4 Amendments of Julie LECHANTEUX related to 2019/2191(INI)
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Highlights the role of the ERTMS Coordinator in defining the lines and corridors to be equipped with the ERTMS as a matter of priority, and in ensuring its deployment in the most cost-efficient way in close cooperation with stakeholders; stresses that, when setting its priorities, the ERTMS coordinator must also take into account gaps in certain lines and corridors affecting cross-border links, such as the gap between Perpignan and Montpellier on the France-Spain rail axis, for example;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Believes that a ten-fold increase in the deployment pace of ERTMS is urgently needed to achieve the digital transition of the European railway system, and for the ERTMS to be rolled out on the core network by 2030 and on the comprehensive network by 2040; calls on the Commission, in this regard, to maintain and reinforce the binding nature of the targets in its revisions of the Trans- European Network Transport Programme (TEN-T) guidelines, the ERTMS European Deployment Plans (EDPs) and the CCS Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSIs);
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to come up with a gradual decommissioning strategy for Class B systems with regulatoryflexible deadlines to be set at EU levelin consultation with all stakeholders in the Member States; believes that the effectiveness of this strategy depends on the consent and the involvement of the actors concerned;
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls on the Commission, moreover, to introduce a regulatory provision to ensure that the ERTMS NIPs are legally aligned with the binding ERTMS deployment targets set in EU legislation;deleted