BETA

34 Amendments of Ibán GARCÍA DEL BLANCO related to 2020/2217(INI)

Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Welcomes the Commission’s planned mid-term review of the Digital Education Action Plan; remains convinced that the Plan needs a clearer governance and coordination structure, involving the European Parliament, to monitor developments and performance on an ongoing basis; urges the Commission to better integrate digital education into the European Semester exercise;
2020/11/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the EU approach to digitalisation should be human-centred, value-oriented and based on the concept of the social market economy; underlines that choosing a third patits own approach to digitalisation should not mean that the EU becomes protectionist; stresses, therefore, that every non-EU player should still be welcome to operate in the single European data space as long as they meet the EU’s ethical, technological, privacy and security standards, security and particularly ethical standards, such as those on transparency, accountability, traceability, non-discrimination, sustainability, social responsibility and good governance;
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Notes that the EU approach to digitalisation should be human-centred, value-oriented and based on the concept of the social market economy; underlines that choosing a third patits own approach to digitalisation should not mean that the EU becomes protectionist; stresses, therefore, that every non-EU player should still be welcome to operate in the single European data space as long as they meet the EU’s ethical, technological, privacy and security standards, security and particularly ethical standards, such as those on transparency, accountability, traceability, non-discrimination, sustainability, social responsibility and good governance;
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Stresses that the EU should include among its prioritises digital literacy and competencies in its cohesion policy for 2021 and beyond, with a focus on supporting teachers and the heads of education institutionseducational community as a whole in implementing digital education throughout curricula and on sharing best practices and know-how, without creatavoiding additional administrative or financial burdens; considers that education should be focused on practical skills for the future and be based on a long-term and comprehensive analysis of labour market needpolicy should help citizens to be prepared for an increasingly data-based economy, and to develop their ability to take part in the digital transformation and further shape democratic societies; welcomes the Commission’s proposal to develop a common European skills database;
2020/11/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Highlights the urgent need to close the EU’s digital skills gap and considers that enhanced graduate tracking and labour marketskills, competences, qualifications and occupations data sharing will be invaluable tools to achieve this end; stresses the importance of fully abiding by EU rules on personal data protection when using these tools;
2020/11/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Stresses that platforms are more and more used in schools across the EU and are becoming essential tools to prepare lessons as well as to communicate with parents; in this respect, considers that the use of children’s data should be limited to educational purposes and under no circumstances derive in commercial use; calls on the European Commission and the Member States to support and contribute to the development and the strengthening of secure, user friendly, accessible and EU-based teaching platforms;
2020/11/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Highlights the opportunity to increase mobility in the European Education Area through the use of digital education and data; underlines the importance of automatic mutual recognition of diplomas at all levels of education and of learning periods abroad; calls therefore on the promotion of the European Qualification Framework and the development of the European Student Card in order to include all learners;
2020/11/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that the new strategy should be implemented by means of a principle-based and innovation-friendly EU legal framework, which should be proportionate and, while safeguarding the best interests of EU citizens, avoid unnecessary administrative burdens for small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and start-ups, and should be combined with concrete measures, guidance, private- public codes of conduct and programmes, strong investments, and, if necessary, new sector-specific laws;
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that the new strategy should be implemented by means of a principle-based and innovation-friendly EU legal framework, which should be proportionate and, while safeguarding the best interests of EU citizens, avoid unnecessary administrative burdens for small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and start-ups, and should be combined with concrete measures, guidance, private- public codes of conduct and programmes, strong investments, and, if necessary, new sector-specific laws;
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Emphasises that the implementation of the European data strategy should take account of the specific needs of vulnerable groups; recalls that almost 100 million persons with disabilities in the EU are facing particular challenges in accessing digital tools and quality education; calls on the Member States to make every effort to ensure that persons with disabilities and persons from disadvantaged backgrounds have full access to digital tools and infrastructure in order to harness the full potential of digitalisation and prevent a widening of gaps between different parts of society in terms of access to digital education;
2020/11/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to explore the potential merits and scope of creating a common European data space for the cCultural and cCreative iSectors and Industryies at large; believes that the digitalisation of cultural heritage could be useful and beneficial in a wide variety of ways, by for instance facilitating physical protection and preservation or enabling three-dimensional virtual applications which could be suitable for a number of sectors, including tourism; calls for the development of a common European data space on cultural heritage, which could be built on the basis of the Europeana Digital Service Infrastructure and should be accessible to all parts of society.
2020/11/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7 a. Calls on the EU to lead the way in the field of AI, both in the public and the private sector; highlights the opportunity given by the use of AI in education; stresses that any new legislation in the field must be observant of fundamental rights, including the right to protection of privacy and personal data, and contribute to set high ethical standards;
2020/11/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the key importance of fostering access to data for EU businesses, and their competitiveness at the global level, especially for SMEs and start-ups; considers that voluntary data sharing between businesses based on fair and transparent contractual arrangements, triggered by incentives in the form of subsidies and tax breaks, would help to achieve this goalwould help to achieve this goal; notes, in this regard, that a solid legislative framework is important to ensure trust and encourage businesses to make data available to others, particularly across borders;
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the key importance of fostering access to data for EU businesses, and their competitiveness at the global level, especially for SMEs and start-ups; considers that voluntary data sharing between businesses based on fair and transparent contractual arrangements, triggered by incentives in the form of subsidies and tax breaks, would help to achieve this goalwould help to achieve this goal; notes, in this regard, that a solid legislative framework is important to ensure trust and encourage businesses to make data available to others, particularly across borders;
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 b (new)
7 b. Points out the need to support research programmes and networks through the use of data and digital innovation; underlines the necessity to train, hire and retain talents in Europe to address and accompany digital transition; stresses that access to such jobs and curricula needs to be gender-balanced;
2020/11/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 c (new)
7 c. Underlines the existence of a gender gap in the digital sector, both in the education and therefore in the employment fields; encourages the use of data to close such gap and develop targeted policies that promote gender equality in digital education and careers; notes that encouraging and supporting the participation of girls and women to science, technology, engineering, arts and mathematics (STEAM) education and careers should be an important part of such policies;
2020/11/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. States that mutually beneficial, fair, simple, intelligible, secure, interoperable and affordable voluntary data sharing agreements between companies from the same supply chain and different sectors, that either monetise the participation of data providers or enable ‘give and take’ schemes, will further accelerate the development of the EU data economy;
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. States that mutually beneficial, fair, simple, intelligible, secure, interoperable and affordable voluntary data sharing agreements between companies from the same supply chain and different sectors, that either monetise the participation of data providers or enable ‘give and take’ schemes, will further accelerate the development of the EU data economy;
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to assess the possibility of defining fair contractual conditions with the aim of addressing imbalances in market power and between the concerned parties; underlines that a single European data space will require companies to be allowed to closely cooperate with each other, and therefore considers that safe harbours and block exemptions on cooperation for data sharing and pooling, as well as more guidance for businesses on competition law matters from the Commission, are needed;
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Calls on the Commission to assess the possibility of defining fair contractual conditions with the aim of addressing imbalances in market power and between the concerned parties; underlines that a single European data space will require companies to be allowed to closely cooperate with each other, and therefore considers that safe harbours and block exemptions on cooperation for data sharing and pooling, as well as more guidance for businesses on competition law matters from the Commission, are needed;
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Recommends further strengthening interoperability and establishing consensus-based, industry-led common cross-sector standards in order to guarantee that the movement of data between different machines and entities can take place in an innovative manner without leaving any gaps in that regard to be filled by the economic entities with significant market power that operate across sectors; highlights the importance of open, non- proprietary standards to ensure a high degree of interoperability;
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Recommends further strengthening interoperability and establishing consensus-based, industry-led common cross-sector standards in order to guarantee that the movement of data between different machines and entities can take place in an innovative manner without leaving any gaps in that regard to be filled by the economic entities with significant market power that operate across sectors; highlights the importance of open, non- proprietary standards to ensure a high degree of interoperability;
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Believes that open source technology promotes the mutually beneficial collaboration between businesses while guaranteeing transparency and public scrutiny, thereby providing the high level of trust needed to engage in data sharing; further notes that open source technology can play a significant role in ensuring Europe’s digital sovereignty; considers therefore that the uptake of open source technology should be actively encouraged and promoted by the Commission, particularly through effective permanent funding facilities;
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Believes that open source technology promotes the mutually beneficial collaboration between businesses while guaranteeing transparency and public scrutiny, thereby providing the high level of trust needed to engage in data sharing; further notes that open source technology can play a significant role in ensuring Europe’s digital sovereignty; considers therefore that the uptake of open source technology should be actively encouraged and promoted by the Commission, particularly through effective permanent funding facilities;
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Declares that a distinction between the legal regimes concerning personal and non-personal data is essential, as not sharing any commercial datasets is often the only option for businesses due to the complexity of the existing rules and the great legal uncertainty as to whether personal data is sufficiently depersonalised; notes that this distinction may be difficult to draw in practice given the existence of mixed data, for which specific rules and approaches should be introducedexisting Union legislation mandates that, where non-personal data and personal data are inextricably linked, data protection rights and obligations apply in full to the whole mixed dataset, regardless of the comparative amount of personal data in relation to non-personal data; believes that models that focus on anonymisation, which requires a clear legal base and a list of criteria, and other technical ways of ensuring privacy must be encouraged, such as the shift from the sharing of data to the sharing of computation, application programming interfaces (APIs), synthetic data and data sandboxes;
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
9. Declares that a distinction between the legal regimes concerning personal and non-personal data is essential, as not sharing any commercial datasets is often the only option for businesses due to the complexity of the existing rules and the great legal uncertainty as to whether personal data is sufficiently depersonalised; notes that this distinction may be difficult to draw in practice given the existence of mixed data, for which specific rules and approaches should be introducedexisting Union legislation mandates that, where non-personal data and personal data are inextricably linked, data protection rights and obligations apply in full to the whole mixed dataset, regardless of the comparative amount of personal data in relation to non-personal data; believes that models that focus on anonymisation, which requires a clear legal base and a list of criteria, and other technical ways of ensuring privacy must be encouraged, such as the shift from the sharing of data to the sharing of computation, application programming interfaces (APIs), synthetic data and data sandboxes;
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion
Subheading 4
Liability for datadeleted
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 80 #
Draft opinion
Subheading 4
Liability for datadeleted
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Believes that the existing liability principles and technology-neutral liability rules are already fit for the digital economy and most emerging technologies; states that there are nevertheless some cases, such as those concerning operators of AI systems, where new liability rules are necessary to provide the affected persons with adequate compensation;deleted
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 81 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
11. Believes that the existing liability principles and technology-neutral liability rules are already fit for the digital economy and most emerging technologies; states that there are nevertheless some cases, such as those concerning operators of AI systems, where new liability rules are necessary to provide the affected persons with adequate compensation;deleted
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 95 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
13. Is of the belief thatCalls for an impact assessment to be conducted by the Commission on whether the data-driven digital economy does not requires any major changes to the existing IPR framework and thus notes that the Commission should carefully assess what legal adjustments are really necessaryor adjustments to the existing IPR legal framework; welcomes, in this regard, the Commission’s intention to revise the Database Directive and clarify the application of the Trade Secrets Directive;
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 95 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 13
13. Is of the belief thatCalls for an impact assessment to be conducted by the Commission on whether the data-driven digital economy does not requires any major changes to the existing IPR framework and thus notes that the Commission should carefully assess what legal adjustments are really necessaryor adjustments to the existing IPR legal framework; welcomes, in this regard, the Commission’s intention to revise the Database Directive and clarify the application of the Trade Secrets Directive;
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 101 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to assess to what extentake measures to ensure that the application of foreign jurisdictions’ legislation, such as the US CLOUD Act, might lead to legal uncertainty and disadvantages for Union residents and businesses and whether any action is neededdoes not undermine the fundamental rights of Union citizens or lead to legal uncertainty and disadvantages for Union businesses; points out recent jurisprudence by the Court of Justice of the European Union in this regard.
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI
Amendment 101 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 14
14. Calls on the Commission to assess to what extentake measures to ensure that the application of foreign jurisdictions’ legislation, such as the US CLOUD Act, might lead to legal uncertainty and disadvantages for Union residents and businesses and whether any action is neededdoes not undermine the fundamental rights of Union citizens or lead to legal uncertainty and disadvantages for Union businesses; points out recent jurisprudence by the Court of Justice of the European Union in this regard.
2020/11/23
Committee: JURI