9 Amendments of Adriana MALDONADO LÓPEZ related to 2020/2017(INI)
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Notes that the Commission has proposed to rapidly deploy products and services that rely on AI in areas of public interest and the public sector; emphasises that in the education sector, thise development and deployment of AI should involve educators, learners and wider society and take their needs and the expected benefits into account in order to ensure that AI is used purposefully and ethically;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission to include the education sector in the regulatory framework for high-risk AI applications given the importance of ensuring that education continues to contribute to the public good and given the high sensitivity of data on pupils, students and other learners in order to promote the public good and the public well-being of society; underlines that data sets used to train AI should be reviewed to avoid reinforcing gender stereotypes and other biases;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Points out that all children are entitled to a high-quality public education at every level; calls, therefore, for the development, deployment and use of high- quality AI systems that provide pupils at all levels with high-quality educational tools and emphasises that the deployment of new AI systems in schools should not widen the digital divide in society; calls on the Commission to examine how to implement these systems, particularly in the most vulnerable educational establishments and in depopulated areas with no or poor Internet access;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Calls on the Commission to establish a method whereby the manufacturers of devices that use AI can control content by means of a data tag or a similar means of providing information which allows users to make free and informed decisions, given that many pupils will be minors whose access to certain unsuitable content must be restricted on account of their age;
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Stresses the importance of putting in place a proper framework for the public procurement of such services for the public sector, including for education providers, to ensure consumer choice and the respect of fundamental rights; stresses the need for public buyers to take into account specific criteria, such as non-discrimination and data privacy, the ethical regulation of data privacy and fundamental rights, and, specifically when purchasing services for public education providers, the involvement of educators and learners;
Amendment 104 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for recommendation algorithms and personalised marketing on audiovisual platforms, including video streaming platforms and news platforms, to be transparent, in order to give consumers an accurate insight into these processes and content, and ensure that personalised services are not discriminatory; stresses the need to guarantee and properly implement the right of users to opt out from recommended and personalised services.
Amendment 107 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls for audiovisual platforms to be responsible for their content in order to protect the rights of both consumers and pupils, ensuring that their fundamental rights are not infringed, and in order to prevent fake news and disinformation;
Amendment 116 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 b (new)
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6b. Points out that the deployment, development and implementation of AI must make it easier for consumers and pupils with some form of disability to use tools to access audiovisual content;
Amendment 120 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 c (new)
Paragraph 6 c (new)
6c. Points out that the AI systems that are developed, implemented and used in the European Union, in any of the three sectors referred to in this report, must reflect the EU's cultural diversity and multilingualism.