BETA

6 Amendments of Traian BĂSESCU related to 2020/2080(INI)

Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
O. whereas it is crucial to filladdress the capability gappriorities identified in the Capability Development Plan (CDP), and byto build on the Coordinated Annual Defence on Review (CARD);
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point g
(g) ensure that the funding of PESCO projects by the EDF is focused on a limited set of strategic key projects, in line with the HCIG of the CDPCDP priorities, in order to maximise its impact;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 293 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point n
(n) promote compliance with the 20 PESCO commitments by establishing clearer definition of compliance benchmarkindicators, and by ensuring that future project proposals must address a specific CDP priority; ensure that any reviews of project progress should be based on clear and transparent criteria; ensure that such criteria serve as benchmark for all Member States participating in PESCO projects;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 295 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point o
(o) use the synergies between the PESCO project cycle and other defence capability processes such as CARD, HLG and EDF in order to enable more mature and well-documented projects to be submitted; allow projects to be submitted outside the cycle in order to enable the synchronised implementation of several European initiatives, including the EDF;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 323 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point u
(u) clarify or define the link between the governance of PESCO and that of the EDF and to involve Parliament in the ex- post control process when it comes to EDF funding of PESCO projects;deleted
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 331 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point w
(w) clarify the rules governing third- party participation in PESCO, taking into consideration the importance of EU decision-making autonomy and full reciprocity, with a case-by-case approach considered to be most beneficial for the EU; the decision-making process regarding the involvement of a third-party should be ensured at the level of each PESCO project, by the Member States involved;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET