BETA

Activities of Andrey SLABAKOV related to 2021/2251(INI)

Shadow opinions (1)

OPINION on the implementation report on the Recovery and Resilience Facility
2022/04/26
Committee: CULT
Dossiers: 2021/2251(INI)
Documents: PDF(126 KB) DOC(47 KB)
Authors: [{'name': 'Niklas NIENASS', 'mepid': 197465}]

Amendments (17)

Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 4 a (new)
— having regard to its resolution of 17 September 2020 on the cultural recovery of Europe (2020/2708(RSP)) and to its resolution of 20 October 2021 on the situation of artists and the cultural recovery in the EU (2020/2261(INI)),
2022/03/21
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls the strong need for culture and education, as the backbone of our democracy, society and economy, to receive support from the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), also with regard to the green and digital transitions;
2022/02/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights that the cultural and creative sectors were among those hit first and the hardest by the pandemic and will be the last to recover hence special attention is needed where Member States participation is of utmost importance;
2022/02/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Recalls that the European cultural and creative sectors including industries account for between 4 and 7 % of the EU’s GDP and for about 8.7 million jobs in the EU; emphasizes that these figures are not adequately reflected in the national recovery and resilience plans, leaving the cultural and creative sectors considerably underrepresented in the EU’s overall effort to overcome the pandemic and support the recovery and resilience of the European economy;
2022/02/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2 b. Emphasizes that the European Parliament repeatedly and with an overwhelming majority - e.g. in its resolution of 17 September 2020 on the cultural recovery of Europe and in its resolution of 20 October 2021 on the situation of artists and the cultural recovery in the EU - called on the Commission and the Member States to include culture in the national recovery and resilience plans and to earmark at least 2 % of the RRF budget to culture;
2022/02/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 c (new)
2 c. Recalls that atypical employment (part-time and fixed-duration contracts, temporary work and economically dependent self-employment) is commonplace for authors, performers, artists and many other cultural creators, often leading to precarious working conditions; highlights that the pandemic has exposed and exacerbated this situation which poses a fundamental threat to the EU’s cultural ecosystem, to Europe’s cultural diversity and to our democracy and society;
2022/02/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Deplores the fact that only 146 Member States have included culture in their RRF plans; fears that this heterogeneity of public investments leads to recovery at different speeds, causing increased disparities within the EU’s cultural ecosystem and threatening Europe’s cultural diversity;insists that MemberStates review their RRF plans and put the necessary accent on their culturalrecovery as a corner stone of the general recovery of society, where funds set aside for this sector shouldideally reach 4% of the total RRF;
2022/02/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Opposes the Commission’s approach to incorporate not strictly cultural interventions such as tourism and energy efficiency of cultural buildings in the calculations, resulting in misleading statistics; calls for a recalculation and reassessment of the data available; calls on Member States to separate tourism from culture in their RRF plans and to direct funds to the recovery of the cultural sector;
2022/02/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 69 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Recalls previous requests urging the Member States to dedicate at least 2 % and ideally 4% of the budget of each national RRF plan to culture and 10 % to education; criticises the fact that these already misleading numbers have been achieved at an aggregated EU level only; calls for specific remarking and follow up from the Commission on the implementation of the plans;
2022/02/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 77 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5 a. Urges the Member States to put the recovery and resilience of the cultural and creative sectors at the core of their investments into culture, with a particular focus on improving the overall situation of authors, performers, artists and all other cultural creators who are the ones to create the cultural works that our democracy, society and economy benefit from;
2022/02/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 78 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 b (new)
5 b. Underlines that any action taken to help the cultural and creative sectors in their recovery should not only be aimed at economic recovery, but also be used for the improvement of the working conditions of authors, performers, artists and all other cultural creators as well as for their up- and reskilling with regards to i.a. knowledge of their rights, the opportunities of the digital era and the possibilities of international mobility;
2022/02/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 91 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Strongly believes that for the correct implementation of the RRF a special focus should be given to micro and small organisations, throughout the European Union including in rural areas;
2022/02/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Underlines the importance of culture for our identity, democracy, society and economy; is concerned that the European cultural and creative sectors, which account for between 4 and 7 % of the EU’s GDP and for about 8.7 million jobs in the EU, were among those hit first and the hardest by the pandemic and will be the last to recover;
2022/03/21
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6 b (new)
6 b. Notes the Commission’s approach to incorporate interventions that are not strictly cultural, such as tourism on cultural heritage sites and energy efficiency of cultural buildings, in the calculations of the overall RRF spending on culture; considers that in order to have accurate statistical information and thus a good representation on the Recovery and Resilience Scoreboard website, a swift, detailed and transparent assessment of the data available to clearly indicate the amounts destined to culture;
2022/03/21
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 112 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Stresses the need for sustainable structural reforms targeting education and the cultural and creative sectors, and in particular regarding social security in the latter; regrets that such reforms are planned in only a minority of Member States; Highlights the importance of boosting attention to developing and protecting authors' rights in all EU Member States;
2022/02/11
Committee: CULT
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 a (new)
25 a. Regrets that only 16 Member States have included culture in their NRRPs; fears that this heterogeneity of public investments leads to recovery at different speeds, causing increased disparities within the EU’s cultural ecosystem and thus threatening Europe’s cultural diversity; recalls repeated previous requests by the Parliament and by stakeholders from the cultural and creative sectors, urging the Member States to dedicate at least 2 % of the budget of each national NRRP to culture;
2022/03/21
Committee: BUDGECON
Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25 b (new)
25 b. Urges the Member States to put the recovery and resilience of the cultural and creative sectors at the core of their investments into culture, with a particular focus on improving the overall situation and working conditions of authors, performers, artists and all other cultural creators who are the ones to create the cultural works that our democracy, society and economy benefit from;
2022/03/21
Committee: BUDGECON