possibility to create groups of users of a given service should not, in itself, be understood to mean that the information disseminated in that manner is not disseminated to the public. However, the concept should exclude dissemination of information within closed groups consisting of a finite number of pre- determined persons. Interpersonal communication services, as defined in Directive (EU) 2018/1972 of the European Parliament and of the Council,39 such as emails or private messaging services, fall outside the scope of this Regulation. Information should be considered disseminated to the public within the meaning of this Regulation only where that occurs upon the direct request by the recipient of the service that provided the information. Consequently, providers of services, such as cloud infrastructure, which are provided at the request of parties other than the content providers and only indirectly benefit the latter, should not be covered by the definition of online platforms. __________________ 39Directive (EU) 2018/1972 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 establishing the European Electronic Communications Code (Recast), OJ L 321, 17.12.2018, p. 36
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 22
Recital 22
(22) In order to benefit from the exemption from liability for hosting services, the provider should, upon obtaining actual knowledge or awareness of illegal content, act expeditiously to remove or to disable access to that content taking into account the potential harm the illegal content in question may create. In order to ensure a harmonised implementation of illegal content removal throughout the Union, the provider should, within 24 hours, remove or disable access to illegal content that can seriously harm public policy, public security or public health or seriously harm consumers’ health or safety. According to the well-established case-law of the Court of Justice and in line with Directive 2000/31/EC, the concept of ‘public policy’ involves a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat which affects one of the fundamental interest of society, in particular for the prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences, including the protection of minors and the fight against any incitement to hatred on grounds of race, sex, religion or nationality, and violations of human dignity concerning individual persons. The concept of ‘public security’ as interpreted by the Court of Justice covers both the internal security of a Member State, which may be affected by, inter alia, a direct threat and physical security of the population of the Member State concerned, and the external security, which may be affected by, inter alia, the risk of a serous disturbance to the foreign relations of that Member State of to the peaceful coexistence of nations. Where the illegal content does not seriously harm public policy, public security, public health or consumers’ health or safety, the provider should remove or disable access to illegal content within seven days. The deadlines referred to in this Regulation should be without prejudice to specific deadlines set out Union law or within administrative or judicial orders. The provider may derogate from the deadlines referred to in this Regulation on the grounds of force majeure or for justifiable technical or operational reasons but it should be required to inform the competent authorities as provided for in this Regulation. The removal or disabling of access should be undertaken in the observance of the principle ofthe Charter of Fundamental Rights, including a high level of consumer protection and freedom of expression. The provider can obtain such actual knowledge or awareness through, in particular, its own-initiative investigations or notices submitted to it by individuals or entities in accordance with this Regulation in so far as those notices are sufficiently precise and adequately substantiated to allow a diligent economic operator to reasonably identify, assess and where appropriate act against the allegedly illegal content.
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 37
Recital 37
(37) Providers of intermediary services that are established in a third country that offer services in the Union should designate a sufficiently mandated legal representative in the Union and provide information relating to their legal representatives, so as to allow for the effective oversight and, where necessary, enforcement of this Regulation in relation to those providers. It should be possible for the legal representative to also function as point of contact, provided the relevant requirements of this Regulation are complied with. In addition, recipients of intermediary services should be able to hold the legal representative liable for non-compliance.
Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 39 a (new)
Recital 39 a (new)
(39a) In order to effectively and meaningfully address the proliferation of illegal goods and services online, intermediary services should implement measures to prevent illicit content from reappearing after having been taken down. Such measures, undertaken horizontally by all intermediary services, will contribute to a safer online environment.
Amendment 447 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 50 a (new)
Recital 50 a (new)
(50a) After having obtained the necessary contact information of a trader, which are aimed at ensuring consumer rights, a provider of intermediary services needs to verify that these details are consistently being updated and accessible for consumers. Therefore, it shall conduct regular and randomized checks on the information provided by the traders on its platform. To ensure a consistent display of these contact information, intermediary services should establish mandatory designs for the inclusion of these contact information. A content, good or service shall only be displayed after all necessary information are made available by the business user.
Amendment 461 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 52 a (new)
Recital 52 a (new)
(52a) The market position of very large online platforms allows them to collect and combine enormous amounts of personal data, thereby strengthening their market position vis-a-vis smaller competitors, while at the same time incentivising other online platforms to take part in comparable data collection practices and thus creating an unfavourable environment for consumers. Therefore, the collecting and further processing of personal data for the purpose of displaying tailored advertisement should be prohibited. The selection of advertisements shown to a consumer should consequently be based on contextual information, such as language settings by the device of the user or the digital location. Besides a positive effect on privacy and data protection rights of users, the ban will increase competition on the market and will facilitate market access for smaller online platforms and privacy-friendly business models.
Amendment 465 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 52 b (new)
Recital 52 b (new)
(52b) The ban on targeted advertising should not hinder contextual advertisement, such as the displaying of a car advertisement on a website presenting information from the automotive sector.
Amendment 508 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 65 a (new)
Recital 65 a (new)
(65a) Due to their market position, very large online platforms have developed an increasing influence over society’s social, economic, and political interactions. Consumers face a lock-in situation, which may lead them into accepting unfavourable terms and conditions to participate in the services provided by these very large online platforms. To restore a competitive market and to allow consumers more choices, very large online platforms should be required to setup the necessary technical access points to create interoperability for their core services, with a view to allowing competitors a fairer market access and enabling more choice for consumers, while at the same time complying with privacy, security and safety standards. These access points should create interoperability for other online platform services of the same type, without the need to convert digital content or services to ensure functionality.
Amendment 530 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 70 a (new)
Recital 70 a (new)
(70a) The Commission should encourage the development of codes of conduct to facilitate online platforms’ verification of short-term holiday rental providers’ compliance with national registration and authorisation schemes. Such codes of conduct should aim in particular at establishing effective cooperation mechanisms between online platforms and public authorities on short term holiday rentals.
Amendment 534 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 73
Recital 73
(73) Given the cross-border nature of the services at stake and the horizontal range of obligations introduced by this Regulation, the authority appointed with the task of supervising the application and, where necessary, enforcing this Regulation should be identified as a Digital Services Coordinator in each Member State. Where more than one competent authority is appointed to apply and enforce this Regulation, only one authority in that Member State should be identified as a Digital Services Coordinator. The Digital Services Coordinator should act as the single contact point with regard to all matters related to the application of this Regulation for the Commission, the Board, the Digital Services Coordinators of other Member States, as well as for other competent authorities of the Member State in question. In particular, where several competent authorities are entrusted with tasks under this Regulation in a given Member State, the Digital Services Coordinator should coordinate and cooperate with those authorities in accordance with the national law setting their respective tasks, and should ensure regular reporting and effective involvement of all relevant authorities in the supervision and enforcement at Union level.
Amendment 599 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. This Regulation lays down harmonised rules on the provision of intermediary services in order to improve the functioning of the internal market. In particular, it establishes:
Amendment 606 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) set out uniformharmonised rules for a safe, accessible, predictable and trusted online environment, where fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter, including a high level of consumer protection, are effectively protected.
Amendment 640 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – point i a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 5 – point i a (new)
(ia) Directive (EU) 2019/882
Amendment 646 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 a (new)
Article 1 a (new)
Article 1a Objective The aim of this Regulation is to contribute to the proper functioning of the internal market by setting out harmonised rules for a safe, predictable and trusted online environment, where fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter are effectively protected.
Amendment 765 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Paragraph 1 shall not apply where the recipient of the service is acting under the authority, decisive influence or the control of the provider.
Amendment 777 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 a (new)
Article 5 a (new)
Amendment 928 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 1
Article 12 – paragraph 1
1. Providers of intermediary services shall include information on any restrictions that they impose in relation to the use of their service in respect of information provided by the recipients of the service, in theiruse fair, non-discriminatory and transparent contract terms and conditions. T that information shall include information on any policies, procedures, measures and tools used for the purpose of content moderation, including algorithmic decision-making and human review. It shall be set outshall be drafted in clear and unambiguous language and shall bare publicly available in an easily accessible format in a searchable archive of all the previous versions with their date of application.
Amendment 998 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Providers of intermediary services shall ensure that the identity, such as the trademark, logo or other characteristic traits, of the business user providing the goods, content or services on the intermediary services is clearly visible alongside the goods, content or services offered.
Amendment 1015 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 a (new)
Article 13 a (new)
Amendment 1018 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 a (new)
Article 13 a (new)
Article 13a Measures against the reappearance of illegal content Where an intermediary service detects and identifies illegal goods or services, it shall prevent this content from reappearing on its service. The application of this requirement shall not lead to any general monitoring obligation.
Amendment 1019 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 b (new)
Article 13 b (new)
Amendment 1059 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3
Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. Notices that include the elements referred to in paragraph 2 shall be considered to give rise to actual knowledge or awareness for the purposes of Article 5 in respect of the specific item of information concerned. A provider shall be exempted from liability despite knowledge for a time that is appropriate to take an informed decision on the matter.
Amendment 1078 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Article 14 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Where an online platform that allows consumers to conclude distance contracts with traders, detects and identifies illegal goods or services, it shall be obliged to establish an internal database of those goods and services that had previously been taken down by the online platform because they had been found to be illegal or harmful. They shall, under the inclusion of elements listed in the Rapid Exchange of Information System (RAPEX) and other relevant public databases, scan their database on a daily basis to detect illegal goods and services. If this process detects a good or service that has previously been found to be illegal or harmful, the online platform shall be obliged to delete the content expeditiously.
Amendment 1079 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Article 14 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Where the explanation of the reasons as referred to in paragraph 2 (a) does not allow a diligent economic operator to identify the illegality of the content in question; where the notified content is not illegal in the country of establishment of the hosting service; or, where there is a genuine demonstrable doubt about the illegality of the content, the hosting services may seek assistance for further clarification with the relevant authority or the national Digital Services Coordinator;
Amendment 1132 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 15 a (new)
Article 15 a (new)
Amendment 1145 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Online platforms shall provide recipients of the service, and individuals or entities that have submitted a notice for a period of at least six months following the decision referred to in this paragraph, the access to an effective internal complaint-handling system, which enables the complaints to be lodged electronically and free of charge, against the decision taken by the provider of the online platform not to act upon the receipt of a notice or against the following decisions taken by the online platform on the ground that the information provided by the recipients is illegal content or incompatible with its terms and conditions:
Amendment 1152 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) decisions whether or not to remove or disable access to or restrict visibility of the information;
Amendment 1159 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) decisions whether or not to suspend or terminate the provision of the service, in whole or in part, to the recipients;
Amendment 1163 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point c
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) decisions whether or not to suspend or terminate the recipients’ account.
Amendment 1200 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Recipients of the service addressed by the decisions referred to in Article 17(1), shall be entitled to select any out-of-court dispute that has been certified in accordance with paragraph 2 in order to resolve disputes relating to those decisions, including complaints that could not be resolved by means of the internal complaint-handling system referred to in that Article. Online platforms shall engage, in good faith, with the body selected with a view to resolving the dispute and shall be bound by the decision taken by the bodyalways direct recipients to an out-of-court dispute settlement body. The information about the competent out-of-court body shall be easily accessible on the online interface of the online platform in a clear and an user-friendly manner.
Amendment 1205 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Amendment 1208 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 18 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Online platforms shall engage, in good faith, with the independent, external certified body selected with a view to resolving the dispute and shall be bound by the decision taken by the body.
Amendment 1243 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 18 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Certified out-of-court dispute settlement bodies shall draw up annual reports listing the number of complaints received annually, the outcomes of the decisions delivered, any systematic or sectoral problems identified, and the average time taken to resolve the disputes.
Amendment 1350 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 a (new)
Article 20 a (new)
Article 20a Content of public interest 1. When an online platform takes the decision to remove content or to suspend the provision of its services to a recipient of the service, it shall take into account whether the content is or appears to be specifically intended to contribute to public policy objectives, in particular where the content is of particular importance to public policy, public security or public health objectives at Union or national level. 2. If an online platform decides to remove content or suspend the provision of its services to a user which is or appears to be of public interest, related to public policy, public security or public health the online platform shall take the necessary technical and organisational measures to ensure that complaints through the internal complaint-handling system referred to in Article 17, are processed and decided upon with priority and without delay.
Amendment 1362 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 21 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 21 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. When a platform that allows consumers to conclude distance contracts with traders becomes aware that a piece of information, a product or service poses a serious risk to the life, health or safety of consumers, it shall promptly inform the competent authorities of the Member State or Member States concerned and provide all relevant information available.
Amendment 1398 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
Article 22 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new)
(fa) whether the drop shipping principle is applied, i.e. goods are offered that are not in stock in the retailer's warehouse;
Amendment 1411 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 22 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Amendment 1442 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 6
Article 22 – paragraph 6
6. The online platform shall make the information referred to in points (a), (d), (e), (f) and (fg) of paragraph 1 available to the recipients of the service, in a clear, easily accessible in accordance with Directive (EU) 2019/882, in a clear and comprehensible manner.
Amendment 1447 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 6 a (new)
Article 22 – paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. In order to comply with paragraph 1 point (g), web shops shall inform close to the depicted goods if their goods are part of the stock or whether a manufacturer has to be found for them first. Online marketplaces shall provide third party sellers with a dropshipping labelling tool, which they have to use if they want to be approved by the platform.
Amendment 1452 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 7 a (new)
Article 22 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. The online platform may rely on the information provided by third party suppliers referred to in Article 6a point (b) Directive (EU) 2019/2161, unless the platform knows or ought to know, based on the available data regarding transactions on the platform, that this information is incorrect. Online platforms must take adequate measures to prevent traders from appearing on the platform as non-traders.
Amendment 1454 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 7 b (new)
Article 22 – paragraph 7 b (new)
7b. An online platform is liable for damages caused to consumers by a violation of its duties in this Article;
Amendment 1455 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 7 c (new)
Article 22 – paragraph 7 c (new)
7c. The online platform must inform the consumer at the earliest possible point in time and immediately before the distance contract is concluded with a third-party provider in a prominent manner that the consumer is concluding a contract with the third party and not with the online platform. If the online platform violates its duty to provide information, the consumer can also assert the rights and legal remedies arising from the distance contract against the third party for non-performance against the online platform.
Amendment 1456 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 7 d (new)
Article 22 – paragraph 7 d (new)
7d. If an online platform makes misleading information about third-party providers, about goods, services or digital content offered by third-party providers or about other provisions of the distance contract, the online platform is liable for the damage that these misleading information inflicts on consumers;
Amendment 1457 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 7 e (new)
Article 22 – paragraph 7 e (new)
7e. An online platform is liable for guarantees, which it gives about third party supplier or about goods, services or digital content offered by third party supplier.
Amendment 1463 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 a (new)
Article 22 a (new)
Article 22a Duty to protect recipients of the service Operators of online platforms allowing consumers to conclude distance contracts with traders or consumers, or of very large online platforms according to Article 25, who fail to take adequate measures for the protection of the recipients of the service upon obtaining credible evidence of criminal conduct of a recipient of the service to the detriment of other recipients or evidence of the illegality of a certain product, service, commercial practice or advertising method of a third party supplier, shall be held liable for the damages caused resulting from such a failure.
Amendment 1507 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 24 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Online platforms or advertising service providers that play out advertisements shall also check the accuracy of the information about the advertiser in accordance with the due diligence obligations pursuant to Article 22. If there are indications of dubious offers - in the case of obviousness, user reports and web shops "blacklisted" on warning lists - platforms or the advertising service providers behind them may not display the advertising.
Amendment 1519 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 a (new)
Article 24 a (new)
Article 24a Prevention measures against online fraud on platforms Member States shall promote preventive measures to reduce consumer harm caused by illegal advertising and sales practices on platforms. This includes, among other things, the establishment of information platforms that publish daily warnings about current online traps. Such initiatives are linked Union-wide via a network, financed by the Commission and supported by an EU coordinator. Host providers provide clearly visible links to these prevention pages.
Amendment 1520 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 a (new)
Article 24 a (new)
Article 24a Right to information 1. Where an online platform becomes aware, irrespective of the means used to, of the illegal nature of a product or service offered through its services, it shall inform those recipients of the service that had acquired such product or contracted such service during the last six months about the illegality, the identity of the trader and any means of redress.
Amendment 1570 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) any negative effects for the exercise of the fundamental rights, in particular the rights to respect for private and family life, freedom of expression and information, the prohibition of discrimination and the rights of the child, as enshrined in Articles 7, 11, 21 and 24 of the Charter respectively;
Amendment 1708 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 a (new)
Article 29 a (new)
Article 29a Recommendation systems and individual or target-group specific pricing on online market places The description shall also include information on whether users are shown different prices depending on individual, as defined in Article 6 (1) ii) (ea) of Directive 2011/83/EU or target group- specific factors, in particular devices used and geographical locations. Where applicable, the platform shall make reference to these factors in a clearly visible manner.
Amendment 1712 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 1
Article 30 – paragraph 1
1. Very large online platforms that display advertising on their online interfaces shall compile and make publicly available and searchable through easy to access, functionable and reliable tools through application programming interfaces a repository containing the information referred to in paragraph 2, until onfive year after the advertisement was displayed for the last time on their online interfaces. They shall ensure multi- criterion queries can be performed per advertiser and per all data points present in the advertisement, and provide aggregated data for these queries on the amount spent, the target of the advertisement, and the audience the advertiser wishes to reach. They shall ensure that the repository does not contain any personal data of the recipients of the service to whom the advertisement was or could have been displayed.
Amendment 1737 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 30 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 30 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The archive must be easily accessible for users and contain a complaint and reporting option for users directly addressed to the platform and the responsible advertising service provider. The requirements for notifications under Art 14 also apply to notifications and complaints about advertising content.
Amendment 1759 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 3
Article 31 – paragraph 3
3. Very large online platforms shall provide access to data pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 2 through online databases or application programming interfaces, as appropriate., and with an easily accessible and user-friendly mechanism to search for multiple criteria, such as those reported in accordance with the obligations set out in Articles 13 and 23
Amendment 1771 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 5
Article 31 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission shall, after consulting the Board, and no later than one year after entry into force of this legislation, adopt delegated acts laying down the technical conditions under which very large online platforms are to share data pursuant to paragraphs 1 and 2 and the purposes for which the data may be used. Those delegated acts shall lay down the specific conditions under which such sharing of data with vetted researchers can take place in compliance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679, taking into account the rights and interests of the very large online platforms and the recipients of the service concerned, including the protection of confidential information, in particular trade secrets, and maintaining the security of their service.
Amendment 1804 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 a (new)
Article 33 a (new)
Article 33a Algorithm accountability 1. When using automated decision- making, the very large online platform shall perform an assessment of the algorithms used. 2. When carrying out the assessment referred into paragraph 1, the very large online platform shall assess the following elements: (a) the compliance with corresponding Union requirements; (b) how the algorithm is used and its impact on the provision of the service; (c) the impact on fundamental rights, including on consumer rights, as well as the social effect of the algorithms; and (d) whether the measures implemented by the very large online platform to ensure the resilience of the algorithm are appropriate with regard to the importance of the algorithm for the provision of the service and its impact on elements referred to in point (c). 3. When performing its assessment, the very large online platform may seek advice from relevant national public authorities, researchers and non- governmental organisations. 4. Following the assessment, referred to in paragraph 2, the very large online platform shall communicate its findings to the Commission. The Commission shall be entitled to request additional explanation on the conclusion of the findings, or when the additional information on the findings provided are not sufficient, any relevant information on the algorithm in question in relation to points a), b), c) and d) of Paragraph 2. The very large online platform shall communicate such additional information within a period of two weeks following the request of the Commission. 5. Where the very large online platform finds that the algorithm used does not comply with point (a), or (d) of paragraph 2 of this Article, the provider of the very large online platform shall take appropriate and adequate corrective measures to ensure the algorithm complies with the criteria set out in paragraph 2. 6. Where the Commission finds that the algorithm used by the very large online platform does not comply with point (a), (c), or (d) of paragraph 2 of this Article, on the basis of the information provided by the very large online platform, and that the very large online platform has not undertaken corrective measures as referred into Paragraph 5 of this Article, the Commission shall recommend appropriate measures laid down in this Regulation to stop the infringement.
Amendment 1809 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 33 a (new)
Article 33 a (new)
Article 33a Interoperability 1. Very large online platforms shall provide, by creating and offering an application programming interface, options enabling the interoperability of their core services to other online platforms. 2. Application programming interfaces should be easy to use, while the processing of personal data shall only be possible in a manner that ensures appropriate security of these data. Measures under paragraph (1) may not limit, hinder or delay the ability of content hosting platforms to fix security issues, nor should the need to fix security issues lead to an undue delay for the provision on interoperability. 3. This Article is without prejudice to any limitations and restrictions set out in Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
Amendment 1811 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. The Commission shall support and promote the development and implementation of voluntary industry standards set by relevant European and international standardisation bodies, and whenever available widely-used information and communication technology standards that meet the requirements set out in Annex II of Regulation No. 1025/2012, at least for the following:
Amendment 1822 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) interoperability of the advertisement repositories referred to in Article 30(2), and the APIs referred to in Article 33a;
Amendment 1842 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 34 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 34 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The absence of such standards as defined in this article should not prevent the timely implementation of the measures outlined in this regulation.
Amendment 1894 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 36 a (new)
Article 36 a (new)
Article 36a Codes of conduct for short-term holiday rentals 1. The Commission shall encourage and facilitate the drawing up of codes of conduct at Union level between online platforms, short-term holiday rental providers, and relevant authorities to contribute to the proper enforcement of the authorization and registration schemes for short-term holiday rentals. 2. The Commission shall aim to ensure that the codes of conduct lead to the development of effective mechanisms for online platforms to verify and track short-term holiday rental providers’ compliance with national registration and authorization requirements. The Commission shall encourage the development of the codes of conduct within one year following the date of application of this Regulation and their application no later than six months after that date.
Amendment 1941 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 41 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 41 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Where needed for carrying out their tasks under this Regulation and also in order to avoid any discrepancy in the enforcement of the Digital Services Act, Digital Services Coordinators shall have at least the following powers of investigation, in respect of conduct by providers of intermediary services under the jurisdiction of their Member State:
Amendment 2274 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 67 – paragraph 1
Article 67 – paragraph 1
1. The Commission shall establish and maintain a reliable and secure information sharing system supporting communications between Digital Services Coordinators, the Commission and the Board based on the Internal Market Information system.