9 Amendments of Daniela RONDINELLI related to 2020/2216(INI)
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Recital A
Recital A
A. whereas the Fourth Industrial Revolution, digitalisation and artificial intelligence (AI) are leading to fundamental and structural changes to the labour market, the workplace and the work profile of every worker and whereas these processes have been accelerated by the pandemic, which has exacerbated many pre-existing work and social problems;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas these developments plausibly facilitate human-machine synergies, thereby producing a combined effect greater than the sum of their separate outcomes, but also pose serious political, economic, social, ethical and legal questions as well as challenges in terms of workforce reorganisation and upskilling and the potential elimination of more sectors and employment than the new forms they create;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that the future regulatory framework for AI in the European Union should ensure that fundamental human rights and workers’ rights are fully respected and adapted towithin the framework of the new forms of work relations and work organisation, in a way that secures jobs and improves upon wages and working conditions, while safeguarding the quality of employment; stresses, in addition, that the European AI framework should respectbe founded upon European values, Union rules and the principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights; , based on a human- centred approach in which humans are the guiding principle and beneficiaries of this process;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Considers that, in order to guarantee the proper and full operation of the digital single market, legal certainty must be re-established by codifying the new rights of a digitalised society, ensuring a level playing field for all stakeholders involved and plugging the current legislative gaps that often give rise to abuse, discrimination and unfair competition;
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Urges the Commission and the Member States to ensure that the implementation of AI enforces the dialogue between social partners and to allowBelieves that dialogue between social partners is an essential prerequisite for the establishment of the new legislative framework and that against a background of changing industrial relations it is necessary to ensure that trade unions have access to the work floor, albeit in digital form, in order to promote collective bargaining and guarantee a human-centred approach to AI at work;
Amendment 120 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Reiterates its call for legal protection for platform workers and, teleworkers and workers in the gig economy, as well as recognition of their status as such, to ensure that their entitlement to full social security protection is upheld;
Amendment 132 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Recalls that the flexibility and self- organisation of workers must not be synonymous with disproportionate surveillance or the misuse of digital technology in a way that causes or fuels discrimination or exploitation;
Amendment 144 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Reiterates the need to fully involve women in the process of digitising work and society in order to close the current gender gap, both through a large-scale digital literacy operation designed to spread knowledge and awareness of the opportunities and risks linked to the use of new technologies and by promoting initial and further study of STEM subjects by young women;
Amendment 155 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to improve occupational health and safety regulations in the context of human-machine synergies and to safeguard workers’ work-life balance as well as their psychological and mental balancwelfare through expert support and an EU directive on work-related stress.