BETA

65 Amendments of Liesje SCHREINEMACHER related to 2020/2019(INL)

Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 3 a (new)
- having regard to Directive 2013/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004, Regulation (EU) No 524/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on online dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive2009/22/EC (Regulation on consumer ODR) and Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on consumer ADR), and Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters,
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to the commitment of the European Commission President, Ms. Ursula von der Leyen, to upgrade the liability and safety rules for digital platforms, services and products, and complete the Digital Single Market via a Digital Services Act,
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8
- having regard to Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights,
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 8 a (new)
- having regard to the 2007 Lugano Convention and the 1958 New York Convention,
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas some businesses offering digital services enjoy, due to strong data- driven network effects, market dominance that makes it increasingly difficult for other players to compete and difficult for new businesses to even enter the market;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital D
D. whereas ex-post competition law enforcement alone cannot effectively address the impact of the market dominance of certain online platforms on fair competition in the digital single market;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas content hosting platforms often employ automated content removal mechanisms that raise legitimate rule of law concerns, in particular when they are encouraged to employ such mechanisms pro-actively and voluntarily, resulting in content removal taking place without a clear legal basis, which is in contravention ofautomated content removal mechanisms, employed by content hosting platforms, raise legal concerns, in particular as regards possible restrictions of freedom of expression and information, protected under Article 101 of the European Convention on Human Rights, stating that formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties governing the exercise of freedom of expression and information must be prescribed by lawCharter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital I
I. whereas the civil law regimes governing content hosting platforms’ practices in content moderation are based on certain sector-specific provisions at Union level as well as on laws passed by Member States atand national level, and there arewith notable differences in the obligations imposed on content hosting platforms and in the enforcement mechanisms of the various civil law regimes; whereas this situationand enforcement mechanisms deployed; whereas this situation creates a fragmented Digital Single Market and, therefore, requires a response at Union level;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
L. whereas the choice of algorithmic logic behind such recommendation systems, comparison services, content curation or advertisement placements remains not solely but also at the discretion of the content hosting platforms with little possibility for public oversight, which raises accountability and transparency concerns;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
O. whereas the terms and conditions of platforms, which are non-negotiable, often indicate both applicable law and competent courts outside the Union, which represent an obstacle as regards access to justice; whereas the question of which private international law rules relate to rights to data is ambiguous in Union law as well Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters lays down rules on jurisdiction; whereas Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the protection of natural persons with regards to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, clarifies the data subject’s right to private enforcement action directly against the controller or processor, regardless of whether the processing takes place in the Union or not and regardless whether the controller is established in the Union or not; whereas Article 79 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 stipulates that proceedings shall be brought before the courts of the Member State in where the controller or processor has ian international lawestablishment or, alternatively where the data subject has his or her habitual residence;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital P a (new)
Pa. whereas it is important to assess the possibility of tasking an existing or new European Agency, or European body, with the responsibility of ensuring a harmonised approach across the Union and address the new opportunities and challenges, in particular those of a cross- border nature, arising from ongoing technological developments.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Requests the Commission that the regulation includes a universal definition of ''dominant platforms'' and lay down its characteristics.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Insists that the regulation must proscribehibit content moderation practices that are discriminatory;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Recommends the establishment of a European Agency tasked with monitoring and enforcing compliance with contractual rights as regards content management, auditing any algorithms used for automated content moderation and curation, and impThe application of this regulation should be closely monitored by an existing or new European Agency, or European body, tasked, in particular, to ensure compliance by content hosting platforms with the provisions of this Regulation. The relevant Agency or European body should review compliance with the standards laid down for content management on the basis of transparency reports and an audit of algorithms employed by content hosting penalties for non- compliancelatforms for the purpose of content management;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Calls for content hosting platforms to evaluate the risk that their content management policies of legal content pose to society e.g. public health, disinformation, and, on the basis of a presentation of reports to the relevant European Agency or European body, have a dialogue with the relevant European Agency or European body and the relevant national authorities biannually;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Suggests that content hosting platforms regularly submit transparency reports to the European Agencpublish and submit comprehensive transparency reports, including on their content policies, to the existing or new European Agency, or European body, concerning the compliance of their terms and conditions with the provisions of the Digital Services Act; further suggests that content hosting platforms make available, in an easily accessible manner, their content policies and publish their decisions on removing user-generated content on a publicly accessible database;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Takes the firm position that the Digital Services Act must not contain provisions forcing content hosting platforms to employ any form of fully automated ex-ante controls of content, and considers that any such mechanism voluntarily employed by platforms must be subject to audits by the European Agencrelevant, existing or new, European Agency or European body to ensure that there is compliance with the Digital Services Act;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls for content hosting platforms to give users the choice of whether to consent to the use ofuse targeted advertisingement based on the user’s prior interaction with content on the same content hosting platform or on third party websites, only after having obtained prior consent by the user, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/679;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Further calls for users to be guaranteed an appropriate degree of influence over the criteria according to which content is curated and made visible for them; affirms that this should also include the option to opt out from any content curation;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Suggests that content hosting platforms publish all sponsoreships and advertisements madeclearly visible to their users, indicating who has paid for them, and, if applicable, on behalf of whom they are being placed at all times;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Considers that non-negotiable terms and conditions should neitherall not prevent effective access to justice in Union courts nor disenfranchise Union citizens or businesses and that the status of access rights to data; calls on the Commission to assess if the protection of access rights to personal and non-personal data with regards to protection under private international law is uncertain and leads to disadvantages for Union citizens and businesses;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – introductory part – indent 1 a (new)
- The proposal focuses on content moderation and curation, and civil and commercial law rules with respect to digital services. Other aspects, such as regulation of online market places, are not addressed, but should be included in the Regulation on Digital Services Act to be proposed by the European Commission.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – part I – section 1 –indent 2 a (new)
- It should provide a dialogue between major content hosting platforms and the relevant, existing or new, European Agency or European body together with national authorities on the risk management of content management of legal content.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 255 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – part I – section 1 –– indent 5
- It should fully respect Union rules protectingthe Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, as well as Union rules protecting users and their safety, privacy and personal data, as well as other fundamental rights.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 262 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – part I – section 2 – introductory part
A European Agency on Content Management should be establishedsks the Commission to entrust an existing or new European Agency or European body with the following main tasks:
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 295 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – part I – section 2 – indent 4 – subi. 3
- failure to provide access for the European Agencrelevant, existing or new, European Agency or European body to content moderation and curation algorithms for review;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 302 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – part I – section 2 – indent 4 – subi. 4
- failure to submit transparency reports to the European Agencrelevant, existing or new, European Agency or European body;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 308 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – part I – section 3 –– introductory part
The Digital Services Act should contain provisions requiring content hosting platforms to regularly publish and provide transparency reports to the Agency. Suchrespective, existing or new, European Agency or European body. Such reports should be comprehensive, following a consistent methodology. Transparency reports should, in particular, include:
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 315 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – part I – section 3 –– indent 1 – subi. 3
- the total number of removal requests complied with, and the total number of referrals of content to competent authorities,
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 317 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – part I – section 3 –– indent 1 – subi. 8
- information on the enforcement of terms and conditions and information on the court rulings received to remove and/or delete terms and conditions for being considered illegal per Member State.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 324 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – part II – section 1 – indent 1
- Measures to lminimitze the data collected by content hosting platforms, based on inter alia interactions of users with content hosted on content hosting platforms, for the purpose of completing targeted advertising profiles, in particular by imposing strict conditions for the use of targeted personal advertisements and by requiring prior consent of the user.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 325 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – part II – section 1 – indent 1
- MEnforcement of existing measures to limit the data collected by content hosting platforms, based on inter alia interactions of users with content hosted on content hosting platforms, for the purpose of completing targeted advertising profiles, in particular by imposing strict conditions for the use of targeted personal advertisements.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 328 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – part II – section 1 – indent 2
- Users of content hosting platforms should be given the choice to opt in or out of receiving targeted advertisementand withdraw their consent to be subject to targeted advertisements, in line with data protection and privacy rules.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 330 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – part II – section 1 – indent 3 – introductory part
- Content hosting platforms should make available an archive of sponsoreships and advertisements that were shown to their users, including the following:
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 331 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – part II – section 1 – indent 3 – subi. 1
- whether the advertisement or sponsorship is currently active or inactive,
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 332 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – part II – section 1 – indent 3 – subi. 2
- the timespan during which the advertisement or sponsorship was active,
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 333 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – part II – section 1 – indent 3 – subi. 3
- the name and contact details of the advertisersponsor or advertiser and, if different, on behalf of whom the advertisement or the sponsorship is being placed,
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 334 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – part II – section 1 – indent 3 – subi. 6
- the amount paid for the advertisement.deleted
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 353 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – part II – section 4 – indent 1
- include the effective enforcement of existing measures ensuring that non- negotiable terms and conditions do not include provisions regulating private international law matters to the detriment of access to justice,
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 357 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part A – part II – section 4 – indent 2
- include measures clarifying private international law rules as regards data in a way that isto inter alia consider the activities of platforms, so that they are not detrimental to Union subjects,
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 371 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – recital 6 a (new)
(6a) In order to ensure evaluation of the risks presented by the content amplification, this Regulation establishes a biannual dialogue on content management policies of legal content between major content hosting platforms and the respective, existing or new European Agency, or European body together with relevant national authorities.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 375 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – recital 7
(7) In order to ensure, inter alia, that users can assert their rights they should be given an appropriate degree of influence over the curation of content made visible to them, including the possibility to opt out of any content curation altogether. In particular, users should not be subject to curation without specific consent.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 394 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – recital 15
(15) In order to ensure that users and notifiers to make use of referral to independent dispute settlement bodies as a first step, it must be emphasised that such referral should not preclude any subsequent court action. Given that content hosting platforms which enjoy a dominant position on the market can particularly gain from the introduction of independent dispute settlement bodies, it is appropriate that they take responsibility for the financing of such bodies. These bodies shall be provided with adequate resources to ensure their competence and independence.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 396 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – recital 16
(16) Users should have the right to referral to a fair and independent dispute settlement body, as an alternative dispute settlement mechanism, to contest a decision taken by a content hosting platform following a notice concerning content they uploaded. Notifiers should have this right if they would have had legal standing in a civil procedure regarding the content in question.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 397 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – recital 17
(17) As regards jurisdiction, the competent independent dispute settlement body should be that located in the Member State in which the content forming the subject of the dispute has been uploaded. For natural persons, it should always be possible to bring complaints to the independent dispute body of their Member States.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 400 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – recital 19
(19) This Regulation should include obligations to report on its implementation and to review it within a reasonable time. For this purpose, the independent dispute settlement bodies established pursuant to this Regulation should submit reports on the number of referrals brought before them, including the number of referrals dealt withthe decisions taken – anonymising personal data as appropriate – including the number of referrals dealt with, data on systemic problems, trends and the identification of traders not complying with the decisions of the alternative dispute settlement body.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 405 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – recital 21
(21) Action at Union level as set out inThe application of this Regulation wshould be substantially enhanced with the establishment of a Unioclosely monitored by an existing or new European aAgency tasked with monitoring and, or European body tasked, in particular, to ensuringe compliance by content hosting platforms with the provisions of this Regulation. The Agencrespective Agency or European body should review compliance with the standards laid down for content management on the basis of transparency reports and an audit of algorithms employed by content hosting platforms for the purpose of content management ‒
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 416 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 3 –point 1 a (new)
(1a) 'Dominant platforms' or 'dominant content hosting platforms' means an information society service with several of the following characteristics: (a) ‘bottleneck power’ – which means the capacity to develop or preserve its user base because of network effects which lock-in a significant part of its users, or its positioning in the downstream market allows it to create economic dependency; (b) a considerable size in the market, measured either by the number of active users or by the annual global turnover of the platform; (c) integration into an business or network environment controlled by its group or parent company, which allows for leveraging market power from one market into an adjacent market; (d) a gatekeeper role for a whole category of content or information; (e) access to large amounts of high quality personal data, either provided by users or inferred about users based on monitoring their online behaviour. Data indispensable for providing and improving a similar service, as well as being difficult to access or replicate by potential competitors;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 421 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 3 –point 5 a (new)
(5a) 'Sponsorship' means content payed for or placed on behalf of a third party;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 427 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Dominant content hosting platforms shall evaluate the risks of their content management policies.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 431 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Content hosting platforms shall provide users with an appropriate degree of influence over the curation of content made visible to them, including the choice of opting out of content curation altogether. In particular, users shall not be subject to content curation without their specific prior consent.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 436 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 4 a (new)
Article 4a Structured risk dialogue on content curation As part of a structured risk dialogue with the existing or new European Agency, or European body together with the relevant national authorities, the dominant content hosting platforms shall present a report to the Commission or relevant Agency or European body on their risk management of content curation on their platform and how they mitigate these risks.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 439 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 5 – subparagraph 1
Any natural or legal person or public body to which content is provided through a website or, application, or another software, shall have the right to issue a notice pursuant to this Regulation.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 446 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 7 –introductory part
A notice regarding content shall be made in writing and shall include at least the following information:
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 447 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 7 –point a
(a) a link to the content in question and, where appropriate, e.g. video, a timestamp;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 461 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 10 – introductory part
Once a decision has been taken, content hosting platforms shall inform all parties involved in the notice procedure about the outcome of the decision, providing the following information in a clear and simple manner:
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 464 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 10– point b
(b) whether the decision was made by a human or an algorithm and in the latter case, whether a human review has taken place;
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 465 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 10 – point c
(c) information about the possibility for review as referred to in Article 11 orand judicial redress for either party.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 467 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 11
Where aDominant content hosting platform hass must set up a review mechanism. In all cases, the final decision of the review shall be undertaken by a human.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 475 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 13 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall establish independent dispute settlement bodies for the purpose of providing quick and efficient extra-judicial recourse when decisions on content moderation are appealed against. The independent dispute settlement bodies should as a minimum comply with the quality requirements for consumer ADR bodies set down under Directive 2013/11/EU.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 477 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 13 – paragraph 3
3. The referral of a question regarding content moderation to an independent dispute settlement body shall not preclude a user from being able to have further recourse in the courts unless the dispute has been settled by common agreement.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 479 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 13 – paragraph 4
4. Content hosting platforms that enjoy a dominant position on the market shall contribute financially to the operating costs of the independent dispute settlement bodies through a dedicated fund. Member States shall ensure these bodies are provided with adequate resources.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 482 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. The uploader shall have the right to refer a case of content moderation to the competent independent dispute settlement body where the content hosting platform has decided to remove or, take down or make invisible content, or otherwise to act in a manner that is contrary to the action preferred by the uploader as expressed by the uploader.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 484 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 14 – paragraph 3
3. As regards jurisdiction, the competent independent dispute settlement body shall be that located in the Member State in which the content that is the subject of the dispute has been uploaded. For natural persons, it should always be possible to bring complaints to the independent dispute body of their Member States.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI
Amendment 486 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex I – part B – Article 14 – paragraph 4
4. Where the notifier has the right to refer a case of content moderation to an independent dispute settlement body in accordance with paragraph 2, the notifier may refer the case to the independent dispute settlement body located in the Member State of habitual residence of the notifier or the uploader, if the latter is using the service for non-commercial purposes.
2020/06/05
Committee: JURI