36 Amendments of Carles PUIGDEMONT I CASAMAJÓ related to 2021/2186(INI)
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A
Recital A
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas sexual orientation and gender identity have increasingly been recognised as discrimination grounds in international law. Under EU law, lesbian, bisexual and gay people are currently protected from discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation only in the field of employment as expressed on article 21 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights explicitly prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation and also on article 19 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union allows for taking action to combat this type of discrimination.
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
Recital C
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point 1 (new)
Paragraph 2 – point 1 (new)
(1) Expresses its concerns that in many EU Member States, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex (LGBTI) people run the risk of discrimination and harassment on a daily basis; Highlights that prejudices and misconceptions about homosexuality and transgender people further fuel intolerant attitudes and behaviour towards this community.
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point 2 (new)
Paragraph 2 – point 2 (new)
(2) Reminds that due to the differences between EU Member States in legal recognition for same-sex couples, LGBTI individuals and their families may encounter difficulties when travelling, moving to or residing in other EU Member States that different-sex couples do not experience.
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point 3 (new)
Paragraph 2 – point 3 (new)
(3) Highlights that in some Member States, Public Administrations cannot display unofficial flags and any sign of support to of the rights of LGBTI. Expresses grace concern about the fact that in Spain this has been established by t the Supreme Court, which has established as a doctrine that the use of unofficial flags outside buildings and public spaces in a clear violation of freedom of expression. 1a __________________ 1a https://elpais.com/espana/2020-06- 01/el-supremo-establece-que-ninguna- administracion-publica-puede-utilizar- banderas-no-oficiales-en-el-exterior-de- sus-edificios.html
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point 4 (new)
Paragraph 2 – point 4 (new)
(4) Considers that EU institutions should make a great effort with national and linguistic minorities and grant the fundamental rights of the 50 million European citizens that speak a non- official EU language and should ensure that knowledge of these languages is treated at least on equal basis with other languages in the internal processes of EU institutions.
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – point 5 (new)
Paragraph 2 – point 5 (new)
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point 1 (new)
Paragraph 5 – point 1 (new)
(1) Calls the Commission to ensure that the right to freedom of assembly is duly protected in all Member States where it is being threatened.
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point 2 (new)
Paragraph 5 – point 2 (new)
(2) Highlights that promoting and upholding the Rule of Law requires vigilance and constant improvement, because there is always a risk of backsliding; Considers that the Rule of law guarantees fundamental rights and values, allows the application of EU law, and supports an investment-friendly business environment; notes that the absence of a level playing field in the EU that ensures equal rights and equal treatment for EU citizens produces discriminatory situations; stresses, moreover, that the credibility of our external policies relies on the state of the Rule of Law in the EU itself;
Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point 3 (new)
Paragraph 5 – point 3 (new)
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point 4 (new)
Paragraph 5 – point 4 (new)
(4) Believes that the quality of public administration and the rule of law culture as reflected in the way authorities apply the law and implement court decisions are key; stresses that the fight against corruption is essential for maintaining the rule of law and preserving citizens’ trust in public institutions
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point 5 (new)
Paragraph 5 – point 5 (new)
(5) Recognises that the Commission was encouraged by the response to the 2020 Rule of Law Report in the European Parliament and in the Council, as well as in national Parliaments; expresses deep concern about the fact that there are still one too many cases where there is not enough inter-institutional cooperation on the rule of law.
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – point 6 (new)
Paragraph 5 – point 6 (new)
Amendment 260 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
Amendment 273 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 282 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
Amendment 291 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 – point 1 (new)
Paragraph 9 – point 1 (new)
Amendment 292 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 – point 2 (new)
Paragraph 9 – point 2 (new)
(2) Moreover no member state has yet enacted targeted legislation against SLAPPs; stresses that these lawsuits have an impact on EU values and the internal market; highlights that SLAPPs reflect an imbalance of power and resources between claimants and defendants, which undermines the right to a fair trial; expresses its concerns for the fact that SLAPPs are being funded from state budgets, and their use in combination with other state measures against independent media outlets, journalism and civil society.
Amendment 293 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 – point 3 (new)
Paragraph 9 – point 3 (new)
Amendment 294 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 – point 4 (new)
Paragraph 9 – point 4 (new)
Amendment 295 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9 – point 5 (new)
Paragraph 9 – point 5 (new)
(5) Highlights that the imprisonment of musicians like Mr Hasel is not an isolated case; recalls that another rapper Josep Miquel Arenas Beltran, also known as Valtonyc had to flee to Belgium in 2018 after being sentenced to three-and-a- half years in prison on charges of glorifying terror, insulting the Spanish monarchy and making threats in his lyrics; notes that the musician also came under fire for calling former king Juan Carlos of Spain a "thief."; notes that Juan Carlos, who abdicated in 2014, is currently facing a string of corruption allegations in several countries; recalls that at the moment Belgium’s courts have not decided on his extradition despite having resolved on the Valtonyc case that lèse majesté is not considered a crime anymore and no one can be imprisoned for it 1a. __________________ 1a https://www.dw.com/en/valtonyc- belgium-refuses-extradition-of-spanish- rapper/a-60276667
Amendment 323 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12
Amendment 332 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 345 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
Amendment 348 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
Amendment 354 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
Amendment 362 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
Paragraph 17
Amendment 370 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
Paragraph 18
Amendment 374 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
Amendment 382 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20